💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Bepis]

People like still life are usually lurking around the edges of any forum. Often the whole point of the act is trying to get attention and trying to get banned. And if they don't get banned, they inevitably escalate just like he is doing.
He is still around IMO because Nick wants him there. Probably to prove how free speech Nick is to himself.

Shame he's oblivious to how it actually comes across. From the outside, it sure looks like you can just say whatever you want as long as it doesn't go too directly against a member of the wine mom harem.

 

[waffle]

He usually doesn't stream on Mondays and he is doing so to do a fund raiser for his lawsuit. Also interesting how he is now trying to sell it as just wants to be done and the evil lawyer on the other side is dragging it out. When it first started he bragged about how much content this was going to make for his channel.

RekietaLAWLSUIT UPDATE: New Filing, Dishing on What is Hopefully the Last Major Filing in This Case

My Legal Team has filed what will hopefully be the last major filing in this case before our upcoming summary judgment hearing. The outcome of this filing wi...

www.youtube.com

Nick seems determined to engage in some kind of legal highlander duel with Schneider.

Schneider is just doing his job, Nick. Fish swim, birds fly, and lawyers sue; its what they do. I have no idea why Nick has felt determined to make this some personal issue with Schneider. He seems to have succeeded, and Schneider is definitely not the best lawyers in the biz or he wouldn't be involved with this clown show (or at least he'd be doing a better job, as its starting to seem like there is at least a submissible claim about the claim that Monty sucks little boys dicks).

I wonder what would have happened if you wrote a really good petition, and then approached Nick with a settlement offer of "I won't even file this if you pay me X amount of money and apologize. You can still say Monty is crazy and stuff, and even act like you just got new info and were misinformed, but retract all the sex stuff. I also need $75K, and we can agree to confidentiality." I kind of think he might do that. I mean shit it would allow his to save face while also getting out of it for a reasonable amount of money. If he were smart he'd try and negotiate the price down, but with how fucked up hes been acting I kind of expect hell just reject it out of hand.

 

[Captain Manning]

Isn't it basically 100% that someone already has called the sheriff about this? I mean considering his a-logs and detractors like Cynthia and so on, seems like a given that Nick is going to get some very unwanted attention now.

*shrug*

It is was it is. I know *I* didn't, and I have no intention of doing so. Observe and report.

While Still-Life bears most of the responsibility for anything bad that happens, this situation is definitely exacerbated by Nick's ludicrous view of "free speech." If Still-Life pulled this shit here, Null or some other high level moderator wouldn't "show" him the door, they'd strap JATO boosters to the faggot and launch him out it. If somebody can't see the propriety of not allowing death threats against elected officials on their forum, I think they're functionally lobotomized.

I find it interesting that this unhinged lunatic gets a pass, but the final straw for Nick's Discord was gore being posted.

There's a theory that whatever was posted there wasn't the "real problem," but rather that the Discord was starting to turn against Nick for the way he's been acting. I've seen caps where people were really starting to lay into him.

Consider that Cynthia got yeeted off Nick's locals but Still-Life gets to stay. I think priority is trying to get people to stop making fun of him, or laughing at his wine mommy harem. He wants Locals to be his safe space.

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

Nick seems determined to engage in some kind of legal highlander duel with Schneider.

I wonder what would have happened if you wrote a really good petition, and then approached Nick with a settlement offer of "I won't even file this if you pay me X amount of money and apologize. You can still say Monty is crazy and stuff, and even act like you just got new info and were misinformed, but retract all the sex stuff. I also need $75K, and we can agree to confidentiality." I kind of think he might do that. I mean shit it would allow his to save face while also getting out of it for a reasonable amount of money. If he were smart he'd try and negotiate the price down, but with how fucked up hes been acting I kind of expect hell just reject it out of hand.

Nick the "My way or the highway attitude". He's no different than that activist lawyer in the case with a "self-defense" claim where Judge Lebrowski was about to strangle him.

 

[Strix454]

I think Nick has finally realized this is an actual civil suit by a real attorney. That it could go on for years and cost him a fortune. That he now understands things that were obvious a long time ago.

And yet Nick still believes that three months and a small number of motions into this that the judge is going to in one hearing grant Nick a summary judgement applying the anti-SLAPP laws of another state to make Monty pay all his legal costs and to force Schneider as well to pay Nick's legal costs. Good luck with that.

 

[AnOminous]

He usually doesn't stream on Mondays and he is doing so to do a fund raiser for his lawsuit. Also interesting how he is now trying to sell it as just wants to be done and the evil lawyer on the other side is dragging it out. When it first started he bragged about how much content this was going to make for his channel.

Oh so now it's MONTY who's trying to drive this case into the expensive side. I'm sure hiring Marc Randazza had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with that.

How stupid does this prick think his audience is?

At this point, considering he thinks it's okay for outright psychotics like Still-Life to make actionable death threats to federal officials, apparently he thinks they're really stupid. Plus he's really stupid himself.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

I know which character Rekieta thinks he is, but I have a different opinion on that.

 

[AnOminous]

Ver archivo adjunto 4973129
I know which character Rekieta thinks he is, but I have a different opinion on that.

I know which character I am. . .and I don't care about anybody else's opinion, just about the GODDAMN RULES!

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

If somebody can't see the propriety of not allowing death threats against elected officials on their forum, I think they're functionally lobotomized.

Here's the thing, the logic Nick has stated seems to be mutually contradictory to me. Not a lawyer so just a thought exercise.
On one hand, first amendment only applies to government, public forums (twitter), and content carriers (Section 230). On the other hand, he has stated he believes that his locals chat is a private chat and therefore farmers and detractors can go get fucked.

Given that Nick "publishes" content (?) I'm not sure he gets 230 protection, he claims he's not a public forum, and he definitely isn't the gubermint (unless he glows like Baked) so is there a chance that he gets in real trouble?

Edit:

I know which character I am. . .and I don't care about anybody else's opinion, just about the GODDAMN RULES!

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

Here's the thing, the logic Nick has stated seems to be mutually contradictory to me.
On one hand, first amendment only applies to government, public forums (twitter), and content carriers (Section 230). On the other hand, he has stated he believes that his locals chat is a private chat and therefore farmers and detractors can go get fucked.

Given that Nick "publishes" content (?) I'm not sure he gets 230 protection, he claims he's not a public forum, and he definitely isn't the gubermint (unless he glows like Baked) so is there a chance that he gets in real trouble?

Edit:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=WMq8oRr4HcE

Pretty sure with a sheriff who has national media prominence and fresh of the success of hunting down a 4tranny no one in law enforcement will give flying fuck about muh lolbertarian fwee speech or 230 or anything else. It's unimaginable in 2023 to tolerate overt threatposting whether the nigger doing it is a feposter or a genuine schizoposter. It's social media pollution for starters.
"hey guys hop on over to my Locals to watch me eat dogfood like an imbecile and read detailed repeated threats by my fellow micropenis sufferer!"

 

[feral cat #6385]

This is the type of lawyering and legal practice that make people hate lawyers and the legal system.

YOU'VE DONE THAT YOURSELF!

Nick was supposed to be on Good Lawgic's stream tonight. He blew Joe off. Way to repay Joe for carrying your show last week you drunken piece of shit.

 

[Swole McPole]

It is was it is. I know *I* didn't, and I have no intention of doing so. Observe and report.

I'd be a liar if I claimed that the thought hadn't crossed my mind. However, I'm far too lazy, and don't actually care enough to fire off an e-mail.

I'm really curious about how it would all pan out though, if the Sheriff/FBI/whoever served a subpoena on Locals going after him. Surely, at that point Nick's locals turns into a complete shit show. The press coverage would be savage. His lawsuit would be dead in the water at that point.

So while I remain too lazy to bother myself, there's a side of me that REALLY wants to see what happens if...

 

[Strix454]

Here's the thing, the logic Nick has stated seems to be mutually contradictory to me. Not a lawyer so just a thought exercise.
On one hand, first amendment only applies to government, public forums (twitter), and content carriers (Section 230). On the other hand, he has stated he believes that his locals chat is a private chat and therefore farmers and detractors can go get fucked.

Given that Nick "publishes" content (?) I'm not sure he gets 230 protection, he claims he's not a public forum, and he definitely isn't the gubermint (unless he glows like Baked) so is there a chance that he gets in real trouble?

Its not really a matter of law or what Nick wants. Nick is on the locals platform. And I can't see Rumble standing up to a media punch in the face repeatedly defending the rights of individuals to threaten people.

Locals has community guidelines including:

"v) Violence: You may not threaten violence including an intent to kill, inflict serious physical harm, or threaten sexual assault, against an individual or a group of people."

Nick could cry a river about the first amendment, but the content in his locals is in clear violation of locals own rules. And if Locals is faced with a choice between its public reputation and Nick. Nick is going to lose.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I think Nick has finally realized this is an actual civil suit by a real attorney. That it could go on for years and cost him a fortune. That he now understands things that were obvious a long time ago.

And yet Nick still believes that three months and a small number of motions into this that the judge is going to in one hearing grant Nick a summary judgement applying the anti-SLAPP laws of another state to make Monty pay all his legal costs and to force Schneider as well to pay Nick's legal costs. Good luck with that.

I agree. Consider the blurb @Potatoherder posted. This is not the blurb I would expect someone who feels they are on the precipice of winning their legal battle to write. This sounds like something written by someone who knows they just paid a sum probably in the tens of thousands for another filing advocating a complicated legal argument in a desperate attempt to make the whole thing go away.

In the past when Nick discussed legal disputes, including the ethics complaints that involved himself, he expressed his dislike for parties or lawyers mainly through the form of mockery and derision. He didn't present this blinding levels of seethe or malding rage because it's simply not good content. Even when he went on "rants" it was clear that it was mainly for the sake of entertaining the audience.

This is just raw anger at the level where even people who agree with you start shifting uncomfortably in their chairs, like his guests did during his rant about how much he hated the Murdaugh trial. His tone on the case has changed dramatically and he's added certain verbal tics (referencing Schneider's apparent disabled son in his rants, calling Schneider "retarded" when he says he believes Schneider is personally offended by the term, spelling out Schneider's firm and city) as well. This makes one suspect that he has finally come to the conclusion that this case has an actual chance of moving forward.

It's hard to read that blurb and think that Rekieta is feeling good with his prospects next week. If he thought that it was a sure thing he would be spiking the football and laughing at Schneider for agreeing to represent some weirdo in a frivolous lolsuit. Instead he's muttering darkly about the prospects of discovery and implying that Schneider is somehow acting like a "scumbag" for.... arguing that the case he filed should move forward to the next stage and not agreeing that the case is frivolous.

 

[lolcows_townwatch]

Do we think nick starts off the stream with a plea to his GSG? It's been stuck at 10,885 forever, he's literally bled his PayPigs dry

 

[feral cat #6385]

Do we think nick starts off the stream with a plea to his GSG? It's been stuck at 10,885 forever, he's literally bled his PayPigs dry

I hope Montegraph bleeds this faggot dry.

 

[RotPockets]

Its not really a matter of law or what Nick wants. Nick is on the locals platform. And I can't see Rumble standing up to a media punch in the face repeatedly defending the rights of individuals to threaten people.

Locals has community guidelines including:

"v) Violence: You may not threaten violence including an intent to kill, inflict serious physical harm, or threaten sexual assault, against an individual or a group of people."

Nick could cry a river about the first amendment, but the content in his locals is in clear violation of locals own rules. And if Locals is faced with a choice between its public reputation and Nick. Nick is going to lose.

In regards to potentially litigious behavior, does the rat-faced coomer still use Michael Buffer’s “Let’s Get Ready to Rumble” as his kicker? I know he is tenacious in protecting his copyright of that phrase, and all recordings of it. You would have to be retarded to monetize use of it, especially on YouTube since he could basically claim all of your videos.

Trademarked Phrases: Let’s get ready to rumble! - SYT

The call, “Let’s get ready to rumble!” has appeared in countless boxing matches, WWE events, movies and video games. Let's review the history.

secureyourtrademark.com

 

[Anticipointment]

Even if Still-Born had the best possible opsec (and we know he doesn't), why the fuck would Rekieta let this shit stand? All it takes is a single bottom feeder journalist to write a story about it, and they'd all be in a world of fucking pain.

Carimachet​

I am a journalist

its starting to seem like there is at least a submissible claim about the claim that Monty sucks little boys dicks

Is there?

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

I hope Montegraph bleeds this faggot dry.

I think Randazza will succeed in that regard before Monty.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

He usually doesn't stream on Mondays

Did the lazy fuck not resume streaming on Mondays after bailing of his DnD group months ago?

Wasn't that the whole point of quitting the commitment ?

Edit: Typo