🍗 Deathfat Margaret Pless / idlediletante / Stan - Official Kiwi Farms Advertiser and Enthusiast Who Has Proudly Eaten Ass. Now Posting Her Tits to Own the Troons!

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Not only that, this is the beauty parlor, a place full of wine aunts and catty gays (and closeted) itching to rip someone apart.

haha I guess I'm the catty gay? you bitch lol

 

[Flaming_Barghast]

haha I guess I'm the catty gay? you bitch lol

The *best* catty gay, cunt <3

 

[TTD = Total Tarkov Death]

So, @Stan thinks posting pictures of your own underage cousins to the internet as a known user of a pedophile forum is neato behavior for her friends to engage in. Let’s get that on the record.

 

[Stan]

So, @Stan thinks posting pictures of your own underage cousins to the internet as a known user of a pedophile forum is neato behavior for her friends to engage in. Let’s get that on the record.

You’re so dense. “It’s not illegal” isn’t an endorsement.

 

[TTD = Total Tarkov Death]

You’re so dense. “It’s not illegal” isn’t an endorsement.

No, @Stan, you’re just a literal retard. You’re saying the only way you’d have a problem with your ‘friend’ is if they did something explicitly illegal? I don’t think that’s true at all. I think if someone in your actual life did these things, you’d have a huge problem with it. You just can’t bare the thought that those mean kiwis were right about your pedophile tranny friend.

 

[Stan]

No, @Stan, you’re just a literal retard. You’re saying the only way you’d have a problem with your ‘friend’ is if they did something explicitly illegal? I don’t think that’s true at all. I think if someone in your actual life did these things, you’d have a huge problem with it. You just can’t bare the thought that those mean kiwis were right about your pedophile tranny friend.

The thing is I don't think that you guys were crusading against srhbutts for her supposed crimes against her cousin or because she's allegedly a pedophile. You are willing to exploit those allegations if it would make her go away, but I don't think you actually care about them one way or another, true or untrue, or at least Milo Y. certainly did not (esp given his later admissions regarding his own early sex history, where he claimed to 'seduce' Catholic priests at age 14.)

So it comes off as massively hypocritical to me: the people most stridently pursuing srhbutts did (and still do) things very similar to what she's accused of doing, and none of these adversaries really cared about the offense at hand except it was politically convenient to do that. I'm also very suspicious of the timing and authenticity of a decades-old IRC chatlog that just suddenly appeared when it was convenient for Gamergaters to have it. IRC logs are pretty easy to fabricate.

Also it's "bear", not "bare".

PS you don't have to like it, but it is well within one's rights to post pics of their cousin and talk at length about how sexy you find them. That's called "freedom of expression". You guys have such a hard-on for that, but I guess it's selective: free speech is based when it affords you the opportunity to discuss lowering the age of consent, sending me KYS messages, or complaining about women all fucking day, but it's not so cool when other people can freely express things *you lot* disagree with or find offensive. Pick a lane: either free speech is based for everyone, or it's not and there should be limits to what people are allowed to say.

Spoiler

Also, it's legal to marry your first cousin in 25 US states, including North Carolina, where I come from. Legally, one can potentially do marry in NC starting at 16 or 17. Just to give you a sense of what the law has to say about this subject, because you seem to have outsize expectations.

Any other content of mine you want to make a fuss about?

 

[TTD = Total Tarkov Death]

Free speech can be both based and have consequences. You could call posting loli ‘freedom of speech’, but it’s still fucking gross and you should get your kneecaps broken, in my humble opinion.

I truly hope that somewhere down the line, something like this happens to you personally, so you can come back and change your tune. Because only a retard that hasn’t experienced pedophilia first hand in some form would be as callous to it as you. Btw, you think srh will like this picture? Ngl, it might be the most flattering picture of you

 

[Stan]

I just checked with my copy of the logs and yes, they are accurate. I had no idea I still had access to them until @Stan started calling me anton, reminding me of what burner account I used.

I'll leave the exercise to the viewer how accurate the portrayal matches with the events.

> confirms authenticity of the logs I posted
> continues to assert I'm misrepresenting him in some way

I hope this is the last message I ever send directly addressing you. If there is one person whom in Kiwi Farms whom I genuinely resent, it's you. You said you'd keep my confidence (I have it in writing, and you agree that you said that), but when it was convenient to threaten me with it you did, and after you did this twice I got fed up with it. I'm not shutting up or going away, and I'm not sure why you felt doxing me would do that.

Others: Tell me more about that free speech again tho. Specifically I'd like to hear what you think of Lemmingwise(r)'s efforts to make me STFU about holocaust denialism by threatening to dox me. Izzat cool w/you? Or should Lemmingwise have stuck to his word?

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

The thing is I don't think that you guys were crusading against srhbutts for her supposed crimes against her cousin or because she's allegedly a pedophile.

Does "Sarah" know what you say about him in the Man-Hate thread?

You are willing to exploit those allegations if it would make her go away,

The parents of his cousin took it very seriously and stopped letting him babysit and basically said he can't attend anything they're at. Exposing a pedo is not exploiting anything; it's safeguarding children.

but I don't think you actually care about them one way or another, true or untrue, or at least Milo Y. certainly did not (esp given his later admissions regarding his own early sex history, where he claimed to 'seduce' Catholic priests at age 14.)

Ah how relevant, because everyone here is a huge fan of Milo, and stan him at every opportunity.

So it comes off as massively hypocritical to me: the people most stridently pursuing srhbutts did (and still do) things very similar to what she's accused of doing, and none of these adversaries really cared about the offense at hand except it was politically convenient to do that.

Pedos are universally reviled except by other pedos. It's not political convenience to keep a child from being molested. The parents were grateful to be told about how sarah posted about their child. What, it's wrong because it silenced him? His own choices and reputation silenced him.

PS you don't have to like it, but it is well within one's rights to post pics of their cousin and talk at length about how sexy you find them. That's called "freedom of expression".

Sexualizing a minor is disgusting. Apparently you're okay with it as long as the man is wearing a dress and wig.

You guys have such a hard-on for that, but I guess it's selective: free speech is based when it affords you the opportunity to discuss lowering the age of consent, sending me KYS messages, or complaining about women all fucking day, but it's not so cool when other people can freely express things *you lot* disagree with or find offensive.

You do those three things, except complaining about men instead of women.

Pick a lane: either free speech is based for everyone, or it's not and there should be limits to what people are allowed to say.

There already are limits.

If you had your way, we would all be forced to call Sarah "she." Not exactly free speech. In your man hate thread you'd be forced to say "she" for every predatory man in a dress and wig (like Nyberg), and it's what you're arguing for here. You're a fucking retard.

 

[RACISM]

Any other content of mine you want to make a fuss about?

The contents of your clothes (you're fat).

 

[Trombonista]

So, @Stan thinks posting pictures of your own underage cousins to the internet as a known user of a pedophile forum is neato behavior for her friends to engage in. Let’s get that on the record.

It wasn't even a pedophile forum. It was a Final Fantasy forum run by a pedophile.

 

[TTD = Total Tarkov Death]

> confirms authenticity of the logs I posted
> continues to assert I'm misrepresenting him in some way

I hope this is the last message I ever send directly addressing you. If there is one person whom in Kiwi Farms whom I genuinely resent, it's you. You said you'd keep my confidence (I have it in writing, and you agree that you said that), but when it was convenient to threaten me with it you did, and after you did this twice I got fed up with it. I'm not shutting up or going away, and I'm not sure why you felt doxing me would do that.

Others: Tell me more about that free speech again tho. Specifically I'd like to hear what you think of Lemmingwise(r)'s efforts to make me STFU about holocaust denialism by threatening to dox me. Izzat cool w/you? Or should Lemmingwise have stuck to his word?

We’re on kiwifarms and you think we really care about doxing? Sure, I personally don’t dox people, but why would I care if a retard trusted someone she shouldn’t and then gets burned? Sounds kinda funny tbh. Maybe don’t trust notorious doxxers with your dox you fucking nitwit.

Please respond to how srhbutts will react to all the evidence of your transphobia though!! I won’t tell him, but I can leave all the evidence right here if you wanna keep pretending you’re above the rest of us, @Stan

 

[Stan]

Does "Sarah" know what you say about him in the Man-Hate thread?

Not sure. We haven't spoken in years.

The parents of his cousin took it very seriously and stopped letting him babysit and basically said he can't attend anything they're at. Exposing a pedo is not exploiting anything; it's safeguarding children.

Except you guys weren't into this because you're talent scouts for To Catch a Predator. The people going after Nyberg the hardest (Milo Y, mostly) were absolutely doing it for political reasons.

Ah how relevant, because everyone here is a huge fan of Milo, and stan him at every opportunity.

He's a tortured religious faggot, just like you. <3
My coverage was in response to Milo's coverage. Milo was posting nude photos of Sarah as a teenager without her permission. Milo later was on the record for boasting about "seducing" priests at 14. You can either be a anti-pedo crusader, or you can enjoy underage illicit relationships with Catholic priests.

Pedos are universally reviled except by other pedos. It's not political convenience to keep a child from being molested.

Except it was. It's like Clinton and Lewinski. Clinton wasn't impeached for getting a BJ from Lewinski, he was impeached because the political opposition decided it was useful kompromat.

The parents were grateful to be told about how sarah posted about their child. What, it's wrong because it silenced him? His own choices and reputation silenced him.

Sexualizing a minor is disgusting. Apparently you're okay with it as long as the man is wearing a dress and wig.

You're OK with it when the men aren't in dresses and wigs, (this community is broadly OK with men saying things like "teenage girls are so hot", "I wish the age of consent was abolished", etc.) so idk what you think you are getting at. Sarah even wrote a whole apology essay.

You do those three things, except complaining about men instead of women.

I think I'm on the record as being a Holocaust affirmationist, thank you very much.

If you had your way, we would all be forced to call Sarah "she." Not exactly free speech.

I call some trannies by their preferred pronouns and others not. It's a respect thing.

In your man hate thread you'd be forced to say "she" for every predatory man in a dress and wig (like Nyberg), and it's what you're arguing for here. You're a fucking retard.

I'm really not? I'm comfortable with what I wrote about Nyberg back then, deal with it.

notorious doxxers with your dox you fucking nitwit.

You guys are human, you're not fucking scorpions or wolves. You have self-control, and you can be held responsible when your words don't live up to your actions.

Lemmingwise had the ability to keep his word to me, and he chose not to because he disliked what I had to say about the holocaust. He held it over me to shut me up within a week of the diclosure. That is his fault and his shame, and whatever Anton says to mitigate it is him dealing with the emotional dissonance in wanting to see himself as basically a nice guy, although he's actually an untrustworthy, Holocaust-revising, emotionally-driven, illogical, incurious, Great-Replacement-believing, backstabbing LIAR.

Spoiler: flashback

You doxed yourself to me and I didn't leak any of your information to anyone. On a doxing forum no less. The least you could do is talk a little more respectfully and don't try these basic bitch shaming techniques.

You're getting personally aggressive because I told you to stop simping and we both know you're simping.

If you don't think accusations relating to holocaust lead to events like this, then you're very unaware of western european politics. It's like being unaware of black lives matter when looking at the political events in the united states the last 6 years or so. You're never going to have a clear picture without it.

You say you apologize, yet you continue to try to tell me how I feel. Stop doing that, girl. Consider this a second warning. I'm not going to warn you a third time. At that point I'll just post our conversation and your university email address.

You can believe whatever you want, but you should stop and stop immediately with doing shit like this. Antagonizing someone who you have given leverage is a bad idea and honestly you should be thankful that I don't exercise this without warning.

But this is the last one. Disagree about whatever you like, but stop trying to use these emotional tactics with me. Don't tell me how I feel. You have exerted the limit of my patience for them.

 

[TTD = Total Tarkov Death]

Not sure. We haven't spoken in years.

Oh, I’m sure you’ll be spoken to when he sees this. We all know that troons can’t resist the farms.

That is his fault and his shame

Uh, his shame? Pretty sure you’re the one with your govie attached to this thread lol.

Also, if he’s anything like me, being outed to the people I know as a kiwi farmer would have next to no impact on my life, because I work in a fairly based industry and everyone in my daily life is a level headed, rational person. The people you’ve willingly chosen to have in your life are going to eat you alive for being here. And we’re gonna laugh at you, for this is the mess you’ve made for yourself.

 

[RACISM]

When the copeposts hit.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Lemmingwise had the ability to keep his word to me, and he chose not to because he disliked what I had to say about the holocaust. He held it over me to shut me up within a week of the diclosure. That is his fault and his shame, and whatever Anton says to mitigate it is him dealing with the emotional dissonance in wanting to see himself as basically a nice guy, although he's actually an untrustworthy, Holocaust-revising, emotionally-driven, illogical, incurious, Great-Replacement-believing, backstabbing LIAR.

What, journos don't like being on the other end of journo tactics? I'm inclined to believe your version of events is just more lying on your part. The gravity field you generate distorts spacetime and must also distort reason.

The rest of what you wrote is projection and grasping at straws. You talked past what I wrote rather than responded to it. Milo hasn't been relevant since 2016, which was the last time he was mentioned on the thread. Holocaust affirmationist? How about fact-seeking? Why can't we ask exactly how many died, or why the number was off by 2.5 million just at Auschwitz, while "affirming" the rest of the Shoah? You talk about the Holocaust like its Nybergs gender identity, for you to affirm. Facts don't need affirmation. Lies do, like Nyberg's gender identity.

And you affirm Nyberg, even though he is a sexual predator male. As you said, its a respect thing, to give human rights and the "hate speech" protections to people whose values you affirm, while denying them to and laughing as you take them from your enemies. Way to own the moids, Marge, letting a mutilated sexual predator man call himself a woman and shake off his predation like his birth name, all while you personally defend him.

 

[Stan]

Uh, his shame? Pretty sure you’re the one with your govie attached to this thread lol.

Yeah. Lemmingwiser’s choice to doxx me because he was butthurt that I didn’t buy his extremely shallow and smoothbrain Holocaust revisionist bullshit is on him. He couldn’t agree to disagree, and he was too tempted to doxx me even though he said he would chill about it.

Lemmingwiser lied to me, he doxxed me, and it was 100% his choice to do that. He needs to but up and take some fucking responsibility for that. Currently, he’s blaming me for “bringing this out in (him)”.

Also, and I’m not really a trained journalist, but burning your source is usually reserved for extremely newsworthy content. Anton being buttmad that his extremely shallow explanation for Holocaust denial didn’t sell me on it isn’t more like retaliation than any sort of journalism.

What, journos don't like being on the other end of journo tactics? I'm inclined to believe your version of events is just more lying on your part. The gravity field you generate distorts spacetime and must also distort reason.

The rest of what you wrote is projection and grasping at straws. You talked past what I wrote rather than responded to it. Milo hasn't been relevant since 2016, which was the last time he was mentioned on the thread. Holocaust affirmationist? How about fact-seeking? Why can't we ask exactly how many died, or why the number was off by 2.5 million just at Auschwitz, while "affirming" the rest of the Shoah? You talk about the Holocaust like its Nybergs gender identity, for you to affirm. Facts don't need affirmation. Lies do, like Nyberg's gender identity.

And you affirm Nyberg, even though he is a sexual predator male. As you said, its a respect thing, to give human rights and the "hate speech" protections to people whose values you affirm, while denying them to and laughing as you take them from your enemies. Way to own the moids, Marge, letting a mutilated sexual predator man call himself a woman and shake off his predation like his birth name, all while you personally defend him.

Shut up. You say I’m lying but I posted the receipts and Lemmingliar even confirmed their accuracy. He’s just weaseling around trying to find a way that being a dick to me isn’t his fault.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

I hope this is the last message I ever send directly addressing you

Looks like it wasn't:

Liar, liar Lemmingwiser.
Lemmingliar
Lemmingliarpantsonfire

Wtf dude? You’re blaming ME for your inability to agree to disagree? Or are you blaming me because you can’t regulate your emotions, and just got so seething mad that I deserved the worst retribution you could dish out? Or are you blaming me for trying to sympathize with you?! Wtf do you mean when you say That I “brought this out of you?!?”

You’re such a whiny little coward about it too. Always trying to find a little loophole where doxing me to punish me was justified somehow.

Own up to your betrayal. You’re a fucking liar who threatened me to win a stupid Internet argument. You’re a chore, a scrote, a cocksucking snitch. I already posted all the receipts.

Don't know if there is a way to link the quotes above directly, but they're here:

https://kiwifarms.pa/members/lemmingwiser.132240/#profile-post-504260

 

[TTD = Total Tarkov Death]

I’m not really a trained journalist

Color me shocked. Maybe if you went to journoscum school, you would keep your stories straight... You brought up your friend srh in the man hate thread? Weird, so why fence sit and refer to him as 'she' now? The damage is done, but you keep trying to showcase how much better than us you are.

 

[Lidl Drip]

It is not a good idea to antagonize unhinged men in the internet under your real identity. You should protect yourself and your family. If I was you I would private my social media, not post anymore pictures of yourself and your family and make a sock account on here that nobody knows is you to continue posting. It's your business but I think what you're doing is very unwise considering you have a child.