Several Berkeley Law student groups adopt ‘no Zionist speakers’ rule

Archive
A strongly worded pro-BDS bylaw adopted by a handful of student groups at Berkeley Law is quietly raising the temperature of the debate surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and prompted the law school dean, a progressive Zionist, to write an email expressing concern to students.

The statement, written by Berkeley Law Students for Justice in Palestine, goes beyond the now-familiar calls for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel, pledges that have become commonplace at U.S. universities (The campus advocacy group Amcha Initiative has tallied 28 such resolutions adopted since 2021.)

Groups that adopt the bylaw pledge not to invite Zionist speakers or “speakers that have expressed and continued to hold views … in support of Zionism, the apartheid state of Israel, and the occupation of Palestine.”

The rule is in the interest of “protecting the safety and welfare of Palestinian students,” the provision says. As to how it will be enforced, the bylaw leaves that up to each group, though “suggested strategies can include publicly stipulating [each individual] organization’s position of anti-racism and anti-settler colonialism to speakers, ensuring that proposals for speakers emphasize the organization’s desire for equality and inclusion,” or “informing speakers of the event’s goals and mission values.”

Neither Berkeley Law Students for Justice in Palestine (BLSJP) nor any of the bylaw adopters responded to emails from J. seeking comment. Its title is “To include a Palestine-centered and de-colonial approach to holding club activities.”

Although the bylaw was proposed to the more than 100 student and affinity groups at Berkeley Law, only nine had adopted it as of early this week. About 1,100 students are enrolled at the prestigious law school.

Berkeley Law Students for Justice in Palestine nevertheless celebrated what it called a major “BDS victory” in an Instagram post on Sunday, listing the groups that had adopted the measure. Among them were the Berkeley Law Muslim Student Association, the Queer Caucus, Law Students of African Descent and Women of Berkeley Law.
 
Imagine how much these same people would shit themselves in tantrum if it were a "no socialist speakers" rule.

Why does the left love the fucking dipshit Palenstinians so much?

Even among goat fuckers and bronze age savage, the Palestinians are known to be some of the biggest losers and trash out there.
Because western millennials/zoomers are gullible fucks for "muh oppressed n shiet", and Palestoids are unrivaled among the other austere goat fuckers at spinning themselves to be the perpetual victims.
 
What a bunch of dumbasses. Not just because they're idiots for supporting Palestine or anything like that (which they are, but that's besides the point), but because these fucks are going to be wondering why all of the big successful law firms with Jewish partners aren't returning their calls when they're applying for jobs after law school. Enjoy your public defender job, shitheads.
THIS.

And I would bet those firms are keeping careful track of the names of these law students, and passing those names around to other firms they work with. Suggest the Bay Area big-time legal community is smaller than might be thought, and word will get around. Good. Fuck those sacks of shit.
 
FireShot Capture 830 - whites berkeley law school at DuckDuckGo_ - https___duckduckgo.com_.jpg FireShot Capture 829 - whites berkeley law school at DuckDuckGo_ - https___duckduckgo.com_.jpg FireShot Capture 828 - whites berkeley law school at DuckDuckGo_ - https___duckduckgo.com_.jpg
 
It's millions of people being held as second class citizens, in large open air prisons in a recently colonised by Europeans area. People like to think the West is above that, but people are in denial about what actually has happened and going on there.

The big issue is that it was too recent, past the era of colonising and despite your racist views, the Palestinians were too modern and developed to be colonised like primitive natives.

The only way Zionism can actually succeed is to genocide the Palestinians and what is going on is a holding game of delaying that. In part because people don't want to do a genocide, but the ultimate goal of Zionism requires it. So either stop the pretence and just do it. Which of course is untorable and won't happen. Or just end the apartheid regime, they're people being tortured for a goal that won't happen, unless they do the unspeakable.

People don't like that their nations are supporting the holding pattern for them to leave genociding millions of people on the table.
That's ridiculous, you remove the responsibility from the Palestinians as if they dindu nuffing the last century rather than violently resist Jews having a right to settle in Israel and decline any possibility they had for peaceful coexistence. Also the use of the term Genocide is laughable when the population had a massive increase over this century. Finally, the use of the term colonize is flat out wrong since the Jewish settlers idoleology was based about being self reliant, as well as how fucking dangerous it would have been to have muslims in your midst.
And the term muslims is apt because "Palestinians" is a made up term created as a response to Jewish immigration, the original muslims that lived in Israel wanted to make it South Syria.
 
That's ridiculous, you remove the responsibility from the Palestinians as if they dindu nuffing the last century rather than violently resist Jews having a right to settle in Israel and decline any possibility they had for peaceful coexistence. Also the use of the term Genocide is laughable when the population had a massive increase over this century. Finally, the use of the term colonize is flat out wrong since the Jewish settlers idoleology was based about being self reliant, as well as how fucking dangerous it would have been to have muslims in your midst.
And the term muslims is apt because "Palestinians" is a made up term created as a response to Jewish immigration, the original muslims that lived in Israel wanted to make it South Syria.

It was a deliberate effort to colonise that started in the 1800s. As I said, too late and they never got to follow through on what was needed. As it is terrible. So it's just created another terrible situation.

You're saying I'm ignoring the bad shit the Palestinians do, but I never spoke to it. Sounds like you're ignoring the horrible shit Israel does.

It's a fucked up situation. Both sides can be assholes and both sides can be victims. The creation of a Zionist state has failed because it required a genocide. Now both sides are stuck in a situation neither is happy about.
 
The only way Zionism can actually succeed is to genocide the Palestinians and what is going on is a holding game of delaying that. In part because people don't want to do a genocide, but the ultimate goal of Zionism requires it. So either stop the pretence and just do it. Which of course is untorable and won't happen. Or just end the apartheid regime, they're people being tortured for a goal that won't happen, unless they do the unspeakable.
Tinfoil time: Israel is holding the palestine sitiuation in limbo, waiting for the collapse of liberal democracy in the west so they can be allowed to go through with the genocide,
 
It was a deliberate effort to colonise that started in the 1800s. As I said, too late and they never got to follow through on what was needed. As it is terrible. So it's just created another terrible situation.

You're saying I'm ignoring the bad shit the Palestinians do, but I never spoke to it. Sounds like you're ignoring the horrible shit Israel does.

It's a fucked up situation. Both sides can be assholes and both sides can be victims. The creation of a Zionist state has failed because it required a genocide. Now both sides are stuck in a situation neither is happy about.
Bitch, for it to be genocide the population should at least have the courtesy to decline. Also I'm sick of "here is bad shit Israel does, but I'll give no context to why they did it". Very few conflicts had the victors continuosly offer the losers ground back, only to be spat on every time.
 
Bitch, for it to be genocide the population should at least have the courtesy to decline. Also I'm sick of "here is bad shit Israel does, but I'll give no context to why they did it". Very few conflicts had the victors continuosly offer the losers ground back, only to be spat on every time.
"We'll agree to every single one of your requests for a two-state solution, if you agree to lay down your arms against us."

For whatever reason, those terms were flat-out unacceptable to the Palestinians.
 
Okay, progressives, please explain to us why you enthusiastically support a nation that hates gays with a lethal passion, while at the same time you vehemently oppose the one country in the Middle East that offers gays a safe haven?
This is a stupid take, they're obviously not pro-Hamas. Palestine has the PFLP, which is one of the most significant socialist groups in the middle east aside from the YPG.
 
This is a stupid take, they're obviously not pro-Hamas. Palestine has the PFLP, which is one of the most significant socialist groups in the middle east aside from the YPG.

Israel has the People's Front of Judea, and the Judean People's Front.
 
Israel has the People's Front of Judea, and the Judean People's Front.
Splitters...
The unacceptable term for them is saying that Israel is a country that exists.
Well, yeah. Damn shame, although to be honest, like that one dude on MEMRI, I am very pro-LGBT: Let's Go Bomb Tel Aviv. That place is the San Francisco of the Middle East thanks to all the faggotry, and I don't think your typical Israeli would miss the place all that much.
 
Bitch, for it to be genocide the population should at least have the courtesy to decline. Also I'm sick of "here is bad shit Israel does, but I'll give no context to why they did it". Very few conflicts had the victors continuosly offer the losers ground back, only to be spat on every time.

You're misunderstanding because you're emotionally charged that someone isn't being a zionist.

I am saying Zionism failed because it required a genocide of the Palestinians. As that hasn't happened, they need to give up on it. Or go through with it. Which I am against. I don't support genocide. So this holding pattern of holding out hope they somehow do it, or it happens naturally somehow is stupid. It's prolonging out a shit situation for both Israel and the Palestinians. At some point the current status quo will break and it'll be better for everyone if that isn't in chaos and civil war.
 
You're misunderstanding because you're emotionally charged that someone isn't being a zionist.

I am saying Zionism failed because it required a genocide of the Palestinians. As that hasn't happened, they need to give up on it. Or go through with it. Which I am against. I don't support genocide. So this holding pattern of holding out hope they somehow do it, or it happens naturally somehow is stupid. It's prolonging out a shit situation for both Israel and the Palestinians. At some point the current status quo will break and it'll be better for everyone if that isn't in chaos and civil war.
Zionism is having the Jewish people live in their own independent country on Israel. Very few people will argue that Zionism requires every plot of land to be Israel's, so there is no reason there couldn't have been coexistence.
Also what do you even consider "giving up on zionism"? Going back to our original countries, that some outright kicked Jews out after Israel was founded? (an interesting historical tidbit that people like to ignore).
 
Atrás
Top Abajo