The Many Miracles of Nick Fuentes - a thread documenting Nick's more blasphemous moments

remember nowhere in Tha Book does it say anything about taking it up the ass, it's not explicitly forbidden
If anyone's curious, Romans 1:18-32 explicitly mentions it as forbidden:

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,[g] in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.

24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.

26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. 29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.
 
Damn those hebrew skychiefs do be angry as FUCK, I always thought about it, wouldn't it be easier to make a list of what you're ALLOWED to do? That would be like a 2 page booklet or something, and in a very plain language.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 3276176
Can't seem to quote or reply to that Tomboy Respecter guy, which is odd since I can reply to everyone else in the thread.

I won't argue against Roman Catholicism or the concept of an "orthodox" Catholic for the moment, since it's not thread related. For the purposes of this thread, though, it should be pointed out that Mathoma is not a good-faith actor and neither is CT or really anyone in that circle barring maybe some exceptions. Anyone who's had an argument with Mathoma knows what I'm talking about. Whenever they're losing an argument, the accuse the other side of being mean, piety-signal, and then astroturf a fake moral victory. They'll change their arguments and contradict themselves mid-conversation if necessary in order to protect the institution of the papacy, because they certainly won't defend any actual specific point of doctrine. Watch them argue with an Orthodox guy about the essence/energies distinction and you'll see them take five different positions in the same conversation.

It makes complete sense that they'd share audiences with Nick.
Ah, I'm not the only one. Not to go do deep into theology sperging, but Mathomas takes on st. Palamas are hilariously retarded. Like I said, you can make a lolcow thread on the stupidities and hilariously bad takes from the e-caths. Mathoma, Mauritian, CT, Taylor "milkers" Marshal, Lolcow Loften, Eric Ybarra and many more. And I haven't yet spoken about the twitter/discord anime-caths. They are the worst of all. Coomer incels using Christianity as an excuse to hate on women, coom and politics sperg. So it wasn't a shock for me that some of them allied themselfs with nick.
I don't doubt it. I was younger and more impressionable when I cared about these gayass e-apologetics theological battles and had my ideologicsl filters untuned to any possible nonsense they might be spouting. I've since stopped caring and occupy myself with actual real life bullshit and programming. Honestly, learning a genuine trade is more productive than debating 1000 year old theological polemics/apologetics and more likely to build character as well in addition to being good grounds for evangelization.

Back on topic, does anyone have that clip of Nick saying he's as intelligent and wise as Aquinas and Jesus Christ and saying they were "based" because they hated women (they didn't, especially if you consider the story of Jesus and the Syro-Phonecian woman, Jesus and the adulteress and Jesus and the hemorraging woman, all of which show how Jesus's love and mercy extends to everyone)?
 
If the e-thomist poster boy Classical Theist is still carrying water for Nick, it does not bode well for that whole internet tradcath sphere in general. I suspect that CT's carrying water for nick has more to do with their mutual associations with the poa.st crew, but I'm sure it also has a lot to do with what happens when politi-cooming takes the center stage in your faith-based movement. You get neither.
Yeah. As a Catholic I agree. I mean don't get me wrong. Early on he showed promise. But it has become painfully apparent that the guy is now far beyond the pale.
 
Damn those hebrew skychiefs do be angry as FUCK, I always thought about it, wouldn't it be easier to make a list of what you're ALLOWED to do? That would be like a 2 page booklet or something, and in a very plain language.
You literally only had to follow 10 simple rules, which were later rephrased as two when He became incarnate (Thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thy soul, and with all thy heart, and with all thy mind; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself). With the exception of the temple rituals (which describe how He wants worship to be done) and the weirder parts of the Law (which symbolically prefigure future realities, like how circumcision prefigures baptism) everything else is just an extension of that.

Nick is to Catholicism as fedora tipper memes were to skeptics. He’s ushering in a whole new meta of Catholic mockery.

Stop making my religion look gay and cringe, Nick.
Yeah. As a Catholic I agree. I mean don't get me wrong. Early on he showed promise. But it has become painfully apparent that the guy is now far beyond the pale.
I don't doubt it. I was younger and more impressionable when I cared about these gayass e-apologetics theological battles and had my ideologicsl filters untuned to any possible nonsense they might be spouting. I've since stopped caring and occupy myself with actual real life bullshit and programming. Honestly, learning a genuine trade is more productive than debating 1000 year old theological polemics/apologetics and more likely to build character as well in addition to being good grounds for evangelization.

Back on topic, does anyone have that clip of Nick saying he's as intelligent and wise as Aquinas and Jesus Christ and saying they were "based" because they hated women (they didn't, especially if you consider the story of Jesus and the Syro-Phonecian woman, Jesus and the adulteress and Jesus and the hemorraging woman, all of which show how Jesus's love and mercy extends to everyone)?
Nick hopped onto the scene at the opportune moment when a lot of the alt-right types who had probably been gamergate types earlier were starting to realize that /pol/ memes weren't enough to build a real movement or society on, and that due to atheistic/agnostic presuppositions it was just as arbitrary and meaningless of a personal philosophy as whatever the leftists wanted. A lot of these guys started looking into religion and philosophy and read a bit of Aristotle for the first time. They were immediately hooked on what trads presented Roman Catholicism as, which was a cohesive and intellectually defensible worldview with real purpose, with a foundation in Hellenic philosophy.

For a few years, Trads were the hot new thing. Pretty soon, though, people started to realize that that's not what Rome actually is. That image reflects a chunk of their history that started more than 1000 years after Christ, and ended more than a century ago. What Rome is is actually very hard to pin down, as I'm sure you three have felt. As that becomes clearer, it's less appealing to that wave of people.

Now, Orthodoxy seems to be taking that spot as the "traditional" and "based" religion. That does bring in a lot of genuine converts, but there's also a downside. In Orthodox history, when people start talking about what's "based" externally rather than the actual internals, what you get are schisms to the right. The Russian Old Believers, the Greek Old Calendarists, and the "True Orthodox" that came from America in the past century are all examples of this. I wouldn't be surprised if one comes out of what's going on now. We'll have our own Nick, and we definitely already have our own CTs and Mathomas (although with slightly better arguments).

My point is that online tradcaths now are in the same boat as alt-right were in 2018. They have the same relationship with Orthodox as the alt-right had with them. Soon, the inevitable politicoomer Ortho schism will have the same relationship with whatever comes next. The Antichrist will be "based and redpilled".
 
You literally only had to follow 10 simple rules, which were later rephrased as two when He became incarnate (Thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thy soul, and with all thy heart, and with all thy mind; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself). With the exception of the temple rituals (which describe how He wants worship to be done) and the weirder parts of the Law (which symbolically prefigure future realities, like how circumcision prefigures baptism) everything else is just an extension of that.




Nick hopped onto the scene at the opportune moment when a lot of the alt-right types who had probably been gamergate types earlier were starting to realize that /pol/ memes weren't enough to build a real movement or society on, and that due to atheistic/agnostic presuppositions it was just as arbitrary and meaningless of a personal philosophy as whatever the leftists wanted. A lot of these guys started looking into religion and philosophy and read a bit of Aristotle for the first time. They were immediately hooked on what trads presented Roman Catholicism as, which was a cohesive and intellectually defensible worldview with real purpose, with a foundation in Hellenic philosophy.

For a few years, Trads were the hot new thing. Pretty soon, though, people started to realize that that's not what Rome actually is. That image reflects a chunk of their history that started more than 1000 years after Christ, and ended more than a century ago. What Rome is is actually very hard to pin down, as I'm sure you three have felt. As that becomes clearer, it's less appealing to that wave of people.

Now, Orthodoxy seems to be taking that spot as the "traditional" and "based" religion. That does bring in a lot of genuine converts, but there's also a downside. In Orthodox history, when people start talking about what's "based" externally rather than the actual internals, what you get are schisms to the right. The Russian Old Believers, the Greek Old Calendarists, and the "True Orthodox" that came from America in the past century are all examples of this. I wouldn't be surprised if one comes out of what's going on now. We'll have our own Nick, and we definitely already have our own CTs and Mathomas (although with slightly better arguments).

My point is that online tradcaths now are in the same boat as alt-right were in 2018. They have the same relationship with Orthodox as the alt-right had with them. Soon, the inevitable politicoomer Ortho schism will have the same relationship with whatever comes next. The Antichrist will be "based and redpilled".
At least we had Orthodoxy First’s Luke Kendrat who went on to seminary at Jordanville. A guy who actually practiced what he preached.

That said, the online Orthosphere is rife with the same types as the trad caths. Young, disaffected guys who convert because Orthodoxy is “based” and then become insufferable woman-hating faggots. Most of them tend toward the Russian tradition, as it is (at least in America) the most traditional, with the strictest rules. In the past week, I have seen way too many of them take Nick’s side, which is worrying.

The reality is that if any of these guys, whether Catholic or Orthodox, expressed to their priests the type of garbage they spew online, they would likely be corrected very quickly. There is a reason many priests warn converts about “online Orthodoxy.”
 
Strictly in terms of quality, Chris Emerson's art is not bad. If only it wasn't wasted on a faggy narcissist, it could actually be good.
 
You literally only had to follow 10 simple rules

I'm not a Abrahamic scholar but I do know the number "10 commandments" is fake news, it's a made up appropriated thing, my guy. In the OT there are I think 50 "original commandments" but even if there are only 10 (which there aren't) - it's a blatant lie and cope saying that the entire teaching of the Abrahamic Trilogy Book is condensed in those 10 rules.

You're lying to yourself.
 
Jesus withered a fig tree, Nick is as straight as an apple tree. Can anyone confirm???
 
I'm not a Abrahamic scholar but I do know the number "10 commandments" is fake news, it's a made up appropriated thing, my guy. In the OT there are I think 50 "original commandments" but even if there are only 10 (which there aren't) - it's a blatant lie and cope saying that the entire teaching of the Abrahamic Trilogy Book is condensed in those 10 rules.

You're lying to yourself.
Wubba-lubba-dub-dub to you too, my friend
 
Nick is to Catholicism as fedora tipper memes were to skeptics. He’s ushering in a whole new meta of Catholic mockery.

Stop making my religion look gay and cringe, Nick.
I find it increasingly hard to believe Fuentes isn't intentionally working to embarrass and discredit all conservative/religious/nationalist movements.
 
You literally only had to follow 10 simple rules, which were later rephrased as two when He became incarnate (Thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thy soul, and with all thy heart, and with all thy mind; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself). With the exception of the temple rituals (which describe how He wants worship to be done) and the weirder parts of the Law (which symbolically prefigure future realities, like how circumcision prefigures baptism) everything else is just an extension of that.




Nick hopped onto the scene at the opportune moment when a lot of the alt-right types who had probably been gamergate types earlier were starting to realize that /pol/ memes weren't enough to build a real movement or society on, and that due to atheistic/agnostic presuppositions it was just as arbitrary and meaningless of a personal philosophy as whatever the leftists wanted. A lot of these guys started looking into religion and philosophy and read a bit of Aristotle for the first time. They were immediately hooked on what trads presented Roman Catholicism as, which was a cohesive and intellectually defensible worldview with real purpose, with a foundation in Hellenic philosophy.

For a few years, Trads were the hot new thing. Pretty soon, though, people started to realize that that's not what Rome actually is. That image reflects a chunk of their history that started more than 1000 years after Christ, and ended more than a century ago. What Rome is is actually very hard to pin down, as I'm sure you three have felt. As that becomes clearer, it's less appealing to that wave of people.

Now, Orthodoxy seems to be taking that spot as the "traditional" and "based" religion. That does bring in a lot of genuine converts, but there's also a downside. In Orthodox history, when people start talking about what's "based" externally rather than the actual internals, what you get are schisms to the right. The Russian Old Believers, the Greek Old Calendarists, and the "True Orthodox" that came from America in the past century are all examples of this. I wouldn't be surprised if one comes out of what's going on now. We'll have our own Nick, and we definitely already have our own CTs and Mathomas (although with slightly better arguments).

My point is that online tradcaths now are in the same boat as alt-right were in 2018. They have the same relationship with Orthodox as the alt-right had with them. Soon, the inevitable politicoomer Ortho schism will have the same relationship with whatever comes next. The Antichrist will be "based and redpilled".
Yeah it is, the Ortho politics coomers came out of the woodwork in the last few week with the whole nick ting. It was gay. Some people are just retarded I guess. But tbf most people I know that converted don't care much anymore about politics. Speaking of the "True Orthodox" they are peak lolcow schizo's. They can be milked indefinitly for lols. Tho they don't hold a candle to VaticanCatholic. The most retarded group of sedes on the internet.
 
I'm not a Abrahamic scholar but I do know the number "10 commandments" is fake news, it's a made up appropriated thing, my guy. In the OT there are I think 50 "original commandments" but even if there are only 10 (which there aren't) - it's a blatant lie and cope saying that the entire teaching of the Abrahamic Trilogy Book is condensed in those 10 rules.

You're lying to yourself.
R.gif
 
Very emotional responses, as always, Tha Thumpers are always aggressive when you point out those few (a couple) discrepancies in their holy hebrew scribe from the tribe of Ishraell.

Well, still didn't refute the point that originally, the G-d came down to Moses (the chosen one, a jew of course) to hand him over a beautiful stone scribe of 50+ rules, and if some rabbis are doing the interpretation, because after all, YHWH came down from heavens for THEM because he chose THEM, so some rabbis interpret that there are actually (akchually, hehe funny meme I'm a fat loser ok, you're bowing down to jewish skymaster) endless rules, no cap no limit.

But your pastor told you "it was 10" and now you're felted. Praise be to YHWH.
 
Very emotional responses, as always, Tha Thumpers are always aggressive when you point out those few (a couple) discrepancies in their holy hebrew scribe from the tribe of Ishraell.

Well, still didn't refute the point that originally, the G-d came down to Moses (the chosen one, a jew of course) to hand him over a beautiful stone scribe of 50+ rules, and if some rabbis are doing the interpretation, because after all, YHWH came down from heavens for THEM because he chose THEM, so some rabbis interpret that there are actually (akchually, hehe funny meme I'm a fat loser ok, you're bowing down to jewish skymaster) endless rules, no cap no limit.

But your pastor told you "it was 10" and now you're felted. Praise be to YHWH.
The Law was not placed on the stone tablets, Moses has revealed it to jews orally. You sound like mentally challenged man who read too much /pol/ infographics. If you have any specific criticism that doesn't revolve about ZE JOOS, feel free to quote some bible fragments and point out what's wrong with them. Also sorry to break it to you but not everyone is american protestant. Your immense hatred of the bible and jews is quite bizarre, like chill out dude, why do you even feel the need to go on a tirade about jews every time christianity is brought up. It's quite ironic how you accuse others of having emotional response and being aggressive to your posts when you sperg out so much yourself.

Not necessarily to you, but I always found it baffling why all the combatant atheists cite only Old Testament as proof that Bible God is fake. Mosaic Law doesn't even apply to christians.
 
A lot of these guys started looking into religion and philosophy and read a bit of Aristotle for the first time. They were immediately hooked on what trads presented Roman Catholicism as, which was a cohesive and intellectually defensible worldview with real purpose, with a foundation in Hellenic philosophy.

To be honest, I think you are giving these spergs too much credit. I’m sure some of them did their reading, but I’d be willing to bet most of them just started falling in line with ideas and aesthetics the SJWs hate because they are hated by SJWs. Exercise is the most fascinating one - I would have never guessed that largely sedentary Internet loafers would start settling arguments with ‘post physique.’ Or, to return to Nick, that mustache. It is so bad it must be born of reactionary politics.

Also that picture of Nick on the rock still have me rolling. For someone who prides himself on his youth he co-signed the most boomer meme possible.
 
Classical theist is actually a YouTuber who makes really thought provoking videos on Christianity but sense i recently i found out that he supports nick Fuentes a man who has probably committed almost every sin in the bible
Here's a protip man, almost every youtuber or "online personality" who talks about politics or religion doesn't believe a lick of what they actually talk about, they just found a group of idiots they can sucker out of money or clout.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo