US AP: Groups get creative to help Alaska voters with ranked voting - Groups = Disgusting Drag Degenerates

Groups get creative to help Alaska voters with ranked voting
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Becky Bohrer
2022-08-11 19:01:44GMT

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Drag performers shimmied up and down a walkway between café tables, as enthusiastic patrons took photos, waved cash and filled out ballots ranking the shows.

The mock election, fueled by performances that brought the din of an Anchorage, Alaska, café to a roar, was aimed at teaching voters about the state’s new ranked choice voting system.

The first ranked voting election under a suite of elections changes approved by Alaska voters in 2020 will be the Aug. 16 special U.S. House election featuring Republicans Sarah Palin and Nick Begich and Democrat Mary Peltola.

Organizations have gotten creative in trying to help voters understand how to cast their ballot, as the mock election featuring drag performers shows.

Under ranked voting, ballots are counted in rounds. A candidate can win outright with more than 50% of the vote in the first round. If no one hits that threshold, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. Voters who chose that candidate as their top pick have their votes count for their next choice. Rounds continue until two candidates remain, and whoever has the most votes wins.

Leaders of some of the efforts see their work as critical to getting voters comfortable with ranked voting, whether they like the system or not, and to helping voters avoid errors in casting their ballots.

“In the spirit of democracy, you need to at least understand how this works,” said Bernadette Wilson, state director of Americans for Prosperity-Alaska. The group opposed the 2020 ballot initiative but “we lost,” she said. The new system is “the law of the land, and we have an election coming up.”

While Americans for Prosperity Action-Alaska has endorsed Begich, Wilson has avoided using the actual candidates as examples in videos she’s posted on Facebook explaining the system, opting instead to demonstrate with colorful sticky notes on a whiteboard.

She also did a presentation and Q&A at an Anchorage theater, an event sponsored by an education wing of the group, Americans for Prosperity Foundation.

A commenter on one of Wilson’s posts said: “I am glad she understands. Clear as mud to me.”

Wilson said she wonders how many people risk incorrectly filling out their ballot and having it rejected because “they read a comment on Facebook somewhere” or got bad information from a friend.

Maine uses ranked voting in state-level primaries and in general elections for federal offices. But Alaska’s unique system combines open primaries with ranked vote general elections. The top four finishers in each primary race, regardless of party affiliation, advance to the general election.

Supporters see ranked choice as a way to give voters more choice and to have candidates seek support from beyond their traditional bases.

Three candidates are in the House special election after elections officials and courts determined that independent Al Gross, who finished third in the special primary, withdrew from the race too late for fifth-place finisher Republican Tara Sweeney to make the ballot in his place.

The winner will serve the remainder of the late Rep. Don Young’s term, which ends early next year. Young died in March.

The special election will be on one side of the ballot. The other side will feature regular primary races, in which voters select one candidate per race.

Palin at a recent forum called ranked voting “convoluted” and complicated and said it should be changed. Former President Donald Trump, who has endorsed Palin, at a rally in Anchorage last month called ranked choice a “rigged deal.”

Palin’s campaign did not respond to questions from The Associated Press about whether the campaign is trying to help voters understand the system or encouraging them to rank a certain way. Neither did Peltola’s. Peltola, at the forum, said she was hopeful about the new system.

Begich said his job is to make sure voters mark him first. Begich, who said he would like to see Alaska return to its old system, said he’s focused on campaigning and leaving education around the process to others.

The Alaska Division of Elections, which oversees elections, has produced ads, videos, fliers and online explainers. But a candidate for governor, Democrat Les Gara, said one of its mailers risks confusing people because it uses a mock state Senate race as a ranked choice example when no state legislative races will be ranked in August. A division spokesperson did not respond to the criticism.

Some of the outreach efforts are political. For example, the National Republican Congressional Committee in a video encourages voters to “leave the Democrat blank” and only rank the Republicans in the House special election.

The Alaska Democratic Party is urging voters to “rank the candidate(s) that most closely align with their values.”

The Alaska Center Education Fund, a nonpartisan arm of the progressive-leaning The Alaska Center, helped sponsor the recent “Drag out the Vote” event in Anchorage. Kyla Kosednar, the fund’s advocacy director, said the fund’s work is focused this year on young and first-time voters.

“We try to add those fun elements into these voting events so that folks are more likely to take time out of their busy summer schedule and come learn about ranked choice voting,” Kosednar said.

Kosednar said Young’s death accelerated the timeline for educating voters. She said some people don’t realize an election is happening or are unfamiliar with the new system. She said practicing help.

“Once people do practice it they’re like, ‘Oh, this makes total sense,’” she said.

Sarah Erkmann Ward, who owns a communications agency in Anchorage, has a contract with Alaskans for Better Elections and is doing outreach to help conservatives understand the system, she said. Alaskans for Better Elections backed the new elections system and has been working with a variety of groups in efforts to help voters understand it.

Ward said she hasn’t seen any ranked voting skeptics leave her presentations an advocate.

“It’s more of a realization that, ‘OK, this is not as hard as I thought, still not wild about the idea but I know how to vote.’ And that’s really the goal here, just to get people comfortable with how you vote.”

01.jpg
This July 28, 2022, photo shows drag queen Dela Rose performing in a mock election at Cafecito Bonito in Anchorage, Alaska where, people ranked the performances by drag performers.

02.jpg
This July 28, 2022, photo shows a person completing a ballot in a mock election at Cafecito Bonito in Anchorage, Alaska, where people ranked the performances by drag performers.

03.jpg
This July 28, 2022, photo shows drag king Hank VanDickerson performing in a mock election at Cafecito Bonito in Anchorage, Alaska, where people ranked the performances by drag performers.

04.jpg
This July 28, 2022, photo shows stickers put out for people during a mock election at Cafecito Bonito in in Anchorage, Alaska, where people ranked the performances by drag performers.

05.jpg
This July 28, 2022, photo shows emcee Golden Delicious performing before a mock election at Cafecito Bonito in Anchorage, Alaska, where people ranked the performances by drag performers.

06.jpg
This July 28, 2022, photo shows a ballot for a mock election where people ranked the performances by drag performers at Cafecito Bonito in Anchorage in Anchorage, Alaska.

07.jpg
This July 28, 2022, photo shows drag queen Dela Rose performing in a mock election at Cafecito Bonito in Anchorage, Alaska where, people ranked the performances by drag performers.
 
How does ranked choice voting benefit lefties? I assume it does, since I only ever see them advocate for it.
A lot of them think the green party cost them elections, this is because they're brain dead and don't realize that under ranked choice voting most libertarian voters (who vastly outnumber green voters) are going red, not blue.

There are also probably a small handful of leftists who think this will genuinely help the green party, not realizing that the only thing that could actually do that is proportional representation. Ranked choice voting fucks 3rd parties harder than first past the post.
 
How does ranked choice voting benefit lefties? I assume it does, since I only ever see them advocate for it.
It benefits whichever side runs the most candidates. People tend to rank every choice even though they only support one or two candidates, which means that some candidate no one actually consciously voted for can win because they were ranked ahead of someone who was consciously voted against.
The opposite system is the jungle primary which is used in various blue states and favors whoever runs the fewest number of candidates.
Ranked choice voting is also impossible to audit in a manner understandable to the average person.
 
Yeah, it was totally ranked choice that did this and not Sarah fucking Palin being the candidate.
There were two republican candidates. Read the article. That aside, this whole thing has been a clusterfuck for multiple reasons, including the last-minute drop out of a candidate, this new voting system, and 49 candidates in the initial run. On a somewhat unrelated note, one of my dad’s coworkers had to get her leg amputated due to poor aftercare by Al Gross.
 
Trial concludes in challenge to Alaska ranked choice voting repeal petition
Anchorage Daily News (archive.ph)
By Iris Samuels
2024-07-04 01:28:18GMT
A trial concluded Wednesday in a case that could determine whether Alaskans get to vote later this year on keeping the state’s ranked choice voting and nonpartisan primary system.

The voting system was narrowly adopted by Alaskans in a 2020 ballot initiative and first used in 2022. Shortly after, a group of conservative Alaskans launched a new ballot initiative to repeal the voting method and return to closed primaries and traditional pick-one general elections. Since then, the organizers of the repeal effort have been plagued by allegations of violating Alaska’s law concerning campaign ethics and signature collection.

Supporters of Alaska’s ranked choice voting and nonpartisan primaries filed suit earlier this year alleging that the repeal initiative organizers had violated state laws by leaving signature booklets unattended, leaving them open to fraud.

The lawsuit targeted the Alaska Division of Elections for certifying the ballot question despite questions about the initiative organizers’ conduct. The initiative organizers themselves joined the lawsuit as intervenors, arguing that even if there were some concerns about some unattended ballots, they were not enough to throw out the ballot petition entirely.

During the six-day trial before Superior Court Judge Christina Rankin, witnesses testified about possible suspicious or questionable behavior by signature gatherers.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs in the case, including Scott Kendall — one of the primary authors of the 2020 ballot measure that put in place Alaska’s current voting system — alleged that the behavior by some signature gatherers violated Alaska law to a sufficient degree that the petition should be thrown out.

The Division of Elections had counted that the initiative organizers gathered 37,000 signatures, meeting threshold requirements in 34 out of 40 House districts — exceeding the required 26,000 signatures representing a minimum percentage of voters in 30 out of 40 districts. The plaintiffs argued that 11,000 signatures should be thrown out. If the judge rules in their favor, the initiative would not meet the minimum statewide requirement nor the geographic distribution threshold.

The authors of the ballot initiative seeking to repeal ranked choice voting, who are represented by former Alaska Attorney General Kevin Clarkson, argued that even if some signature gatherers violated the law, it was because they were ignorant of the laws rather than because of malicious intent, and the behavior was not widespread enough to disqualify more than a handful of signatures.

Rankin has already dismissed part of the lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs, finding in June that the Division of Elections acted properly when it allowed the sponsors of the repeal petition to correct problems with signature booklets after they were submitted.

Rankin is expected to issue an order in the case before July 20. She could either dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint altogether, or find that the Division of Elections should throw out some or all of the signatures that plaintiffs pointed out could be cause for concern. If she rules that some signatures should be thrown out, the Division of Elections must then count the remaining valid signatures to ensure they meet the minimum threshold of roughly 26,000 signatures from Alaska voters, including a minimum representation from most voting districts around the state.

This isn’t the only allegation of improper behavior that the ballot initiative organizers have faced. They were previously fined more than $94,000 by the Alaska Public Offices Commission for violating the state’s campaign finance requirements, including by forming a tax-exempt religious organization through which they funneled most of their funding. The fines were largely upheld in court recently after the initiative organizers challenged them.

The trial included testimony from multiple people who volunteered as signature gatherers for the initiative, people who witnessed the signature gathering, and an expert in signature verification who has worked on multiple ballot initiatives in Alaska and elsewhere.

The expert, Jay Costa, founded a company called eQual that works with ballot initiative organizers to ensure the signatures they gather meet legal requirements. He testified during the trial that it is common for signature gatherers to collect fewer than 100 signatures per day, and that in less than 1% of instances did signature gatherers collect more than 150 signatures per day.

Phillip Izon, the author of the ballot initiative and organizer of the signature drive, had in one day gathered 580 signatures.

“That seems to stretch the bounds of credulity,” Costa said when testifying on Tuesday.

During testimony on Wednesday, Izon said that he had gathered those signatures during an event in February 2023, and credited the high number of signatures to the motivation of event attendees to repeal Alaska’s voting system. Alaska law required the signature gatherer — in this case, Izon — to witness every signature. Izon said he was able to do so by having multiple signature booklets in front of him at a time.

“I’m just really good,” Izon said when asked how he was able to gather 580 signatures in a day. “If people are motivated to sign, they’re going to show up. And they did.”

“I was very, very secure with every book that I had,” said Izon.

Costa said that in the course of the trial and depositions, several petition circulators testified that they had left booklets unattended or allowed their booklets to be circulated by another person, in violation of state statute.

“My conclusion following the review of testimony is that indeed, it seems like there was a significant impropriety with regard to the circulation of this petition,” said Costa.

Clarkson, representing Izon and the other initiative organizers, conceded that some laws were violated but said it was not enough to throw out the petition, arguing ahead of the trial that the violations affected at most around 1,400 signatures.

The decision timeline in the case could allow any party to appeal the case to the Alaska Supreme Court ahead of the certification of the November ballot, which is set to take place after the August primary.

Iris Samuels is a reporter for the Anchorage Daily News focusing on state politics. She previously covered Montana for The AP and Report for America and wrote for the Kodiak Daily Mirror. Contact her at isamuels@adn.com.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo