UN Panel recommends reparations in U.S. for slavery.

I am not shitting you.

http://www.phillytrib.com/metros/u-...074-e9d0-52db-8509-2a456bd993d5.html?mode=jqm

Copy/pasta


WASHINGTON — The United States should consider reparations to African-American descendants of slavery, establish a national human rights commission and publicly acknowledge that the trans-Atlantic slave trade was a crime against humanity, a United Nations working group said Friday.


The U.N. Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent released its preliminary recommendations after more than a week of meetings with Black Americans and others from across the country, including Baltimore, Chicago, New York, Washington, D.C., and Jackson, Miss.

After finishing their fact-finding mission, the working group was “extremely concerned about the human rights situation of African-Americans,” chair Mireille Fanon Mendes-France of France said in the report. “The colonial history, the legacy of enslavement, racial subordination and segregation, racial terrorism and racial inequality in the U.S. remains a serious challenge as there has been no real commitment to reparations and to truth and reconciliation for people of African descent.”

For example, Mendes-France compared the recent deaths of unarmed Black men such as Michael Brown and Eric Garner at the hands of police to the lynchings of Black men in the South from the post-Civil War days through the Civil Rights era. Those deaths, and others, have inspired protests around the country under the Black Lives Matter moniker.
 
The whole reparations thing is retarded even if it were to happen where would the money come from? If from taxes of the American people that mean it would come from everyone including the people it is meant for. Also most of white America came here after the civil war and blacks at the time outnumbered whites hence the government encouraged the migration of people from Europe. What about mixed race black and white people does that mean they only get half the money as non mixed people? What about the descendants of people who owned slaves who now have no money will they take away their homes? How about Europe they introduced the slave trade to the New World or the Islamic world who had been enslaving Africans long before Europeans came on the scene. Why does the UN not care about actual slavery going in modern Africa or the sex slave trade that is happening everywhere in the developed and non developed world? I mean the UN really has no right to comment on American internal problems when they let Saudi Arabia a very backwards nasty nation that is really a stone age nation with modern weapons on the Human Rights Council. I understand working on modern problems currently going on in this country but no one alive today had any thing to do with Antebellum slavery in America no matter how much the SJW's whine and prostrate themselves. It will never happen no matter how much bitching Black Lives Matters, liberal arts college SJW's, or the UN do. It did not happen then and won't happen now!
 
The whole reparations thing is retarded even if it were to happen where would the money come from? If from taxes of the American people that mean it would come from everyone including the people it is meant for.

You're overthinking it. Most of them know it's stupid and it won't do anything at all, but some countries which don't like the US (Russia, Zimbabwe, etc.) will feel better about themselves.
 
There were free blacks in the South who SOLD black slaves.
The main reason America had black slavery in the first place was because Africans were willing to sell each other. The idea people have of Portuguese manhunters raiding paceful African villages only makes up for a small percent of the total enslaved Africans.
 
What about mixed race black and white people does that mean they only get half the money as non mixed people?
You have to invent a sort of "oppression calculus", where you can accurately determine someone's marginalized minority levels.
Why does the UN not care about actual slavery going in modern Africa or the sex slave trade that is happening everywhere in the developed and non developed world?
"pay attention to meee!! I'm still here!!" - the UN
 
Why does the UN not care about actual slavery going in modern Africa or the sex slave trade that is happening everywhere in the developed and non developed world?

Don't forget Saudi Arabia unless you were including them in the non developed world, because they engage in practices that are basically slavery to this very day. Oh, yeah, Saudi Arabia's heading the commission. Ha ha. Nice joke UN.
 
I'd have less of a problem with this if the majority of the rhetoric wasn't so blatantly dishonest. It's less "The U.S government participated in atrocities committed against peoples of African descent and should compensate them for their suffering." and more "Haha Fuck whitey!"
 
I see.... well, I'm of Hessian descent, y'see. So I expect reparations from the US government too because George Washington decided to be a dick and cross the Delaware and kill my people on Christmas Day. The asshole.

Also? I demand reparations from Paramount Pictures for their movie Sleepy Hollow where the proud hessian people were portrayed as a savage shark toothed Christopher Walken.

Also? Ubisoft for their portrayals of Hessian in Assassin's Creed 3. And also for just making Assassin's Creed 3. I want my $60 back.
 
I see.... well, I'm of Hessian descent, y'see. So I expect reparations from the US government too because George Washington decided to be a dick and cross the Delaware and kill my people on Christmas Day. The asshole.

Also? I demand reparations from Paramount Pictures for their movie Sleepy Hollow where the proud hessian people were portrayed as a savage shark toothed Christopher Walken.

Also? Ubisoft for their portrayals of Hessian in Assassin's Creed 3. And also for just making Assassin's Creed 3. I want my $60 back.

The Ubisoft one is somewhat valid. They'd just offer you free shitty DLC though.
 
This is retarded. What about every other country involved in the slave trade? Do they have to pay reparations? If so, wouldn't literally everyone have to pay reparations to everyone else at some point? Where does it stop and when? If not, then why are they so inconsistent on their principles? (I get that the type advocating this just have a hateboner for the US and whites, but it certainly means they have problems if they don't advocate for it equally, even with their rhetoric about privilege and institutional oppression and such.)

What about how it's essentially treating people who had nothing to do with the crimes as if they are guilty of the offense? Is that not against the rights of the accused? Is that not what is so abhorrent about North Korea's system that punishes several generations after a given "offense"? What about how most of the people alive at the time of the slave trade and slavery in the United States did not own slaves? What about all the immigrants who came after the slave trade was gone? Are they and their descendants also responsible?

Also, part of their recommendation about it is to put up statues and the like to open up a dialogue about slavery and the United States, which is retarded. People already discuss it quite a lot and it's understood to be abhorrent. Even the most racist of assholes know, unless they're completely fucktarded, that they shouldn't advocate for slavery because of the fallout of such a position.

Point is, this sort of original sin type bullshit makes no sense. You cannot control what your ancestors did and you are not them, yet these fools act as if you are precisely the same as them for sharing the same skin color, even if you have no descent from those who acted like that. Even if you were descended from slave owners and Confederates, you are not them, yet these fools would act like they are the same. It's disgusting.
 
Point is, this sort of original sin type bullshit makes no sense. You cannot control what your ancestors did and you are not them, yet these fools act as if you are precisely the same as them for sharing the same skin color, even if you have no descent from those who acted like that. Even if you were descended from slave owners and Confederates, you are not them, yet these fools would act like they are the same. It's disgusting.

It's offensive and actually just intended to be insulting. It doesn't have any chance of ever happening whatsoever, so putting it forward as a proposal is just a joke.

The fact is that an overall policy of ensuring every citizen was entitled to a good education and equal opportunity (not necessarily equal results) would, obviously, disproportionately benefit those who are currently disadvantaged, which would include more black Americans and other minorities than whites. However, it would also benefit whites who are disadvantaged. And it wouldn't insult anyone, so we couldn't do that.

Calling it "reparations" is essentially saying some white homeless guy owes Will Smith's millionaire children, just to pick an obviously absurd example. For what?
 
I see.... well, I'm of Hessian descent, y'see. So I expect reparations from the US government too because George Washington decided to be a dick and cross the Delaware and kill my people on Christmas Day. The asshole.

Also? I demand reparations from Paramount Pictures for their movie Sleepy Hollow where the proud hessian people were portrayed as a savage shark toothed Christopher Walken.

Also? Ubisoft for their portrayals of Hessian in Assassin's Creed 3. And also for just making Assassin's Creed 3. I want my $60 back.
Hessians shouldn't have been around to get their drunk asses fucked up on Christmas in the first place, that's on them.

And I'm pretty sure the Germans have since squandered any rights to whatever past reparations to which they may have been entitled.
 
Since the UN is basically just a SJW mouthpiece now, I wonder when they will change the declaration of human rights to read "Unless they are white."

The "UN" is the Security Council, what it does, and what a few other entities with actual power, like WIPO and the WTO (technically not a UN body) do.

Most of the arrant nonsense comes out of the General Assembly's plethora of bodies, which is what the actually powerful countries (Security Council members particularly the permanent ones) allow the nothing countries to do to feel like they have something important to do.
 
The perpetrators are dead and so are the victims. This proposal would be even then foolish, if the United Nudniks' gremia wouldn't be chock-full of dictatorships.
 
So, I probably have an ancestor who was a slave, does my pasty ass get a check?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo