- Registrado
- 4 de Oct, 2020
Yes, I see what you're talking about there. There seems to be a lot of these types in musical genres like Opera, they have this side-hustle of being pole dancers or whatnot in gay bars... but at least they're HOT, well groomed, or know how to look appealing in some way, have friends who are legit make up artists. They got into schools for stage performance in part because they had the right kind of "look", body composition and charisma that lended itself well to costume, makeup, regardless of the lighting. It's like a Renaissance sculpture in tacky garb, but at least the body itself is appealing to all eyes. Even the artists like Caravaggio, if they picked castrati as models, still picked the pretty ones. Beauty is beauty, male or female, young or old. They can pull off the gender-bending all they want, I personally might find their outfits garish or grotesque, but beauty underneath the outfit and makeup is still beauty.Bipolar II is marked by periods of hypomania interspersed with periods of depression. Hypomania is basically Mania Lite™ and doesn't interfere with your day-to-day life anywhere near as much (roughly speaking hypomanic = rude to your co-workers, spending a bunch of money in restaurants, wanting to screw your partner non stop, while manic = telling your boss to go fuck himself and resigning, maxing out a credit card on designer clothes and impulse purchases, cheating on your partner with people you met in a bar). It's also possible to have a mixed state where there's all the energy of (hypo)mania but depressive feelings, which is the highest risk state for suicide.
That's not what OP said though. It sounds more like he's just emotionally unstable (aka BPD - surprise surprise - although the two can co-occur).
I wonder if any of the transmascs considered firing back on the same level? Not "I'll give you my tits if you give me your dick" (because then they'd coom about getting a real vagina and a uterus) but something like "Yeah, I'll give you my tits if you give me your broad shoulders!" or "Haha I'm game, just give me your facial hair growing abilities!".
I can tell you exactly what's going on in this picture. They've seen queer nights like this:
where people walk around in outlandish outfits or without very much clothes on (often in a "queer" way like blokes in garter belts).
These people tend to have very elaborately crafted outfits that - to a photographer from Dazed magazine, anyway - represent the very pinnacle of cool fashionable counterculture or theatrical performance, and/or (underneath the clown makeup) are generally very good looking people with good bodies who people generally want to see with very little clothes on.
Because the people who do this sort of thing (rather than conventional nightclubbing) are specifically "queer, inclusive, body positive" the crowd behind that photo have misunderstood. They've replicated "dressing crazy" (but not with the production value of a team of Central St Martin's students sewing outfits for the cool sexy people) and "not wearing much clothes" (but without the essential ingredients of people wanting to see you naked). Thus you get that photo, trying to cargo cult its way into being a sexy cool libertine counter culture queer collective (and believing that they are). The above people will pay them lip service, but seldom will you see them attend, because while they may acknowledge them as empowering and radical, they don't want to associate with or fuck them.
The nearest example I can give is an unattractive fat woman being inspired by Dita Von Teese and getting into like, burlesque open mic (yes those exist, yes I've been to them, yes they're as terrible as you'd imagine).
I mentioned Conchita Wurst before-- looks tacky as hell to me personally, but if you see his face in his younger years, you can see the man has a very beautiful face to begin with. That ethereal beauty some men and women have... one that they often keep throughout most of their lives. He could wear a garbage bag and shave all his body hair, wear a sign indicating he has HIV, but he's still visually attractive. I think the dude got some flack a few years ago for claiming he wasn't really "trans", even though his stage name is Conchita. (I wonder if the Wurst name was also a dig at Franz Wurst-- look up Dr. Franz Wurst in Carinthia if you are curious as to what I'm referring to). Whether he likes to believe it or not, he wouldn't get away with his stage act if he wasn't conventionally beautiful to begin with.
My point is... These other "folx", they have no concept of beauty, or they're in denial about the science of beauty.
These folx just don't care. They demand that we turn our biological concept of beauty upside down. They're like incels who demand sex and approval. They think taking estrogen or whatever will transform their ugliness to something better, but it never will. They poison their bodies with artificial hormones. Artificial hormones, like any DRUGS (legal and illegal), age people in dog years. Birth control and anabolic steroids are known to cause weight gain and skin problems, issues with libido, hair loss, etc., so why do these FOLX think they are somehow different? It's obvious they are NOT. All I see are abnormally obese freaks with extreme hair loss, unattractive hair growth, unattractively abnormal bodies, wearing clothes that only SEXY and HEALTHY and beautiful people can get away with and remain visually appealing.
If they want to be beautiful and appealing, which is part of the motivation behind troonism, they'd be better off trying it the old fashioned way. They're being sold troonism as gullible and lazy consumers. The real way to improvement and improving beauty... Diet and exercise. Healthy lifestyle changes. It might not change your DNA, but it will optimize the genetic cards you were dealt.
