Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Pretty much summed up how I feel.I don't call myself anything. Not an egalitarian, or a feminist, anti-feminist or MRA or whatever other shit exists now to describe these views, though I think that my views would align with the former the most and be mixed with certain elements from the second two positions. There are morons who would call themselves either feminists or MRAs, but others who identify with those things who aren't batshit crazy extremists like them.
With that said, I am in favor of social democracy and being in favor of equal opportunities regardless of what race or gender you are. Just like how even though I am an atheist, I don't go around trying to make these kinds of views to be what I identify with when someone asks me what I believe in. I never gave it much thought either when I called myself a progressive and wasn't aware that even that term has some negative connotations now.
When I meet a woman who says she's a feminist it feels like Russian roulette . She could be a rational feminist or an SJW calling themselves a feminist. Many guys I know don't even wait around to find out. They just assume they mean the "everything is problematic" kind and bolt.
How?I don't use the label feminist because of all the baggage, but I do support equality, and think that it's dangerous to pretend like sexism doesn't exist anymore.
Why?Feminism has been colored by chauvinistic extremism for around the past 50 years.
It's unfortunate that the movement turned out the way it did...
That shit's not progressive. It's been the social norm for 50 years.With that said, I am in favor of social democracy and being in favor of equal opportunities regardless of what race or gender you are. Just like how even though I am an atheist, I don't go around trying to make these kinds of views to be what I identify with when someone asks me what I believe in. I never gave it much thought either when I called myself a progressive and wasn't aware that even that term has some negative connotations now.
Then I dislike women because some are feminists. Honestly I feel the women are the ones trying to convince me "I'm not a feminist" and they just make it way worse.I don't call myself a feminist because I actually kind of dislike men, and I really don't believe most feminists are misandrists/female supremacists like MRAs claim. Also my opinion does not come from the feminist realm of the internet, or even the "all men are rapists" crowd, it comes from MRA circles and other primarily male circles. Honestly I feel that feminists are the ones trying to convince me #notallmen while MRAs make it way worse. But other than that I'm pretty feminist, somewhere between 2nd and 3rd wave. I like Christina Hoff Sommers but don't agree with a lot of what she says. I don't like Anita, Zoe and others like them.
Yes men's rights is worse than women's rights.I'm a feminist. Don't like Anita, Zoe or any of the big Gamergate girls. Obviously fucking hate the fucktards on the other side of the debate even more. MRAs can kiss my diaper
It's a shame MRAs are referred to in a contemptuous manner these days because gender politics is fucking dumb. Now no one wants to call themselves a "MRA", because they'll be unfairly lumped in with MRAs.It's a shame that feminists (and feminism itself) are referred to in a contemptuous manner these days because of the obnoxious radicals ranting about patriarchy and shit- especially since women are still treated abysmally in many parts of the world.
Now no one wants to call themselves "feminist", because they're unfairly be lumped in with angry misandrists (and hypocrites).![]()
How?Loosely, yes. But like any person like a lick of sense I hold a pretty deep contempt for radical feminists. I think they're just as damaging, if not more so, than the people who plug their ears and say "la la la sexism is over."
You must not be familiar with American universities.I gladly identify myself as a feminist. I personally think the amount of people who claim to be feminist but are primarily SJWs is wildly overblown. The idea of a SJW in general is seems like one of those comically exaggerated things that doesn't exist for the most part off of tumblr. It's like people complaining about hipsters a few years past, it's the new Internet boogeyman who we can all agree sucks, but really doesn't exist a whole lot in our day-to-day personal lives.
There's always going to be people who take a stance way too far in any given social movement. Had you lived half a century ago, would you've been careful not describe yourself as a supporter of the Civil Rights Movement so you weren't confused with Malcolm X's ideology?
It's a question that definitely deserves answering.
Women vote. What potential was squandered? What should the feminists be promoting which they currently aren't?If you're asking about why it's unfortunate the movement turned out it did...
I believe that feminism had great potential, but it has become squandered in the face of charlatans and gender-supremacists.
Women's suffrage is an example of a worthy goal met by feminists
get laid lolHow?
Why?
That shit's not progressive. It's been the social norm for 50 years.
Then I dislike women because some are feminists. Honestly I feel the women are the ones trying to convince me "I'm not a feminist" and they just make it way worse.
Yes men's rights is worse than women's rights.
It's a shame MRAs are referred to in a contemptuous manner these days because gender politics is fucking dumb. Now no one wants to call themselves a "MRA", because they'll be unfairly lumped in with MRAs.
How?
You must not be familiar with American universities.
I personally believe that feminism's purpose is mostly done, but they could have formed a centralized group to fight for womens liberties- Like the ACLU, or something.Women vote. What potential was squandered? What should the Feminist movement be promoting which it currently isn't?
Unless you're seriously under the belief that any -ism, be it sexism, racism, anti-semitism, etc, simply doesn't exist, it's bad to act like such a thing doesn't exist. If there is a societal problem with say, racism, it's best to acknowledge its existence, rather than sweep it under the rug and act like it isn't there. For example, people particularly began declaring that racism, at least against blacks was over once Obama was elected president, but the multiple protests and riots in communities across the countries due to tension between the populace and police attest otherwise. If you personally believe racism wasn't an issue, going out and saying, "lol racism doesn't exist," wouldn't be a good idea either, it would only make rioters more brazen--the destruction more rampant.
That shit's not progressive. It's been the social norm for 50 years.
MRAs as a whole seem to have more vile rhetoric and beliefs than the opposition. It's not to say that there aren't any legitimate concerns, but it's not as if people who identify themselves as feminist or egalitarian don't believe the same. You don't have to create an entirely new social movement to address it.Then I dislike women because some are feminists. Honestly I feel the feminists are the ones trying to convince me "I'm not a feminist" and they just make it way worse.
Yes men's rights is worse than women's rights.
I think the whole moral of this thread is that be it MRA or feminist, they are both seen contemptuously simply for what other people may misconstrue it as. Like, you know, the part where you dumb-rated me and got snarky because I said I'd describe myself as a feminist.It's a shame MRAs are referred to in a contemptuous manner these days because gender politics is fucking dumb. Now no one wants to call themselves a "MRA", because they'll be unfairly lumped in with MRAs.
Radicals on any side of a spectrum tend to damage and embolden the opposition. Decrying the opposition as being a bunch of evil pigs rather than trying to come together peacefully and make your case is obviously going to piss off the people on said opposition more.
You must not be familiar with American universities.
If the Nation of Islam followers had been by far the most vocal group in the Civil Rights movement and not MLK's, then I doubt we would look back at it as good thing at all.There's always going to be people who take a stance way too far in any given social movement. Had you lived half a century ago, would you've been careful not describe yourself as a supporter of the Civil Rights Movement so you weren't confused with Malcolm X's ideology?
Why do you care so much about racists? Why do racists need such attention?Unless you're seriously under the belief that any -ism, be it sexism, racism, anti-semitism, etc, simply doesn't exist, it's bad to act like such a thing doesn't exist. If there is a societal problem with say, racism, it's best to acknowledge its existence, rather than sweep it under the rug and act like it isn't there. For example, people particularly began declaring that racism, at least against blacks was over once Obama was elected president, but the multiple protests and riots in communities across the countries due to tension between the populace and police attest otherwise. If you personally believe racism wasn't an issue, going out and saying, "lol racism doesn't exist," wouldn't be a good idea either, it would only make rioters more brazen--the destruction more rampant.
Before feminists violated the separation of church and state and made marriage a government program, gays could get married. Civil rights also made it illegal to throw the shop owners who refused to segregate their businesses in prison and confiscate their property anymore. Yeah, I wouldn't hire a black person because then I can never fire him or he might sue me for discrimination and then I'd lose everything. Same with orthodox jews and disabled people.We literally just had to have the Supreme Court decide only months earlier than it isn't acceptable for states to deny people rights depending on their orientation. Falling back on that same Civil Rights/racism reference, we only fifty-one years ago passed a law saying it wasn't okay to discriminate against people or segregate them. Fear or certain minorities, particularly Muslims after 9/11, and particularly reignited now in the wake of Paris, have only furthered this tension. I'd love it if what you said was true and been so for many years, but that's sadly not the case. Discrimination and prejudice is still a problem.
They don't believe the same. Feminists are against MRAs and MRAs are against Feminists.MRAs as a whole seem to have more vile rhetoric and beliefs than the opposition. It's not to say that there aren't any legitimate concerns, but it's not as if people who identify themselves as feminist or egalitarian don't believe the same. You don't have to create an entirely new social movement to address it.
And racists. Racists are seen contemptuously simply for what other people may misconstrue it as.I think the whole moral of this thread is that be it MRA or feminist, they are both seen contemptuously simply for what other people may misconstrue it as. Like, you know, the part where you dumb-rated me and got snarky because I said I'd describe myself as a feminist.
It all sucks.Radicals on any side of a spectrum tend to damage and embolden the opposition. Decrying the opposition as being a bunch of evil pigs rather than trying to come together peacefully and make your case is obviously going to piss off the people on said opposition more.
#BlackLivesMatter #MizzouI've only attended an American university for multiple years. Sorry if that's not good enough.
That's true to some extent, however women still have babies and usually want to stay home with them for a while.Feminism is a method through which I express my dominance over weaker men. I want to liberate hypergamy so that my rivals will become incels and I will become a Chad
But I do think that traditional gender norms are economically obsolete and as a result the long term efficient orientation will no longer be a monogamous family unit in which the woman stays home and the man works
What I said was that in the long term the efficient family structure will involve one woman who specializes in childrearing and the other women will take a little time off after giving birth but will quickly go back into the workforce.That's true to some extent, however women still have babies and usually want to stay home with them for a while.