📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Does this guy have a hair fetish? Never seen someone say 'hair' so many times in one post
Correct.

Yes he does, you are dead on about that. There are a couple of telltale signs. He fantasizes about hair growth, something that is totally routine and not even noticed by most people not trying to grow longer hair, but is a key component of many hair fetishes. He has a favorite hair color, he even uses the word “adore” with regards to it. And not “I adore brunettes”, but “I adore brunette hair”, that’s the giveaway. Another detail, he’d find a wig a lot less attractive.

I think there is hope for this one. Troons have terrible haircare and usually go for cheap wigs. Anyone with an appreciation for hair is going to be turned off by the average troon in real life pretty damn fast. If this dude is wired how I think he is, balding, thinning, male hair is going to be actively repulsive to him. Well, I don’t know for sure, but I can do psychoanalysis here all I want.

There is another reason I have a little bit of hope that this is a strictly online tryst for a lonely man; there are other details that are damning this by their omission. He did not talk about how his “girlfriend’s” hair felt, he did not talk about how it smelled, and he there were no details about any aspect of the hair that couldn’t be shown through a computer screen. Those two have never met in real life at all.

I can guarantee that this dude has thought more about his partner’s hair than “she” has.
 
I don't know about the US, I'm aware that in Anglophone countries the Catholic Church is a bit different because it's been the 'underdog' for centuries in contrast to dominant Protestantism. But in Spain (one of the countries where Catholicism is still the overwhelmingly dominant religion and the Church has still political power) I know for sure there are bishops that still defend conversion therapy (though less and less openly, as it's frowned upon). And I personally know a couple of cases of people who have undergone them (in the relatively recent past, maybe 10 years ago). Some methods are more violent than others, although both cases I know belonged to specific extremist Catholic sects: Opus Dei (it was more of a camp/group pseudo-therapy thing to pray the gay away) and Kikos (individualized exorcism and other crazy stuff) . Incidentally, I also know of a case in an immigrant Muslim family. Same shit about exorcism.
Yeah, I'm a Britbong so in my country Catholics are a minority. (although we're growing - lots of immigrants to the UK are Catholic, and many people, like me, convert).

I heard about that. Was that the bishop of Málaga or am I thinking of someone else?
 
Argh, it's annoying that my favourite team supports Stonewall instead of something like LGB Alliance.

screenshot-twitter.com-2021.11.26-01_11_43.png



Given the amount of support the club has worldwide, it's not taken well on Instagram. If only they knew how nefarious Stonewall really is..

Screenshot 2021-11-26 01.26.23.png
 
Última edición:
Patriarchy seems like a phantom menace to me. It's a legacy concept from the mid 20th when various radicals were doing find and replace text on Marx and Engels, substituting "Patriarchy" or "colonialism" or whatever for "the Bourgeois". None of these class enemies demonstrably exists in the Western world circa 2021, but it's more emotionally satisfying to have a designated class enemy and the narrative of oppressed and oppressors is simpler and more compelling than nebulous and impersonal socio-technological-economic trends.

Seems like if you're fighting a shadowy enemy who doesn't really exist, you can never really 'win', and you're likely to be permanently unhappy as a result. Don Quixote couldn't slay the giant because it was actually a windmill.
Patriarchy does exist in the western world in our good year 2021 lmfao. One clear example is troons, but as I used the patriarchy as a reason for troonism arguing that would be rather circular so I won't use that as an example. Here's a few simple, obvious examples:
- How women that society views as bad are treated compared to men who have done the same thing. A woman being assertive is viewed more negativity than men. There is no male counterpart to Karen that is widely used.
- Women are afraid to walk and be out at night. Why? Because the possibility of men hurting them. Why are men hurting them and not women?
- Acid attacks still happen in Western world, primarily to women. The "if I can't have you, no one can" mentality behind this is from men who wish to destroy their beauty. I will say in the UK most victims are male, but most of this attacks are from gang violence, not personal attacks like the standard motive.
- Men openly harass women who they do not like or do not agree with them. This is obvious with TERFs and how men with the TERF opinions do not get their addresses posted online or their jobs taken from them as much as women
- How lesbians are expected to accept TiMs but gays are not for TiFs.

I can reasonably assume that you're male, and the thing is you think it's an enemy who doesn't really exist because you are not it's target. Just like how troons will never be a woman and cannot experience what women go through, so will you. You will never experience misogyny in your life, so if you only use your personal experiences as evidence for the patriarchy you will conclude that it doesn't exist. And dismissing the existence of the patriarchy because you don't experience it first hand when most women do and will say they do is arguably an example of the patriarchy itself.
 
Non-binary freak resigns after getting flak for trying to normalize pedophilia, blames transphobia. Really MATI to see troons use transphobia as an excuse, even more so when it's the pedophilia people are mad about.

f74889da-4b8c-42e2-8961-5cb39ec14169-large16x9_StoneBridgesign-5-1.jpg


A Joint Statement from Old Dominion University and Dr. Allyn Walker​

Today, Old Dominion University and Dr. Allyn Walker are announcing that Dr. Walker has decided to step down from their position as assistant professor of sociology and criminal justice at the expiration of their current contract in May 2022. Dr. Walker will remain on leave until that time.

"We have concluded that this outcome is the best way to move forward," ODU President Brian O. Hemphill, Ph.D., said. "We hope today's action helps bring closure for our Monarch family. As we move forward, I encourage all members of the Monarch family to continue our efforts toward healing and civil discourse."

"My scholarship aims to prevent child sexual abuse," Dr. Walker said. "That research was mischaracterized by some in the media and online, partly on the basis of my trans identity. As a result, multiple threats were made against me and the campus community generally. I want to thank Old Dominion University for giving me the opportunity to teach and to conduct my research, and the ODU Department of Public Safety for monitoring the threats against me and the community."

Dr. Walker continued: "I am particularly grateful for the outpouring of support from many among the ODU community, as well as others in my research fields who have publicly affirmed the value of my work in advancing child safety. My Department Chair, Mona Danner, my colleagues, and my students all have been especially supportive. And, finally, I am thankful for the assistance of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) during this time."

"The safety and security of individual Monarchs and our collective campus are of the utmost importance," President Hemphill said. "For ODU, these will always remain top priorities as we pursue our mission in a caring, inclusive, and supportive community, one that respects academic freedom and remains willing to discuss controversial ideas in an atmosphere free of intimidation or violence."



'Non-Binary' ODU Instructor Who Sought to 'Destigmatize' Pedophilia RESIGNS​


Allyn Walker, the Old Dominion University assistant professor who sparked a firestorm this month over her views on "minor attraction" has resigned.

On November 9, Walker, a biological female who identifies as non-binary, sat down for an interview with now-infamous group Prostasia – a registered 503c which many have called "pro-pedophile" for their stances on legalizing child-like sex dolls and "artistic" child pornography, as well as routinely comparing pedophilia to a sexuality.

Walker's interview was focused on her recently-released book titled "A Long, Dark Shadow: Minor Attracted People and Their Pursuit of Dignity."

In the Prostasia interview, Walker states the term "minor attracted people" should be used out of consideration for pedophile's feelings, noting "... I think it’s important to use terminology for groups that members of that group want others to use for them." She goes on to state that "MAP advocacy groups like B4U-Act have advocated for use of the term, and they’ve advocated for it primarily because it’s less stigmatizing than other terms like pedophile."

4W has previously covered the group B4U-Act, which was founded by convicted multi-child rapist Michael Melsheimer for the explicit purposes of normalizing pedophilia and distracting from prevention efforts. In Melsheimer's own words, he wanted to ensure B4U-Act was never associated with the "prevention of offending."

Melsheimer died in 2010, but is considered a respected member of the "boy love community" to this day.

Following 4W's breaking coverage on Walker's interview, the instructor's work quickly came under international backlash. Copies of Walker's PhD dissertation began to circulate, showing Walker had entertained theories regarding allowing pedophiles to access "high quality child pornography" in belief it may reduce offending.

On November 16, the public outrage swelled to a fever pitch, and Old Dominion University President Brian O. Hemphill notified the public that Walker had been placed on administrative leave.

Today, a joint statement announced that Walker was resigning from ODU. In it, Walker blamed media as well as transphobia for "mischaracterizing" her work.

In the short statement, Walker is quoted as saying "My scholarship aims to prevent child sexual abuse ... That research was mischaracterized by some in the media and online, partly on the basis of my trans identity."

Walker is on contract with ODU until May of 2022, but will remain on leave until that time.


 
Gays are absolutely expected to accept Aidens, and I say that as somebody who has no love for the gay community.
Yes, I should have rephrased. Gays are not expected as much to accept TiFs than lesbians to TiMs, and if they reject the boipussy they aren't hated as much as lesbians who reject the girldick. It's Thanksgiving here in America and the family looks at me weird if I'm on my phone not socializing so I rushed a bit with my post.
 
Yes, I should have rephrased. Gays are not expected as much to accept TiFs than lesbians to TiMs, and if they reject the boipussy they aren't hated as much as lesbians who reject the girldick. It's Thanksgiving here in America and the family looks at me weird if I'm on my phone not socializing so I rushed a bit with my post.

I think this particular point is more because TIMs are men, and women have good reason to avoid physical confrontations with men. TIFs are women, and while women can certainly leverage social power, it's not quite the same as being able to beat the shit out of someone during a chimpout.

Gay men can afford to laugh at Aydens more than lesbians can with Lillith.
 
Yes, I should have rephrased. Gays are not expected as much to accept TiFs than lesbians to TiMs, and if they reject the boipussy they aren't hated as much as lesbians who reject the girldick. It's Thanksgiving here in America and the family looks at me weird if I'm on my phone not socializing so I rushed a bit with my post.
They are hated as much as lesbian women, it's just that men on average have an easier time standing up for themselves and not taking threats and mean comments to heart. It's a lot harder to intimidate someone when you're a 5'4" anorexic woman with pubes for a mustache and their reaction to you sperging about how bigoted and evil they are for not wanting to fuck a trans man is "lol ok."
In general no one really cares about TIFs even in their own community, just look at the recent reddit meltdowns on trans subs from TIFs complaining about the huge disparity between "FTM and MTF attention" and being uncomfortable around MTFs who seem to always receive more special treatment. This is only one example.
 
In general no one really cares about TIFs even in their own community, just look at the recent reddit meltdowns on trans subs from TIFs complaining about the huge disparity between "FTM and MTF attention" and being uncomfortable around MTFs who seem to always receive more special treatment. This is only one example.
Hm, it's quite odd that in a movement that signals itself as progressive, the ones who are really women don't have their problems taken seriously or cared for.

If the whole movement had an issue with gay men not accepting TiFs they would yell and shout about gay men not doing so as much as they do with lesbians. TiMs would be in on this too and they are taken more seriously. But they aren't cause they don't care about problems that only affect women. These Aidens are trying to run for patriarchy but they run right into the muck of it.
 
Patriarchy does exist in the western world in our good year 2021 lmfao. One clear example is troons, but as I used the patriarchy as a reason for troonism arguing that would be rather circular so I won't use that as an example. Here's a few simple, obvious examples:
- How women that society views as bad are treated compared to men who have done the same thing. A woman being assertive is viewed more negativity than men. There is no male counterpart to Karen that is widely used.
- Women are afraid to walk and be out at night. Why? Because the possibility of men hurting them. Why are men hurting them and not women?
- Acid attacks still happen in Western world, primarily to women. The "if I can't have you, no one can" mentality behind this is from men who wish to destroy their beauty. I will say in the UK most victims are male, but most of this attacks are from gang violence, not personal attacks like the standard motive.
- Men openly harass women who they do not like or do not agree with them. This is obvious with TERFs and how men with the TERF opinions do not get their addresses posted online or their jobs taken from them as much as women
- How lesbians are expected to accept TiMs but gays are not for TiFs.

Does "patriarchy" just mean "men can be bad to women"? I thought it was meant to be a system of consolidated power and oppression and shit.

- men and women face different societal expectations. Definitely true.
- men are stronger and more violent on average. Definitely true.
- some ethnic groups, mostly Muslims from what I can gather, seem to have a thing for throwing acid at women. Definitely true.
- crazy troons harass women. Definitely true.

But this is a collection of observations and complaints, some of them related to the others and some not. It's not that they're not serious complaints. But you could equally take the incel/MRA route and stitch together various observations about women's behavior towards men, divorce, child support, 60% of college students being women, etc. into a grand theory of "misandry" ( :story: ) or "matriarchy" or whatever. It would be equally missing the point.

Life is unfair and some people are crazy assholes, but that doesn't mean there's necessarily a systemic structure of oppression going on. And if we're not talking about a system of oppression it's Quixotic to call it an -archy. Shaking your fist at an imagined conspiracy by car saboteurs when you really just need a new tire or a better car.

I can reasonably assume that you're male, and the thing is you think it's an enemy who doesn't really exist because you are not it's target. Just like how troons will never be a woman and cannot experience what women go through, so will you. You will never experience misogyny in your life, so if you only use your personal experiences as evidence for the patriarchy you will conclude that it doesn't exist. And dismissing the existence of the patriarchy because you don't experience it first hand when most women do and will say they do is arguably an example of the patriarchy itself.

It's true that I'm a man and the CEO of Sexual Harassment ( :punished: ) but I don't think your enemy really exists because there's no real evidence for it existing as a coherent concept. Not being convinced that something exists isn't evidence of it existing, or else Xenu would be real. But I see this rhetorical trick (disagreement with my belief is proof I am right) used a lot by people who are determined to convince themselves.

Life can suck sometimes, and there seems to be a lot more misunderstanding, disappointment and sometimes anger between the sexes than there used to be. It's probably psychologically comforting to aggregate personal setbacks - and the horrible shit you see on social media and the news - into a grand theory of how They (those bastards) are Ruining Everything and that you in particular are a "target". But it also means your righteous anger will be simmering forever and nothing will get fixed, because They aren't going to go away if They weren't really there to begin with.

🙏HAPPY TROONSGIVING 🦃
Troonsgiving.jpg
 
Does "patriarchy" just mean "men can be bad to women"? I thought it was meant to be a system of consolidated power and oppression and shit.

- men and women face different societal expectations. Definitely true.
- men are stronger and more violent on average. Definitely true.
- some ethnic groups, mostly Muslims from what I can gather, seem to have a thing for throwing acid at women. Definitely true.
- crazy troons harass women. Definitely true.

But this is a collection of observations and complaints, some of them related to the others and some not. It's not that they're not serious complaints. But you could equally take the incel/MRA route and stitch together various observations about women's behavior towards men, divorce, child support, 60% of college students being women, etc. into a grand theory of "misandry" ( :story: ) or "matriarchy" or whatever. It would be equally missing the point.

Life is unfair and some people are crazy assholes, but that doesn't mean there's necessarily a systemic structure of oppression going on. And if we're not talking about a system of oppression it's Quixotic to call it an -archy. Shaking your fist at an imagined conspiracy by car saboteurs when you really just need a new tire or a better car.



It's true that I'm a man and the CEO of Sexual Harassment ( :punished: ) but I don't think your enemy really exists because there's no real evidence for it existing as a coherent concept. Not being convinced that something exists isn't evidence of it existing, or else Xenu would be real. But I see this rhetorical trick (disagreement with my belief is proof I am right) used a lot by people who are determined to convince themselves.

Life can suck sometimes, and there seems to be a lot more misunderstanding, disappointment and sometimes anger between the sexes than there used to be. It's probably psychologically comforting to aggregate personal setbacks - and the horrible shit you see on social media and the news - into a grand theory of how They (those bastards) are Ruining Everything and that you in particular are a "target". But it also means your righteous anger will be simmering forever and nothing will get fixed, because They aren't going to go away if They weren't really there to begin with.

🙏HAPPY TROONSGIVING 🦃
Ver archivo adjunto 2750694
FFS if you are going to take selfies at least clean the fucking cumstains off the mirror. Why are troons so fucking lazy? And what's with that bulge? Is it a bulge or conveniently placed mirror grime? I can't tell anymore, but it's kind of hilarious.

That aside, this one is weirdly unsettling even compared to the insanity we've seen so far. Looks even faker than the filtered ones. What the fuck did this creature put on its face, feces and chalk? It's so off compared to that pasty white skin tone elsewhere. The Dumbo ears don't help (specially with the earrings making them easy to see from Google's satellite maps).
 
Atrás
Top Abajo