Science Smart people first in line for COVID-19 vaccines, study suggests - Smarties trust The Science and the Government; You don't want to be a dummy, do you?

Intelligent people get their COVID-19 vaccines much faster, suggests a study of more than 750,000 people in Sweden published in the Journal of Health Economics.

Uppsala University researchers assessed the relationship between cognitive ability and prompt COVID-19 vaccination among 750,000 men and 3,000 women who registered for military service in Sweden from 1979 to 1997. The team used intelligence-test data from the Swedish Military Archives.

In Uppsala, after priority groups received their COVID-19 vaccinations, the government made vaccination appointments for all residents aged 50 to 59 years.

"Most Western countries wanted their populations to be vaccinated as soon as possible," coauthor Oscar Erixon, PhD, said in an Uppsala University news release. "We wanted to investigate whether there was a link to cognitive ability or whether other factors caused the differences and led to people hesitating to get vaccinated."

140-day difference between groups

A total of 80% of the most intelligent people were vaccinated within 40 days of vaccine availability, while it took 180 days for those with the lowest cognitive ability to reach that level. The results, the researchers said, suggest that the complexity of the vaccination decision may make it difficult for people with lower cognitive abilities to understand the benefits of vaccination.

"If we are to have equal care for all, we need to take into account the different ways people absorb information," lead author Mikael Elinder, PhD, said in the release.

Coauthor Mattias Ohman, PhD, said that making vaccination appointments for people accelerated uptake in both groups. "Logging on to a website, finding an appointment, booking it, going there and getting vaccinated may have been too many steps for some people," he said.

Erixon said some disparities in vaccination behavior can be addressed through better-designed vaccination campaigns. "As it is known that the group with lower cognitive ability was also hit harder by COVID-19, such a measure is likely to contribute to more equal health outcomes," he said. "Faster vaccination rates are also likely to help bring an end to the pandemic more effectively."

 
"We wanted to investigate whether there was a link to cognitive ability or whether other factors caused the differences and led to people hesitating to get vaccinated."
The results, the researchers said, suggest that the complexity of the vaccination decision may make it difficult for people with lower cognitive abilities to understand the benefits of vaccination.
"As it is known that the group with lower cognitive ability was also hit harder by COVID-19, such a measure is likely to contribute to more equal health outcomes," he said. "Faster vaccination rates are also likely to help bring an end to the pandemic more effectively."
lol typical "science"

1694238911361.png
1694238920391.png
1694238932656.png

Ah, of course.
 
If they were smart they wouldn't be the first to volunteer to be guinea pigs for a new, original and experimental 'vaccine'

This is how you win a darwin award
 
Wasn't there another study showing that vaxxing is a bell curve where ph.Ds and high school dropouts are most likely to reject the Science Juice?

There was definitely some funky demographics data during the initial jab rollout in the US suggesting PhDs and those with postgrad degrees were some of the most vaccine hesitant.

Which arguably is a shitty proxy for intelligence in 2023.

More surprising, it didn't really fit along political divides as you would expect.

Although jab mandates that came later in 2021 at post-secondary institutions likely steamrolled any resistance from staff and students.
 
So there’s sufficient database on people to track their IQ test scores and when they got jabbed and play with that in a database?
Nice…
Sweden did make appointments for everyone. They didn’t push it past that though, I have family there and apparently they made appointments and everyone just queued up like good little girls and boys. But they didn’t do much past that.
And how were the intelligence of these "people" evaluated?
Iq tests are part of the testing for the Swedish military service. This says 1979-1997. Everyone used to be called up for service at 17-18 (? Not sure what age, post school pre college anyway.) , so I would imagine it’s that data. It would mean the youngest of them were early to mid forties and the oldest mid late sixties.
 
So there’s sufficient database on people to track their IQ test scores and when they got jabbed and play with that in a database?
Nice…
And yet when that one researcher pointed out who was behind the majority of rapes suddenly there's too much data being used.
 
My dog is smart. I mean, being smart is a desirable trait in pets. It means they're trainable but lack the imagination to really get up to mischief.

That's what comes to mind when people self-identify as "smart", especially to try to justify what they're doing, anyway.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo