Medical Journal Warns About Masks’ Potentially Devastating Consequences
YouTube has taken it upon itself to censor the opinions of esteemed scientists that depart from the orthodoxy on masks. This is not surprising given that masks have become dogma – a visible symbol of compliance and fealty to the medical/political agenda that elevates the coronavirus above all else.
This dogma was illustrated by Anthony Fauci’s response to the situation in Texas, which repealed its mask mandate and saw cases plummet. Asked to explain this result, Fauci responded: “I’m not really quite sure….It could be they’re doing things outdoors.” He declined to even consider the fact that perhaps masks are not effective at controlling spread of the coronavirus. In other words, the theory that universal masking stops the virus is becoming non-falsifiable.
(I’m sure you know this, but for those who don’t, non-falsifiable is a scientific term which applies to a theory or hypothesis which is considered useless or having no scientific value at all, due to the impossibility of proving or disproving the truth in real life).
The author goes on to explain a myriad physiological dangers associated with mask wearing:
In addition to hypoxia and hypercapnia, breathing through facemask residues bacterial and germs components on the inner and outside layer of the facemask. These toxic components are repeatedly rebreathed back into the body, causing self-contamination. Breathing through facemasks also increases temperature and humidity in the space between the mouth and the mask, resulting in a release of toxic particles from the mask’s materials. A systematic literature review estimated that aerosol contamination levels of facemasks including
13 to 202,549 different viruses. Rebreathing contaminated air with high bacterial and toxic particle concentrations along with low O2 and high CO2 levels continuously challenge the body homeostasis, causing self-toxicity and immunosuppression.
And the conclusion:
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemasks can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize proper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.
https://www.aier.org/article/medical...-consequences/
Considering this information, I’ll risk the label of conspiracy theorist by stating that of the 4 major components of Covid 19 mitigation strategy, all four are showing a net-negative health value:
1) masking (see above) no scientifically provable benefit, with scientifically provable harmful effects
2) Remdesivir - the only therapeutic sanctioned by the CDC for use in treating Covid 19 with a history of a 53% death rate for those dosed under Ebola trials. This drug has a proven history of inducing renal failure, which results in pulmonary edema that might easily be misdiagnosed as Covid pneumonia, and a primary driver to the subsequent use of ventilators, and increased mortality rates.
3) Intubation - resulting in between 80 and 95% deaths for all ventilated patients, showing continuing gross negligence and medical malfeasance, driven by huge financial incentives, upwards of $39,000 per intubation patient to the hospitals.
4) Covid 19 “vaccines” - more and more data showing a net negative effect on immune function, resulting in higher hospitalizations and mortality rates. Higher mortality figures in 2021 post vaccine era, compared to 2020 pre vaccine era support that conclusion.
When you have 4 basic components, and all 4 not only fail to produce measurable benefits, but actually show measurable harm, when does incompetence in strategy give way to deliberate intent to cause harm?
Couple these facts with the systematic efforts to block the availability and use of proven successful therapeutics like HCQ and Ivermectin, including media smear campaigns, paid for propaganda, reversals of conclusions such as was previously documented, and health authorities and healthcare networks threatening to revoke medical licenses to those who deviant from sanctioned protocols and employ Ivermectin and HCQ, I’d say we have more than enough evidence to show there is an agenda to secretly cause as much harm as possible, using toxic methods masquerading as medicine, while blocking effective strategies that could have saved countless lives.
symbols on the windows of businesses not enforcing the rules. I'm not joking, I'm going to have to leave. I refuse to let Euro monkeys put shit in me. If they ask why I don't get it I just shrug and say "я американски" because fuck you retard
