ISideWith.com results

[Zeorus]

Spoiler: big

 

[yasscat]

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

Spoiler: Huge screencap from phone

 

[ShinyVulpix]

Jill Stein isn't anti-vax, she's a medical doctor. She just has a problem with the FDA being controlled by drug companies.
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2384559038

Also this comment from someone else:
“I don't care about femmies, and lezzies wanting to merry, and live together. I really would have little about femmies, and lezzies if they didn't pose the risk to public health that they do, and I'm referring specifically to their disgusting physical activities! The rectum is NOT a sexual organ, and should never be used that way! I want to the sodomy activities of these groups stop!”

 

[AnOminous]

Jill Stein isn't anti-vax, she's a medical doctor. She just has a problem with the FDA being controlled by drug companies.
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2384559038

Yeah, it's a little unfair to call her an outright anti-vaxer, but she has also pimped homeopathic bullshit which is just as quacked up.

 

[yasscat]

Yeah, it's a little unfair to call her an outright anti-vaxer, but she has also pimped homeopathic bullshit which is just as quacked up.

She's also on the "vaccines cause autism" train of stupidity.

 

[ShinyVulpix]

She's also on the "vaccines cause autism" train of stupidity.

Isn't anti-vax and "vaccines cause autism" basically the same thing? As for the homeopathic bullshit, I haven't seen anything too cringe-worthy but I'm keeping my eyes peeled. I think 99% is a bit too much for siding with Jill, I sided with Sanders a lot more. This entire election is a joke.

 

[Pikimon]

93% Jill Stein, but with heavy disagreements on Science.

 

[Joan Nyan]

Apparently they changed some of the candidates' responses recently so now I have Castle as number one without even retaking the test again.

 

[DZ 305]

Apparently they changed some of the candidates' responses recently so now I have Castle as number one without even retaking the test again.

Good for you lad! You and @Hat can have a little clubhouse!

I haven't seen anything too cringe-worthy but I'm keeping my eyes peeled.

I think her VP is cringe tastic. Allow me to explain from a post I made in the election thread.
Her VP, human rights activist Ajamu Baraka called the rallies and vigils in memory for the victims after Charlie Hebdo a "white power march", says Malaysian Airline 17 was shot down as part of a false flag operation by the West, and called Bernie Sanders a white supremacist. Might be a good idea to get off the crazy train bruv

 

[Silvana]

Here's mine...
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2527025344
89% Hillary (who for years now, I've considered to be a woman with a brilliant future firmly behind her)
87% Jill Stein - and I know what's behind the 2% gap between Stein and Hillary!

That was my breaking point, too. She's not a pure antivaxer but any antivax is too much for me. It's a total deal-breaker. I do not put up with that kind of fucking noise, at all.

Shame isn't still in the running - I would have liked to see just how strongly I side with him. In fact, I would have been extremely interested to see how America dealt with a red-hot Socialist in charge! (Well, a red-hot Socialist by US standards. By UK standards, he's a typical well-meaning, liberal-left sap. Rather like myself, tbh. )

I am just going to pinch my nose and vote a straight Dem ticket. Hillary and all that shit. I will probably vomit afterwards.

AnOminous, I feel your pain.

 

[Zeorus]

Took the Canadian quiz out of curiosity (and since I'll likely be moving there in a few years for school). https://canada.isidewith.com/results/2527396931

Edit: also did the UK quiz because fuck it why not http://uk.isidewith.com/results/2528070341

 

[ShinyVulpix]

I can only imagine the makers of this quiz would have to constantly update it considering Hillary changes her mind about something every single week.

 

[DadaistVizor]

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2527498820

#MakeAmericaGreatAgain

lol I side with Clinton and Stein on environmental issues

 

[AnOminous]

93% Jill Stein, but with heavy disagreements on Science.

The problem with these kind of percentage measurement things is maybe I only do disagree on 10% of whatever issues there are, but if those issues are science, they're absolute deal-breakers for me.

 

[Florence]

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2527680274
Pretty much what I was expecting. I'm still not voting for him, though.

EDIT: And my results from last year's election:

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

Without Bernie, and retaking the quiz, I am now 89% Hillary and 88% Stein. This is unsurprising. I do not particularly trust Clinton, though.

I should take some of the quizzes for other countries for shits and grins.


EDIT: As I suspected, I'm pretty left-wing for an American but in the UK I'd be a centrist

 

[AN/ALR56]

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2527704986
70%+ for gary jonhson.

 

[Chicken Dippers]

97% Clinton

Sadly correct

 

[Picklechu]

Spoiler: Donald Trump isn't a Republican

 

[Jaiman]

I've only recently been trying to stand less neutrally on most politics, I'm surprised it's Clinton my views fall under more.
http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/2537549139