- Registrado
- 24 de Ago, 2014
No. CAIS women are infertile. The mere presence of a Y chromosome will stop the gonads from developing into ovaries.they produce viable eggs you say? could they theoretically produce an egg with a y chromosome? could this then be fertilized by a y carrying sperm to produce a YY genotype embryo? then what would a YY human phenotype look like? is this how we will eventually breed the real IRL gigachad of the future, a literal double-male man?
This lead us to the asinine post retweeted by Edward Gorcenski. No, testosterone is NOT the only signal that calls on the genes of male development. I'm sure trannies, who are all well-versed in complex, advanced Biology, have heard of Sry, Sox9, Fgf9 and Dmrt. CAIS women does not respond to testosterone, but that doesn't mean that, in their early embryonic life, they did not respond to the aforementioned signals. The bidirectional gonad has to decide whether to become a testis or the ovary before the embryo starts producing either T or E (which, after all, are produced by differentiated gonads), and these are the signals the undifferentiated gonad follow.
A good way to make trannies cry some more is to point out that Sry has a very narrow window of activity. Experiments in mice show that if the gene gets activated a few hours too late, it would fail to override the default female program, and the embryo develop internal and external female genitalia (with atrophied, non-functional internal testes).The thing is, sex isn't tied strictly to the Y chromosome itself, but more specifically the SRY gene that is almost always found on the Y chromosome. An XY individual with a mangled SRY gene is female. Or if the SRY gene gets transposed (another genetic anomaly) to the X chromosome, you can end up with an XX male.
So you can now tell your favorite troon that they'd just missed the boat by just a few hours.
It is still >99% true.Yes, this is why it annoys me when people take the “if there’s a Y it’s a guy” position

