💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema Puck
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
Why is he so upset over BAP? Bap is only an online personality, he carries no political clout, only thing he's done is publish some gobbledygook book and shitposted online
Because he advised against going to AFPAC (1 or 2? I don't remember), and they've been twitter feuding ever since. Nick was pretty sympathetic to him before that IIRC, he even talked about BAM on his show.
 
Nick's hairy belly.

screen-shot-2022-05-01-at-9-23-16-pm-png.3326739


You're hairy, old and malding nicholas fuentes.
 
Fuentes and his catbois literally report anyone who disagrees with them for hatespeech and has tagged these organizations multiple times to attack anyone who dissents from his movement. The irony is strong.

Ver archivo adjunto 3332216
What is this spelling? Kindergarten children spell better than this ESL freak. Probably not even White, I'm guessing it's another beaner.
 
Nick is a teenage girl obsessed with twitter. BAP talked shit on twitter.

Ta-da.
This is true about any fued for Nick, if someone ever got a good shot on him he would instantly block them.

If he doesn't like someone, it is because of twitter beef because like his fans he is terminally online as well
 
"Nicholas J. Fuentes is what you call 'a confirmed bachelor.'" --PPP, February 2021
Ver archivo adjunto 3331841
"Is this what happens at America First, they eat Big Macs off young boys' bodies, in some bizarre ritual to Molloch? What else are we supposed to believe? And you know, Nick is inspiring copycats. Young men like Kansas Zoomer."
Ver archivo adjunto 3331842
"How many? How many of these groypers have actually spread their ass cheeks for Nicholas?"
Well definitely kansas zoomer, that boy's never getting laid
FTdSPepXsAEjzqn.jpg
 
Última edición:
Here's the thing about getting fuentes outed as a homo. These kinds of things will continue to happen, there will continue to be revelations, gayops, whatever, and each individual incident will have it's own levels of plausibility to them. All it takes for us though is one single time. Nick only has to fuck up once. Meanwhile, for every single incident that happens like with the recent mrkrabs9000 (still not completely convinced that wasn't nick, but w/e) him and his sycophants have to go out full force like their lives depend on it to discredit/debunk/whatever. Defending nick is not sustainable, and it will continue to have diminishing returns. We just have to watch and wait, and point and laugh.  They have to go full force every time.
 
What's really so amusing is that Fuentes reads every post here...lol! (Like a painful addiction that he can never satiate.)
So Nick...do you think you look older or younger than Metokur? Or the same age? hahahaha

Ver archivo adjunto 3331445

Nick Fuentes going to look like his child-grooming gay hero Matt Gaetz in the next 5 years as the stress and processed junk foods builds up in him

1653841226044.png 1653841335510.png
 
Live twitter spaced happening

He's seething rn because the media doesnt attack BAP. He's doing circular reasoning for his cult but cant wrap his head around the fact a guy who writes books and does non-face podcast is able to keep from being attacked vs Fuentes who profits from public appearances.
Also BAP is hard for progressives to internalize, as he is not like the evil right wing stock characters that occupy their minds. Fuentes better matches the progressive archetype of EVIL WHITE RACIST CHRISTIAN MALE, which sets them off to attack on sight, not unlike a mongoose seeing a snake.

So for example, Jason Jorjani, a controversial right wing philosopher, who had to abdicate his teaching position at at technical college, does not have a page on the SPLC website (despite his name bringing up pages of others). He largely gets away with it because his ideology is some kind of futuristic Neiszchian power fantasy based on new age woo and occultism. It goes over most progressives heads. They have a limited range of archetypes that register (notice how leftist memes love using KKK imagery in their memes and propaganda) that BAP and his crew just doesn't instantly set off.

Basically if you don't look like a cobra, or openly and loudly advocate for cobras, the progressive mongooses will largely leave you alone, though there will be some repercussions.
 
Here's the thing about getting fuentes outed as a homo. These kinds of things will continue to happen, there will continue to be revelations, gayops, whatever, and each individual incident will have it's own levels of plausibility to them. All it takes for us though is one single time. Nick only has to fuck up once. Meanwhile, for every single incident that happens like with the recent mrkrabs9000 (still not completely convinced that wasn't nick, but w/e) him and his sycophants have to go out full force like their lives depend on it to discredit/debunk/whatever. Defending nick is not sustainable, and it will continue to have diminishing returns. We just have to watch and wait, and point and laugh.  They have to go full force every time.
In all seriousness, what legitimate basis do you have to even doubt that MrKrabs9000 is Nick? I'm talking legitimate basis, not Groyper smokescreening.
 
In all seriousness, what legitimate basis do you have to even doubt that MrKrabs9000 is Nick? I'm talking legitimate basis, not Groyper smokescreening.
Well I suppose depending on how far you want to go with "legitimate" would change whether or not you find this answer to be satisfactory, but I think the circumstantial evidence suggesting it is him is more straightforward than the circumstantial evidence that suggests it isn't him. I don't want to derail the thread so if you want to keep going with this I'll gladly accept a DM but also this isn't the most important thing in the world to me nor is it any kind of hill I'm willing to die on.

Edit: read you post wrong. I just think the evidence is circumstantial. Not insubstantial, not absolutely worthless, its just not a smoking gun that can be 100% proven either way. Still believe nick is a faggot though, even in the slim chance he can somehow completely rxonerate himself in this specific incident.
 
Well I suppose depending on how far you want to go with "legitimate" would change whether or not you find this answer to be satisfactory, but I think the circumstantial evidence suggesting it is him is more straightforward than the circumstantial evidence that suggests it isn't him. I don't want to derail the thread so if you want to keep going with this I'll gladly accept a DM but also this isn't the most important thing in the world to me nor is it any kind of hill I'm willing to die on.
I am not able to send DMs because KiwiFarms discriminates against Autism. I am just interested in knowing what reasonable doubt exists in a non-Groyper's mind.
 
I just think the evidence is circumstantial. Not insubstantial, not absolutely worthless, its just not a smoking gun that can be 100% proven either way. Still believe nick is a faggot though, even in the slim chance he can somehow completely rxonerate himself in this specific incident.
Do you believe that the cum hunting incident happened?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo