📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.

She-Man (2023) - after being struck by lightning in a government research laboratory during a top secret experiment into autoerotic asphyxiation, top FBI billionaire forensic scientist Dr. Otto Gynophile develops the uncanny ability to mimic the female body... poorly.

Armed with his fabulous new powers and a burning passion for justice and a filthy apartment full of crimefighting sex toys, She-Man takes to the streets to bring down his most powerful nemesis yet, the shadowy criminal terrorist misgendering syndicate known as T.E.R.F.


71GtZYeb4sL._RI_.jpg
 
Ringkvinna wasn't even that. If someone died without a male heir but with a unmarried adult (over 20) female relative then she could inherit the land and take over her relatives responsibilities. When/if she married all male responsibilities would go to her husband and she'd return to being a typical woman. No actual contemporary sources claims that these women were less women.

It's funny how people in the 9th century would see a woman as a woman even when performing "male" duties , while modern people will see the same woman as lesser.
Apologies for overposting but it’s amazing how people attach the modern, fuzzy, useless concept of “gender” to what were obviously practical (if unfair and sexist) ways of dealing with property, inheritance, marriage, the running of farms, etc.

We were talking about the concept of the simulacrum in the Grace Lavery thread as it applies to trans surgeries and appearances and I think it applies here as well. No concept remains of the purpose of any of these “abnormal gender roles” and how they affected real life and contributed to the group’s survival and reproduction. Only the idea and the aesthetics of the role remain, detached from anything else.

In this conception, no one inherits land or works a farm or has children or marries or adopts relatives or performs any interconnected role in wider society as an integral part of these “gender roles.” Instead these “non-conforming” people are all just kind of floating there, alone, deracinated, waiting for trans people in the 21st century to adopt them as symbols.

No, I'm specifically arguing they're technically females. If SRY can't do its job, they're female. I'll agree that because SRY was able to do its job far enough that they have testes does make it legitimately debatable, but I think it's significant that the development doesn't go beyond that point. They're not functional testes and they otherwise have significantly female health considerations beyond that.

Well and, no, they cannot produce sperm. Spermatogenesis shuts down at high temperatures. (and probably requires testosterone? Idk)
The problem with this line of thinking is: if an adult male has injured testicles and they no longer produce sperm is SRY still “doing its job”? In CAIS, SRY did do its job but another gene fucked things up.

I feel bad for CAIS women but defining them as biologically female is nonsensical unless you define a whole bunch of other males as female as well. SRY sent them down the male path, just because their male path didn’t express itself right doesn’t mean they didn’t go down that path.
 
The problem with this line of thinking is: if an adult male has injured testicles and they no longer produce sperm is SRY still “doing its job”?
Yes, there are other effects of SRY than just sperm production. Infertile males are still male.
I feel bad for CAIS women but defining them as biologically female is nonsensical unless you define a whole bunch of other males as female as well. SRY sent them down the male path, just because their male path didn’t express itself right doesn’t mean they didn’t go down that path.
I'm arguing it's more accurate to say they went down the female pathway.

Edit: To elaborate on this a bit more, there's no one simple determiner of sex. Not chromosomal, not gonads, not hormones. It's something of a "totality of the circumstances" thing. This is annoying , especially when arguing with troons who are keen to appropriate people's medical conditions for their fetishes, but unfortunately, biology is messy.

Like I said, I think the most reliable standard is "SRY present and able to do its job". That gives a reasonable answer for XX males, XY females, infertility, etc, etc. CAIS is one of the more debatable edge cases because of the presence of the testes, but I still think it fits with that standard; they're non-functional testes, and beyond just that, they cannot function.

There's a more profound difference between a castrated male, one that doesn't produce (as much) testosterone, and an individual that cannot react to any testosterone, even exogenous testosterone. A CAIS woman, for example, could not medically, hormonally transition to being a transman, because their bodies would just convert the T injections to estrogen. (this is a funny lie to catch interfakers in, btw)
 
Última edición:
Apologies for overposting but it’s amazing how people attach the modern, fuzzy, useless concept of “gender” to what were obviously practical (if unfair and sexist) ways of dealing with property, inheritance, marriage, the running of farms, etc.

We were talking about the concept of the simulacrum in the Grace Lavery thread as it applies to trans surgeries and appearances and I think it applies here as well. No concept remains of the purpose of any of these “abnormal gender roles” and how they affected real life and contributed to the group’s survival and reproduction. Only the idea and the aesthetics of the role remain, detached from anything else.

In this conception, no one inherits land or works a farm or has children or marries or adopts relatives or performs any interconnected role in wider society as an integral part of these “gender roles.” Instead these “non-conforming” people are all just kind of floating there, alone, deracinated, waiting for trans people in the 21st century to adopt them as symbols.
Ironically, the more gender unbalanced a society is, the more transpeople there are because the binary becomes stricter. "If you're not X, you're not a man" as opposed to "Men are anything from A to M, women are anything from N to Z".


tl;dr Save our Tomboys
 
The problem with this line of thinking is: if an adult male has injured testicles and they no longer produce sperm is SRY still “doing its job”? In CAIS, SRY did do its job but another gene fucked things up.

I feel bad for CAIS women but defining them as biologically female is nonsensical unless you define a whole bunch of other males as female as well. SRY sent them down the male path, just because their male path didn’t express itself right doesn’t mean they didn’t go down that path.
They are genetically male, but for the purposes of socialization they are phenotypically female. In regards to sport in particular, my own opinion is that someone with CAIS has more place competing in women's events than a woman with hyperandrogenism, because the woman with hyperandrogenism, even if she is genetically female, has the advantages that high testosterone produces. But, it's a hard line to thread, because genetic advantage is part of athletic performance anyway, so the question of where it's fair to draw the line will come up. I think it's sort of a red herring though, because while any definition you draw it going to split the line in some way for intersex people, trans women athletes are quite obviously not in that category. The advantages of going through puberty as a man are too great, the immediately obvious effect being that trans women dominate any sport they participate in. The trans lobby likes to throw up these edge cases as hypotheticals as a smokescreen. Like when it comes to "trans" kids and sports. I don't think it actually matters if the "trans" girl plays with the real girls, because puberty hasn't set in yet. But we all know that the reason that is being pushed is to trojan horse in adult participation.
Ironically, the more gender unbalanced a society is, the more transpeople there are because the binary becomes stricter. "If you're not X, you're not a man" as opposed to "Men are anything from A to M, women are anything from N to Z".


tl;dr Save our Tomboys
and our flamboyant gay dudes.
 
I have never seen his photos from front before. Holy fuck, those shoulders are broader than an industrial refrigerator.
Ver archivo adjunto 2907499
Yes, very feminine.
Are we sure this dude didn't just lose some frat bet and it went too far? Yo Will, you were just supposed to wear a dress while mowing the lawn, not join the girls swim team.
 
Here's the post that people found in her history: reddit , reveddit , archive
Reddit tranny dijo:
So my boyfriend recently proposed to me, and of course I said yes, but I’ve also recently come to the conclusion that I’m trans (FTM) and am not sure how to approach the subject of me medically transitioning with him for fear that he won’t want to continue the relationship. He’s told me before that he wouldn’t be able to date me if I medically transitioned because he would see me as a man at that point and he’s straight. I previously identified as non-binary and presented fairly fem, and he was comfortable with that, but I just don’t know what to do. Any help?
lol wait, wait, so hang on here. Her fiancé was open and honest with her right up front and even said he would respect her pronouns and recognize her new gender without question, but she's still upset anyway because one consequence of changing her gender surgically and gaining what trannies always claim is super important -- being recognized and respected as their new gender -- happens to mean she'll technically be trying to "gay it up" with her straight lover? Kinda sounds like she wants him to pretend to be gay so she can be with him while pretending to be a man.

Also, this response to the threat of a partner trooning out is fucking brilliant. "Okay, I'll totally support your decision and respect your new pronouns and gender, but I'm straight so if you actually do this, we can't be together anymore because you'll be the same gender as me, and that's gay, which I'm not." Troon doctrine can't outmaneuver it because he's respecting the holy pronoun doctrine, and it's a not-so-gentle warning: "cut the shit dude, I love you but I'm not going to put up with this braindead horseshit if you want a future with me."

Anyone who makes their own checkbox on a form is destined to be a headache. What an obnoxious thing to do. The second the manager saw that they probably knew they made a fucking mistake and good on them for cleaning up the mess so efficiently.
This was my first thought when I read that. You just know everyone in HR who saw that immediately started laughing their asses off about it (assuming that department hasn't been contaminated by woketards), and certainly anyone he bragged about this to probably just rolled their eyes and drew in a slow, deep breath and sighed. Autism really is a comorbidity with troonism. Fucking uncanny. I can't imagine how this guy thought people would find that behavior anything but annoying.

Also, what a fucking idiot -- you absolutely never want to rock the boat at a new job unless you don't want to keep it. There are good reasons why companies practically always include a "probationary period" clause in their employment contracts, and this is one of them. If you're still in that first 60- or 90-day window at the new job, you can be fired for practically any reason (or no reason at all) with no recourse and without the benefit of their usual discipline policies (no written warnings, "coaching," reassignments, etc.). Just one screwup and it's GTFO time.

"The backchannels that should be used to protect people from abusers and rapists are instead used to protect abusers and rapists. Any usefulness these channels have is reserved for Real Women."
Ah, the irony of a tranny complaining that the backchannels they cheerfully abuse constantly to attack and silence critics with impunity have stopped working for them and are being used by others to shove them back into their own fucking lane.

"But they call trans fems things that are harder to respond to. Rapist, pedophile, male conditioning, etc. They call us things so bad that even denying them is destructive. Who wants to stand up in public and say they aren’t those things? Who has the privilege to not get called those things in the first place? When I look at a cis woman these days, the first thing I think is, I bet no one ever casually called her a rapist. "
lol they call you those things because you very likely are those things. "Who has the privilege to not get called those things?" People who are not rapists or pedophiles. Funny how that works, eh? "I bet nobody ever casually called her a rapist." Probably because she's never raped anybody, which is not a safe assumption to make about the average troon.

And why is rape the first thing this creep thinks of when he sees a "cis woman?" Doesn't that support the notion that he's a fucking rapist?

Have you watched Eternals? There's a character in there that is bewilderingly terrible, called sprite, that I feel was some sort of ham-fisted metaphor for being trans. She's eternally a 14 year old girl, because the Eternals are weird not-robots from a space god, and she has a big rant about how she has the wrong body and can't have Richard Madden love her because of it. It was skeevy as hell, and I'm glad I did not pay to see that movie.
Kinda sounds like pedophilia apologia to me. Don't these woketard types love to rag on weeaboos who worship 1,000 year-old goddesses trapped in young barely-pubescent bodies as their waifus? This is literally that, but in a mainstream movie, and arguably even worse because it's the little girl whining that she can't chase the D instead of some guy skulking around hoping to give it to her.
 
Última edición:
This was my first thought when I read that. You just know everyone in HR who saw that immediately started laughing their asses off about it (assuming that department hasn't been contaminated by woketards), and certainly anyone he bragged about this to probably just rolled their eyes and drew in a slow, deep breath and sighed. Autism really is a comorbidity with troonism. Fucking uncanny. I can't imagine how this guy thought people would find that behavior anything but annoying.

Also, what a fucking idiot -- you absolutely never want to rock the boat at a new job unless you don't want to keep it. There are good reasons why companies practically always include a "probationary period" clause in their employment contracts, and this is one of them. If you're still in that first 60- or 90-day window at the new job, you can be fired for practically any reason (or no reason at all) with no recourse and without the benefit of their usual discipline policies (no written warnings, "coaching," reassignments, etc.). Just one screwup and it's GTFO time.
Yeah, you read these accounts, and you have to assume that none of these people has ever held a real job before. This the part I find super annoying about the way trans has ended up on like the extreme end of the oppression spectrum. Anybody can have a shitty boss, who picks on them or is an asshole. And you can be fired for complaining about on Facebook. Hell, if you're a woman, you can have a boss who creeps on you and still be fired for complaining about it because you're too low on the totem pole for it to matter. Normal people who go through this as they enter the working world realize that you have to make sure you aren't a problem so that you don't put a target on your back. Sure, it's easier for some people get that target put on them than others, but only the gender specials put up their hand and say "yes please, pick me! I am the squeaky wheel who's going to file the HR complaint or start the fight in the lunchroom about something. I will make waves and stick out". Purely for their internal angst too, like a goth teenager demanding to wear all black because that's what they feel in their soul. Am I supposed to have sympathy for these people? It's not like they're working to make sure nobody can be summarily fired for no reason. Oh no, just if you feel that you're clowngendered on the inside should you get special protection.

Except for the fact that none of these videos are funny, I would swear that this is some comedian trying to do a sketch character of a 1950's housewife. The Kids in the Hall are more convincing women than this dude is. The fact that he is serious is equal parts sad and crazy.
 
Última edición:
I think it's a holdover from the teenage years of wanting so badly to belong, and some people like her never break away from it
I think its a sign of autism.

My sister has been going through an identity crisis since birth and I noticed it's very linked to her autism. Seeing things in black and white means there MUST be labels for everything, including one's self.

It doesn't help that people like that tend to spend a lot of time online around others who have the same identity issues, so they start thinking that's a normal struggle that everyone goes through
 
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
Not even really any LGB stuff, at least through Endgame. I've heard a ton of fans were pissed when the TV show made it clear Bucky was straight because there went their dirty fanfiction.

The only extended MCU character who had a same sex partner was that shaved head chick in Deadpool 2, but at the time Sony/Fox owned Deadpool, the movie was rated R, and it was technically X-men universe (because of studio movie ownership rights), not Avengers MCU. And they never kissed or were affectionate, it was a dialogue only lesbian relationship. Deadpool is notoriously bisexual in the comics, and made a few dirty comments about Wolverine in the movies, but he's strictly hetero for relationships onscreen. I don't expect that to change now that Disney owns him.

I think Loki was supposed bi in his show, but that's on their streaming service where they would be more steamy than the movies in the cinema, like was already said, because of China. They are trying to make content for everyone, which means "cis" hets only.
 
When reality is bigoted.
B7D7C316-92EC-43F9-BF1B-DE3FB33E577D.jpeg CB663F92-68F8-43B4-8500-F73140FA2499.jpeg FB63C22F-8AC5-4D97-90A0-4D5889D714D4.jpeg
When your floored by gay men not wanting to date or fuck women.
CADD406A-5192-44E7-9293-EFCAEDBD283E.jpeg
Lovely, non-delusional comments /sneed 161D2F7D-0D5B-4E20-87ED-2C080BF1EC6A.jpeg
Gay men are the “bottom of the barrel” in their own community?
0ABDCB44-D819-48E0-AFC9-95FA841DE189.jpeg
Here is the reddit post she was floored by F9704862-F1EA-46EB-AE25-E38019B1ECEA.jpeg
My favorite comments 2C1A0E51-6948-41F4-8B97-C2D0561CAC71.jpeg C7804280-B766-440A-9A14-527D33383E60.jpeg 7679DBD2-7760-4BCF-974C-8D5ABFA8E334.jpeg A1DA9849-253A-4BDE-A01B-B897AA9956D3.jpeg 47B30A82-E39D-4276-BA3B-1F1FCACE5623.jpeg
Also, there is a specific reason as to why lesbian subs are so accepting vs gay subs. Many of you probably now this but for those who don’t,there is a website that tells you the other reddit subs that users of a specific sub frequent.


Here are the results for two major “lesbian” subs

2535E998-32EA-4F7D-8750-619E69F43811.jpeg 98CB8C87-5E9C-40D5-9C0A-2A60FA85FB43.jpeg
The number on the left is a “probability multiplier”. That means that users of r/actuallesbians are 46 times more likely (relative to the average redditor) to post and comment in r/mtf. If actual lesbians are on that sub (which they aren’t), then there is no way in hell that r/mtf would be the other subreddit that they frequent the most. This is why “girldick” is worshipped there.

For comparison, look at the result for r/askgaybros.

59947A56-4832-425D-BFE4-5E9F52AE5B36.jpeg
There are actually gay men using the sub. Not a damn troon subreddit in sight.

Look at r/bisexual E35B8DD7-9834-4522-BEDF-5B627F4722E0.jpeg
There are actual bisexuals on that sub. I believe r/nonbinary is filled with gender specials but r/egg_irl is a troon sub but it is the eight most frequented subreddit.

Of course, even r/asklesbians, which is supposed to be the lesbian equivalent of r/askgaybros is heavily infiltrated by troons. 4F185E46-1F3C-4D94-B12B-880A706F2257.jpeg
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo