Total Retard War: Lessons of War - Taking the tactics of Honeycomb.io's Field CTO Liz Fong-Jones and making them available to everyone.

Just be careful not to send DMCA requests without authorization of the owner.
I don't know the specifics an am not a lawyer, but in lost Europe, I think the law is that you can file a copyright notification as a concerned citizen / 3rd party (and IIRC demand compensation for your time if you do it). It's why a lot of the copyright trolls have GmbH in their email addresses / company names -- they're companies playing janny in hopes the bigger Eurocuck companies will pay them to go a way.

Edit: But yes, as FedPostalService says below, DO NOT DO THIS. Copyright trolling is best left to people in shithole 3rd world countries like the Ukraine or Germany where they have nothing to lose. That's not you.
 
Última edición:
I don't know the specifics an am not a lawyer, but in lost Europe, I think the law is that you can file a copyright notification as a concerned citizen / 3rd party (and IIRC demand compensation for your time if you do it). It's why a lot of the copyright trolls have GmbH in their email addresses / company names -- they're companies playing janny in hopes the bigger Eurocuck companies will pay them to go a way.
DO NOT DO THIS. As a non practicing non lawyer but who does know a bit about these things DO NOT DO THIS.

You’re opening yourself up to all manner of legal trouble that it just takes annoying the wrong person/company who will actually bother to look at the seven proxies you’re hiding behind to come after you.

Again, DO NOT DO THIS.
 
They have already done that. Most, if not all, routers in any botnet have very shit CPUs, which means solving the hash would take a very long time.
Routers tend to not have enough room (RAM and NAND space) for running offscreen Chromium.

> that requires them to actually execute JavaScript
The current POW also requires Javascript for it to be solved in the browser. However, even if Josh makes a custom algorithm, anything solvable within the browser can also be solved outside of it.
Generate the actual algorithm using pieces of obfuscated code. You can express the number R = 42 in an infinite number of ways (in practice, R should be a large random number to xor against the POW token):
  • (84.1|0) >> 1
  • 336.2>>3
  • document.getElementsByName("nigger").length
  • // some Canvas API shit
  • // some audio API shit
You can easily imagine a sufficiently nested obfuscated subexpressions (aka abstract syntax tree) reducing to the halting problem. That requires executing JavaScript on the host. The assumption is that routers won't be able to pretend to be modern, bloated browsers with fonts, keyboards and canvases.
 
??? this thread has zero to do with kiwiflare
The site is having daily outages. Maybe something can be improved from its present state?

The tranny launches DDoS attacks, arranges BGP blackholing via Cogent and harasses ISPs at the same time, right? Questions:

- Are ISPs null routing your frontends as result of DDoS attacks?
- Is bandwidth/pps exhaustion on the frontend an issue at all?
- Is Cogent's blackholing propagating to other ISPs that peer with it? I don't believe they can propagate blackholing all the way to my Polish ISP? I'm connecting to the present host in Iceland using twelve99/Telia Romania using level3.net.
- Why is the hidden service having regular outages? Are they exhausting the frontend's resources or causing problems for the entire Tor network? You likely run separate kiwiflare frontends for Tor and clearnet.
- Any other way they're causing outages?
 
Última edición:
86.107.179.19
89.221.224.80
89.221.225.73
94.131.3.118

Go down this list and traceroute each. Figure out which ones aren't completing. Copy the last successful node to ping. Identify the company, find their NOC address. Complain to them that their network is unable to access whatever IP you tried tracerouting. Suggest it might be Cogent's fault.
 
DO NOT DO THIS. As a non practicing non lawyer but who does know a bit about these things DO NOT DO THIS.

You’re opening yourself up to all manner of legal trouble that it just takes annoying the wrong person/company who will actually bother to look at the seven proxies you’re hiding behind to come after you.

Again, DO NOT DO THIS.
What I gather from this then is - It might be okay to inform a company some site may be or has a history of hosting copyrighted material but you can't explicitely request some content be taken down unless you're the original author or working on their behalf. Is this correct or does any complaint mentioning copyright automatically become a DMCA issue?
 
Última edición:
The only person who has the right to submit a DMCA is the actual copyright holder or their designated agent. A DMCA is a formal action under federal law and if done fraudulently could open you up to lots of problems. If you want to go the Copyright route, notify the actual owners of the copyright of their material being misused.
 
The only person who has the right to submit a DMCA is the actual copyright holder or their designated agent. A DMCA is a formal action under federal law and if done fraudulently could open you up to lots of problems. If you want to go the Copyright route, notify the actual owners of the copyright of their material being misused.
This. on a personal level It will be really aggravating that someone is acting on your behalf in a ham-fisted manner. On a legal level, if you piss the wrong person off, impersonating an agent or copyright owner has a broad range of legal ramifications, all of which are pretty nasty.

Your best option is to inform the copyright owner of the infringement, and let them do the rest.
 
Another tool for retards: https://phish.report/tools/hosting-lookup. You can input a website, and it will display the hosting provider and domain registrar. Furthermore, clicking on them provides the best method to contact these entities.
Screenshot 2023-12-26 at 10.43.53.png


Girlpotion.net
Registered at Registrar.eu. Coincidentally, the resellers website and the registrars abuse report page are both offline.
Vannapharma.com
Registered at Internet.bs, a well known pharmacy friendly registrar since 2012 (https://krebsonsecurity.com/2012/03/half-of-all-rogue-pharmacies-at-two-registrars/). Still hosted at 2a02:f48:2000:208::1034.

Screenshot 2023-12-26 at 10.47.49.png
 
Hosted at 110.173.58.220. Their upstream upstreams to Cognet.

Hosted at 95.214.235.176 (VSYS). Upstreams directly to Cognet.

Hosted at 2a02:f48:2000:208::1034.

Hosted at Hostinger shared hosting via 154.56.63.201.

Hosted at Shinjiru shared hosting via 78.40.143.217. Looks like Shinjiru banned them or the owner just put the site in maintenance mode.

Hosted at shared hosting via 176.61.147.139. Their upstream upstreams directly to Cognet.

Hosted at 95.211.238.135 and upstreams directly to Cognet.
That is an alarming number of DIY pharmacies on clearnet.
 
I've taken down the bar because I'm debating how I want to proceed.

There's two issues I want to press,
  • Cogent has desired to make itself Internet censor, and this can be exploited through malicious compliance until something in corporate snaps,
  • Cogent is still actively censoring the Kiwi Farms's public IPs, and this can be fought by mass complaints.
Both of these things require highly educated users to properly deal with it. I have to find a way to crash course ordinary people on low-level networking so they can identify who to complain to.

I didn't think #2 was a big deal because Cogent doesn't actually have a large presence in our upstream blend, but it's apparently a big enough deal that some dude who thinks he can rewrite KiwiFlare can't identify it's Cogent obstructing his networking and not a DDoS attack.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo