Disaster White nationalist Nick Fuentes has never had a girlfriend

Link (Archive)

White nationalist Nick Fuentes has never had a girlfriend​

Fuentes says the Taliban beat the United States because they weren't 'distracted' by women.​

In a recent podcast appearance, white nationalist Nick Fuentes shared his deeply sexist views about women. His opinions were apparently formed without dating one. Fuentes said he’s never been in a relationship with a woman.

On You Are Here, Fuentes said women shouldn’t vote and described the Taliban’s treatment of women as “ideal.”

The Taliban is notoriously restrictive of women’s rights. Women under Taliban rule in Afghanistan can’t work or attend school. Under its previous rule, women were forced into marriages and beaten for appearing in public without a male relative or for wearing something other than a burqa.

Fuentes also described a “nagging wife” as his “worst nightmare.”

Co-host Sydney Watson didn’t take too kindly to Fuentes’ views. She began by pressing him on his admiration of right-wing authoritarians, as he hasn’t lived anywhere but the United States.

“You can only do so much reading before practical experience actually should take some precedence,” Watson said.

She then pivoted to Fuentes’ statements about women.

“Have you been in a relationship with a woman?” she said.

“No,” Fuentes replied.

“So how are you telling other people how to behave towards women when you yourself have not had any physical interaction with them in a romantic capacity?” Watson fired back. “Or in fact in any capacity when you uphold them in a way that treats them with respect.”

“I have to question what kind of a person who has had no experience with women is in a position to basically promote these ideas,” she said.

“Well, I’m having an experience with a woman right now,” Fuentes retorted. He went on to say that he’s “talked to” and “known enough women to know what’s going on.”

Further, based on things men who are successful with the opposite sex have told him, he thinks it takes a few tricks to pick up women. (Presumably he hasn’t used them himself). Nevertheless, thus, he concludes: “They’re not fully rational. I do not believe that like men they possess a full rationality.”

A clip of the exchange posted by Hannah Gais, a senior researcher with the Southern Poverty Law Center, has more than 600,000 views on Twitter. In the comments, Gais added, “Also to be clear, not dating is ok!”

People weren’t particularly surprised that the white nationalist and sexist young man who some claimlived with his parents until recently (and may still) hasn’t had a girlfriend.

Many were amused or even embarrassed for him.

“You can actually see his soul trying to embarrassment-escape from his body,” tweeted@annamerlan.
B18CF009-D87D-40F3-9474-6105E987D1E8.jpeg D48164D4-1996-4975-994B-6C2CE9A7C2FF.jpeg
Several suggested that they would never have admitted it.

One Twitter user posted a screenshot of a tweet that says: “Water boarding couldn’t have gotten this outta me.”

Some pointed out that conservatives and far-right figures have complained that their dating lives suffer because of their views. Incel (or involuntary celibate) culture is notoriously right-wing.

“Dude, you went full Tim Pool at the age of 23,” tweeted @thetomzone. “You never go full Tim Pool at the age of 23.”

Pool once blamed feminism for him being single.

The clip of Fuentes admitting he’s never had a girlfriend made its way to the Cringe subreddit. The comments there were brutal.

“My guy is 23! Who listens to whatever he has to say? And why???” said one.

As for Fuentes, he’s endeavored to prove his indifference to being perpetually single by postinga doctored video of him tuning out everything Watson says.
 
The word "retarded" was being autocorrected to "exceptional" by some old word filter Null turned on. I wasn't aware it had been turned off. Thinking I would "censor" myself by replacing a letter with the same letter with a little mark over it is retarded.

That's the game everyone else is playing, so you either play or you automatically lose. Pretending otherwise ignores half a century of recent history and, more recently, the outright effectiveness of nigger propaganda on public policy and discourse. You aren't going to sit this one out in a cabin in Montana; your kids will be indoctrinated by these people, arrested for speaking out against them under draconian hate speech laws, and you will be fired for not clapping enthusiastically at their genocidal rhetoric.

Pretending it doesn't exist doesn't make it not exist. Grow the fuck up and learn to deal with reality on reality's terms.
i'm not pretending it doesn't exist, i'm just not bending over and spreading my cheeks about it and coping by saying that it's pointless to resist. these retards are completely incapable of doing anything when they don't have a mob behind them, which is a terribly weak position to find yourself in. they're literally the weakest adversary imaginable, they just have superior numbers. clutching your pearls about how unrealistic it is to put up resistance to them is pretty dumb when every single one of these people will not confront you about anything you say if you aren't on twitter. they are content in their inaction because they think they are on the right side of history. fucking tell them that they're wrong, and get enough people to tell them that they're wrong that they no longer have a percieved advantage. they only take action when they know there's no consequences. you aren't 'beating them at their own game' you're just standing up to a bully.

buying into their egotistical power trip that they're actually dangerous outside of corporations and big cities just betrays your underlying state of mind. when i say 'none of them matter' i don't mean that they don't have significant power or influence over parts the country, i mean that they literally RELY on people who disagree with them bending over out of fear to have any sort of power, because it sure doesn't come from the twitteristas. the second you don't give them what they want or put up any sort of resistance they scurry away like cockroaches.

you literally don't have to play their game. that's how you win. trying to beat them at their own game is absolutely fucking retarded considering they're the ones writing the rules and they're going to make you lose no matter how well you can play it
 
What about his opinions would be enhanced by having had sex with a woman? Would eating a woman out give him more insight on the capacity for women to be rational in their policy opinions? Would enduring her faked orgasms convince him of the superiority of an asymptotically egalitarian society? Shoot, what if he was an abusive boyfriend that raped his girlfriends? Would he have been qualified, then?

That's what I'm trying to communicate-- when I talk about it being used as an insult, I'm more referring to it being used as argumentum ad hominem. It's a waste of time, either way, but if it was an unanchored insult used in the same way as "I fucked your mom", it would be trivially easy to dismiss and you could either just laugh at it or just get angry.

But it's supposed to have a point, here.

So what is that point? That if he spent time with women, he would think that they were worthy of voting? Well, shit, why couldn't she have said that, instead? Why couldn't she have argued that? There's no way he hasn't witnessed anything about women at all, even if he hasn't had sex, so maybe challenge those impressions, or explain why they're so inferior to personal experience as to be completely useless.

She gets to retain the insult, and make a point-- as is, at best, she made an incomplete argument bordering on non sequitur, and that's the kind of thing that rankles me. She masquerades as having a point, but you have to think about it to realize that you wasted your time because there wasn't any point and she just didn't even have the balls or integrity to make a blunt insult. And that's how those "you're a virgin" arguments generally go outside of discussion of specific sex techniques (talk less of political discussions).


"Thinking about becoming a theater critic. Never been to a fucking play in my life."

Does it not register how ridiculous the above sounds?

She bodied him the same way that Jay Kang bodied Jordan Peterson a few years ago in that Vice interview... by just leading him to talk about himself and sitting there and letting him do it. Because both her and Jay knew that the person they were sitting across from has a deluded sense of power coming from their being insulated by their own carefully cultivated audience of spergs, and they're not used to having their opinions challenged in front of a hostile audience.

So all you have to do to get them to take a big fucking bite out of their own ass in front of a camera is challenge them on some basic idea that they can't resist talking about, and let them go off. They will fuck it up all by themselves. gg no re
 
Última edición:
"Thinking about becoming a theater critic. Never been to a fucking play in my life."

Does it not register how ridiculous the above sounds?
Yes, I do.

Now, provide an applicable analogy or otherwise answer how eating out a woman provides wisdom on shaping policy involving women.

It's obvious why becoming a theater critic requires you watch a play, because being a theater critic requires you to critique plays that you've watched. In contrast, you can draw policy for demographic groups you've never met in your life (talk less of a demographic whose women you just haven't had sex with). It's literally possible, and it happens all the time all over the world.

You can argue about the efficacy of the policies devised in such a context, but clearly those people (and by extension, Fuentes) are more concerned with another picture than they are with the specific benefit of those groups-- that, and/or they define "benefit" by different criteria.
 
There’s an ancient Egyptian joke that goes “Man is even more eager to copulate than a donkey — his purse is what restrains him.”
Maybe I'm reading this wrong but that sounds like a joke about not showing restraint, not a joke about virgins.

>Cuban mutt who dates a mutt mutt

404 error
Welcome to pissearth 2021, where everywhere is brazil and the nigger who takes skin whitening products is the most ardent defender of the KKK on the planet.
 
Welcome to pissearth 2021, where everywhere is brazil and the nigger who takes skin whitening products is the most ardent defender of the KKK on the planet.
im in a discord for a game i play and an indian guy threw a shitfit and left immediately after getting into an argument where a bunch of extremely conservative mostly white people told him that national socialist white ethnostate rhetoric was dumb shit being peddled to poison the well
 
He doesn't like the company of women, full stop. Even when there appears to be some groyper groupies, there is no evidence that he ever took advantage of it for a quick fling or one night stand.

He's very very very gay.
I know nothing of the guy, but him not taking advantage for one-night stands doesn't mean he's gay. I mean, unless he is gay, as everyone here seems to be implying. Then he's just a dumb faggot.

But on principle that doesn't make someone gay. I turned down women who were interested in me, and I was accused of being gay many times because of that. It's annoying to see that notion perpetuated.

Life's not all about getting laid, it's about living morally and enjoying it.

Now, I think his view on women is a bit extreme. They certainly shouldn't be beaten or have their freedom taken away, but they definitely shouldn't be voting or doing important work, like serving as soldiers, etc.
 
Nick had some Latina who looked vaguely like his sister doing some dab thing with him, at some event. Even if he despises women, having a girl and later wife, would be good for his movement, gay or not, and fairly easily got.
 
How did this thread evolve from Nick Fuentes secretly liking cat boys to people over sharing what they’d do if they never had romantic relationships with women?
 
*(taps-mic)
Gayyyyyyyyyyyyy!
Its all gay ops
All of these independent content creators are paid pets
 
Atrás
Top Abajo