📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Ver archivo adjunto 2728514
archive
tweet
Troids: my biology is oppressing me! Male puberty is literally the devil to me!
Also Troids: You think males can share experiences esp going through puberty that might be uncomfortable and/or stressful? OMG the male privilege!! Men have oppression fetishes!
The irony of a fucking man mocking other men for this and thinking he is somehow exempt from the category - all from the comfort of a Screenshot instead of QT obviously

Ugh, the commenter was never claiming oppression? Even sounds a bit accommodating of troons. He was saying that females just don‘t have the same experiences as males growing up and that romanticizing them is plain fucking weird.
I was lurking this thread yesterday. Some real exceptional individuals with some real hot takes in there.

Here is the screenshot to the original thread troony is quoting
Screenshot_20211118-110701_Twitter.jpg Screenshot_20211118-110715_Twitter.jpg
Here's some dumb ass from the same thread saying that Posie Parker created the definition "adult human female"
Screenshot_20211118-111321_Twitter.jpg Screenshot_20211118-111353_Twitter.jpg Screenshot_20211118-111414_Twitter.jpg
 
Última edición:
I can't believe I'm discussing Dumbledore being gay in Current Year, but fuck it. I think one thing about this "retcon" in particular is that it gets unfairly lumped in with all the other stupid additions Rowling made to HP canon over the years, but this is actually just as much of a revision of history as troons now trying to rewrite her past as sexist/racist/etc in light of her transphobia. The Dumbledore-being-gay revelation is not part of Rowling's woke twitter retcons, it just got lumped into them in retrospect. This particular tidbit got added to canon in 2007, only 3 months after the last book was released and before the last few movies were. It absolutely was part of canon - it's normal for authors to have detailed backstories about certain characters that never make it into the books, and the Dumbledore revelation was part of a larger set of background details about various characters that she talked about at fan conventions in an effort to promote the 7th book. So this wasn't woke pandering, "woke" was in its infancy in 2007. To put it into perspective, California of all places banned gay marriage a year later. It was just a very different cultural time.

Another thing to keep in mind is Section 28. Section 28 was a UK law that essentially forbade the positive portrayal of gay characters in children's media. This law was only repealed in 2003 - and Harry Potter started being published 1997. That's right, when Rowling started writing the series, her publisher would not have allowed her to make Dumbledore openly gay. Which isn't to say people didn't write gay characters under section 28. They did, and they used some recognizable tropes to signal a character's homosexuality in the subtext. And Rowling was signaling hard with Dumbledore - older man, never married, no children despite being good with children, flamboyant clothing and personality, and an extremely close "friendship" with another man who's also a confirmed bachelor.
 
ETA: Launching the Kiwifarms fund for extra-terrestrial troids when? Can we send the transwomen to Mars just to mess with them?
I'm sorry, that is a horrific and transphobic thing to say.

True and honest womyn should only be sent to Venus. (Think we can skip the whole terraforming it first bit though.)
 
Trans Kid: STOP LITERALLY KILLING TRANS PEOPLE YOU NAZI!

*punches own reflection in mirror and then kills himself*
 
Here is the screenshot to the original thread troony is quoting
> transmen get erections
oookay… If I didn‘t know this was an actual man saying that bullshit I would almost believe his confused act. A man LARPing as some innocent lady being full on grrrlpower will never not be funny. Go and cry over your senseless erection, dude (might be ingrown now, who knows if it got flayed yet).

Wasn‘t Bryn the one educating us all on Tom of Finland and gay culture recently? Wonder how many gay men jump roided ftm „erections“. Brynman will bring receipts any minute now!
 
Is it me or is transgenderism, has a vague connection between cuck, chastity and humiliations fetishism, along with incel-dom. I just notice that a lot of them have a translucent connection between each other. It's a feeling which is hard to describe in words.
Pretty much every MTF I've ever met dresses like an 8-12yo girl, and clearly gets a huge kick out of acting like some freak coomer's bottom pedo fantasy. I dislike them more than I pity them because they keep dragging innocent bystanders into their fetish world.
 
Happy Trans Awareness Week,

And remember, the group with the highest tranny kill count are the troons themselves
 
Última edición:
Imagine going from Chad grandpa to whatever the fuck this is.

Screenshot_20211118-120706.jpg


:story:

Imagine cutting your dick off at 73 years old. I have to believe he was hopelessly impotent.

Edit: he also thinks he has a "monthly cycle." Never mind that the average woman begins menopause in her early 50s; tranpa here is still cycling in his 70s only 2+ years on tiddy skittles.

Screenshot_20211118-134439.jpg


(:_(
 
Última edición:
Sorry for the double post, this just came up.

Michael Hobbes, a British journalist, has discovered that Chapelle lied about Daphne. Societal transphobia killed Chapelle's friend, not fellow trans harassment.

Link. It appears he does not allow ANY comments on his journalism whatsoever. Contrast this with Alex Berenson or Glenn Greenwald, whose comment sections are filled with reader input.

He also lacks predictive power. These predictions came true.

Ver archivo adjunto 2727574

Ver archivo adjunto 2727575

He was on a Podcast, 'You're wrong about' that has 121k listeners yet cannot pull in more than 150 likes per post. Twitter.

So if you see BreadTube/troon Twitter talk about Chapelle, this is what they are referring to.

Here is his post on CRT/race panic. Comments closed again.

Some Jack Saint stuff, will post the rest in the BreadTube thread.
Ver archivo adjunto 2727571
Journalists are the biggest fags.
 
So this wasn't woke pandering, "woke" was in its infancy in 2007.

Not really tho. It's just gotten progressively crazier.

To put it into perspective, California of all places banned gay marriage a year later.

They had a referendum (vehemently opposed by establishment politicians, celebrities and rich assholes, then quickly overturned by unelected judges) because people were already getting tired of woke pandering.

Section 28 was a UK law that essentially forbade the positive portrayal of gay characters in children's media.

No. It was a law that stopped local government from promoting homosexuality to children. Nothing to do with the media at all. Since it was repealed UK kiddos now get to enjoy this kind of healthy LGBTQ+ stuff, without their bigoted parents having knowing about it :tomgirl:

1_THP_MDG_240220Slug_15842JPG.jpg


🏴‍☠️PIRATE TROON UPDATE MATEYS 🦜
Piratetroon~2.jpg

23 tho :stress:

IF CHINS COULD KILL
Chinmaster~2.jpg
 
No. It was a law that stopped local government from promoting homosexuality to children. Nothing to do with the media at all.
In other words: it was a law that determined what kind of literature was allowed in public school libraries (aka within local government's jurisdictions). The entire publishing industry of UK children's literature was built around avoiding invoking this law, much like current Hollywood blockbusters avoid introducing major gay characters because that would mean that their movies would never be cleared for release to the Chinese market. There's a reason capeshit will pander to race (Black Panther) and feminism (Captain Marvel) but there's no such gay main character, despite there being plenty within the comic book source material. That's also the reason the Harry Potter "Fantastic Beasts" prequels don't dare show Dumbledore's gay relationship with Grindelwald, despite Rowling having established that they were gay lovers for over a decade now. It'd cost them the non-Western market.
 
On Dumbledore being gay:


Don't forget that he was always dressed in extra over the top robes. Stars, shiny fabric, brilliant colors, just flamboyant in a way that other wizards didn’t seem to be. Even accounting for the horrid colors they sometimes dressed in. I think she was trying to give us hints in how he was dressed. But remember that we see Dumbledore only through Harry's viewpoint. What 11-17 year old thinks of their teachers as being adults with a personal and sexual life? It makes sense that he would never connect the dots. And thus we wouldn't know. The way she described his relationship with Grindwald was definitely somewhat sexual, I admit thinking when I read it that it sounded kinda gay, so when she said he was it made sense to me.

/autism
Now that you misspelled it that way I am going to call him Grindrwald from now on.

Anyway I agree, and we also have to take into account that while homosexuality and gender non-conformity was taboo in both Britain and the US until recently, neutral non-obvious depictions were not completely absent from children’s entertainment in Britain the way they were in the US. Having a somewhat obvious but not explicitly gay teacher that you clarify is gay later just doesn’t strike me as weird given that wider cultural context, but might sound more pandering to Americans. Any Britbongs feel free to step in and correct me if I’m wrong.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo