Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votos: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votos: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votos: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votos: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votos: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votos: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votos: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votos: 35 1.1%

  • Total de votantes
    3,199
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
You jokingly circled that, but I legit think that's what they THINK shows a gun. But,fucks sake, isn't that just the side mirror on the passenger side of the car directly behind Kyle?
Yes that is exactly what they are hoping the jury sees. Its bullshit because I can circle any number of things in that image, it's like spotting shapes in clouds. If the fagot prosecutors had any actual proof the would have had Zillinsky testify.
 
JUdge1.png
 
Bill Ackman, billionaire investor and big-time donor to the Democratic party, declares that he thinks Kyle is innocent after watching the courtroom footage -


 
richards and agent 47 are still going to make their motion for mistrial with prejudice right.
considering all the BS Binger pulled.
the judge would probably consider it.
 
Can any lawfag explain what should we expect tomorrow? What's jury instructions exactly and how that works?
Jury instructions are explanations of how the jurors should decide how to find Guilty or Not Guilty, and hopefully the defense puts up a good brief and motion to limit the jury instruction and closing. Binger wants to bring up this 'provocation' bullshit where he lies that the blurred image shows Kyle pointing his rifle therefore he has to lay down and die. HOWEVER this has never been shown in court, and Binger deliberately did not call the person he would now want to claim was threatened. There is no factual basis, and no legal basis because even under the provocation statues doing something like retreating (like Kyle did) then restores your right to self defense.

If Binger wanted to argue provocation he could have called Ziminsky either in his case in chief or as a rebuttal to Kyle. Nobody has testified to this new 'fact' that he wants to introduce under his own testimony (lawyers are not supposed to testify.
 
I stayed away from the trial today because yesterday was so sickening I needed a break. Reading now that Binger has fucked up AGAIN warms my cynical heart. Plus it seems that many "progrsssives" seem to waken up what bullshit they were fed (yes call me :optimistic: I don't care. I am like Pandora's Box I still have a little hope in me). And I also read that both sides have getting threats. That isn't a good sign. I hope that the jury can make a neutral decision. At the very least they have seen what a slimebag Binger is and how most of his witnesses were nothing but examples that Kyle did indeed what he did namely clear self-defense.

By the way does the defense still have witnesses left? I believe they wanted to get the roommate of the one biceps bandit in the stand to confirm if he really heard one byceps man say what he allegedly said.. Or did they drop that?
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo