📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[HullDown]

All 3 videos or just the last one?

Another fren managed to archive the content in a previous post, but thanks!

 

[ForbiddenVelma960]

A recent post from our old pal Erin.
Ver archivo adjunto 2736575
How did his jaw get more masculine after FFS? And this man really claims to pass irl

People like Erin and some other TIMS I know really make the case for this all being a fetish. Have you ever noticed that they CONSTANTLY post the before and after pictures? See most od the old school trannies I know would be mortified to be posting their dude pics online - it is not something they want to see or have anyone else see!

But the ones who fall deep into the AGP cope fantasies like exes of mine would re-post these images on a weekly almost basis. Like they are literally getting a massive transformation boner. Normal people don't do this. It is not mentally healthy to be so fixated!

Seeing "Erin" posting pics where he figured out how to lose weight and do his eye brows- I am always amazed how much these"transformations" amount to basic grooming.

That nose is atrocious though. Get FFS for fucks sake!

 

[decaydent]

archive
Tranny meets kid who is nice and the mom is being the uber-libfem educating indoctrinating her offspring. And then everyone clapped.

Even their „happy“ stories are pathetic - in the dramatic sense. „So I had this beautiful moment, and I my gaze fell upon the sun and I remembered all my fallen folx. It was like, such a moment. This juxtaposition of content and sorrow. So fucking poetic it made me ugly-cry.“

wow I really felt that.

 

[GloriousScarf]

The other day I noticed that my male NB identified housemate has the same dress that I do and looks atrocious in it. I haven't worn this dress in years, but part of me wants to pull it out from the back of my closet and wear it in front of him just to make him seethe.

Given their penchant for stealing clothes of the women they live with, that probably is your dress.

 

[RandallBoggs]

But how can they actually believe this? I mean, Semitic languages are even worse. They don't only differentiate between he and she, but also between you female and you male. If trannies were so universally accepted and integrated in every form of society, why does Arabic force me to call you a male or female? The same goes for Hebrew (at => you female, atah => you male) and other Semitic languages like Amharic in East Africa. I'm quite familiar with several languages and all of them either don't differentiate between different genders (for example Finnish and Turkish) or they differentiate between male and female. There were only very few languages which differentaite between more than two genders and in that case they were mostly very small tribes and not complex societies. And those genders were often homosexual men who were considered neither male nor female, women who had to adopt the male role because there wasn't a patriarch around or infertile women.

Also the whole thing with the Native Americans is bogus. There was never a Native American culture, but thousands of American cultures. It's strange how leftists only point out the cultures they like and pretend that all Native American cultures were like this: "Language X didn't have gender!". Sure honey, but I can show you hundred of Native American languages who do differentiate between male and female. I also know of one Native American language which is very ableist: If you have a disability, people traditionally actually always referred to it (For example if you were blind, people wouldn't call you he/she, but "the Blind one" and this wasn't voluntary but grammaticalized in the language's grammar itself). Many Native American cultures were also very patriarchal. We looked at one tribe in linguistics that thought that women were so irrelevant in the discourse that they didn't even differentiate between different female family members, whereas the male members were clearly differentiated. So you had a father, an uncle, a cousin etc., but for females a mother, an aunt and a cousine etc. were just the same word.

So my suggestion: Like this noble Native American tribe who called out someone's disabilities, it should be obligatory to use the pronoun "tranny" or "exceptional individual" if someone is trans.

Their obsession with erasing Semitic languages has been especially bad recently considering the sudden influx of self identifying Jews claiming ethnic minority points. Hebrew is HEAVILY gendered, to the point even objects have genders and the grammatical structure of a sentence changes depending on what you're referring to. To make it gender neutral would literally require an overhaul of the entire language from the very roots of it.
A bunch of white people demanding "POC" cultures change their whole way of life to accommodate the white people's beliefs... where have we seen that before? But no those awful transphobes are the true white supremacists!

 

[1440p Curved Monitor]

Once again, JK Rowling rolls up and slam dunks on these troons. Never piss off writers because they will obliterate you via their prose.



Clicking on their Twitter accounts leads to nothing, so they all most likely deactivated.

 

[Wallace]

Once again, JK Rowling rolls up and slam dunks on these troons. Never piss off writers because they will obliterate you via their prose.

Ver archivo adjunto 2740963Ver archivo adjunto 2740960Ver archivo adjunto 2740958

Clicking on their Twitter accounts leads to nothing, so they all most likely deactivated.

More women getting doxxxed and receiving rape and death threats on Twitter for the crime of disagreeing with incels. GamerGaaate!

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Why do these perverts always portray "sluts" in bondage gear? Not that dumbass sincere bdsm perverts don't exist, but these people really seem to only source their "sluts" from the same pool of reluctant women gaslit into harmful sexual relationships. Sluts in their mind only seem to be just a hair over "consensual" interactions.

These people have some real intimacy problems.

Because an ordinary woman who has a lot of vanilla (or otherwise) sex - a slut - looks like a ordinary woman. She goes around wearing jeans and t-shirts and sneakers with her hair in a pony tail.

How can they virtue signal with a cartoon of a regular woman? Even a woman in lingerie won't cut it for these men, because there's also an element of control/sadism/abuse to their treatment of women. A woman in lingerie is a woman who has agency in her sex life. Obviously sluts have no agency (God forbid women like sex) and need to be put in their place, thus bondage gear.

 

[AssignedEva]

Rate me late but this answer to the topic of conflict between transmen and transwomen on r/Traaaaaaans just cracked me up

Ver archivo adjunto 2739544

Sure, a good chunk of reddit is a creative exercise in bullshitting. But there is no conspiracy to paint trans people as anything, there is no factory producing sock puppets to "infiltrate" the community. There is SO many legit accounts being cringe at best, pathetic, deviant or unhinged at worst. How can you be in so much denial.

Cope harder, "ancient trans lady", we didn't made up Aimee Chanellor.

Edit: Bitch is dying on that ill. Tifs can't be made to feel unconfortable by Tims, this must be a conspiracy to drive a wedge into the community.
Ver archivo adjunto 2739602
Ver archivo adjunto 2739604

They're almost correct. Bad faith actors have infiltrated the subreddit, but not to drive a wedge. They're called AGPs and they're there to coom.

It is incredible the amount of cognitive dissonance that goes on though. Trans woman does something bad - it's a hoax, if it's not a hoax then it must be a bad faith actor pretending to be trans, if it's an actual trans person well that's an isolated incident. Anything to avoid reflecting on the community having a problem.

Yes, this is a serious tweet, and the pictured mans transphobia killed hundreds of precious valid trans people today! lets play a game can you spot the "transphobia" in this pic because I had to look it up (answer in spoiler)
Ver archivo adjunto 2738940

Spoiler: Answer

their bag says lgb alliance, apparently lgb alliance are transphobic because they say same sex attraction not same gender attraction. goodness, what oppresshun!

I think that might be Hammersmith tube station. If it is that's extra hilarious, because TfL rebranded the roundels in that station with pride flags so Mr LGB Alliance might have a sit down and rest his tote bag against this sign:

Once again, JK Rowling rolls up and slam dunks on these troons. Never piss off writers because they will obliterate you via their prose.

Ver archivo adjunto 2740963Ver archivo adjunto 2740960Ver archivo adjunto 2740958

Clicking on their Twitter accounts leads to nothing, so they all most likely deactivated.

Their little plan to doxx JK Rowling backfired spectacularly. It's already hitting newspapers like The Evening Standard (distributed for free on public transport in London) and even The National, which is a pro-independence Scottish newspaper. I await the BBC article.

 

[decaydent]

To make it gender neutral would literally require an overhaul of the entire language from the very roots of it.

German has this issue as well and it continues to amuse me that the plural form „Sie“ in capital letters is our way of formal address for individuals and SO widely used, that no one will manage to re-educate us. So there goes your they/them plural for single person pronouns. And then that teeny tiny issue of all nouns being gendered (and therefor also all pronouns and adjectives) so they have to resort to their dumb */^:; to mark that inclusivity. Which immediately makes it obvious to everyone that a genderspecial is in their midst. Mein:e Lehrer:innen haben mir das anders beigebracht! My teachers taught me otherwise They even want us to speak that by making pauses. Can‘t wait for everyone to sound like asthmatics or stutterers.

Their little plan to doxx JK Rowling backfired spectacularly. It's already hitting newspapers

B-b-but it is/was Trans Day of rememberance in close proximity! How dare she? Quick, bring out the bullshit statistics and whine about her privilege!

---

Lesbians complaining about being called“analogous to sexual racists“ by stonewall - must be transphobia. Defending yourself from transphobia allegations is exactly what a transphobe would do.

 

[Sexual Chocolate]

Can someone British please explain why your cops are such pussies? Do you have no real crimes so they investigate broken garden gnomes and cry about mean Facebook comments to feel productive?

Idk, but I'm guessing the answer is similar to the kind of ideological capture / political gayops that causes the FBI to send 20 of its top agents to investigate a potentially racist garage door pull.

you know you guys want the soft sexy traps

Taftaj

Imagine if your son was like that tho. Idk if there's a bigger parenting fail short of literally being Michael Jackson or something

Both statements are , but the first one is especially special. Idk if this is incel logic, but it's pretty close. No woman on the planet is ever gonna drop dem panties because a guy washed a plate, but these people seem to believe sexual attraction is like some sort of autistic RPG where you can level up on points.

I IRONED A STAR WARS SHIRT, WHERE'S MY CONGRATULATORY BLOWJOB?? -

 

[Sexual Chocolate]

Lesbians complaining about being called“analogous to sexual racists“ by stonewall

"Suck the dick, bigots" turned from ironic joke to official policy fast

How can they virtue signal with a cartoon of a regular woman? Even a woman in lingerie won't cut it for these men, because there's also an element of control/sadism/abuse to their treatment of women. A woman in lingerie is a woman who has agency in her sex life. Obviously sluts have no agency (God forbid women like sex) and need to be put in their place, thus bondage gear.

I think you're overthinking how coombrains think. They like those pictures because their brains are pickled by porn, it's probably not more complicated than that. It's not virtue signaling, it's creepy, perverted guys showing off the kind of cartoons that give them boners.

 

[Oliver Onions]

Once again, JK Rowling rolls up and slam dunks on these troons. Never piss off writers because they will obliterate you via their prose.

Ver archivo adjunto 2740963Ver archivo adjunto 2740960Ver archivo adjunto 2740958

Clicking on their Twitter accounts leads to nothing, so they all most likely deactivated.

>single x 'doxing'

J.K. Rowling confirmed fan of MATI podcast. Oh wait, she spelt it wrong in a different tweet...get it together, Joanne.

Either way, it's very nice to see her dunk on troons, with receipts, and not a ratio in sight despite her posting this on the absolute mecca for these degenerate weirdos.

 

[LanceHaver]

Ver archivo adjunto 2740641

>transmascs started calling out transfems sexual harasser "misogynists" for their "male socialization"

you cannot make this shit up

 

[Bibendum]

Taking bets: trolling terf or peaking hsts?


Broke troid milks breadwinner wife for all she's worth, seeks to bankrupt family with cosmetic surgeries despite mountains of debt


Based beyond belief

 

[Humbert Humbert]

Ver archivo adjunto 2740850
The resemblance is truly uncanny.

The “slut” under the pronouns is a nice touch. Hell, we might as well forego the pronouns and just replace them with “slut” with all these AGPs like to blatantly fetishize femininity.

 

[chiobu]

Troons judging real women on their passing game, lmfao

r/asktransgender - Do you ever judge cis women on their passing game?

187 votes and 55 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

Do you ever judge cis women on their passing game? : asktransgender

archived 22 Nov 2021 15:20:06 UTC

archive.md

 

[AssignedEva]

Ver archivo adjunto 2741030
Ver archivo adjunto 2741035
Lesbians complaining about being called“analogous to sexual racists“ by stonewall - must be transphobia. Defending yourself from transphobia allegations is exactly what a transphobe would do.

This is specifically the sort of thing that has lead to a bunch of public bodies withdrawing from the Stonewall Diversity Champions scheme. The BBC is legally required to be impartial:

Due impartiality usually involves more than a simple matter of ‘balance’ between opposing viewpoints. We must be inclusive, considering the broad perspective and ensuring that the existence of a range of views is appropriately reflected. It does not require absolute neutrality on every issue or detachment from fundamental democratic principles, such as the right to vote, freedom of expression and the rule of law. We are committed to reflecting a wide range of subject matter and perspectives across our output as a whole and over an appropriate timeframe so that no significant strand of thought is under-represented or omitted.

In applying due impartiality to news, we give due weight to events, opinion and the main strands of argument. We may produce content about any subject, at any point on the spectrum of debate, as long as there are good editorial reasons for doing so.

We must always scrutinise arguments, question consensus and hold power to account with consistency and due impartiality.

Where our content highlights issues on which others campaign, we must take care not to endorse those campaigns, or allow ourselves to be used to campaign to change public policy. But this should not prevent us highlighting issues and offering our audiences choices about how to confront them.

thus having Stonewall attempt to pressure the BBC on editorial decisions specifically because they don't want certain articles published demonstrates a serious conflict of interest.

Edit: It's actually quite a lot more significant. First up:

Stonewall’s chief executive Nancy Kelley wrote to the editorial director of BBC News, saying that the BBC article would be labelled "transphobic" because it represented trans women as "sexual predators", which was a "central anti-trans argument". She also suggested that the "highly toxic" cotton ceiling issue was "analogous to issues like sexual racism". 'Cotton ceiling' basically refers to the difficulty trans people have to face when seeking lesbian and gay relationships. Acknowledging that "consent is paramount and we all want who we want" in sexual relationships, she said that "structural oppression can influence who we want".

This is the dumbest part of this discussion.

The article is about how lesbians are being told not wanting to suck dick is transphobic and they need to unlearn their bigoted genital preferences. The lesbians are saying this feels like they're being pressured to suck dick. The response throughout has been "Oh my God just because one trans woman raped one person some time doesn't mean that all trans women are rapists" - which is literally not what the BBC is saying - and then the exact same response is made. It is transphobic for lesbians not to suck dick, and they need to think about "unlearning" it.

Anyway Nancy Kelley appears to have overplayed her hand:

When the announcement was made, Corporation executive Rhodri Talfan Davies refused to confirm whether Stonewall had ever successfully swayed its journalistic output.

But speaking to Radio 4’s Women’s Hour last week, Kelley was open about her group’s intentions. ‘I want Stonewall to have more influence on the editorial policy of the BBC,’ she said.

There's also an unsourced claim from an anonymous former Boris aide that Stonewall's been influencing policy by getting advisors to basically lie to him (like they've been found doing in their Diversity Champions scheme). This might explain why the Gender Recognition Act 2004 nearly got switched up to self-id. The only reason it didn't is apparently because Dr. Michael Brady, the National Advisor for LGBT Health, told them not to. He seems to not like Stonewall that much, pointing out the NHS Rainbow Badge Scheme was invented within the NHS as part of them tackling worse health outcomes for LGBT patients, and had nothing to do with Stonewall and they don't get to claim credit.

 

[doja tiger]

Troons judging real women on their passing game, lmfao

disgusting. they keep using women in any way possible to get that sweet validation. imagine how obsessed they have to be in order to stare at random women and think "ah yes, she's ugly and I am such a sexy trans gurl". no you're not. you're mentally ill and your delusions don't make you a woman.

and they think they can judge us on our "passing", but God forbid anyone says anything critical about a troon.

 

[AvocadoToast]

Troons judging real women on their passing game, lmfao

Ver archivo adjunto 2741117

Ver archivo adjunto 2741126

r/asktransgender - Do you ever judge cis women on their passing game?

187 votes and 55 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

Do you ever judge cis women on their passing game? : asktransgender

archived 22 Nov 2021 15:20:06 UTC

archive.md

I started looking at women I presumed to be cis with the same beauty expectation that society holds trans women to and it turns out that almost no one “passes”.

We're reaching unprecedented levels of copium!

Most cis women are not misgendered even if they present masculine because the totality of their features read female. Trans women can be obsessed with fishing for masculine feature in cis women to help them feel better about their own features.

The one tranny who hit the nail on the head was ignored by the salty ones.