Supreme Court Watch

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
You still didn't answer the question.
Your question has already been answered. I just told you it would violate the Constitution.

You should probably stop bringing other people's education into question, you seem to be projecting.
 
It'd be great, we'd actually get some kind of abortion discussion rooted in existing legal protections instead of some nebulous "right to privacy" that the entire legal profession couldn't pretend was legitimate.
If the right to privacy mattered so much to Dems, they’d be against vaccine passports. It isn’t the vaccine, so much as using the passport as a tracking device and as a method to limit movement.
 
Dozens of white people were mowed down in a racial motivated terror attack in Wisconsin and the nigger that did it is getting the insanity defense. A white girl was tortured to death in North Dakota by an illegal Liberian immigrant and he's getting the insanity defense even though both expressed clear intent and prior planning. And conservatives aren't doing fuck all about it. They won't even acknowledge that white people exist.
 
>Supreme courts deem abortion a states issue because they're constitution autists

>Seethe about the turtle man trying to ban it federally

>Cope and seethes harder ignoring that the bill is going to get slapped down by the constitution autists every time

>Cums and cries harder when question is answered.
You aren't answering the question. If McConnell tries to push for a nation-wide abortion ban, will you be upset about it?

And again, this site isn't 4chan.

My rights are fine. I’m all for easy access to more birth control to make it so less women have to even think about getting abortions. I’m also for voluntary sterilizations. Really, a 12-15 week limit for abortion is more than fair, unless it’s for certain exceptions like the endangerment of the mother.
Your Republicans are trying to ban birth control next, by the way. At least Thomas opened the door for it and Louisiana is trying to start that next. And I have rights over my own reproductive organs. You, however, do not. So your rights aren't just fine.

That being said, I'd say a 16 week ban is a fair compromise (with same limitations like you said). 4 months in is pretty far.

Did people have the right to not send their bodies over to Vietnam in the 1960s? "Right to your body" is a meaningless and disingenuous phrase.
They did after the draft was eliminated. I don't know if you know this, but it hasn't been the 60s in over 50 years.

I do like your user name though

Your question has already been answered. I just told you it would violate the Constitution.

You should probably stop bringing other people's education into question, you seem to be projecting.
You did NOT answer it. Would you, personally, be upset about that if McConnell did it? You refuse to answer that. Gee, I wonder why that is? The answer is because you don't care about states rights, you just want to ban abortion and this is the first step and hide behind it with "MAH STATES RIGHTS" like all ashamed Republicans do
 
Dozens of white people were mowed down in a racial motivated terror attack in Wisconsin and the nigger that did it is getting the insanity defense. A white girl was tortured to death in North Dakota by an illegal Liberian immigrant and he's getting the insanity defense even though both expressed clear intent and prior planning. And conservatives aren't doing fuck all about it. They won't even acknowledge that white people exist.
Those are black people getting away with murdering white people. Not white people being prosecuted for defending themselves against black people.
 
They're attacking you over what they ignorantly assume is constitutionally protected rights being taken away or just asking questions about what's going on back in you're ancestral lands kemosabe?
Just asking questions, but the questions are always bizarre extrapolations of what they heard on TV.

Japanese news agencies get all of their news about the US from CNN for free, pre-translated and formatted for their particular broadcast characteristics. This saves Japanese news agencies time and money and allows CNN to control the information that the Japanese public gets about what is going on in the US. Which turns out as well as you would expect.

I`ve already fielded questions about whether or not the abortion issue is really based in Christian extremism, because the CNN clips that were on TV this weekend potrayed all of the anti-abortion people as Jesus-crazed fundies.

Imagine if all you knew about Japan came from your animes, vidya, and some guy down the street who is very bad at hiding the fact that he hates Japanese people.
 
Your Republicans are trying to ban birth control next, by the way. At least Thomas opened the door for it and Louisiana is trying to start that next. And I have rights over my own reproductive organs. You, however, do not. So your rights aren't just fine.
I doubt many states would be on board with that to begin with. The chances of birth control being outlawed in any state are slim to none. This is a non issue.
That being said, I'd say a 16 week ban is a fair compromise (with same limitations like you said). 4 months in is pretty far.
At least we can agree on something.
 
They did after the draft was eliminated. I don't know if you know this, but it hasn't been the 60s in over 50 years.
There isn't an active draft. but I and almost every able bodied man over 18 in the US is registered with the selective service system as we speak. I even have a card to prove it. "Right to muh body" isn't a legally valid argument against it or abortion restrictions.
 
Those are black people getting away with murdering white people. Not white people being prosecuted for defending themselves against black people.
Oh I guess that makes it okay then. In Michican a pregnant woman pulled her CCW on two Nigresses trying to beat her and was charged with assault. She and he husband lost their jobs.
 
I doubt many states would be on board with that to begin with. The chances of birth control being outlawed in any state are slim to none. This is a non issue.
You'd be surprised. A lot of Republicans would go along with it to please their evangelical base.

There isn't an active draft. but I and almost every able bodied man over 18 in the US is registered with the selective service system as we speak. I even have a card to prove it. "Right to muh body" isn't a legally valid argument against it or abortion restrictions.
The government cannot force you to donate organs, but now they can force you to give up your uterus. That's pretty shitty if you ask me. A corpse has more bodily autonomy than a woman does.
 
The government cannot force you to donate organs, but now they can force you to give up your uterus. That's pretty shitty if you ask me. A corpse has more bodily autonomy than a woman does.
I'll be extremely interested in seeing where the pro-life trigger laws are in, say 5 years. You've called me over-optimistic before, and perhaps that's warranted, but I really don't see most of the extreme trigger laws surviving the next two election cycles.
 
You did NOT answer it. Would you, personally, be upset about that if McConnell did it?
Yes I would, he would be overstepping boundaries and trying to pass a mandate from heaven like Obamacare, the U.S. government was always meant to be small and decentralized with an emphasis on State autonomy, not an edict passing authoritarian autocracy.

Did you think I'd say otherwise?
 
You'd be surprised. A lot of Republicans would go along with it to please their evangelical base.
Outside of trad Catholics, I don’t really see many against birth control. Maybe some companies might restrict paying for birth control for their employees, but that doesn’t prevent you from getting it on your own. I’d be fully okay with subsidizing IUDs and other forms of birth control for women on welfare/low income if it means less strain on the welfare system. Kids are more expensive than birth control.
 
>Detroit
Yes, I'm going to blame it on being a libshit jurisdiction, because it is. There are on the order of 1 million defensive gun uses per year in the US. A disproportionate amount of those are against black people. Do the math. Just because its not on the tee vee doesn't mean it isn't real.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo