Business Robot Truckers Could Replace 500K U.S. Jobs - Amid a severe driver shortage, a new study says 90% of long-haul trucking could be replaced by self-driving technology.


1647766646145.png

The robots will take the most tedious, most dangerous jobs first, in most things. Trucking is no exception.

Autonomous driving engineers are squarely focused on long-haul freight, the interstate runs with almost no complexity save for a slow curve or an E-ZPass lane. As such, those routes are some of the simpler challenges on the self-driving spectrum.

The biggest hurdle may be infrastructure. The short trip from a factory or distribution center to an interstate is usually far more complicated than the next several hundred miles. The same is true once the machine exits the interstate. One solution is for trucking companies to set up transfer stations at either end, where human drivers handle the tricky first leg of the trip and then hitch their cargo up to robot rigs for the tiresome middle portion. Another station at the exit would flip the freight back to an analog truck for delivery.

Such a system, according to a new study out of the University of Michigan, could replace about 90% of human driving in U.S. long-haul trucking, the equivalent of roughly 500,000 jobs.

“When we talked to truck drivers, literally every one said, ‘Yeah, this part of the job can be automated,’” explained Aniruddh Mohan, a PhD candidate in engineering and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University and a co-author of the study. “We thought they would be a bit more dubious.”

Drivers Wanted

Trucking's market demand index, which measures the ratio of cargo to trucks available, has been running at record highs.

1647766712420.png


There are, however, a handful of big ifs. For one, the autonomous systems would have to figure out how to navigate in crummy weather far better than they can now. Second, regulators in many states still haven’t cleared the way for robot rigs. Finally, there’s the infrastructure to consider — all the transfer stations where the cargo would pass from the caffeine-fueled analog to the algorithms.

Still, if trucking companies focused only on America’s Sun Belt, they could fairly easily offset 10% of human driving, the study shows. If they deployed the robots nationwide, but in warmer months only, half of the country’s trucking hours could go autonomous.

“It is happening already, but in a fairly limited way,” said Parth Vaishnav, a climate and energy assistant professor at Michigan and co-author of the study. There are about 3.3 million truck drivers in America, though many don’t stay in the trade long. The long-haul jobs, in particular, are some of the worst. Not only are they protracted and tedious, but they are among the lowest-paid gigs. Long-haul drivers are on the road about 300 days a year and make around $47,000; short-haul routes can be trickier and, as such, pay better and attract more experienced drivers.

Not surprisingly, the long-haul workforce tends to turn over entirely every 12 months or so. At the moment, the industry is short about 61,000 drivers, according to the American Trucking Associations. “In our imagination, we see these as middle-class jobs,” Vaishnav said, “but that hasn’t been the case for awhile now.”

1647766742460.png

TuSimple, a seven-year-old startup, aims to have a fleet of self-driving trucks hauling freight
by the end of 2023.


The driver shortage is so bad that American trucking companies are trying to import drivers to ease what has become one of the most acute bottlenecks of the supply chain crisis. Truck lobbyists also are seeking to lower the minimum age for interstate drivers to 18 from 21. So when it comes to piloting an 80,000-pound machine going 75 miles an hour, the choice might come to a robot or a teenager.

Several startups are betting on the robots, including TuSimple, a San Diego, Calif.-based company that says its self-driving systems reduce fuel consumption by as much as 10%. In December, the company removed its human chaperones on an 80-mile stretch of road between Phoenix and Tucson. ( It plans to start deliveries in large swaths of the country without human drivers by the end of next year.

“We’re getting to a real level of commercial viability,” said TuSimple Chief Financial Officer Pat Dillon, “which I think is pretty exciting.”




Hahah gotta love how they keep pushing for the idea of autonomous trucks, much like "eat the bugs" articles.

I agree with a comment I've read where I pulled this from:

>I'll believe it will happen once we get autonomous freight trains.

Now this would be pretty interesting (but the transport lobby would seethe too much about it). Trains are quite literally on rails, and operate in a much more controlled environment than trucks.
 
The article defeats itself well enough but another thing that seems to be often ignored is public opinion. A Tesla running into something is one thing, a 50,000lb+ 18-wheeler running into something else is another.
Perhaps the trucker shortage problem, as with many other such shortages, stems from other factors that are more complicated than "No one wants to do the job."

The solution certainly is not immigrants.
 

Read the comments: Wonderous automated technology can't even reliably remotely shut off cars without massive fuck ups. It won't safely drive them for at least a century. The first time a car, let alone a semi, runs into a school bus, they'll be banned in the supposedly civilized world.
 
The article defeats itself well enough but another thing that seems to be often ignored is public opinion. A Tesla running into something is one thing, a 50,000lb+ 18-wheeler running into something else is another.
Perhaps the trucker shortage problem, as with many other such shortages, stems from other factors that are more complicated than "No one wants to do the job."

The solution certainly is not immigrants.
thats sort of the rub with AI, self driving cars will happen around the time sex bots will exist, even the people at the front of AI admit it can't do 100% of the job, its like pilots you still need them and pay them what they would deserve as if AI didn't exist because those last miles are the important parts.

cruise control only just became a thing in 18-wheelers in the last decade or so. so the idea of them being the first machines to be full-auto is a joke.
 
The first time a car, let alone a semi, runs into a school bus, they'll be banned in the supposedly civilized world.
Awfully :optimistic: thinking here as nothing going to happen especially if the kids are white. Parents will just take the pittance settlements as they won't do anything.
Unless of course the auto semi plows through at least a few dozen school busses with nothing but black and brown illegals future brain surgeons. Then the calls and riots for banning them will occurred.
 
Última edición:
This has nothing to do with the shortage. As Null predicted, this is a response to the Ottawa protests. Human truckers can actually seriously disrupt the lives of urban elites, and so they must be automated out of existence. (Obviously the company working on it is responding to demand, I'm talking about the article. Journos are used to prep the nigger cattle for whatever fate the elites decide will happen to them)
 
Automated driving vehicles haven't really become a thing yet and people are already trying to make automated big rigs? I guess investing in technology that doesn't currently exist is easier then actually addressing issues in the industry.
 
Awfully :optimistic: thinking here as nothing going to happen especially if the kids are white. Parents will just take the pittance settlements as they won't do anything.
Unless of course the auto semi plows through at least a few dozen school busses with nothing but black and brown illegals future brain surgeons. Then the calls and riots for banning them will occurred.
But what if a group of kids was (((white)))? :story:
 
Ah yes, those amazing self-driving vehicles that have been the subject of countless articles since about 2010 predicting that they’re just around the corner and will be everywhere within 5-10 years.
 
This has nothing to do with the shortage. As Null predicted, this is a response to the Ottawa protests. Human truckers can actually seriously disrupt the lives of urban elites, and so they must be automated out of existence. (Obviously the company working on it is responding to demand, I'm talking about the article. Journos are used to prep the nigger cattle for whatever fate the elites decide will happen to them)
This is 100% true, this talk wouldn't be happening with such fervor without the Honkening.
 
The first time a car, let alone a semi, runs into a school bus, they'll be banned in the supposedly civilized world.
The first major self driving vehicle accident to hit the news is a curious thought...

On one hand, it seems more likely that one of these machines will run over a nog first, what with how racist technology can't see blacks and how they love standing in the middle of highways.

And we know from 2020, a human driver of that vehicle could be literally the only person in the whole company willing to deliver to a neighborhood, and he'll still be literally Hitler. There is no forgiveness and no consideration for the circumstances whatsoever of you run over a nog. Vengeance is more important than the fact that you're living in a food desert of your own making just because you can't get out of the fucking highway.

On the other hand, you can't get BLM to legitimately care about an oil tanker running over a black guy out of pure consideration for the lost life, and I can't see their owners wanting to disrupt anything that can put them evil redneck truckers out of business.

On the gripping hand, if self driving trucks are allowed to get off scot-free for running over blacks, some people would consider that a happy side effect. And that would make the trucks like Planned Parenthood clinics. Sure they say that the goal is more efficient deliveries / less accidental pregnancies and safer drivers / safer sex, but is it a coincidence that these are largely deployed to zip codes full of gangbangers and gun violence? Or is there something more to it?

🤔
 
Última edición:
There are so many things that could go wrong with autonomous cars it's insane that they're pushing this hard to get them on the road. If the car's computer overheats even a little bit then that's a fucking car wreck. If it misjudges anything that's a car wreck. If it's raining that's a car wreck. If there's a fog that's a car wreck.

And all that goes without mentioning the backdoors and hacking.
 
Unless of course the auto semi plows through at least a few dozen school busses with nothing but black and brown illegals future brain surgeons. Then the calls and riots for banning them will occurred.
False. All it takes is one kid. "Justice For Donquarius" would be the Helen that moves a thousand semis.
 
And all that goes without mentioning the backdoors and hacking.
Isn't that a plus to the people who have the power to legalize the trucks? If you want to get rid of someone, fuck with the breaks on a hackable vehicle, then it's an accident and if anyone gets in trouble then the owner gets in trouble instead of the hacker's masters?
 
How do self driving trucks deal with diverse individuals deciding to obtain self-help welfare?
 
Self-driving trucks coming out anytime soon are a meme. Inclement weather and rough geography are a huge obstacle to trucking that isn't present in urban hives. How are you gonna have an autonomous truck handle snow? Is it going to pull itself over at a chain-up zone and put on chains? Is it going to automatically swap out wheels for the trucking equivalent of xtreme snow tires? Is it just going to have those on all the time and wreck the roads?

EDIT: Actually, going by Silicon Valley's historical tendency to externalize the costs of their brilliant idea onto greater society (see: all the rental bikes that get trashed everywhere), it'll 100% just have the permanent snow tires that destroy the highways.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo