📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[AvocadoToast]

YOU. DUMB. BITCH.
I have been telling this in the past, and I'll repeat: terfs are just broken clock showing right time. It's YOUR deranged ideology that was built on manhate, hating masculinity, suppressing natural male sexuality, feminizing boys, and creating a message of men bad girls good that cauzed shit you've gotten into. Trannies are product of feminism and progressivism. Go and suck girl dick, you've earned it. The only real reason terfs are terfs is because of man hate. They hate mtf because they were men, they hate ftm because they ditched sisterhood. Terfs don't belong anywhere, because you're bunch of mongloid retards who can't take accountability for the product of your ideology.
In a fight of terfs vs tranies I would like to see them both cemented in a ditch.

Trannies are not a product of feminism, completely the opposite in fact. They see womanhood as being a dumb bimbo slut, which is not a feminist or female view of womanhood but a male degenerate one. Pretty much everything about trannies is extreme maleness, from terminal coombrain to threatening/committing suicide when they don't get what they want, to blaming and projecting their faults on women.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

It's a stitched tiktok. The thumbnail is the audio - if it's an original audio (i.e. someone talking, rather someone lipsynching along to another tiktok) then the audio display will show their avatar, which rotates while playing like a vinyl record.

They literally mean being friends, yes. Primary is sexual, secondary is romantic, tertiary is platonic.

Tertiary is an umbrella for all the other attraction types. So there's also queerplatonic attraction, which they claim is asexual nonromantic soulmates, so in other words want to be best friends with someone*. There's also aesthetic, where you think they're pretty "but not sexually, honest!". There's sensual, where you want to do "sensual" things with them like cuddle or massage or even kiss, but "genuinely this isn't sexual attraction, honest!". There's even more exceptional shit like "domestic attraction" where you want to cook someone a nice meal and do their laundry.

*Asexuals get really mad at you calling queerplatonic relationships "being best friends", but not as mad as aromantics do when they go on about their sexual queerplatonic relationships and you insist they're either fuckbuddies or they have a regular old relationship and they just have commitment issues.

I kinda miss the asexuality phase of social justice, because nobody took their whining about oppression seriously, so you could poke holes in their logic with no social penalty. They were also mostly harmless, and were basically autistic people who didn't understand that what they were experiencing was just regular old sexual attraction and had an obsessive need to categorise everything and make exceptional graphs:

Ver archivo adjunto 2745347Ver archivo adjunto 2745348
or they were attention whores who wanted attention for having a regular old relationship but "queer" in some nebulous sense. They've pretty much all faded away now or transitioned, and unfortunately the movement birthed the concept of the "non sexual fetish" which a bunch of groomers use now.

This is exceptional and autistic and almost legitimately broke my brain. Tbf, my brain didn’t far to go to break, but whatever.

This is the end result of the Mythbusters quote: I reject your reality and substitute my own.

That's enough internet for the night*. (Thanks for the explanation, really. It's not your fault these people are stupid and suck, you're just the messenger.)

* lie. Imma finish reading the thread. At least.

 

[decaydent]

I honestly never thought I'd see it in real life... oh how wrong I was.
(cropped to remove some identifying stuff)
Ver archivo adjunto 2746077

Is this legit art now? Because it does make me feel a certain type of way.. It needs more shapes and cluttering. Where is the neurodivergence? Where are the clown fish? Where are the MAP?

 

[Zoids Fan 025]

I honestly never thought I'd see it in real life... oh how wrong I was.
(cropped to remove some identifying stuff)
Ver archivo adjunto 2746077

I thought the same, but saw one flying out a window right where I live. I live on the edge of deep red country and a college town though, so ultimately it make sense. Shame no ones done anything to it, but I’m not risking shit just to destroy it. Much like the flags owner, it’ll be taken care of by nature anyway.

 

[PS2 Kiryu]

Forgot which tranny this tranny orbited.

 

[Bixnood]

I don’t think this is true. I think tranny rights is being promoted in much the same way “girl power” used to be: a corporate, media friendly cultural movement that appeals to mainstream liberal sensibilities about individual freedom.

Any genuinely radical feminist perspective would reject it on various grounds. Gender constructivism reasonably asserts that gender is externally imposed based on biological categorization and therefore isn’t some sort of innate identity and cannot be claimed by a male socialized as a man. Furthermore, trans identity generally manifests as a grotesque and misogynistic performance of womanhood driven by deviant male sexual tastes. There’s no reason a consistent radical feminist WOULD support troonery, it’s counterproductive to their goals in a lot of ways(making it valorous for men to occupy spaces women have carved out for themselves is a good example).

I’m not a radfem or a leftist, but accusing them of creating trannies is stupid as fuck.

alot of you are writing with the benefit of hindsight, radical feminists have always wanted to drastically shift the status quo.
for many trans and homosexual rights were part of the progressive agenda which went hand in hand with women's liberation.
many feminists also argued that the main difference in the treatment of men and women was childhood socialisation something which is now a big part of the tranny zeitgeist.
I understand now why feminist would want to distance them selves from the trans movement now that it has had negative effects on women. but I don't see why it's so hard to just admit the part they played in it.

 

[behindyourightnow]

Love this guy putting on this pity party and then admitting in the comments that no, of course he hasn't made even the tiniest, most miniscule effort to even see his kids, let alone get custody. He could hire a lawyer and take his ex-wife to court and even after all this time he'd probably at least get visitation if not outright 50/50, assuming he's not completely deranged publicly (which is a stretch, I know). He could get a private detective to find where his ex-wife lives so he can get in touch with his kids. But he doesn't, because he doesn't give a shit - he only cares about creating the appearance that he's the sort of father who loves and misses his children and was a Good Dad until that evil harpy ex of his stole his children from him, but he's so lazy about it that he can't hold up the illusion for more than two comments before crumbling and admitting the truth: He's a psychotic deadbeat who drove his wife off by being a (lbr probably abusive) lunatic and doesn't give a shit about any of his kids.

Why is this kind of shit so common in trans-identified men tho. At least most shitty deadbeat "cis" dads manage to keep the illusion up for more than ten minutes before admitting the truth, lol.

My reading of it was that something so terrible happened that he didn't even bother trying to get partial custody of them (possibly there is even some sort of restraining order), rather than him just being a deadbeat. Not necessarily pedo shit but maybe extreme inappropriateness in front of the children, or violence.

And yet he still makes it all about his suffering.

I honestly never thought I'd see it in real life... oh how wrong I was.
(cropped to remove some identifying stuff)
Ver archivo adjunto 2746077

I haven't seen that one yet, but the old rainbow flags around where I live have all been replaced with the dumb new troon/BLM ones now. I used to find the old ones quite heartening and aesthetically pleasing but now it's just a visual metaphor of troons eating their way through everything lol

alot of you are writing with the benefit of hindsight, radical feminists have always wanted to drastically shift the status quo.
for many trans and homosexual rights were part of the progressive agenda which went hand in hand with women's liberation.
many feminists also argued that the main difference in the treatment of men and women was childhood socialisation something which is now a big part of the tranny zeitgeist.
I understand now why feminist would want to distance them selves from the trans movement now that it has had negative effects on women. but I don't see why it's so hard to just admit the part they played in it.

Radfems have been fighting troons for literally decades, just because you're not aware of that doesn't mean that our brave unshaven TERF sisters were not trying to warn us.

And wanting to "drastically shift the status quo" has very little to do with troonery, which as far as I can tell is very much in harmony with the status quo (since it pushes activists to focus on fulfilling the needs of men in dresses, rather than something like economic inequality). Which is why the status quo has so enthusiastically embraced it.

 

[warehouse]

YOU. DUMB. BITCH.
I have been telling this in the past, and I'll repeat: terfs are just broken clock showing right time. It's YOUR deranged ideology that was built on manhate, hating masculinity, suppressing natural male sexuality, feminizing boys, and creating a message of men bad girls good that cauzed shit you've gotten into. Trannies are product of feminism and progressivism. Go and suck girl dick, you've earned it. The only real reason terfs are terfs is because of man hate. They hate mtf because they were men, they hate ftm because they ditched sisterhood. Terfs don't belong anywhere, because you're bunch of mongloid retards who can't take accountability for the product of your ideology.
In a fight of terfs vs tranies I would like to see them both cemented in a ditch.

WTF I love this thread now

 

[LateNightMuffin]

You know how in some countries with poor sanitation, every so often they have an outbreak of dysentery? This thread is the same way, in that every so often there is an outbreak of 'nasty stupid uppity women are responsible for the behavior of mentally ill men.' Same shit different day.

 

[dra dra dra gon]

alot of you are writing with the benefit of hindsight, radical feminists have always wanted to drastically shift the status quo.
for many trans and homosexual rights were part of the progressive agenda which went hand in hand with women's liberation.
many feminists also argued that the main difference in the treatment of men and women was childhood socialisation something which is now a big part of the tranny zeitgeist.
I understand now why feminist would want to distance them selves from the trans movement now that it has had negative effects on women. but I don't see why it's so hard to just admit the part they played in it.

it was the radfems though who were critizising including men in dresses in lesbian spaces or feminist places or whatever already like in 70s or something so blaming radfems for other feminists doings is kinda dumb when they the og tranny haters

 

[soggy london]

You know how in some countries with poor sanitation, every so often they have an outbreak of dysentery? This thread is the same way, in that every so often there is an outbreak of 'nasty stupid uppity women are responsible for the behavior of mentally ill men.' Same shit different day.

On god. I won’t bother trying to imagine the autistic mental gymnastics that occurs for these exceptionals to blame a handful of angry lesbians on tumblr for the mfs in this thread jerking themselves off while wearing flower patterned shit-packed pampers. Hilariously bold of them to assume troons give a shit about what a uterus haver thinks anyway.

 

[Chandelier]

I grabbed this from Women Are Human.

The Canadian government, thanks to Morgane Oger, wants to criminalize ALL hate speech, including things such as saying 'You Will Never Be a Woman' on any social media platform, blog, or personal website.

On November 3, 2020, Liberal Party Member and Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault introduced Bill C-10 to the House of Commons. While officially the bill is said to be (and I quote) “An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts”, the Conservatives are calling it “the censorship bill”. Bill C-10 will amend the Broadcasting Act to include internet and digital media.[2] Then, in June of 2021, the Honourable David Lametti, also of the Liberal Party of Canada, introduced Bill C-36, which proposes legislative changes to the Canadian Human Rights Act and to the Criminal Code in order to combat hate speech and hate crimes. According to the Government of Canada, “The bill defines ‘hate speech’ as the content of a communication that expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination. These grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression…”[3] and others. Furthermore, “These amendments would apply to public communications by individual users on the Internet, including on social media, on personal websites, and in mass emails. For example, they would apply to an individual publishing a blog or posting on a social media platform. They would also apply to operators of websites that primarily publish their own content but also publish comments by users and visitors, including in articles on online newspapers and in user comment sections.”[4] “Operators of these social media platforms are the subject of upcoming engagement by Canadian Heritage, which will outline a proposed approach to regulating social media and harmful content, including hate speech, online.”[5] Continue reading Gender Critical Feminism Soon May Be Criminalized in Canada | Women Are Human. Read more at: https://www.womenarehuman.com/gender-critical-feminism-soon-may-be-criminalized-in-canada/

This followed Bill C-16, which promised 2 years of jail for anyone caught misgendering. The Canadian public largely did not know about this and an Angus Reid poll showed 80% of Canadians supporting trans rights. I'm not sure how many were polled exactly, but I do remember it being used to show how important the Bill was.

So, even in personal emails these laws will make you a criminal.

You can thank Morgane Oger for this, because closing down a rape shelter wasn't enough for the fucker.

 

[bread n circuses]

alot of you are writing with the benefit of hindsight, radical feminists have always wanted to drastically shift the status quo.
for many trans and homosexual rights were part of the progressive agenda which went hand in hand with women's liberation.
many feminists also argued that the main difference in the treatment of men and women was childhood socialisation something which is now a big part of the tranny zeitgeist.
I understand now why feminist would want to distance them selves from the trans movement now that it has had negative effects on women. but I don't see why it's so hard to just admit the part they played in it.

The problem is that you view feminism and feminists as being homogeneous. Feminism is vast and contains many strands of thought, and feminists aren’t in agreement about much at all. There are Marxist feminists, there are generic liberal feminists(the kind you’re most likely thinking of), there are various shades of radical feminist, etc.

Broadly, tranny rights can be identified with the third wave of feminism, which started in the 80s, was concerned with shit like “intersectionality”, and was significantly less radical than the second wave. Shit like “sex work” and individualism and other liberal issues replaced the old goal of radical women’s liberation. It’s become more popular now with the mass adoption of watered down “woke” ideology.

Radfems often reject many of the third wave’s innovations and support gender abolitionism, biological realism, and other stuff that is anathema to mainstream liberal feminism. Radfems are critical of shit like prostitution, the commodification of sexuality, the commodification of gender identity, and other shit that the mainstream promotes.

Tranny ideologues actually don’t understand the significance of childhood socialization in the same way that radfems do at all. Radfems believe this socialization is what creates what we call gender while trannies believe gender is some sort of inherent quasi-divine state of being and therefore gender expression should be a choice left to the child . They reify essential gender identities while radfems deny them.

 

[1440p Curved Monitor]

YOU. DUMB. BITCH.
I have been telling this in the past, and I'll repeat: terfs are just broken clock showing right time. It's YOUR deranged ideology that was built on manhate, hating masculinity, suppressing natural male sexuality, feminizing boys, and creating a message of men bad girls good that cauzed shit you've gotten into. Trannies are product of feminism and progressivism. Go and suck girl dick, you've earned it. The only real reason terfs are terfs is because of man hate. They hate mtf because they were men, they hate ftm because they ditched sisterhood. Terfs don't belong anywhere, because you're bunch of mongloid retards who can't take accountability for the product of your ideology.
In a fight of terfs vs tranies I would like to see them both cemented in a ditch.

So class, as demonstrated here by a presumably right man and by the many examples from left men on Twitter, political alignment doesn't protect men from being misogynistic, so thus radical feminist do not fit squarely in the left/right political spectrum as they are against misogynistic men as a whole.

 

[Hepativore]

Okay, serious question here...I know that there are no girls on the internet, but for the people who actually are lesbians how bad is the troon encroachment into your dating pool/culture really? Are transbians as big of a plague in your scene as they seem to be?

I have no issues with the LGB part of the alphabet acronym so this is an honest inquiry.

 

[ash9990]

Are you sure Rowling is the one who has a "sad, miserable life" here?

Ver archivo adjunto 2745932
x

'Tis the season to join the 41%.

 

[Sourceress]

Okay, serious question here...I know that there are no girls on the internet, but for the people who actually are lesbians how bad is the troon encroachment into your dating pool/culture really? Are transbians as big of a plague in your scene as they seem to be?

I have no issues with the LGB part of the alphabet acronym so this is an honest inquiry.

It's honestly horrible. I haven't experienced it myself (married) but from conversations with other lesbian women, every dating app lesbians use is absolutely teeming with trans-identified men who identify themselves as "lesbians" and are seeking out lesbian women. Most of my lesbian friends and acquaintances have stopped using these apps altogether because the sexual harassment is so bad from the men there. The ones who stay... it depends. Some get pressured into relationships and sex they don't want to have with men. Some play nice but turn every one of the shits down. Some just ignore them. All of them have it pretty rough.

Offline lesbian groups and meetups usually happen more or less in secret, because otherwise either you have to let the men in and the entire nature of the space changes (and many of the actual lesbian women leave the group) or you have to deal with turning them down and being called "exclusionary," possibly ostracized in your community, possibly losing your job and/or receiving death and rape threats, etc. I know at least one lesbian woman who I met online who got in huge trouble with her local "LGBT" group for trying to organize a lesbian only meetup group. (It's not all bad - there's a lesbian group in my town and to the best of my knowledge, it has never included any men and still exists. Probably just because it's all organized through an email list, though.)

It's really tough. These men are incredibly entitled and sexually aggressive, and they don't take rejection well. A lot of lesbians have had to go "underground" just to be able to meet up with one another without the presence of males. It's so ridiculous. And it makes it so much harder to find community and relationships than it already was - and it was already difficult due to a small population that is really spread out.

 

[1440p Curved Monitor]

The problem is that you view feminism and feminists as being homogeneous. Feminism is vast and contains many strands of thought, and feminists aren’t in agreement about much at all. There are Marxist feminists, there are generic liberal feminists(the kind you’re most likely thinking of), there are various shades of radical feminist, etc.

Broadly, tranny rights can be identified with the third wave of feminism, which started in the 80s, was concerned with shit like “intersectionality”, and was significantly less radical than the second wave. Shit like “sex work” and individualism and other liberal issues replaced the old goal of radical women’s liberation. It’s become more popular now with the mass adoption of watered down “woke” ideology.

Radfems often reject many of the third wave’s innovations and support gender abolitionism, biological realism, and other stuff that is anathema to mainstream liberal feminism. Radfems are critical of shit like prostitution, the commodification of sexuality, the commodification of gender identity, and other shit that the mainstream promotes.

Tranny ideologues actually don’t understand the significance of childhood socialization in the same way that radfems do at all. Radfems believe this socialization is what creates what we call gender while trannies believe gender is some sort of inherent quasi-divine state of being and therefore gender expression should be a choice left to the child . They reify essential gender identities while radfems deny them.

I have explained this in detail to this farmer (iirc) on this thread. It's not worth trying to change his mind, just keep giving him the trash react.

Okay, serious question here...I know that there are no girls on the internet, but for the people who actually are lesbians how bad is the troon encroachment into your dating pool/culture really? Are transbians as big of a plague in your scene as they seem to be?

I have no issues with the LGB part of the alphabet acronym so this is an honest inquiry.

Disclaimer: I am not a lesbian, but I have many friends who are. I'm bisexual so I can see what happens on the dating apps.

It's pretty darn bad. Lots of lesbians, especially young lesbians, are pressured to date and have sex with transwomen. Transwomen are everywhere on dating apps and iirc it's rumored that the app HER will somehow make the transbians feel better about themselves because they keep getting rejected on the app. There is no way for a lesbian to say that she is same sex attracted on her dating app profiles without getting banned. Rejecting transwomen irl is much worse as you might be making a narcissistic man angry and he will go out and brand you as a terf. I know from first hand experience that making troons angry as a woman is a bit traumatizing so I bet it is worse if you make them angry by denying them sex.

Even if you do not find a transbian, there are a fair amount of bisexual handmaidens who think they are lesbians that will shame you for not wanting the dick. So not only you have to deal with transbians, you have to deal with women who will call you out as a terf if you say you're same sex attracted. One of my friend said she that dating a female they/them was annoying as the they/them kept stressing that my friend wasn't a lesbian since the two were dating. You can occasionally find this phenomenon when a lesbian dates a ftm.

The offline dating scene for lesbians is hard. There's only a handful of lesbian bars in America. Whats left is queer bars where it's likely you will be shamed for not liking the dick. The lesbians I know don't even bother date or try to covertly sniff out other terfy lesbians on dating apps.

Gender ideology is a cult and for lesbians it's best to not date anyone in that cult as they think that lesbians do not mean women who are same sex attracted. It's straight up homophobia. This is why a lot of lesbians are terfy and have been against transwomen since day one: transwomen have been saying that lesbians are opposite sex attracted.

 

[chiobu]

Girl guide tranny's in the news, reddit tranny Aimee Challenor mentioned too.

Girlguides launch probe into commissioner, 58, who identifies as trans after campaigners uncovered 'disturbing' social media messages and pictures including her dressed as a dominatrix and wielding an assault rifle​

• Monica Sulley took on the role in July, overseeing groups in Nottinghamshire
• The 58-year-old bus driver's appointment has upset some feminist campaigners
• They say biological males identifying as women shouldn't have leadership roles
• Pictures show her in black bondage-style dress and high heels, wielding a whip

Girlguiding bosses have launched an investigation into one of their Commissioners who is a trans woman after she allegedly posed for a saucy picture in a dominatrix-style outfit.

Bus driver Monica Sulley, 58, reportedly became a guiding Commissioner in July this year, overseeing Rainbows, Brownies, Guides and Rangers in Southwell, Nottinghamshire.

Her appointment has upset some feminist campaigners who argue that biological males identifying as women should not be given leadership roles in the movement.

Campaigners delved into her background and unearthed a picture on her Instagram page showing her in a black bondage-style short dress with high heels and wielding a whip.

The picture of her posing in a corridor was captioned: 'Now behave yourselves or Mistress will have to punish you #mistress'.



Another snap showed Ms Sulley dressed in a tight fitting black top and taking aim with what appears to be a fake assault rifle with a holstered handgun hanging from her waist.

She was also seen in a third picture posing with a sword and in a Twitter picture showing off her ample cleavage with the caption: 'Boobs, or did you want to see more?'

Girlguiding which is Britain's leading charity for girls and young women launched its investigation after the pictures of Ms Sulley were revealed by the feminist website 4W.

Angela Salt, the CEO of Girlguiding, said in a statement tonight: 'The safety and wellbeing of our members is our absolute priority.

'We follow rigorous recruitment and vetting procedures, have clear policies, and a volunteer code of conduct which volunteers are expected to follow to keep our members safe.

'Girlguiding is aware of concerns raised. We are looking into this as a matter of urgency and will provide the necessary support and action in line with our compliance procedures.'

A spokeswoman for the organisation said she would not be issuing a statement on behalf of Ms Sulley who is also known on social media as Monica Tetley.

Ms Sulley who describes herself on social media as 'a trans woman married to a wonderful man' declined to comment when contacted by MailOnline.

Her Instagram account has now been deleted and her Twitter account set to private settings.

Girlguiding has described itself in recent years as being a 'girl-only organisation with a trans-inclusive Equality and diversity policy'.

A statement on its website says: 'We treat trans girls and women according to the gender they have transitioned, or are proposing to transition, to. Meaning trans girls and trans women are welcome to be a part of our great charity.

'The benefits to Girlguiding of being fully-inclusive are significant. We recognise the huge impact Girlguiding can have on each young member and volunteer.

'And it's vital that trans girls and women – like all other girls and women – can contribute their experiences, time, commitment and skills to our charity.'


But feminist writer Anna Slatz described Ms Sulley's social media posts as 'disturbing' in her article on the 4W website.

She wrote: 'While Girlguiding framed their policies as being directed towards including and supporting children, they tip-toed around the fact they were also allowing adult males who identified as women to take leadership positions within the organization (sic) in proximity to and control over the youth.'

Ms Slatz added that Ms Sulley's appointment had been 'met with backlash from women's rights activists and netizens concerned over his (sic) inappropriate online behavior (sic).'

She quoted one social media user as questioning Ms Sulley's involvement in Girlguiding, saying: 'Why would you be so insensitive towards women and girls that you would do this? I've managed my whole life without being involved with guiding and I'm a woman, it's hardly traumatic to not be involved.'

Another user said Ms Sulley's appointment was sending a 'possibly harmful' message to girls and young women, as 'it simply demonstrated males would be readily able to gain leadership over females in exclusive spaces simply by identifying as women'.

The article on 4W also revealed that Ms Sulley was one of 2,000 signatories on a letter to Pride in London organisers in 2018 which protested about how radical lesbians had been allowed to stage an anti-trans demonstration during the Pride march.

The lesbians pushed their way to the front of the Pride march behind a giant Rainbow flag to protest that the trans movement was attacking lesbian rights.

The letter which Ms Sulley signed was written by transgender woman and activist Aimee Challenor, a former contender for the deputy leadership of the Green party.

Ms Challenor was suspended by the Green party a month later, over revelations that she allowed her father David to be her election agent for 18 months after he was charged with raping and torturing a ten-year-old.

He was jailed for 22 years after being found guilty at Warwick Crown Court of 'depraved' crimes, including dressing as a baby and tying the girl to a beam, before whipping her and giving her electric shocks.

Ms Challenor later resigned after accusing the Green party of transphobia.

Girlguiding was forced to defend its trans-inclusive policy in September 2018 after it expelled two volunteers who objected to it.

The movement insisted at the time that allowing people who identify as women to join or lead groups did not put girls at risk.

Helen Watts, from Ealing in west London and another volunteer, were expelled after 'a number of complaints' were made about them, the organisation said.

Ms Watts, who has a 15-year history with Girlguiding, told the BBC's World At One programme on Monday that she felt 'a real loss' about being was banned from events and from contacting her group.

She insisted that girls have a right to 'female-only' spaces, particularly when guides and leaders shared lavatories, showers and sleeping accommodation in camps.

Ms Watts added that adolescents coping with changes in their bodies, victims of bullying or harassment by men, as well as girls from some cultural or religious backgrounds might feel shut out by Girlguiding becoming 'effectively a mixed-sex space'.

But feminist writer Anna Slatz described Ms Sulley's social media posts as 'disturbing' in her article on the 4W website.

She wrote: 'While Girlguiding framed their policies as being directed towards including and supporting children, they tip-toed around the fact they were also allowing adult males who identified as women to take leadership positions within the organization (sic) in proximity to and control over the youth.'

Ms Slatz added that Ms Sulley's appointment had been 'met with backlash from women's rights activists and netizens concerned over his (sic) inappropriate online behavior (sic).'

She quoted one social media user as questioning Ms Sulley's involvement in Girlguiding, saying: 'Why would you be so insensitive towards women and girls that you would do this? I've managed my whole life without being involved with guiding and I'm a woman, it's hardly traumatic to not be involved.'

Another user said Ms Sulley's appointment was sending a 'possibly harmful' message to girls and young women, as 'it simply demonstrated males would be readily able to gain leadership over females in exclusive spaces simply by identifying as women'.

The article on 4W also revealed that Ms Sulley was one of 2,000 signatories on a letter to Pride in London organisers in 2018 which protested about how radical lesbians had been allowed to stage an anti-trans demonstration during the Pride march.

The lesbians pushed their way to the front of the Pride march behind a giant Rainbow flag to protest that the trans movement was attacking lesbian rights.

The letter which Ms Sulley signed was written by transgender woman and activist Aimee Challenor, a former contender for the deputy leadership of the Green party.

Ms Challenor was suspended by the Green party a month later, over revelations that she allowed her father David to be her election agent for 18 months after he was charged with raping and torturing a ten-year-old.

He was jailed for 22 years after being found guilty at Warwick Crown Court of 'depraved' crimes, including dressing as a baby and tying the girl to a beam, before whipping her and giving her electric shocks.

Ms Challenor later resigned after accusing the Green party of transphobia.

Girlguiding was forced to defend its trans-inclusive policy in September 2018 after it expelled two volunteers who objected to it.

The movement insisted at the time that allowing people who identify as women to join or lead groups did not put girls at risk.

Helen Watts, from Ealing in west London and another volunteer, were expelled after 'a number of complaints' were made about them, the organisation said.

Ms Watts, who has a 15-year history with Girlguiding, told the BBC's World At One programme on Monday that she felt 'a real loss' about being was banned from events and from contacting her group.

She insisted that girls have a right to 'female-only' spaces, particularly when guides and leaders shared lavatories, showers and sleeping accommodation in camps.

Ms Watts added that adolescents coping with changes in their bodies, victims of bullying or harassment by men, as well as girls from some cultural or religious backgrounds might feel shut out by Girlguiding becoming 'effectively a mixed-sex space'.

Girlguides probe into trans Commissioner's 'dominatrix-style' picture

Bus driver Monica Sulley, 58, reportedly became a guiding Commissioner in July this year, overseeing Rainbows, Brownies, Guides and Rangers in Southwell, Nottinghamshire.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Girlguides launch probe into trans Commissioner, 58, over saucy domin…

archived 24 Nov 2021 00:30:28 UTC

archive.md

 

[nyango star]

You know how in some countries with poor sanitation, every so often they have an outbreak of dysentery? This thread is the same way, in that every so often there is an outbreak of 'nasty stupid uppity women are responsible for the behavior of mentally ill men.' Same shit different day.

they seem to believe that a woman's job is to essentially be a glorified tard wrangler for their husbands/boyfriends/men in general. which ironically is something a lot of troons believe as well.