Opinion Protesting Won't Work — How To Make Actual Changes To The Law The Way Republicans Do

Link (Archive)

Protesting Won't Work — How To Make Actual Changes To The Law The Way Republicans Do​

As shocking as the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade late last week might have seemed, what we really should be shocked by was how easy it was to do so.

Following the June 24 decision, Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi warned that, “the rights of women and all Americans will be on the ballot this November,” urging us to get out and vote.

She's not wrong but Democrats have missed several opportunities to prevent Roe v. Wade from being overturned on several previous ballots.

The rights of women and all Americans were supposed to be on the ballot 14 Novembers ago when Presidential Candidate Barack Obama was elected into office and held a Democratic majority in the Senate and in the House for two whole years after his inauguration.

The rights of women and all Americans were supposed to be on the ballot in 2019, when Joe Biden promised on his presidential campaign trail to work on codifying Roe v. Wade into law, once again failing to do it.

RELATED: If You're Pro-Life, Here Are All The Things You Should Be Advocating For

After being failed time and time again by our elected officials who are supposed to represent us how are we supposed to believe that the Democrats will actually do anything to change the way things are?

What can we actually do when it feels like there’s nothing left to do?

Democrats should start taking notes on how Republicans get things done for their side.​

Ever since January 22, 1973, Republicans and conservatives alike have been fighting to tear down the Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision during the original Roe v. Wade case.

The New Yorker reports that “groups such as the Federalist Society intensified their efforts, making staunch rightist views and allegiance a litmus test for any prospective Court appointment,” which is the reason we now have Samuel Alito on the Supreme Court.

Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas have repeatedly used the liberals’ language of rights against them in the past in order to move forward with their own agenda.

“The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia,” Scalia wrote in the 2007 District of Columbia v. Heller ruling.

Thomas extended Scalia’s argument last week when trying to justify striking down a New York gun law that has been in effect for over a century.

Thomas claimed that the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect “an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.”

RELATED: Why People Are Deleting Their Period-Tracking Apps Out Of Fear After Roe V. Wade Overturn

The right-wing is, put simply, just far more brazen and unforgiving when it comes to combatting the left.​

Supporting progressive politicians who have clear plans for both protecting abortion laws and preventing other regressive laws from being pushed through is more essential now than ever.

For example, some progressive Democrats in the Senate and House, like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have been pushing for an expansion of the Supreme Court in order to eliminate the conservative supermajority in play right now.

Speaker of the House Pelosi has flip-flopped on the subject, claiming that she supports “the president’s commission to study such a proposal,” according to The Hill, but that it’s not at the forefront of her mind.

A lot of Democrats also want to get rid of or amend the Senate filibuster, which blocks legislation from being passed unless the piece can reach a supermajority of 60 votes — something that is impossible when the Senate is split 50-50.

Republicans use the filibuster whenever possible in order to block Democrats from passing more progressive legislation but also amended it so that it couldn’t be used while appointing Supreme Court justices — which is why the Supreme Court is in the conservative supermajority it’s in right now.

However, getting rid of the filibuster seems to keep falling on deaf ears as partisan support wavers indefinitely.

Biden claims to be “working” on writing laws that would keep abortion pills available “to the fullest extent possible” across the nation, but that isn’t enough.
More progressive leaders and Democratic candidates that will actually do something with their power need to step up and make their voices heard and be placed in office.

Lobbying career politicians who don't make good on their election promises is also vital. Knowing the ins and outs of who represents you and what they stand for is the only way to enact real change.

Protesting is not enough.

RELATED: Woman Says She Was Left 'Grieving' After Learning She Was Having Another Baby Boy
 
Thomas extended Scalia’s argument last week when trying to justify striking down a New York gun law that has been in effect for over a century.

Hahahahahah! REEEE Thomas understands what the law/legislation is saying, maybe we should too! Nah, let's just try to ham fist and brute force progressive retards into office who violate the law and constitution and then whine when it gets overturned. (If ever)

Protesting is not enough.

Neither is being a moron but here we are.
 
This article doesn't say anything about how to make actual changes to the law the same way Republicans do. It's just complaining that Democrats won't stack the courts, and complaining that Republicans got rid of the filibuster for appointing Judges. I didn't know Harry Reid was a Republican, but I'm uneducated so what do I know?
A lot of Democrats also want to get rid of or amend the Senate filibuster, which blocks legislation from being passed unless the piece can reach a supermajority of 60 votes — something that is impossible when the Senate is split 50-50.
I also didn't know that literally 0 bills have passed this 50-50 split Senate since Biden took office. Absolutely nothing. 0. Nada.
 
1656435858397.png

Obama ran on that promise, in fact; he was very clear that he would consider it a priority to enshrine abortion access. Biden is openly Catholic, and has waffled between "No way I'm supporting abortion legislation" and refusing to comment entirely on the matter, for his entire career. He was also aware that gun control had no impact on criminal access and use to firearms, and then changed his tune with he helped author the crime bill he helped during the Clinton adminstration.
1656435910190.png

I mean, allegiance to the Constitution SHOULD be a critical litmus test for legislators and members of the judiciary, because their job is to pass legislation that doesn't trample the Constitution, and rule on the legality of legislation as in interacts with the Constitution. I'll even go 1 step further than Thomas' comment about implications of the 2nd and 14th Amendment for the right to "keep and bear arms", I'll flat-out suggest that the right to concealed carry is protected by the 4th Amendment right to freedom from undue searches.
 
Holy shit who would’ve thunkin that merely being as obnoxiously vocal about your moral superiority is ineffective against actual policy
 
Are they saying that yhe Republicans made it so they could breeze through SCOTUS nominees and not the democrats? Because I'm pretty sure that was Harry Reed.
 
Protesting works only if you don't do it every damn day.
At some point, people just don't care anymore, they get used to the weirdos holding signs and screaming, it becomes part of the background.

Notice how you can't go to sleep when there's something making sporadic noises but when the noise is constant, your ears get used to it and your brain starts ignoring it and you can go to sleep.

When was the last time America had 2 months in a row with no protests whatsoever?
Was it never?
 
Democrats don't pass legislation because they know:
  1. Actually passing legislation will rob them of the moral urgency that they use to scare up more votes and money.
  2. No matter what they pass, it won't be good enough for progressives.
  3. Progressives will shit themselves and do nothing, and then just Vote Blue No Matter Who, so it doesn't matter if Democrats sit on their hands.
 
Protesting works only if you don't do it every damn day.
At some point, people just don't care anymore, they get used to the weirdos holding signs and screaming, it becomes part of the background.

Notice how you can't go to sleep when there's something making sporadic noises but when the noise is constant, your ears get used to it and your brain starts ignoring it and you can go to sleep.

When was the last time America had 2 months in a row with no protests whatsoever?
Was it never?
Not to mention for some reason, they only protest in very blue areas lol.

The reason may be “a desire to not be shot by armed homeowners.”
 
Republicans use the filibuster whenever possible in order to block Democrats from passing more progressive legislation but also amended it so that it couldn’t be used while appointing Supreme Court justices — which is why the Supreme Court is in the conservative supermajority it’s in right now.
when did this happens?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo