- Registrado
- 27 de Oct, 2021
Having been on Jaime's videos, can confirm her fans - like those on Noah Finnce's and Noah Samsen's videos - are all reeeetarded. Her paper is also publicly available and she would have never gotten her doctorate had she went into an actual scientific field. The funniest thing is, she references J. Michael Bailey heavily in it despite not even knowing who he is. She has never made any videos on his 'The Man Who Would be Queen'. Her paper was about how transmen's sexualities are supposedly alike to normal males.
Other people have to do years of work in their fields to even get close to a PhD. In hard sciences, that is. Jaime chose social science - and probably didn't even take statistics - and got her PhD in two years.
This is the paper.
In said paper, it argues, seriously, that the detached clitoris actually becomes a penis.
In short: transmen tend to be bisexual females. Genital arousal, btw, isn't associated with gender but sex based perception.
As much as I respect Bailey, I really don't agree with his views on female sexuality. I'm male, fwiw. As for Jamie, her paper is basically a cope for I'm not like the other girls with their icky "bisexual" arousal patterns. Funny enough, research has shown that lesbians like Jamie actually have more male-typical sexual arousal patterns.
I remember last year the topic of bisexual arousal patterns in straight women came up when I was interacting with a TIM who kept insisting women are AGP too because lesbian porn is women's most watched porn genre. He was using that to argue that straight women aren't exclusively androphilic and could therefore be AGP. I argued (with sources) that bisexual arousal responses in straight women might be indicative of performative bisexuality and the over-sexualization of women in our society. The troon disappeared after that, lol.
Última edición:
