Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Iniciador del tema trannyfucker
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 15 de Nov, 2016
I think this is the most surprising thing about the article. Jews go through Bar Mitzvahs to be confirmed as, well, men. Presumably "she" did as well. IIRC most hardcore Jews don't recognize the female equivalent of Bat Mitzvah; the whole idea of a female coming of age ceremony is only a little over a century old. (Not sure if "Modern" (?) Orthodox do or don't. Whatever makes one a Modern Orthodox in the first place might be an interesting article.)
As an aside, how do you confirm what nobody can apparently define?
LateNightMuffin
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 25 de Jul, 2019
Some men are pervs. Man blames women because some men are pervs. Stop the presses!
- Registrado
- 16 de Dic, 2019
You know, I could almost buy it after a couple beers on account of how ugly people on that island are. Little wonder they're especially delusional in Scotland considering those people are almost as drunk as the Irish.
- Registrado
- 25 de Jul, 2020
- Registrado
- 4 de Mar, 2019
- Registrado
- 22 de Abr, 2022
As expected, the UK government has blocked the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Act Bill passed recently at Holyrood. Trannies seething. (bbc.com, archive.ph)
Edit: Technically it's still a Bill rather than Act because ’is Maj hasn't signed it.
Edit: Technically it's still a Bill rather than Act because ’is Maj hasn't signed it.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 25 de Jul, 2020
The UK seems like it is one of the few developing countries fighting back against this troon nonsense. Why is this?
Everybody in mainstream US culture seems like it is still popping pink pills daily, with no end in sight.
- Registrado
- 22 de Abr, 2022
In comparison with the US, I guess broadly because transgenderism didn't become a "culture war" issue, at least partly because the people who first organised against the proposed GRA reforms were trade unionists and feminists. We also have the advantage of consolidated health systems, so it's possible to have something like the Cass Report that causes a fairly big shift "in one go". (The situation in Sweden and Finland is somewhat similar.)
But it's not all roses, and the picture is far more complicated than that.
The health systems are devolved so the Cass Report findings won't necessarily be adopted by NHS Wales or Scotland (or the HSC in Northern Ireland). Were there some hypothetical free vote on some pro-trans legislation in (the UK) Parliament, I wouldn't dare to bet on the outcome, but it's more likely such a thing would pass in Scotland (as with the GRR) or Wales. (Partly I think this is because MSPs and MSs like to appear to outflank the ruling Westminster government.)
Plus let's not forget that it was the Conservatives who originally planned to reform the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and bring in sex self-ID.
Very mixed bag, and a long way to go still.
- Registrado
- 4 de Mar, 2019
I would say "baby steps", but that might get the nonces too excited.
- Registrado
- 22 de Abr, 2022
My Lord there are some dumb takes on the GRR veto:
(twitter.com, archive.ph)
This TIF was issued her Gender Recognition Certificate in March 2022, in England, under the terms of the Gender Recognition Act 2004. The UK government's veto of the Scottish GRR Bill does not affect anyone who wishes to seek such a Gender Recognition Certificate, ie nothing changes.
Also, she lives in England (and is wearing an England football top!) so she wouldn't have been eligible for a quickie GRC under the Scottish Bill.
(twitter.com, archive.ph)
This TIF was issued her Gender Recognition Certificate in March 2022, in England, under the terms of the Gender Recognition Act 2004. The UK government's veto of the Scottish GRR Bill does not affect anyone who wishes to seek such a Gender Recognition Certificate, ie nothing changes.
Also, she lives in England (and is wearing an England football top!) so she wouldn't have been eligible for a quickie GRC under the Scottish Bill.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Because they totally cucked to troons earlier than nearly everyone else, so they hit peak trans a lot sooner because it was a complete disaster.
- Registrado
- 28 de Sep, 2022
Headcount of UK prison inmates (plus similar data from NZ, and Queensland, Aus) shows mtf's are 5x more likely to be convicted sex offenders than normal men, and well over 500x more likely than women.
The release of some early 2021 census statistics relating to gender was greeted with glee and elation by Nancy Kelley, CEO of Stonewall in the UK. Vindication at last!
(Kelley declined to mention that her figure of 262,000 was substantially less than half the number of trans and non-binary individuals – 600,000 – that her organisation has habitually claimed for years.)
The census suggested that England and Wales are home to 48,000 transwomen (and 48,000 transmen), from the total who’d answered No to the voluntary question asking if their gender identity aligned with their sex at birth.
(The largest number that said No, around 118,000, didn’t tick the boxes of transwoman, transman or non-binary, nor wrote in their own. An unknown number of these may have been rejecting “gender” altogether. 30,000 ticked “non-binary” and 18,000 wrote in a gender because they were REALLY special.)
But, as we’ve been told time out of number, we must accept what people say about themselves. So 48,000 transwomen it is. So few. So vulnerable. And that number got me thinking.
Because one of the few places we’ve been counting transwomen, transmen etc all along has been the prison population, for the fairly obvious reason that we (officially) have single sex prisons in the UK, and trans offenders need to go somewhere just like everyone else does.
You would have needed to suffer from a fairly extreme form of sensory deprivation not to have at least heard of or read the “scare stories” like Karen White, a trans-identifying male sex offender who was put in the women’s estate, and proceeded to sexually assault female inmates who could not escape White’s predations because, y’know, prison.
Trans activists have targeted prisons as a place where self-ID can be rolled out in practice before it was made law. A series of FoI requests of the Ministry of Justice had found an ever increasing number of trans prisoners, and there was a significant kerfuffle when Fair Play For Women (FPFW) – a feminist organisation that has done a lot of work on the clash between women’s rights and trans rights – reported that 48% of trans prisoners in the England and Wales system were incarcerated for sex crimes, while the percentage for women was miniscule.
BBC Reality Check infamously followed this up in 2018. I say “infamously” because when their initial enquries proved that FPFW were broadly correct – 60 of 125 trans prisoners at the time were sex offenders – they provided a series of excuses and reasons why readers shouldn’t believe those figures.
Some of those reasons were not wrong. There very well may be trans prisoners in the system who are “closeted” for the stay and don’t show up in those stats. The hard number of 60, however, was reliable. It was the floor, the number we were certain of at that time. There were at least that many trans-identifying offenders in the prison system for sexual offences.
At the time, we simply didn’t know how many transwomen were in the country, so we relied on estimates by groups with skin in the game. In 2018 the Government Equalities Office, using some work done by trans advocacy group GIRES, produced a tentative estimate of between 200,000 and 500,000 trans people in the UK, which would suggest (assuming a roughly even distribution by sex) between 100,000 and 250,000 transwomen.
The Prison Service also helpfully provided statistics for the number of prisoners by sex and offence type for the period in question (click to enlarge):
At the moment in question there were 125 women incarcerated for sexual offences (mostly as accomplice to male offenders and mostly against children). The same spreadsheet shows 13,332 males were in prison for sexual offences
2017 was bang between censuses, so we only have an official estimate of the number of women in England and Wales at the time: 30 million (and 29.5 million men). Still, we now can do some basic mathematics to work out proportions of incarcerated sex offenders to wider population:
13,332 men out of 29.5 million = 1 in 2,212 men
125 women out of 30 million = 1 in 240,000 women
Given the tentative GIRES figures, there was a little ambiguity over the possible trans figures, so we’ll calculate both a min and a max.
60 out of 250,000 (max) transwomen = 1 in 4,166 transwomen
or
60 out of 100,000 (min) transwomen = 1 in 1,666 transwomen
So, it seemed, transwomen were somewhere between a bit more likely than men to be imprisoned as sex offenders and a bit less likely. In any case they were, many, MANY times more likely to be sex offenders than actual women.
But then a funny thing happened.
Partially due to COVID, the number of incarcerated sex offenders of both sexes went down. As of 2021, men dropped as of 2021 from 13,000 to around 11,000 and women dropped from 125 to around 110.
But transwomen sex offenders went up. Way up. Over 50% up. So when the question was asked in Parliament in 2022, we got the following answer:
We checked, and the number held in the women’s estate is exactly five at last count (we believe it was four at the time of the question). This meant a total of 92 transwomen were in jail at that moment for sexual offences, compared to 60 just a couple of years earlier.
So now we have hard counts for sex offenders in prison as of March 2021: 11,660 men and 103 women, plus 92 transwomen.
Alert readers will not have forgotten the start of the story – the 2021 census, and Nancy Kelley’s delight at the first firm count of transpeople in England and Wales. So we can match those numbers up to the now-known numbers of transwomen.
11,660 men serving time for sex offences out of 29.5m = 1 in 2530 men
103 women serving the same time out of 30.4 million = 1 in 295,000 women
92 transwomen serving the same time out of 48,000 = 1 in 522 transwomen
That suggests transwomen are five times more likely than other men, and 566 times more likely than women, to commit sexual offences. That’s not a sample, not a poll, not a survey, not a representative focus group. It’s a hard count.
However, it may be a low count of transwomen, because we know that only around 20% of the people who said their gender identity didn’t align with their sex specifically identified themselves as transwomen. For all we know, the non-binaries and others might all be males, treated as transwomen for prison purposes.
We don’t think it’s at all likely, but for scrupulous fairness let’s add them:
92 out of 96,000 [transwomen AND non-binary AND “other”] = 1 in 1,044
That would still make transwomen more than twice as likely as other men, and 292 times as likely as natal women, to be sex offenders.
But is it just England and Wales, and perhaps the denial of self-ID, that has produced this disturbing behaviour trend? Let’s compare with a haven of self-ID: New Zealand, where it was introduced late in 2021.
According to the 2021 NZ Stats Household Economic Survey, New Zealand had 19,400 trans or non-binary people, from an overall population of 2.5m females and 2.4m males. From that total 4900 were transwomen, 5500 were transmen and 9000 were non-binary or ‘another gender’.
According to the NZ Dept of Corrections in mid 2019 there were 5442 sentenced prisoners on the NZ prison estate, consisting of 5149 males and 293 females. Of these prisoners, around 35 were transwomen.
Just over 21% of New Zealand’s 5442 prison population were primarily incarcerated for sex offences – 1175 prisoners, of which five were female and 15 were transwomen, leaving roughly 1155 ‘cis’ males.
So, assuming there was no cataclysmic change in numbers between 2019 and 2021 we can make the following rough calculations – not as definitive as England and Wales, but good enough for government work :
1155 males from a 2.4 million population = 1 in 2018 men
5 females from a 2.5 million population = 1 in 500,000 women
15 trans identifying males/transwomen in 4,900 = 1 in 326 transwomen
Or, if we were super-generous and again assigned EVERY non-binary a male sex:
15 transwomen in 13,900 = 1 in 927 transwomen
And even with the kindest possible interpretation, transwomen were incarcerated for serious sex offences at more than twice the rate of men, and more than 500 times the rate of women.
Thankfully one of the few limitations of self-ID in New Zealand is a more or less hard bar on any sex-offending transgender prisoner being sent to the prison of the sex they attacked. Readers may recall that the SNP and Greens voted down a similar protection in Scotland, where the Scottish Government’s botched census means Scotland will have to wait another year for its hard population figures.
But from currently available statistics we can note that Scottish prison stats show the number of female sex offenders on the average day in 2021 was 3.9.
The Scottish Prison Service has also stated that six trans sex offenders, out of 16 trans prisoners in total, were currently in the estate, all of them males (ie transwomen).
Scottish Transgender Alliance estimate the Scottish transgender population between 1500 and 4000, according to Scottish Women’s Aid. If the England and Wales experience holds, the real number will be toward the lower end of that estimate, and the number of transwomen will be between 700 and 2000, tending towards 1000. But for the sake of argument we’ll be generous and take the top end of the range: 2000.
The last estimate of Scottish women (by Eurostat) was 2.74m, and 2.65m men. Which would give us 2021 figures for Scotland of:
1298 men in jail for sex offences out of 2.65m = 1 in 2042 men
5 women in jail for sex offences out of 2.74m = 1 in 548,000 women
6 transwomen in jail for sex offences out of 2000 = 1 in 333 transwomen
The small numbers cause larger deviations, but the trend is as clear as a bell. Per capita, transwomen consistently appear far more likely to be convicted sex offenders than either natal women OR non-trans men.
These proportions seem to repeat everywhere. Although Ireland’s self-ID privacy laws try very hard to conceal the figures, we can glean from various media reports that there are at least four transwomen currently in Irish prisons for sex offences, compared with three natal women – basically very much in the same ballpark as Scotland.
We find similar ratios in Queensland in Australia:
It is of course possible that these figures are being distorted by the large numbers of prisoners who self-identify as transwomen when convicted, serve their time in female prisons and then decide on release that they were men all along after all.
But that would seem to a rational observer to be a good reason to be much MORE restrictive about allowing criminals to self-identify their gender, not LESS – the precise opposite of the direction the Scottish Government is doggedly charging in.
Because everywhere we look, we see the same distinct and worrying pattern. As a famous Australian (male) sex offender was known to say : “Can you tell what it is yet?”
wingsoverscotland.com
https://archive.md/CfCSK
The Rorschach Test
Posted on January 10, 2023 by Mar VickersThe release of some early 2021 census statistics relating to gender was greeted with glee and elation by Nancy Kelley, CEO of Stonewall in the UK. Vindication at last!
(Kelley declined to mention that her figure of 262,000 was substantially less than half the number of trans and non-binary individuals – 600,000 – that her organisation has habitually claimed for years.)
The census suggested that England and Wales are home to 48,000 transwomen (and 48,000 transmen), from the total who’d answered No to the voluntary question asking if their gender identity aligned with their sex at birth.
(The largest number that said No, around 118,000, didn’t tick the boxes of transwoman, transman or non-binary, nor wrote in their own. An unknown number of these may have been rejecting “gender” altogether. 30,000 ticked “non-binary” and 18,000 wrote in a gender because they were REALLY special.)
But, as we’ve been told time out of number, we must accept what people say about themselves. So 48,000 transwomen it is. So few. So vulnerable. And that number got me thinking.
Because one of the few places we’ve been counting transwomen, transmen etc all along has been the prison population, for the fairly obvious reason that we (officially) have single sex prisons in the UK, and trans offenders need to go somewhere just like everyone else does.
You would have needed to suffer from a fairly extreme form of sensory deprivation not to have at least heard of or read the “scare stories” like Karen White, a trans-identifying male sex offender who was put in the women’s estate, and proceeded to sexually assault female inmates who could not escape White’s predations because, y’know, prison.
Trans activists have targeted prisons as a place where self-ID can be rolled out in practice before it was made law. A series of FoI requests of the Ministry of Justice had found an ever increasing number of trans prisoners, and there was a significant kerfuffle when Fair Play For Women (FPFW) – a feminist organisation that has done a lot of work on the clash between women’s rights and trans rights – reported that 48% of trans prisoners in the England and Wales system were incarcerated for sex crimes, while the percentage for women was miniscule.
BBC Reality Check infamously followed this up in 2018. I say “infamously” because when their initial enquries proved that FPFW were broadly correct – 60 of 125 trans prisoners at the time were sex offenders – they provided a series of excuses and reasons why readers shouldn’t believe those figures.
Some of those reasons were not wrong. There very well may be trans prisoners in the system who are “closeted” for the stay and don’t show up in those stats. The hard number of 60, however, was reliable. It was the floor, the number we were certain of at that time. There were at least that many trans-identifying offenders in the prison system for sexual offences.
At the time, we simply didn’t know how many transwomen were in the country, so we relied on estimates by groups with skin in the game. In 2018 the Government Equalities Office, using some work done by trans advocacy group GIRES, produced a tentative estimate of between 200,000 and 500,000 trans people in the UK, which would suggest (assuming a roughly even distribution by sex) between 100,000 and 250,000 transwomen.
The Prison Service also helpfully provided statistics for the number of prisoners by sex and offence type for the period in question (click to enlarge):
At the moment in question there were 125 women incarcerated for sexual offences (mostly as accomplice to male offenders and mostly against children). The same spreadsheet shows 13,332 males were in prison for sexual offences
2017 was bang between censuses, so we only have an official estimate of the number of women in England and Wales at the time: 30 million (and 29.5 million men). Still, we now can do some basic mathematics to work out proportions of incarcerated sex offenders to wider population:
13,332 men out of 29.5 million = 1 in 2,212 men
125 women out of 30 million = 1 in 240,000 women
Given the tentative GIRES figures, there was a little ambiguity over the possible trans figures, so we’ll calculate both a min and a max.
60 out of 250,000 (max) transwomen = 1 in 4,166 transwomen
or
60 out of 100,000 (min) transwomen = 1 in 1,666 transwomen
So, it seemed, transwomen were somewhere between a bit more likely than men to be imprisoned as sex offenders and a bit less likely. In any case they were, many, MANY times more likely to be sex offenders than actual women.
But then a funny thing happened.
Partially due to COVID, the number of incarcerated sex offenders of both sexes went down. As of 2021, men dropped as of 2021 from 13,000 to around 11,000 and women dropped from 125 to around 110.
But transwomen sex offenders went up. Way up. Over 50% up. So when the question was asked in Parliament in 2022, we got the following answer:
We checked, and the number held in the women’s estate is exactly five at last count (we believe it was four at the time of the question). This meant a total of 92 transwomen were in jail at that moment for sexual offences, compared to 60 just a couple of years earlier.
So now we have hard counts for sex offenders in prison as of March 2021: 11,660 men and 103 women, plus 92 transwomen.
Alert readers will not have forgotten the start of the story – the 2021 census, and Nancy Kelley’s delight at the first firm count of transpeople in England and Wales. So we can match those numbers up to the now-known numbers of transwomen.
11,660 men serving time for sex offences out of 29.5m = 1 in 2530 men
103 women serving the same time out of 30.4 million = 1 in 295,000 women
92 transwomen serving the same time out of 48,000 = 1 in 522 transwomen
That suggests transwomen are five times more likely than other men, and 566 times more likely than women, to commit sexual offences. That’s not a sample, not a poll, not a survey, not a representative focus group. It’s a hard count.
However, it may be a low count of transwomen, because we know that only around 20% of the people who said their gender identity didn’t align with their sex specifically identified themselves as transwomen. For all we know, the non-binaries and others might all be males, treated as transwomen for prison purposes.
We don’t think it’s at all likely, but for scrupulous fairness let’s add them:
92 out of 96,000 [transwomen AND non-binary AND “other”] = 1 in 1,044
That would still make transwomen more than twice as likely as other men, and 292 times as likely as natal women, to be sex offenders.
But is it just England and Wales, and perhaps the denial of self-ID, that has produced this disturbing behaviour trend? Let’s compare with a haven of self-ID: New Zealand, where it was introduced late in 2021.
According to the 2021 NZ Stats Household Economic Survey, New Zealand had 19,400 trans or non-binary people, from an overall population of 2.5m females and 2.4m males. From that total 4900 were transwomen, 5500 were transmen and 9000 were non-binary or ‘another gender’.
According to the NZ Dept of Corrections in mid 2019 there were 5442 sentenced prisoners on the NZ prison estate, consisting of 5149 males and 293 females. Of these prisoners, around 35 were transwomen.
Just over 21% of New Zealand’s 5442 prison population were primarily incarcerated for sex offences – 1175 prisoners, of which five were female and 15 were transwomen, leaving roughly 1155 ‘cis’ males.
So, assuming there was no cataclysmic change in numbers between 2019 and 2021 we can make the following rough calculations – not as definitive as England and Wales, but good enough for government work :
1155 males from a 2.4 million population = 1 in 2018 men
5 females from a 2.5 million population = 1 in 500,000 women
15 trans identifying males/transwomen in 4,900 = 1 in 326 transwomen
Or, if we were super-generous and again assigned EVERY non-binary a male sex:
15 transwomen in 13,900 = 1 in 927 transwomen
And even with the kindest possible interpretation, transwomen were incarcerated for serious sex offences at more than twice the rate of men, and more than 500 times the rate of women.
Thankfully one of the few limitations of self-ID in New Zealand is a more or less hard bar on any sex-offending transgender prisoner being sent to the prison of the sex they attacked. Readers may recall that the SNP and Greens voted down a similar protection in Scotland, where the Scottish Government’s botched census means Scotland will have to wait another year for its hard population figures.
But from currently available statistics we can note that Scottish prison stats show the number of female sex offenders on the average day in 2021 was 3.9.
The Scottish Prison Service has also stated that six trans sex offenders, out of 16 trans prisoners in total, were currently in the estate, all of them males (ie transwomen).
Scottish Transgender Alliance estimate the Scottish transgender population between 1500 and 4000, according to Scottish Women’s Aid. If the England and Wales experience holds, the real number will be toward the lower end of that estimate, and the number of transwomen will be between 700 and 2000, tending towards 1000. But for the sake of argument we’ll be generous and take the top end of the range: 2000.
The last estimate of Scottish women (by Eurostat) was 2.74m, and 2.65m men. Which would give us 2021 figures for Scotland of:
1298 men in jail for sex offences out of 2.65m = 1 in 2042 men
5 women in jail for sex offences out of 2.74m = 1 in 548,000 women
6 transwomen in jail for sex offences out of 2000 = 1 in 333 transwomen
The small numbers cause larger deviations, but the trend is as clear as a bell. Per capita, transwomen consistently appear far more likely to be convicted sex offenders than either natal women OR non-trans men.
These proportions seem to repeat everywhere. Although Ireland’s self-ID privacy laws try very hard to conceal the figures, we can glean from various media reports that there are at least four transwomen currently in Irish prisons for sex offences, compared with three natal women – basically very much in the same ballpark as Scotland.
We find similar ratios in Queensland in Australia:
It is of course possible that these figures are being distorted by the large numbers of prisoners who self-identify as transwomen when convicted, serve their time in female prisons and then decide on release that they were men all along after all.
But that would seem to a rational observer to be a good reason to be much MORE restrictive about allowing criminals to self-identify their gender, not LESS – the precise opposite of the direction the Scottish Government is doggedly charging in.
Because everywhere we look, we see the same distinct and worrying pattern. As a famous Australian (male) sex offender was known to say : “Can you tell what it is yet?”
The Rorschach Test
The release of some early 2021 census statistics relating to gender was greeted with glee and elation by Nancy Kelley, CEO of Stonewall in the UK. Vindication at last! (Kelley declined to mention t…
https://archive.md/CfCSK
- Registrado
- 25 de Jul, 2020
Free the nipple: Facebook and Instagram told to overhaul ban on bare breasts
Meta’s advisory board says policy impedes right to expression for women and trans and nonbinary people
- Registrado
- 4 de Mar, 2019
Men have always been allowed to bare their nipples on facebook, so this is just acknowledging what everyone already knows.
Mariposa2.0 LTE
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 16 de Dic, 2022
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2018
We already have hetero women claiming fake LGBTQ+ status for attention points. I predict the number of hetero women claiming to be "non binary" is about to skyrocket.Ver archivo adjunto 4296130
Ver archivo adjunto 4296136
Free the nipple: Facebook and Instagram told to overhaul ban on bare breasts
Meta’s advisory board says policy impedes right to expression for women and trans and nonbinary peoplewww.theguardian.com
- Registrado
- 23 de Mar, 2022
Trans-Identified Male At Center Of Santee YMCA Controversy Had Previously Sued A Gym For Access To Women's Facilities - Reduxx
The trans-identified male who allegedly exposed himself to a 17-year-old girl at a YMCA facility in California has stepped forward to reveal his identity in response to a January 18 rally held outside of the property. Christynne Lili Wrene Wood, 66, addressed a crowd of counter-protesters and...
reduxx.info
Some ogreish black Yaniv-clone was (proudly) announcing himself as the nude man seen in the female changing room of the YMCA. It was in a rally supporting the 17 year old girl that felt scarred by that encounter. Need I mention Twitter trannies are being absolutely gross to her?
I say Yaniv-clone not just because fat, but his history of using the ACLU to force his way into female changing rooms and toilets at a gym. Does the classic "transphobia is segregation 2.0" line of defense and compared himself to Emmett Till. You can't make this shit up.
- Registrado
- 26 de Feb, 2021
Can anyone find a source for the 41% going up to 50%?
- Registrado
- 13 de Mar, 2022