Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
📚 MegathreadTranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
Ringkvinna wasn't even that. If someone died without a male heir but with a unmarried adult (over 20) female relative then she could inherit the land and take over her relatives responsibilities. When/if she married all male responsibilities would go to her husband and she'd return to being a typical woman. No actual contemporary sources claims that these women were less women.
It's funny how people in the 9th century would see a woman as a woman even when performing "male" duties , while modern people will see the same woman as lesser.
That's the stupid thing. Bringing up these examples of violations of traditional gender roles makes the exact opposite point from what these "historians" think it does. None of these people "identified" as non-binary or trans or whatever. The label is assigned to them due to either a) gender variant behavior (like the hirja) or b) social circumstances that results in a breaking of traditional gender roles (as was the case with the Ringkvinna). It's the exact opposite of trans people, it proves that genders roles are socially generated and aren't related to some sort of intrinsic "internal" gender. In fact, if gender identity were real, you'd think owning property would cause the Ringkvinna gender dysphoria
Unless you believe in tranny style gender identity, and thus believe the CAIS individuals who "identify" as men, there are no men with CAIS. Individuals with CAIS are female. The effects of SRY have virtually zero effect on them because they cannot process androgens. Their bodies convert all testosterone to estrogen.
Yes but technically all CAIS individuals are males. Let's get this clear from the start, I don't mean they shouldn't be treated as women, that's not something I'm arguing here. They did grow up as girls and naturally grow most but not all secondary female characteristics so women category makes most sense socially but biologically they are males. They have XY chromosomes, they have internal balls, balls that create sperm that can't mature and male hormone production. It's just their bodies can't react to those hormones. Reason they get so close females that the condition tends stay hidden till puberty and missing periods is that testosterone if not used turns into estrogen. This still isn't the same as female hormonal production and so CIAS don't grow completely like females but get very close. So like I said treating them as women makes sense but they are still males, males with screwed up hormones but males.
Yes but technically all CAIS individuals are males. Let's get this clear from the start, I don't mean they shouldn't be treated as women, that's not something I'm arguing here. They did grow up as girls and naturally grow most but not all secondary female characteristics so women category makes most sense socially but biologically they are males. They have XY chromosomes, they have internal balls, balls that create sperm that can't mature and male hormone production. It's just their bodies can't react to those hormones. Reason they get so close females that the condition tends stay hidden till puberty and missing periods is that testosterone if not used turns into estrogen. This still isn't the same as female hormonal production and so CIAS don't grow completely like females but get very close. So like I said treating them as women makes sense but they are still males, males with screwed up hormones but males.
No, I'm specifically arguing they're technically females. If SRY can't do its job, they're female. I'll agree that because SRY was able to do its job far enough that they have testes does make it legitimately debatable, but I think it's significant that the development doesn't go beyond that point. They're not functional testes and they otherwise have significantly female health considerations beyond that.
Well and, no, they cannot produce sperm. Spermatogenesis shuts down at high temperatures. (and probably requires testosterone? Idk)
.In there she says "identity is difficult" and that's what all of this really boils down to. Identity is not difficult. It really isn't. You are not a blog that needs to find the right tags to assign to yourself. Once you're out of high school and don't have to worry about which rigidly structured social group to fit in with, you just exist. You're just walking around being the person you are whether or not you've got a name for all of your human qualities. Maybe I'm being too empathetic or whatever but it's really sad that people think they need to figure out which Hogwarts house they belong to before they can get on with the business of being alive.
No, I'm specifically arguing they're technically females. If SRY can't do its job, they're female. I'll agree that because SRY was able to do its job far enough that they have testes does make it legitimately debatable, but I think it's significant that the development doesn't go beyond that point. They're not functional testes and they otherwise have significantly female health considerations beyond that.
Well and, no, they cannot produce sperm. Spermatogenesis shuts down at high temperatures. (and probably requires testosterone? Idk)
No, they do produce sperm, it just doesn't mature beyond first stage so isn't anyway viable and just get reabsorbed. So they are sterile but that sperm production is still kinda there.
Batman and Superman are orphans, Spidey is doubly orphaned when Uncle Ben dies, Harry Potter is an orphan, Ironman is an alcoholic who misses his dead parents, Captain America is a man out of time and everyone he ever loved is dead.
They could've made Black Widow an orphan too but baby drama, or sexual abuse, is a cheap and easy way to create instant sympathy for female characters because humans immediately feel bad for women in those situations without the need for much exposition. And these movies are dumb CGI spectacles for children and retards anyway.
Mom cared more about the penis than the fact they were having sex in his room? That sounds like a "i have a cool mom" brag, unless that's the norm these days with teens.
On the other hand mom is probably relieved that at least son won't be coming home and saying she's going to be a grandma before he finishes high school.
Troons won't get to pretend to be normal because they all either look like they have FAS or look like ghouls. You don't get to pretend to be normal when you cut your cock off or shove a plastic tube on your pussy and wrap arm skin around it.
Batman and Superman are orphans, Spidey is doubly orphaned when Uncle Ben dies, Harry Potter is an orphan, Ironman is an alcoholic who misses his dead parents, Captain America is a man out of time and everyone he ever loved is dead.
They could've made Black Widow an orphan too but baby drama, or sexual abuse, is a cheap and easy way to create instant sympathy for female characters because humans immediately feel bad for women in those situations without the need for much exposition. And these movies are dumb CGI spectacles for children and retards anyway.
Y'all too hard on Marvel/Disney. I mean, we still have Scarlet Witch, who was an orphan but she at least had her brother who...um...died...but at least she was able to move on to find love with a...robot...who also "died"...but at least she somehow moved on to actually have a family...in her...imagination...you know what, bad example. Nevermind.
Because then they get to tell you that you have a third grade level of biology for thinking sex is a binary, and they get to explain to you what The Truth (c) is. By ridiculing your understanding of reality they put themselves in a position of authority and try to shove their bullshit down your throat.
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
as if. that garbage is made for the chinks to lap up like the transformers movies. if they did itd be some man in one cutaway they could easily chop out for poohbear.
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
It's funny that so many people are willing to believe that this person did nothing to deserve being fired. My first instinct with sob stories like this on the internet is to assume the person is lying about how innocent they are.
"INADMISSIBLE NARRATIVES OF ABUSE #1 The typical narrative of abuse on social media doesn’t include the problems of the most vulnerable, like how public verbal harassment may only be an ultimately minor part of a trans fem’s exile. The most skilled abusers know that a good exile is done with pure silence, through the whisper network, by having the person wake up one day and have every second or third person she knows or who practices her profession block her and/or stop talking to her. No one tells her why. She has to painstakingly talk to every friend, every contact, every person she would normally have a cheerful conversation with. The electric shocks of knowing that every simple human interaction you have with a friend or stranger could turn into a nightmare of victim blaming or worse, a cold iciness where they pretend nothing is wrong. Imagine repeating that experience hundreds and hundreds of times, with no way to end it. After the noise, the long years of silence are what kill us. The backchannels that should be used to protect people from abusers and rapists are instead used to protect abusers and rapists. Any usefulness these channels have is reserved for Real Women. No one warned me about any of the comically large number of predators in my professions. I was considered unrapeable, unabuseable, not worthy of protection. A trans fem can try to talk about her experiences of abuse for years and have no one listen, but the instant one of her abusers smears her, everyone is alert and awake. One reason it took me so long to talk about my experiences was that I associated being able to speak against abuse with being an abuser. Because every abuser throughout my life was so good at being believed, I thought that being believed was the exclusive domain of abusers. This is why my first months in therapy were spent convincing me that I wasn’t a sociopath, crazy, abusive, or any of the other terms I had been brainwashed with. Abusers don’t spend years disabled by those thoughts because they don’t care if they hurt other people.
INADMISSIBLE NARRATIVES OF ABUSE #2 And when verbal harassment does occur, it’s often cloaked in feminist language, making it impossible to fight. If they call a woman a bitch, people comprehend that as misogyny. But they call trans fems things that are harder to respond to. Rapist, pedophile, male conditioning, etc. They call us things so bad that even denying them is destructive. Who wants to stand up in public and say they aren’t those things? Who has the privilege to not get called those things in the first place? When I look at a cis woman these days, the first thing I think is, I bet no one ever casually called her a rapist. "
I got introduced to this in the NostalgiaChick thread, because she quoted it when she QuiT ThE InTeRNeT recently. I had a hunch and went looking around, and there's quite a few tweets out there saying that Porpentine was not driven out of these circles without reason
I can hardly pick my way through that tortured prose but he seems to be complaining that even if you force your way into female spaces, and make it nigh-impossible for those females to even verbalize any objections they might have to your presence, females will still exclude you.
If you were actually a woman you would have known this already. Women do it to each other all the time (not even maliciously most of the time, it’s just an aspect of being part of different social crowds). The difference is that if women are iced out by one group they can usually find another bunch of women that truly accepts them. You never will. Sucks to be you I guess.
Speaking of marvel, have we seen any tranny virtue signaling from them so far? And I'm talking about the MCU here. I can't recall any. Might be too spicy for Disney so far.
Have you watched Eternals? There's a character in there that is bewilderingly terrible, called sprite, that I feel was some sort of ham-fisted metaphor for being trans. She's eternally a 14 year old girl, because the Eternals are weird not-robots from a space god, and she has a big rant about how she has the wrong body and can't have Richard Madden love her because of it. It was skeevy as hell, and I'm glad I did not pay to see that movie.
Biologically they are women, except in all the ways that count, and are surgically altered in ways that we would call racist if someone tried to do it to "change their race". Socially they are women, in that they act out stereotypes about women that we claim we don't believe constitute gender, but actually do.
If you begin an argument with "determining what a woman is biologically is actually very difficult" then you've already lost the argument.
These people never will have a chance to improve any of their arguments since all disagreement of any kind is censored and blocked, so I don't know what they expect when they post this. Are they not just preaching to the troony choir?
