📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[NOT THE BEEEEES!]

They do not want muscle to break down, they pretend it's gonna happen to dismiss valid concerns that would hinder their inclusions in some gendered spaces

I found some pure insanity
Who made fun of the troon by pretending to be threatened by their beauty and brain? it's not kind.
Ver archivo adjunto 2917059

Too “hot”? Maybe to futa fetishists and closeted gay men.

I went onto the old tracker and was met with this,
Ver archivo adjunto 2917132
And I could only think of every transgender subreddit, ever.
I then realised you can search words and it will bring back results for comments as well as posts. Surprised I didn't get a MTF claiming to have bloodless periods.

Spoiler: FTMs Triggered by Period Tracker

A gay boy who didn't take it in the backdoor like a Champ? What are you, a pussy?
Ver archivo adjunto 2917062
"How can gynaecologists be more accepting/accomodating of LGBTQ+?"
Ver archivo adjunto 2917064
Yes. Changing language for less than 1% is really worth it.
Ver archivo adjunto 2917075
Ver archivo adjunto 2917078
How about you guys just get over it and stop demanding that everything cater to you, when most of you will re-identify as straight women or lesbians in 10 years time?

Ver archivo adjunto 2917084
Ver archivo adjunto 2917085
They are triggered by literal colors and packaging. These people don't know hardship.
Ver archivo adjunto 2917088
I don't even have the words...
Ver archivo adjunto 2917094
You can literally use a calendar to track your periods and symptoms. Alternatively, make your own fucking app that has fire, monster trucks and beer as the theme.
Ver archivo adjunto 2917102
Yeah, donate a uterus to a male who has a male skeleton, that isn't fit to accomodate a healthy baby. Let's put the wellbeing of unborn babies at risk, to validate them. Even to transplant a uterus into a female is ghoulish narcissism that puts the potential baby's health at risk, purely because they "need" to birth it. That's not being a parent.
Who other than a coombrain would use the term "breedable" in place of fertile?
Ver archivo adjunto 2917108
Ver archivo adjunto 2917111
"Dear companies, please stop using vivid colors. Sure, it helps convey which brand and product it is, and yeah it sure makes it much easier to spot from a distance, particularly for those of us with poor vision, but please use only gray on all packaging, because it hurts my feelings. #BoysBleedToo."
Ver archivo adjunto 2917125
Attention females, if you have short hair and like wearing men's clothes, you are now men, please sign up to the draft immediately."

USE THE CALENDAR APP ON YOUR PHONE!!!! Srsly. Women have been using regular calendar apps to track periods for decades. And before that, they used paper calendars. And before that… idk, bones, or something?

So this is going to be old hat to many of you I'm sure, but reading this article led me to the story of Synthia China Blast, who is in prison for raping and murdering a 13 year old girl. I found a Jezebel article portraying Blast is a very positive light, and was struck by this:

Ver archivo adjunto 2917156

The "never convicted" link does not show that Synthia was not convicted of rape. It links to a dismissed mistrial motion. I can't find anything anywhere saying he wasn't convicted of rape. So that's just a straight up lie in the text there, banking on people not reading the content of the links they provide as proof. It also seems like this dude was a gang member and rolling with gangs early. He says he felt like a girl on the inside, but what evidence is there of him being trans in any way prior to incarceration at 16? Nothing anywhere states that he was anything other than a typical masculine male at any point other than years later in prison.

The Jezebel article and the SRLP page all couch their language in talk about poverty and systemic violence, but don't mention the crime at all. It's really fucking sickening to see the way people are going to bat for this dude. He isn't some gangbanger who killed someone accidentally in a drug trade, something you can argue emerges out of systemic forces. This was deliberate deviant behavior of a psychopath. There's no way they would accept any of these arguments if he didn't choose to identify as trans afterwards.

I never read Jezebel, but I saw people quote it all the time. I didn't realize it was such trash and so hypocritical.

Jezebel has always been libfem trash.

Ver archivo adjunto 2917447
I'm pretty sure that a chair is different from a horse, even if they share similar qualities and conflating the two is probably a fallacy of some sort

So… using semantics to declare a living being “a piece of furniture i can sit on”. Yeah, sounds like troons.

Ver archivo adjunto 2917640

Using your father’s death to get that sweet validation. Just troon things ~uwu~

 

[Marvin]

Ver archivo adjunto 2917447
I'm pretty sure that a chair is different from a horse, even if they share similar qualities and conflating the two is probably a fallacy of some sort

Is this trying to pull some clever take on the "woman: adult human female" thing?

I don't get it.

(also, horses aren't seats; with saddles, they merely have seats on their backs, but whichever, I've given this way more thought than this deserves)

 

[Ona Quest]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=oDafRjNu_rI:382

The pure insanity in the comments. Glad Cheryl, over here, knows the difference between a theory and a hypothesis.

Dude, no blood, no period. Also, hormone pills are basically birth control pills which means no period. Like, c'mon

 

[TheBigZee]

Ver archivo adjunto 2918433
The pure insanity in the comments. Glad Cheryl, over here, knows the difference between a theory and a hypothesis.
Ver archivo adjunto 2918435
Dude, no blood, no period. Also, hormone pills are basically birth control pills which means no period. Like, c'com

Someone in my personal circles confided in me that the "trans period" sounds like they're just parroting a midol commercial and tropes about women on the rag. Lia Thomas got me over being hated and just encouraging people to read what JK rowling actually wrote, or watch that librarian bring up age appropriateness. That schoolboard hearing was lulz, he refused to acknowledge the woman board member calling for a point of order.

 

[Captain Fitzbattleaxe]

Ver archivo adjunto 2917447
I'm pretty sure that a chair is different from a horse, even if they share similar qualities and conflating the two is probably a fallacy of some sort

I like this meme. It really showcases how retarded troons are. The definition cleary states that a chair is a seat. A horse is not a seat.

 

[Mellow Malevolent]

It takes two brain cells to see that Jurassic Park’s “moral of the story” is directly opposed to the butcher horror show that is the transgender movement.

They missed the point of the book/movie so hard that a hundred middle school reading teachers rope when they try to make it about being pro-trans.

It’s really abysmal and telling that grown adults can miss the point that hard. But I mean, they’re troons. So of course they would. But on the other hand - is this how bad the US education system is? Shouldnt most adults have learned the basics of analyzing literature & film sometime in like the 8th grade? Jurassic Park isn’t some deep and complex plot either. It’s like candy with a pretty easy moral/theme to figure out.

Maybe it’s just my own autistic pet peeve.

I don't know, I think this sort of relates to the history talk previously, and even the intersex talk. It's just more examples of taking information and ideas and removing the context to make a poor argument.

Like this, for example:

Is this trying to pull some clever take on the "woman: adult human female" thing?

I don't get it.

(also, horses aren't seats; with saddles, they merely have seats on their backs, but whichever, I've given this way more thought than this deserves)

They're trying to make reference to a fallacy of definition. The point here is the idea that TERFs provide definitions that are overly broad and can apply to multiple things (humans who menstruate= trans men and cis women!) as though they have formal logic on their side, except they have to really stretch the semantics to make it work. This is also ignoring that their own definitions of gender are essentially tautologies now. Based on the videos above, it's not even clear how you would go about defining what a trans person is, if we cis and trans people do not differ in any meaningful sense.

 

[behindyourightnow]

Transgenderism doesn't develop organically. That's why they need to have a blanket ban on scientific dissent and even jokes.

I think there is some confusion about levels going on here: when i talk about ideas developing organically, I mean high-level ideas that end up influencing the culture, I don't think that John Money or Judith Butler are CIA plants. Same for all the other thinkers whose ideas are now dominating the American left. The current state of discourse around transgenderism is not completely organic obviously, but I don't know exactly what's behind that. Obviously the media and NGOs and governing bodies have played a large part in spreading perceived consensus, and that's due to both the influence I talked about and the more specific pro-troon influence from organizations like Arcus.

Plus, the population has all been taught for years that the most important thing happening in America is [stupid culture war issue of the day] and that all their friends will reject them if they disagree with that issue, so they play along in order to get along with their tribe.

But there is probably also a genuinely organic element to it in terms of, for example, troons just being really, really good at enforcing consensus online. I don't think the tranny jannies needed any outside help or support in taking over Reddit, for example; they just have no lives and are very dedicated to their hatred of women disagreeing with them. And then the pre-existing culture in America also favors troonism in a lot of ways (for example, being preferable over homosexuality to a lot of conservatives). A perfect storm, in other words.

Also the people at the top do conspire. They read the same books and go to the same conferences to watch the same powerpoint presentations about how to destroy solidarity. I agree with you mostly, not trying to give you a hard time.

True I suppose, my point was that there is no need to conspire, or for Specific Powerful Person A to have ever talked to Specific Powerful Person B for them to have the exact same aims and even do the same things. They wouldn't all be reading the same books or watching the same powerpoints if they weren't already in agreement about what their ultimate goals are.

That's about when we'll start seeing actual violence against trannies. It's always fun when people don't bother learning much history and proceed to repeat its mistakes, and I imagine most trannies have no idea who Gary Plauche is. But if they start hurting or killing kids for misgendering them, they'll learn pretty quickly why he didn't do any jail time for doing what any good father would have done.

Trannies and AGPs have already murdered children. Off the top of my head: Diana Rivers who killed two lesbians and their adopted son, the FTM school shooter, the guy who murdered his son after the son found his porn pictures, and an AGP who murdered a random woman and her baby. No one cares. Victims are collateral damage.

 

[The Emperor Skeksis]

She started T a year ago and manages to look like a cross between Lawrence from Funhaus and Adam Driver. Here is her transition video.

Sucks for her that's she is an extremely unattractive woman, but trooning isn't going to help that.

 

[lady stoneheart]

Eww they showed his dick????

they show his bulge in AGP silk panties

Under this comment, Mitchfest was mentioned.
Ver archivo adjunto 2917833

From my understanding, Mitchfest has been a target for AGPs since the 1990s. In 2013, Red Durkin, a troon, created a change.org petition. Of course, numerous, major LGBT advocacy proceeded to boycott Mitchfest and blacklist artists that performed there

Here is the AGP that managed to shut down a music festivel that began in 1976:Ver archivo adjunto 2917851

don’t forget the one of the most prominent anti-Michfest activist troons Dana Rivers also murdered a lesbian couple and their son who were longtime attendees.
not the most thorough source but a good jumping off point

also, sharing your pronouns is no longer in vogue which i think is hysterical. i’ve been seeing rumblings that some troons don’t like this for a couple years, but i just saw this video on TikTok with 50k likes and the comments are all troons bitching about how sharing your pronouns “outs” them (lol sure) and is performative activism and no one should do it any more.

after years of troons screaming about wanting us to do this, now that well-meaning but retarded HR departments are implementing this against the 99%’s will across the nation, it is actually bad and troonsphobic!!! troons will NEVER be happy, no concession made for them will ever satisfy them, because they don’t actually want to be happy and they don’t have reasonable goals, they just want to inflict their narc rage fetish on as many people as they can. anything they ask for, as soon as someone gives it to them, it is no longer good enough.

 

[behindyourightnow]

Ver archivo adjunto 2918433
The pure insanity in the comments. Glad Cheryl, over here, knows the difference between a theory and a hypothesis.
Ver archivo adjunto 2918435
Dude, no blood, no period. Also, hormone pills are basically birth control pills which means no period. Like, c'com

It's interesting how most of their "period symptoms" are exactly those you would hear about from watching shitty movies and not those that most women actually experience. And that they seem to think that all periods follow calendar months lol.

But let's face it, this isn't really about periods. This is about them refusing to let women have anything that sets them apart from troons, or that women can claim as their own. AGPs can't make themselves get periods, but they can claim to get periods and demand that people play along and give them the attention and validation they think they deserve.

A lot of married AGPs claim that their cycles have synched up with their wives' (note: this doesn't actually happen to women in reality) which is clearly a way for them to narcissistically redirect any attention back onto themselves any time that their wife experiences anything female that she might dare to claim as her own. Male troon lying in bed weeping and eating chocolates (because that's what a movie he saw in the 90s told him periods were) while his wife, who's actually suffering from cramps, limps around attending to him.

Mark my words, it's only a matter of time until we see handmaiden wives literally giving birth sitting between an AGP's legs like in The Handmaid's Tale. Why would you want to deny a poor suffering transwoman the birth experience? What are you, a TERF?

 

[Mellow Malevolent]

You can tell there's a tiny voice at the back of
their brains saying "but if I don't get a period, how am I a real woman?". Some tiny rational part that knows what they want is impossible.

Faced with either admitting the truth or doubling down, they double down.


E: Also Moon cycle lol. AGP is just incel nerds wanting to get in on the earth goddess new age female empowerment movement. They want the magic wicca powers too!

 

[Notorious AGP]

The Nazi memes are apparently getting out of hand again on r/traa:

Apparently, lots of you have decided to reward people again for their…

archived 25 Jan 2022 07:43:55 UTC

archive.md

I still feel rly bad about this : traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

archived 25 Jan 2022 07:42:29 UTC

archive.md

Germany Oneesan / Anime Girl's Nazi Past | Know Your Meme

archived 15 Jun 2021 07:07:28 UTC

archive.md

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Her thread on how biological sex doesn't exist can be found here. Archive.

Ver archivo adjunto 2918094
Ver archivo adjunto 2918095

"'Sex' attempts to summarize many variables into a binary that works for most, but not all, cases."

It only works accurately 99.8% of the time, it's a practically worthless model!

Alex Petrovnia has also given another hot take, this time with biological sex being a TERF dogwhistle.

Link. Archive.

Ver archivo adjunto 2918136
Ver archivo adjunto 2918138

If you lie about the "rising violence" against trans people simply to try and declare a reasonable and unharmful debate permanently off limits then why should I believe you about TERF dogwhistles or sex or anything else?

 

[Alabamavillain]

also, sharing your pronouns is no longer in vogue which i think is hysterical. i’ve been seeing rumblings that some troons don’t like this for a couple years, but i just saw this video on TikTok with 50k likes and the comments are all troons bitching about how sharing your pronouns “outs” them (lol sure) and is performative activism and no one should do it any more.
IMG_3733.MP4after years of troons screaming about wanting us to do this, now that well-meaning but retarded HR departments are implementing this against the 99%’s will across the nation, it is actually bad and troonsphobic!!! troons will NEVER be happy, no concession made for them will ever satisfy them, because they don’t actually want to be happy and they don’t have reasonable goals, they just want to inflict their narc rage fetish on as many people as they can. anything they ask for, as soon as someone gives it to them, it is no longer good enough.

They did the same thing with the abomination that was "womxn". It went from totally inclusive and TERFs are evil for objecting to it to a TERF invention to say trans women aren't women.

Exactly like you said, they will never be satisfied.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Also always found it funny how people who claim to be born the wrong gender is considered "valid" and stunning and brave, but people who claim to be born the wrong race are chastised, labeled racist and not considered valid.

I actually think the transracial thing is a bigger timebomb that the trans movement realizes. So far they've pushed it off by claiming the examples that exist (it's more than just Dolezal, there was of course Krug, but also H. G. Carrillo, who claimed to be Afro-Cuban and wrote a whole biography of coming to the US, who turned out to be just a black guy from Detroit) are just feeding into "stereotypes", not like trans woman and their "authentic" experience of gender. But there's really no part of trans logic that makes transracialism make less sense. And there's already been people asking "well if they really feel it inside, why shouldn't we respect it?". If gender dysphoria, why not racial dysphoria? The only reason people feel differently about it is because sex is at least a binary, so you can conceive of potential biological origins of having a switch flipped the wrong way more easily than you can imagine someone having a different race on the inside. But if they keep pushing this non-binary xenogender bullshit, that goes out the window too.

That's why there's such a tension in the trans community over looking for biological sources. Identifying a neuroanatomical source means medicalization and gatekeeping, it creates criteria that can be used to push back and resist the pure self-identification trans people want. But without some sort of marker in physical reality, being trans is the same as being otherkin (it is the same, but they don't want to admit it).

This actually caused an epic shit storm almost five years ago when a philosophy professor did exactly this and was accused of "epistemic violence" that committed “egregious levels of liberal white ignorance and discursive transmisogynistic violence" and a whole bunch of people resigned from the journal that published her paper and others publicly threatened to ruin her career:

Hypatia transracialism controversy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

https://archive.ph/20170512172506/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hypa.12327/full (the paper is readable here)
https://www.pdcnet.org/C1257B82005A.../$FILE/philtoday_2018_0062_0001_0077_0092.pdf (a response by the professor to some criticism)

If this is feminism... - The Philosophical Salon

The dust-up on social media over Rebecca Tuvel’s article, “In Defense of Transracialism” published in Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, has given a new meaning to the public/private split ... Read More

thephilosophicalsalon.com

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/05/transracialism-article-controversy.html (JESSE SINGAL of genociding troons fame's article on it)

An example of the complaints about the paper:

An example of the maximum insanity by another professor is here:

 

[behindyourightnow]

"'Sex' attempts to summarize many variables into a binary that works for most, but not all, cases."

It only works accurately 99.8% of the time, it's a practically worthless model!

Are there any definitions that work in 100% of cases? Like, ask a biologist to define "species" or "life" (but bring some bottled water and a comfortable chair, since you'll be there a while). But for some reason it's only the idea of "sex" that must be abolished because it's possible to find exceptions to it.

Christ, these people are dumb:



No, moron, people put "biological" in front of "sex" because otherwise it sounds like you're talking about fucking. You might know that if you ever interacted with an actual human outside of your sexless dissociated internet cocoon.

Also, who transitions to a "binary trans man" and then keeps what sounds like a feminine patronym?

She's a pretty amazing cow overall:

WE ARE SUFFOCATING. WE ARE DYING. *continues to tweet* WE ARE BEING GENOCIDED *heats up a bucket of chicken wings for lunch and returns to computer screen* LITERALLY DYING RIGHT NOW *closes browser window to watch some anime* YOUR INACTION COSTS LIVES *falls asleep in computer chair*

 

[Mellow Malevolent]

=
Ver archivo adjunto 2918683

I like how nothing in this argument explains how these points don't apply to trans women. The hierarchy of oppression is taken as a given and used as a defense of the critique. If transracialism is anti-black, how is MTF transgenderism not anti-woman? Prior to transitioning, the dynamic are the same.

Are there any definitions that work in 100% of cases? Like, ask a biologist to define "species" or "life" (but bring some bottled water and a comfortable chair, since you'll be there a while). But for some reason it's only the idea of "sex" that must be abolished because it's possible to find exceptions to it.

This is one of the annoying things about people not understanding philosophy, and trying to use it. The abstract concept of sex is a cultural construct referencing a physical fact that we can recognize. The definition of sex is trying to lay out the necessary and sufficient conditions for calling something man or woman. But definition can vary by the context. You could argue that, in terms of genetics, karyotype determines sex, but decide that the external phenotype determines sex for the purpose of the social/legal definition of women. That doesn't mean that the concept of woman has no inherent truth or recognizability, even if you can't make a definition that holds in all contexts. There is a some core descriptive truth that is being reached towards

A good example of the same idea is continents. A continent is a large landmass. But, in the context of geology, do you extend the definition to include the submarine continental shelf? Culturally, is Europe a continent because it is considered culturally separate from Asia, or are they the same Eurasian continent? Does Africa count as a separate continent because the connection it has to the Eurasian landmass is so small? Are Islands part of continent (see the definition of continental Europe as excluding England and Ireland)?

All of the above ambiguities can hold, and you can still say it would be wrong to refer to Alcatraz as a continent. Without having to set out exactly what the definitional boundaries of the word continent is, you can tell from the examples provided that a tiny island is not part of that set. TRAs and troons act like they are the first humans to discover that there's some ambiguities and limits to ontology and formal logic, as if this hasn't been a thing people have been discussing since we started using words. It's like a first year philosophy student talking about Plato's cave and acting like we should have our minds blown by the fact that on some level objective truth is unknowable.

 

[Treasure Champs]

Are there any definitions that work in 100% of cases? Like, ask a biologist to define "species" or "life" (but bring some bottled water and a comfortable chair, since you'll be there a while). But for some reason it's only the idea of "sex" that must be abolished because it's possible to find exceptions to it.

Generally definitions are not 100%, but usually it's very easy to point out to a logical person that odd exceptions do not disprove rules. Children born with 11 fingers don't prove that 'humans have ten fingers' is not true, it just means something goes wrong in a very small percentage of cases. A 99.98% rule with a 0.02% exception rate was not a spectrum according to any biologist or scientist of any kind until they realized they'd be harassed, threatened, and ostracized unless they stfu and started saying things like 'but well of course, socially, it's true that...'

Part of my irritation with such people is how easily they abandoned the principles of their craft. Twenty years ago if you said 'people experience having opposite sex minds so sex is not clear cut' they'd have said, 'yeah I'm sure some people say that, if you're interested in what people say about themselves, the psychology department is down the hall, here we deal with facts'.

Ditto with 'biological sex' is a TERF dog-whistle REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE. Any good (or medicore, or slightly bad) scientist would be able to point out that the term existed thousands of years before TERFs and therefore could not be a dog whistle for a protest against an ideology that was born in 1995. If they were not too afraid of getting cancelled.

WE ARE SUFFOCATING. WE ARE DYING. *continues to tweet* WE ARE BEING GENOCIDED *heats up a bucket of chicken wings for lunch and returns to computer screen* LITERALLY DYING RIGHT NOW *closes browser window to watch some anime* YOUR INACTION COSTS LIVES *falls asleep in computer chair*

The histrionic ones are my favorite. I wonder if they actually believe in the little world they've created, where poor downtrodden kweer trans of color are beaten to death in the street every day on their way to feed the homeless and save babies from drowning. TERFs rove around in gangs looking for gender non-conforming toddlers so they can beat it out of them early. And everyone has an immutable, supremely important gender soul that dictates their sex and is obvious from birth, except in the case of the declared genderfluids, whose sex changes, but who know they are genderfluid so that's okay, and middle-aged men who say their gender has evolved especially after they are arrested, and desisters who were never really trans but just thought they were and are probably just terfs trying to prove a point.

 

[Positron]

Ver archivo adjunto 2918433
The pure insanity in the comments. Glad Cheryl, over here, knows the difference between a theory and a hypothesis.

Both hypotheses will be easy to disprove. As far as I know no one ever tested the GnRH secretion in men claimed to be women, but menstruation only involve the constriction and dilatation of the spiral arteries inside the uterus, not "the pelvic circulatory system" in general. So yup: the uterus is sorta essential for menstruation.

No, moron, people put "biological" in front of "sex" because otherwise it sounds like you're talking about fucking. You might know that if you ever interacted with an actual human outside of your sexless dissociated internet cocoon.

It is not the concept of "sex" is insufficient; it is the brains of trannies that are insufficient. And I don't know why normal people should celebrate "prides".

 

[Notorious AGP]

Do these people hear themselves? Women's healthcare isn't about women apparently:

"[Women's healthcare's] not *about* you ("cis" women), for fucks sake."

"As if trans men and nonbinary people with [female] anatomy aren't literally being turned away from healthcare that can prevent diseases and save lives because they don't fit [under the definition of woman]."

I hate how cis women always have to make trans-inclusive language abo…

archived 25 Jan 2022 10:40:11 UTC

archive.md

It gets even better. So women who simply want to be acknowledged as women in healthcare settings are closeted transmen:

Shower thought: If bigots are really eggs, doesn't that make trans people bigots themselves?

This ain't it, Eugenia: