- Registrado
- 1 de Jul, 2017
@thinking man
"Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted..."
That's a real dishonest reading of what this paper actually says. They're saying there wasn't WHEN THE TEST WAS DEVELOPED AND THIS STUDY CONDUCTED. But hey, some guy on the internet pointing it out to always fools the rubes like you.
If the pandemic was planned ahead of time, then why would they go through all the trouble of planning mass rioting, including deleting the pandemic from the news cycle for two weeks? This seems like what they did with January 6, where they let in a bunch of MAGA loons and expected an epic hostage scenario ending in hundreds of MAGAtards dead alongside a few cops and Congressmen (and maybe even Pence), but all they got was a few dead Trump supporters and lulzy footage. However, because the "script" was already written, everyone has to TREAT the event like it went according to their script, just like how the pandemic was never considered as part of the "script" for the Floyd riots.
Show me the textbooks then, and then show me where in the papers discussing the sequencing of the virus that it was somehow sequenced in error instead of using cutting edge technology. Even if you're totally right, you still have to explain why the virus proceeded to act like every other virus that gets sequenced using this technology does. Or for that matter why the Chinese government bothered to delete the sequences, or why the sequence resembles nothing in nature."it has been sequenced"
the manner in wihich it was sequenced involved highly error prone fradulent methods.
it involved both consensus sequencing and conservative sequencing, those methods were originally created as purely learning tools and there are text books that say to not use them to actually genome sequence as you won't get something accurate.
Or you could just do a 5 minute search and find plenty of pictures of the virus isolated from patients all around the world."we've seen it under a microscope"
no, we have seen pictures of cellular debris under a microscope, with black arrows pointing pictures at vesicles, and the declaration that this is sars cov 2. that doesn't count as "Seeing it under a microscope."
Nope, happened globally in third world countries. Also happened in countries which adhered to freedom-based policies like Belarus. Countries with more lockdown policies had higher deaths from mistreatment, but there is a clear baseline rise in mortality.the reaction to the supposed pandemic it self explains the increase in mortality.
also, there were countries that didn't have severe reactions to the pandemic and they faired better off then countries that reacted strongly.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2324-7 - Oh look, the virus can be isolated and spread to other primates. Note a reference to a certain "R. Baric", one of the creators of the virus.then, according to the thomas rivers postulates, you take the isolate, and you inject it into a host, and you observe that it becomes sick, and then you take another sample from that new host and you once again isolate the same pathogen.
Name it then. You're literally trusting a hippie loon who can be proven wrong in a few minutes because you want to have "hidden knowledge" no one else has, ignoring the fact your "hidden knowledge" is bunk and probably disinfo. I highly doubt you've ever actually read a textbook, you probably just hit the bong and watched this government disinfo stoned. Watch flat earth documentaries next time, you'd be funnier that way.you projecting on to me your own method of believing in stuff which i already prefaced in my post about what makes someone believe something, you get your information from people whom you decide to trust or not based on pavliovian association and your fear of being ostracized. i get my information from trying my best to actually evaluate the information. i've read alot of literal text books regarding the subject.
i could go into detail as to why conservative and consensus sequencing is retarded. or why the method that they proved "Cytopathic effects" is retarded, but that would be such a high level of effort posting, and might fly over peoples heads, and i've done all this before, and people still don't believe because of stupid shit like associating the source of information with "hippy wackjobs". the quality of the evidence literally doesn't matter because you have already started at a conclusion "the virus was a lab leak, people who think other wise are shills" and are working backwords to find evidence to support that conclusion.
Because virologists are using the word "isolated" as it applies to what we actually know these past few decades, not using the word "isolated" like it's 100+ years ago and were only working with bacteria. Turns out, this vision of science makes predictions that end up correct. Maybe viruses don't exist, but then what exactly is causing this?virologists have literally stripped the clinical definition of "isolated" that is used in pathology, when virologists use the word "isolated" it means in the casual sense, as in what ever they want it to mean, like taking a photo of cellular debris. so then people will say "its never been isolated" and then people like you will own a study, hit ctrl + f, find the word "isolated" and be like "see it is isolated your a wack job" and leave it like that.
Science fraud exists =/= this science is fraudulent.thats it, they don't need to be malevolent and have malicious intent, they often don't even have to conciously engage in science fraud most of the time because their research is so cellularized, they just have to be a bit more suggestable from authority, not rock the boat, and if a question makes them feel uncomfortable, just respond with "thats out side the area of my expertise."
Because if you're right, then Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology are only incidentally involved and all we can do is blame DA MAN. Go check the Twitter Files and see this is exactly how they operate--they WANT you to blame the institution as a whole instead of pointing out the bad actors. They fear nothing more than being called out on an individual basis, by name. Especially consider that these people fear financial and criminal sanctions for being behind millions of counts of manslaughter and untold trillions in financial damage. If you don't think they'd want this to go away by saying "it was the government's fault", you're absolutely retarded. This is textbook Operation Mockingbird-style disinfo on the level of the FBI trying to insert anti-Russian conspiracies into every conversation on 8chan. You're either a shill yourself, or you're repeating shills.not really, why is "there is no actual covid 19" seem like government disinformation, but "covid 19 was a bioleak" can't be exactly that? if there is no covid 19, then a bunch of shit that is beneficial to WEF and different governments who want to enact medical tyranny is in jepordy, if "covid 19 was a bioleak" then a few people can be blamed but still all the economic depression, medical tyranny stuff can still happen.
"Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted..."
That's a real dishonest reading of what this paper actually says. They're saying there wasn't WHEN THE TEST WAS DEVELOPED AND THIS STUDY CONDUCTED. But hey, some guy on the internet pointing it out to always fools the rubes like you.
We all know that the testing for the virus has very low efficiency, so how can you assert any of this as fact? I sure know I caught the virus by being in a crowd in a city where the virus was going around. You further show your ignorance in knowing how the disease works (hint, it's very good at infecting the bloodstream)Heres the bradford hill criteria, and how on every part of the bradford hill criteria, covid 19 doesn't satisfy it and appears to there for not be a legitimate disease.
One of the biggest arguments against this being a preplanned event and instead a case of "never letting a crisis go to waste" is the BLM riots. There's evidence things like the funding, the pallets of bricks, etc. were all being arranged in December 2019. I think they planned on having it be THE event of 2020, and we know they were looking for a martyr since they were amping up the racial tension with silly shit like Jussie Smollett, the Bubba Wallace noose, and Jogger Ahmaud Arbery into "their guy." It was so vital to their plan that the pandemic totally vanished from the news cycle as they cheered on the burning of America and paid zero attention to the fact most people in those mobs weren't wearing masks or practicing social distancing. And then they even got DA EXPERTS to say the protests were vital and somehow not spreading the virus.They didn't have to fake the pandemic. It was a real pandemic of an engineered virus. It just had a lethality of less than 1%. Unless you had a compromised immune system or had other comorbidities. Usually present in the over 60's. So the response was overblown.
Now why would they do that? Theorizing.
Firstly. The US Presidential Election. Biden was in no way fit to be campaigning around the country. If he appeared in public, they would have show that his crowds would be tiny compared to Trumps turn out. So due to the lockdowns, he was able to campaign from the Basement. Only appearing a handful of times, late in the campaign.
He then took questions, in socially distanced, limited capacity, controlled events. A pre-COVID campaign would also expose how mentally impaired he was when he would have to take questions on the fly. So when Biden won the election. The public didn't have an on the ground representation of the support for Biden. who knew how popular he was? However he gained the most votes for a President in World history. More than Obama.
If the pandemic was planned ahead of time, then why would they go through all the trouble of planning mass rioting, including deleting the pandemic from the news cycle for two weeks? This seems like what they did with January 6, where they let in a bunch of MAGA loons and expected an epic hostage scenario ending in hundreds of MAGAtards dead alongside a few cops and Congressmen (and maybe even Pence), but all they got was a few dead Trump supporters and lulzy footage. However, because the "script" was already written, everyone has to TREAT the event like it went according to their script, just like how the pandemic was never considered as part of the "script" for the Floyd riots.