Science Popularizing Uterus Transplants into Biological Males


The “patriach of bioethics” was a man named Joseph Fletcher. A former Episopal priest turned atheist, he was a wild utilitarian for which virtually nothing was inherently wrong. In his last book, he pitched the then unthinkable idea that uteruses could be transplanted into men, writing back in 1988:

Transplant or replacement medicine foresees the day, after the automatic rejection of alien tissue is overcome, when a uterus can be implanted in a human male’s body—his abdomen has spaces—and gestation started by artificial fertilization and egg transfer.
Hypogonadism could be used to stimulate milk from the man’s rudimentary breasts—men too have mammary glands. If surgery could not construct a cervical canal the delivery could be effected by a Caesarean section and the male or transsexualized mother could nurse his own baby.
Fletcher wasn’t crazy, just ahead of his time (except for the use of the masculine pronoun).

Advocacy in bioethics has continued to touch on this subject, a few even calling it a fundamental human right for a biological male to receive a uterine transplant, gestate, and give birth.

Now, the idea is following the usual progressive political formula, moving from academic discourse into left-wing popular media advocacy. From an article just published in Salon:

Eyvazzadeh added that the risks and cost do not mean the transplant won’t become a more common operation in the future. Surprisingly, she thinks uterus transplants could become an option for an unexpected population: men.
“I predict with our aging population, and the rise of infertility, we will need men to share the burden of growing our population,” Eyvazzadeh said. “While some people may think this is far-fetched, it is not for the near future; I predict in maybe 200 years from now, it will be a reality.”
Transgender female patients will also be another group of people to benefit from the research into uterus transplants.
“Transgender females are also good candidates,” Eyvazzadeh said. “I am not aware of a transgender female having a uterine transplant yet.” Indeed, many doctors believe a uterus transplant could work for a transgender woman.
However, as with most surgeries and procedures that involve a uterus, Eyvazzadeh said to “absolutely” expect many future debates.
“Anytime a treatment involves a woman’s uterus, there will definitely be a debate especially when it involves IVF,” Eyvazzadeh said. “As with all new technology, they will get safer and more effective and ultimately more cost effective.”
I want us to notice a few things.

  • There is absolutely no discussion or concern of the impact on the baby — both with regard to safety and socially. I mean, do we not think that women’s biology beyond the uterus has any impact on the baby’s thriving? Are we going to say that having a “mother” who is biologically male would not impact the child’s social development?
  • There is no discussion about the primary societal purposes and limitations of medicine. The sector is increasingly viewed as a means of attaining life satisfaction and facilitating personal fulfillment, as much as promoting wellness and curing disease (starting, in my view, with cosmetic surgery and moving on from there). This has an impact on available medical resources for other necessaries. Bodily recreationism of males giving birth would materially add to this growing problem.
  • There are no moral boundaries that some don’t want to cross anymore. The impact of such social anarchy and collapse of norms beyond “anything goes” is hard to predict.
  • The transgender movement is evolving into an a subversion of the unique contributions women make to society. Mothering is too important to allow the social anarchists to distort its importance to children and the formation of families.
  • What kind of unethical research and experiments would be required to make males giving birth even workable? We already have witnessed cruelty to animals in an experiment in which researchers enabled male rats to give birth by surgically attaching them to females. Think of the other animal research that would be required to perfect the procedure and then, the human experimentation necessary to get all of the hormones and other necessaries of gestation right. This should be simply beyond contemplating.
We are so becoming so morally and socially paralized that we can’t even say “no” to the most bizarre and unnatural proposals anymore. Enabling males to give birth is not a proper role for medicine. Learning how to do it would be an abuse of the purposes of science. And it would be immoral social policy.

The idea should be rejected out of hand and no resources invested for the research required to effectuate the nightmare.
 
one thing i wonder is how the hell it would work?
i knew a guy that had an organ transplant and it was a near perfect match
he still had to take anti rejection drugs for a significant amount of time, and that's a perfect match for an organ the man needs to live.
how do you transplant something a man doesn't need, something that will never match and even if you could, how the hell would a baby ever come to term with all the physiological and chemical differences that would need to be addressed
It can't, we cannot transplant female reproductive organs into a male body and force it to function as intended without drugs and constant medical intervention, which means the prognosis for the troon and child is very, very low. Male bodies are simply not designed for impregnation, pregnancy and birth and we should not be wasting our resources on mentally ill faggots who get erections from pretending to be girls.
 
do these fetishits niggers really think that the uterus is just a piece that can be taken out and put on like a puzzle to magically work on a male body?
They think genitals are like this, so why would a uterus be different? I mean, look at the case of Jazz Jennings: they've cut his penis off and created a hole in there. For them, that's a vagina. They think the vagina is a hole rather than a muscle that opens and expands depending on the needs, or that it's connected to other muscles and nerves to the brain because it has very specific functions.

Uterus transplant from women to women work because women already have the equipment they've been born with. Uterus transplants to men it's like trying to play a CD on a phonograph.
 
Apparently troons have never heard of organ rejection. It’s gonna be really funny when we start hearing about how some guy’s new womb rotted him from the inside out.
 
Frankestein was a cautinary tale, not a guide, you bunch if freaks. Also, why not adopt? There are plenty of children that could use a home, or maybe not, these freaks would harvest them for their organs.
 
There is no such thing as a fundamental human right and if there were this would not be one. This is sick and twisted, it would be more ethical to simply develop artificial wombs and probably less complex than allowing men to gestate.

"Giving birth" isn't even on the table. If this worked it would always result in csection.
C-section isn't even on the table, even if the uterus is somehow not rejected the body itself will react to a pregnancy in a male body as a parasite or a foreign body and forcefully destroy it or abort it, no matter how hard an endo tries to fuck with the hormones.
 
Frankestein was a cautinary tale, not a guide, you bunch if freaks. Also, why not adopt? There are plenty of children that could use a home, or maybe not, these freaks would harvest them for their organs.
They don't want children. They want to be pregnant and give birth or be able to have an abortion for validation, full stop. The caring for children part is not validating.
 
Shit like this makes me think about getting myself off the organ donor registry.
It can't, we cannot transplant female reproductive organs into a male body and force it to function as intended without drugs and constant medical intervention, which means the prognosis for the troon and child is very, very low. Male bodies are simply not designed for impregnation, pregnancy and birth and we should not be wasting our resources on mentally ill faggots who get erections from pretending to be girls.
You can't transplant it and force it to function even WITH drugs and constant medical intervention. It full stop cannot be done with current medical technology.
Frankestein was a cautinary tale, not a guide, you bunch if freaks. Also, why not adopt? There are plenty of children that could use a home, or maybe not, these freaks would harvest them for their organs.
Your mistake is in thinking this is motivated by the troon wanting to have a child rather than the troon being sexually aroused by the idea of being pregnant.
 
one thing i wonder is how the hell it would work?
i knew a guy that had an organ transplant and it was a near perfect match
he still had to take anti rejection drugs for a significant amount of time, and that's a perfect match for an organ the man needs to live.
how do you transplant something a man doesn't need, something that will never match and even if you could, how the hell would a baby ever come to term with all the physiological and chemical differences that would need to be addressed
Not just physiological, but structural.
There's a reason "child-birthing hips" became a thing. Have fun giving birth with a dude's pelvis.
 
This wouldn't be logically feasible even if available; the male body just can't accommodate one.

How about focusing on organs people actually need? I know someone who lost their large intestine to an autoimmune disorder and their life would be greatly improved if they had one again. But yes, let's focus all energy on getting autogynephile trannies uteruses that they have absolutely zero need for.

It can't, we cannot transplant female reproductive organs into a male body and force it to function as intended without drugs and constant medical intervention, which means the prognosis for the troon and child is very, very low. Male bodies are simply not designed for impregnation, pregnancy and birth and we should not be wasting our resources on mentally ill faggots who get erections from pretending to be girls.

It means whatever fucking creature falls out of that womb is 100% going to be the antichrist.
 
All I can think is the structural issues inherent in a womb transplant for it to be more than just an organ squished in between other mutilated organs and stitched to them by Hell's Scotch Tape.

The fact that people seem to think that everyone's a fucking Anatomy Adam where all the organs are interchangeable just fucking amazes me.

How the fuck is it that a dumbass like me gets it that women's bodies get REALLY fucking strange during pregnancy, with all kinds of wild shit in their bloodstream and shit changing function and output, to the point where a male body is in no way shape or form able to replicate it, but these fucking tards can't?

It has to be mental illness and the profit of catering to it.
 
Hypothetically lets say you are able to transplant a womb into a man and gestate a baby for 9 months. What happens during the birth? How does the amhole stretch to accommodate the child? How does the child fit through the mans narrow pelvis?

It's so laughable that they think transplanting a womb is some sort of end goal of being a woman. I guess the copypasta got to them.
 
It will never work. They did this to a troon a long time ago, and he died after getting the transplant. What makes them think it's going to work this time?
Remember kids, this is how we get Hitler.

Frankestein was a cautinary tale, not a guide, you bunch if freaks. Also, why not adopt? There are plenty of children that could use a home, or maybe not, these freaks would harvest them for their organs.
Okay, but who in their right mind would let a troon adopt? I'd rather give them a uterus transplant since both the troon and kid would die. Having a troon as a parent (even assuming they weren't actually pedophiles which is a big assumption) is traumatizing. Better to let the kid die in the transplanted womb.

An artificial womb will happen before this will. And that is still a long way off. But, if they want to do even more unethical experimenting on troons, let them. Honestly. I used to care that mentally ill people were being butchered to enable their delusions. Trouble is, they are such horrible assholes that I stopped caring what happens to them. Let's keep trying to make troon wombs a reality until 59% of them are dying from organ rejection. 41 + 59 = problem 100% solved.
 
Watch now as the "animal testing bad!!!111!!!11!!" crowd completely changes their tune once they find out we'll be needing to harvest a lot of chimp wombs to even attempt this.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo