US AP: Registration error affects up to 6,000 Arizona voters - A voter registration error caused up to 6,000 Arizona voters to get a mail ballot with only federal races, Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs said Tuesday

Registration error affects up to 6,000 Arizona voters
Associated Press (archive.ph)
2022-10-19 04:30:06GMT

az01.jpg
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs speaks to the media before dropping off her primary election ballot July 21, 2022, in Scottsdale, Ariz. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File)

PHOENIX (AP) — A voter registration error caused up to 6,000 Arizona voters to get a mail ballot with only federal races, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs said Tuesday.

Hobbs, who is the Democratic nominee for governor, said in a statement that affected voters will receive the correct ballot shortly.

Hobbs has staked her gubernatorial campaign largely on her staunch defense of the 2020 election in the face of criticism from former President Donald Trump and his allies. Her Republican rival, former television news anchor Kari Lake, has spread Trump’s unsupported claims of fraud two years ago and has called on Hobbs to step aside from overseeing the midterms while she’s on the ballot.

When people register to vote in Arizona or update their registration, an election system queries driver’s license records to verify whether the person has proven their citizenship. Those who don’t have citizenship documentation on file are not eligible to vote in state elections and are registered as “federal only” voters.

Sophia Solis, a spokeswoman for Hobbs, said the driver’s license query failed to properly verify the citizenship for some people, leading them to to be improperly registered as federal only voters. She did not provide a breakdown of their party affiliation or describe the characteristics that led to problems.

Federal only voters have been a subject of political wrangling since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that Arizona cannot require documentary proof of citizenship for people to vote in national elections. The state responded by creating two classes of voters — those who can vote in all races and those who can vote only in federal elections.

Hobbs said in her statement that the problem affected less than a quarter of 1 percent of voters. She said the database problem has been corrected.
 
It's just a glitch goy. The claim that we're putting our thumb on the scale of close races is totally unsubstantiated goy.

Remember, this is the AP we're talking about here. They still push the narrative that "there's no evidence that conservatives are being censored online" because the only people that believe them anymore are leftoids.
 
When people register to vote in Arizona or update their registration, an election system queries driver’s license records to verify whether the person has proven their citizenship. Those who don’t have citizenship documentation on file are not eligible to vote in state elections and are registered as “federal only” voters.
Shouldn't it be the other way around? Citizens are eligible to vote federally, and in some places - if it's a region that lives and breathes on work visa non-citizens for example - they can choose to allow legal residents to vote locally. Why the fuck are non-citizens allowed to vote federally but not locally?

Yes, I understand they're talking about illegals here, but I'm speaking of the strongest benefit of the doubt version I can. With maximum benefit of the doubt, I can only understand a local vote.
 
Shouldn't it be the other way around? Citizens are eligible to vote federally, and in some places - if it's a region that lives and breathes on work visa non-citizens for example - they can choose to allow legal residents to vote locally. Why the fuck are non-citizens allowed to vote federally but not locally?

Yes, I understand they're talking about illegals here, but I'm speaking of the strongest benefit of the doubt version I can. With maximum benefit of the doubt, I can only understand a local vote.
How about non-citizens don't vote at all? Better yet, let's bring back landownership as a prerequisite. Universal Suffrage is one of our societies most destructive mistakes.
 
How about non-citizens don't vote at all? Better yet, let's bring back landownership as a prerequisite. Universal Suffrage is one of our societies most destructive mistakes.
I can kind of understand the arguments for allowing non-citizens to vote on city level policies (defund the police, for example), but I'd only accept that for legal work visa holders. The frustrating thing about my stance is I don't think those visa holders should be allowed to become so strongly concentrated in one region that they really matter, I don't think we should have cities that are primarily foreigners, but that's a visa policy issue rather than a voting issue. We really need to stop companies from doing that "hurr bdurr we totally tried to hire an American but nobody fit our list of demands perfectly so please let us import someone who doesn't qualify either but they're cheaper and they'll basically be our slave if they don't want to get deported" exploit.

Restricting votes by landownership would result in too many chink votes, unless we also fix the landownership system and ban foreigners from owning property. We'd also have to put minimum qualifying land restrictions in place to avoid people subdividing land and building minimalist tinyhomes, but then that creates issues like disincentivizing states from keeping rural areas (you can fit more suburban houses than farms in a finite space), and making physically bigger states like California stronger. We'd also have to do away with squatter's rights. Or we'd have to stop high IQ people from fucking like pandas, so their spawn can inhabit their homes and prevent squatters from moving in. Oh and we'd have to fix everything that got fucked during the eviction moratorium and prevent the state from just reshaping their voting population by driving landowners into debt and forcing a rotation of landlords.

E: And prevent non-human entities from holding land. You'd think I'm talking about businesses, due to controversy around business personhood... But no, I'm talking them, and "charities", and the government itself. Can you imagine what a shitshow it would be if the government was allowed to decide who is and is not allowed to decide who can own land by selectively allowing people to buy land and most of the land went to themselves and their cronies so they could vote to keep themselves in power? Fortification via zoning ordinances and eminent domain!

Every system can be exploited, and we'd have to fix them up just as much as (if not more than) the system we have now. It's kind of like what they say about capitalism.
 
Última edición:
Your terms are acceptable.
I'll only accept your accepting of the terms if we fix the land ownership system before fixing the voting system. None of the bullshit "we gotta deal with all the dreamers before we secure the borders but then we never finish dealing with dreamers because the open border creates more of them" bullshit. Stop the number of weird grandfather cases from growing, then we can worry about resolving the inconsistencies when the new system goes up.

I sure as fuck don't trust the government to clean up housing and land ownership once they realize that if they just promise to do it without ever following through, then all they have to do is kiss chink dick to remain in power.
 
I'll only accept your accepting of the terms if we fix the land ownership system before fixing the voting system. None of the bullshit "we gotta deal with all the dreamers before we secure the borders but then we never finish dealing with dreamers because the open border creates more of them" bullshit. Stop the number of weird grandfather cases from growing, then we can worry about resolving the inconsistencies when the new system goes up.

I sure as fuck don't trust the government to clean up housing and land ownership once they realize that if they just promise to do it without ever following through, then all they have to do is kiss chink dick to remain in power.
Yeah, that sounds good. I'd expel every non-white citizen who couldn't provide a valid ID if I could wave my magic wand.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo