📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Bipolar II is marked by periods of hypomania interspersed with periods of depression. Hypomania is basically Mania Lite™ and doesn't interfere with your day-to-day life anywhere near as much (roughly speaking hypomanic = rude to your co-workers, spending a bunch of money in restaurants, wanting to screw your partner non stop, while manic = telling your boss to go fuck himself and resigning, maxing out a credit card on designer clothes and impulse purchases, cheating on your partner with people you met in a bar). It's also possible to have a mixed state where there's all the energy of (hypo)mania but depressive feelings, which is the highest risk state for suicide.

That's not what OP said though. It sounds more like he's just emotionally unstable (aka BPD - surprise surprise - although the two can co-occur).

I wonder if any of the transmascs considered firing back on the same level? Not "I'll give you my tits if you give me your dick" (because then they'd coom about getting a real vagina and a uterus) but something like "Yeah, I'll give you my tits if you give me your broad shoulders!" or "Haha I'm game, just give me your facial hair growing abilities!".

I can tell you exactly what's going on in this picture. They've seen queer nights like this:
where people walk around in outlandish outfits or without very much clothes on (often in a "queer" way like blokes in garter belts).

These people tend to have very elaborately crafted outfits that - to a photographer from Dazed magazine, anyway - represent the very pinnacle of cool fashionable counterculture or theatrical performance, and/or (underneath the clown makeup) are generally very good looking people with good bodies who people generally want to see with very little clothes on.

Because the people who do this sort of thing (rather than conventional nightclubbing) are specifically "queer, inclusive, body positive" the crowd behind that photo have misunderstood. They've replicated "dressing crazy" (but not with the production value of a team of Central St Martin's students sewing outfits for the cool sexy people) and "not wearing much clothes" (but without the essential ingredients of people wanting to see you naked). Thus you get that photo, trying to cargo cult its way into being a sexy cool libertine counter culture queer collective (and believing that they are). The above people will pay them lip service, but seldom will you see them attend, because while they may acknowledge them as empowering and radical, they don't want to associate with or fuck them.

The nearest example I can give is an unattractive fat woman being inspired by Dita Von Teese and getting into like, burlesque open mic (yes those exist, yes I've been to them, yes they're as terrible as you'd imagine).
Yes, I see what you're talking about there. There seems to be a lot of these types in musical genres like Opera, they have this side-hustle of being pole dancers or whatnot in gay bars... but at least they're HOT, well groomed, or know how to look appealing in some way, have friends who are legit make up artists. They got into schools for stage performance in part because they had the right kind of "look", body composition and charisma that lended itself well to costume, makeup, regardless of the lighting. It's like a Renaissance sculpture in tacky garb, but at least the body itself is appealing to all eyes. Even the artists like Caravaggio, if they picked castrati as models, still picked the pretty ones. Beauty is beauty, male or female, young or old. They can pull off the gender-bending all they want, I personally might find their outfits garish or grotesque, but beauty underneath the outfit and makeup is still beauty.

I mentioned Conchita Wurst before-- looks tacky as hell to me personally, but if you see his face in his younger years, you can see the man has a very beautiful face to begin with. That ethereal beauty some men and women have... one that they often keep throughout most of their lives. He could wear a garbage bag and shave all his body hair, wear a sign indicating he has HIV, but he's still visually attractive. I think the dude got some flack a few years ago for claiming he wasn't really "trans", even though his stage name is Conchita. (I wonder if the Wurst name was also a dig at Franz Wurst-- look up Dr. Franz Wurst in Carinthia if you are curious as to what I'm referring to). Whether he likes to believe it or not, he wouldn't get away with his stage act if he wasn't conventionally beautiful to begin with.

My point is... These other "folx", they have no concept of beauty, or they're in denial about the science of beauty.
These folx just don't care. They demand that we turn our biological concept of beauty upside down. They're like incels who demand sex and approval. They think taking estrogen or whatever will transform their ugliness to something better, but it never will. They poison their bodies with artificial hormones. Artificial hormones, like any DRUGS (legal and illegal), age people in dog years. Birth control and anabolic steroids are known to cause weight gain and skin problems, issues with libido, hair loss, etc., so why do these FOLX think they are somehow different? It's obvious they are NOT. All I see are abnormally obese freaks with extreme hair loss, unattractive hair growth, unattractively abnormal bodies, wearing clothes that only SEXY and HEALTHY and beautiful people can get away with and remain visually appealing.

If they want to be beautiful and appealing, which is part of the motivation behind troonism, they'd be better off trying it the old fashioned way. They're being sold troonism as gullible and lazy consumers. The real way to improvement and improving beauty... Diet and exercise. Healthy lifestyle changes. It might not change your DNA, but it will optimize the genetic cards you were dealt.
 
The Eli Erlick 'what is a woman' thread brought some interesting results. The usual claptrap from handmaidens followed, coupled with some doctors spouting bullshit. Human Gay Male provided the best milk, though.
Link / Archive
this is a female.PNG
Which is correct. Do you think people accepted this? No, they decided to fight him on it because think of the troons.
this is a female 2.PNG
They still underwent Mullerian development, you retard.
this is a female 3.PNG this is a female 4.PNG
He never spoke about the banks. But yes, Google is free. Maybe the retard with the Ukraine flag can look up what sex is in humans before running his mouth.
Here is a handmaiden saying that is a 'terrible definition':
terrible definition.PNG
"You can't define people by this trait and then exclude them because of another trait"
Turner's Syndrome sufferers are still female because, despite having no ovaries/no eggs, they still have female reproductive parts.
terrible definition 2.PNG
"I disagree with this because sex is just so complicated we just don't know what it is"
terrible definition 3.PNG
Because transwomen are male, you stupid bitch.
Here is a troon saying that a gay man seems like a loser. Wait until the end.
you seem like a loser.PNG
you seem like a loser 2.PNG you seem like a loser 3.PNG
Here is our sweet woman who thinks she's so beautiful:
FaZ2cERXoAEBoFC.jpg
Here is a PhD linguist openly saying those with DSDs cannot be male or female as their genetics put them outside of it.
so complicated.PNG
There are a lot more responses, but I picked the best I found.
 
They always pull out these arguments about “cis women” who can’t give birth, or intersex people, but they are not either of those things. They are perfectly physically normal men, apart from being insane and very annoying. What point do they think it proves? Anyone can see they are men. We don’t need to know their chromosomes, but even if we did, they’d be men. It’s like saying you’re a real gorilla because orangutans exist, so human is a spectrum. How do we define human anyway? (a: not troons)
And if they’re right and neither exist, they’re exactly the same as everyone else in the world and can never be clocked or persecuted.
 
"I don't get super manic ... I get episodes of extreme depression and sadness ... In this episode all I feel like I want is to be absolutely fucking railed"
"Tl;dr: am currently in a hypomanic episode. All I can think about is getting absolutely railed and fucked silly"

Nah, you gotta pick actually or it doesn't have anything to do with bipolar.
Hypomania is not "super manic" like the mania that most people with bipolar I* experience. It's more like an extended high rather than the hell I understand true mania to be. You have a lot more energy, are more impulsive, tend towards destructive behavior - but not to the extent of ruining your life. You might put a thousand dollars on your credit card when hypomanic - but you're not going to quit your job, put your house up for sale, and buy a big boat to sail around the world doing coke in (from Wyoming). There's a big difference between the two types of mania.

Increased sexual desires/activity is definitely a symptom of mania (both types). It is not at all a symptom of depression!

* if you become psychotic in your hypomanic states you will end up with a "bipolar I with psychotic features" diagnosis. The presence of psychosis is automatically a bipolar I diagnosis, no matter what kind of mania you experience.
 
The Eli Erlick 'what is a woman' thread brought some interesting results. The usual claptrap from handmaidens followed, coupled with some doctors spouting bullshit. Human Gay Male provided the best milk, though.
Link / Archive
Ver archivo adjunto 3629256
Which is correct. Do you think people accepted this? No, they decided to fight him on it because think of the troons.
Ver archivo adjunto 3629257
They still underwent Mullerian development, you retard.
Ver archivo adjunto 3629259Ver archivo adjunto 3629260
He never spoke about the banks. But yes, Google is free. Maybe the retard with the Ukraine flag can look up what sex is in humans before running his mouth.
Here is a handmaiden saying that is a 'terrible definition':
Ver archivo adjunto 3629262
"You can't define people by this trait and then exclude them because of another trait"
Turner's Syndrome sufferers are still female because, despite having no ovaries/no eggs, they still have female reproductive parts.
Ver archivo adjunto 3629263
"I disagree with this because sex is just so complicated we just don't know what it is"
Ver archivo adjunto 3629264
Because transwomen are male, you stupid bitch.
Here is a troon saying that a gay man seems like a loser. Wait until the end.
Ver archivo adjunto 3629266
Ver archivo adjunto 3629267Ver archivo adjunto 3629269
Here is our sweet woman who thinks she's so beautiful:
Ver archivo adjunto 3629282
Here is a PhD linguist openly saying those with DSDs cannot be male or female as their genetics put them outside of it.
Ver archivo adjunto 3629285
There are a lot more responses, but I picked the best I found.
Instead of asking "how to define woman" we should just ask "who is certainly NOT a woman" - anyone born with a penis (esp those who use / have used it to procreate) who has to rely on medical intervention to badly imitate female characteristics.
 
They always pull out these arguments about “cis women” who can’t give birth, or intersex people, but they are not either of those things. They are perfectly physically normal men, apart from being insane and very annoying. What point do they think it proves? Anyone can see they are men. We don’t need to know their chromosomes, but even if we did, they’d be men. It’s like saying you’re a real gorilla because orangutans exist, so human is a spectrum. How do we define human anyway? (a: not troons)
And if they’re right and neither exist, they’re exactly the same as everyone else in the world and can never be clocked or persecuted.
Its a logical phalacy, if one or two exception aren't incluided on your general discription thats means that you are wrong, basically this its very pendant and give a big "wel ACTUALLY!" energy, its makes them look ( at least in their head ) cleaver. Plus the left is full of so called intellectuals that like to question the most basic stuff and say that everything is a social construct.
 
I’m sorry but it is okay to create a definition of “female” or “woman” that does not include intersex people. An individual with a vulva with internal testes is not the same as a woman, and an individual with a micro penis but partially developed female reproductive organs isn’t a woman, either. Exulansic got excoriated for this, but it is true. We can’t discard 49.9% of the population to include 0.03% of the population.
 
I’m sorry but it is okay to create a definition of “female” or “woman” that does not include intersex people. An individual with a vulva with internal testes is not the same as a woman, and an individual with a micro penis but partially developed female reproductive organs isn’t a woman, either. Exulansic got excoriated for this, but it is true. We can’t discard 49.9% of the population to include 0.03% of the population.
Intersex people are just natures fuck ups. Just like crips. We should just ignore them in conversations about how humans are actually supposed to be made.
 
trannies always act so confused as to why only “chasers” are interested in them. it’s cause usually if you live a 24/7 fetishistic lifestyle you’ll repel normal people and only attract those with your same fetish. that’s why they all date eachother.
They often also assume that any "cissie" who acts interested in them is a chaser. I've seen it several times ITT: man messages them on tinder or whatever, tranny reveals he's a tranny, man says it doesn't bother him - TWAW, etc, tranny freaks out; calls him a chaser; blocks him, tranny then whines on reddit about how all men are chasers.

I'm pretty sure at this point they are looking for reasons to be offended and REEEEEEEEEEEE.If the man they're flirting with is horrified about the tranny; they win bc bigot REEEEEEEEEEEE! If the man is accepting of a tranny; they win because chaser REEEEEEEEEEEE! Not even fat wimmins are so ~persecuted~ in their own words.

The only way to win is not to play. True in Wargames and with trannies.
 
Intersex people are just natures fuck ups. Just like crips. We should just ignore them in conversations about how humans are actually supposed to be made.
These conversations get autistic real fast, that’s for sure.

Yeah, intersex people exist.

And there are some birth defects where a person is born with six fingers or no fingers at all.

But nobody would ever pretend that there’s some huge dictionary controversy regarding how many digits on how many hands humans have.

It’s just trannies playing dumb word games.

“Hurr durr! What about INTERSEX people?! Got you shitlord! Nobody knows what a woman is!”
 
Última edición:
Yeah, I'll give you my tits if you give me your broad shoulders!
it’d be so funny to make a fake [male] twitter account and just reply to [women’s] posts with things along the line of “i’ll give you my tits if you give me that jawline!”.

you can’t really get banned for it on somewhere like twitter, but not as likely to succeed on reddit.
 
it’d be so funny to make a fake [male] twitter account and just reply to [women’s] posts with things along the line of “i’ll give you my tits if you give me that jawline!”.

you can’t really get banned for it on somewhere like twitter, but not as likely to succeed on reddit.
In before a tyranny claims that your “gimme that jawline” is a threat.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo