Debate 2026 user Nuklearius on how yelling NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER at strangers saves the White race and why good grammar makes you a liberal bot.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Nuklearius

kiwifarms.net
Registrado
22 de Abr, 2026
...and this is your figurehead?
He was never my figurehead. But I thought it was funny to hype him. On that note, as I mentioned earlier in this thread, you shouldn't need a squeaky clean record to become some right wing influencer. The left wing influencers and heroes they hyped up were all degenerates, but they won anyway and winning is what ultimately counts. Making use of some morally improper people is ultimately better than waiting for some right wing Jesus and setting standarts that no men on earth is ever going to fullfill. That just drives people away

That being said there are limits, and homosexuality is one of them. Obviously faggots and sexual degenerates will never truly turn on liberalism since they got all their "rights" from it, and for that reason they are useless for being counterrevolutionary cultural figures. They will only ever be Kosher-Right grifters that sell you vibes, but don't actually want to produce results. Same for "based" foreigners, jews, women, etc. they must always be bullied out as they will never mean business.
 
He was never my figurehead. But I thought it was funny to hype him. On that note, as I mentioned earlier in this thread, you shouldn't need a squeaky clean record to become some right wing influencer. The left wing influencers and heroes they hyped up were all degenerates, but they won anyway and winning is what ultimately counts. Making use of some morally improper people is ultimately better than waiting for some right wing Jesus and setting standarts that no men on earth is ever going to fullfill. That just drives people away

That being said there are limits, and homosexuality is one of them. Obviously faggots and sexual degenerates will never truly turn on liberalism since they got all their "rights" from it, and for that reason they are useless for being counterrevolutionary cultural figures. They will only ever be Kosher-Right grifters that sell you vibes, but don't actually want to produce results. Same for "based" foreigners, jews, women, etc. they must always be bullied out as they will never mean business.

Amazing how absolutely backwards you have it, how utterly mistaken about human nature and about your own status. Congratulations: you're not just going down with the ship; you're ripping holes in the hull yourself.
 
Amazing how absolutely backwards you have it, how utterly mistaken about human nature and about your own status. Congratulations: you're not just going down with the ship; you're ripping holes in the hull yourself.
Spare me the fucking reddit-tough talk empty phrases, if you're not gonna say anything, then don't bother commenting.
Nothing makes a conservative more excited than a "woman" with a dick in their pants.
Conservatives are literally just leftists in suits. The conservative identity is completely artificial and was created by liberals as artificial opposition, that's why conservatism didn't exist before Liberalism. I have never called myself a conservative for that reason, that's like saying you're a faggot. I'd call myself an anti-liberal, or counterrevolutionary or hierarchist, literally anything but this gay astroturfed identity group.
 
Última edición:
On that note, as I mentioned earlier in this thread, you shouldn't need a squeaky clean record to become some right wing influencer. The left wing influencers and heroes they hyped up were all degenerates, but they won anyway and winning is what ultimately counts. Making use of some morally improper people is ultimately better than waiting for some right wing Jesus and setting standarts that no men on earth is ever going to fullfill. That just drives people away
Brother i think you have a touch of the Tism, yes the left wing influencers are total degenerates but they advocate for all that shit you can try to get Hassan on his brothel use but his audience believes "sex work is real work". You are comparing a right wing figure head not adhearing to right wing values to a left wing figure head not adhearing to left wing values.

You don't have to be faultless but the quality we have now is just dragging it down more. Faguentes, this faggot and Dalton should not be your figure head. The movement should be purged of all the 3 tooth having retard unemployed meth addicts, the only down side is the decrease in the kiwifarms userbase.
 
Brother i think you have a touch of the Tism, yes the left wing influencers are total degenerates but they advocate for all that shit you can try to get Hassan on his brothel use but his audience believes "sex work is real work". You are comparing a right wing figure head not adhearing to right wing values to a left wing figure head not adhearing to left wing values.
What are "right wing" values to you then? Because I'd think in a theoretical "right wing" state you should be able to call Niggers Niggers to their face and put them in their place. All the lolcow bullshit aside, Chud did actually do that.

Listening to you I get the impression right wing values mean being a pussy and doing nothing, and adhering to laws and principles that your enemies made up and never follow themselves. To me right wing values mean Niggers being afraid to offend whitey and sitting at the back of the bus. It means women shutting up and making babies. It means immigrants being loaded into freight trains and being driven straight to Mexico.
Tell me what exactly does right wing mean to you? And be concrete please, because so far you sound like your average Republican conservative.
 
your values are resentful torture porn your ideal world is torturing niggers in woks and telling women to shut up no ideology no ideas or reason just impotently lashing out
I can tell that you're bitter that I didn't take up your passive conservative cuck ideals, because unlike you I actually want to see change in the world.
People like Sheogorath are actually worse than out and proud liberals, he's like a Trojan horse snuck in with the sole intent of rendering the antiliberal opposition impotent. Because the second anything concrete gets put forth, he'll come out and call you resentful, full of hate and unprincipled (unlike BLM, Communist and other Leftists, because they weren't known to be resentful at all, according to his worldview).

And you didn't answer my question, what concretely are right wing values to you? We both know the answer: To you right wing values mean being a fucking pussy, lowering your gaze and doing nothing.
 
What are "right wing" values to you then? Because I'd think in a theoretical "right wing" state you should be able to call Niggers Niggers to their face and put them in their place. All the lolcow bullshit aside, Chud did actually do that.
What even is a "right wing value" worth, if the most important thing to you, is to live out a powerfantasy about saying le based gamer words to peoples faces?
Either you segregate and everyone is with their own or you adhere to basic decency and respect. A terminally abused and insulted underclass WILL revolt, that can't be a basis for a stable society. Unless of course you want to tell me that a stable society isn't the goal in which case I will repeat my question: What are these "right wing values" you speak of worth?
 
A terminally abused and insulted underclass WILL revolt, that can't be a basis for a stable society. Unless of course you want to tell me that a stable society isn't the goal in which case I will repeat my question: What are these "right wing values" you speak of worth?
Hierarchy, Strength, Order.

And your fucking precious stable society had a Nigger Revolt 6 years back, so how does that compute? The more rights you give to these people, the angrier and the more deranged they become. Because they see your "nice guy" reciprocity as weakness - and they are 100% correct.
 
Hierarchy, Strength, Order.
Order is not momentary though, you create or lose it over long periods of time. Going around and being abrasive is not a way of achieving stable order, it's just a powerfantasy.
Also: Strength and hierarchy are mutually exclusive, since hierarchy requires subordination.
And your fucking precious stable society had a Nigger Revolt 6 years back, so how does that compute? The more rights you give to these people, the angrier and the more deranged they become. Because they see your "nice guy" reciprocity as weakness - and they are 100% correct.
Pure projection that I will not engage with.
 
Hierarchy, Strength, Order.

And your fucking precious stable society had a Nigger Revolt 6 years back, so how does that compute? The more rights you give to these people, the angrier and the more deranged they become. Because they see your "nice guy" reciprocity as weakness - and they are 100% correct.
Empty, Gay, Platitudes

What kind of hierarchy? What sort of strength? Ordered how exactly?

It's easy for someone to say "I want all these things nebolous things". It's entirely more difficult to explain what those mean, what the appeal is, and how your ideology intends to achieve them.
 
It's entirely more difficult to explain what those mean, what the appeal is, and how your ideology intends to achieve them.
Let me give you an example, Niggers are inferior and thereby have to sit in the back of the bus.
What does it mean, concretely? They have to sit in the back of the bus.
What is the appeal? You don't have to deal with Niggers on public transport anymore.
How is my ideology going to achieve that? We're simply going to pass a law and enforce it.

It's not nebulous or difficult to understand at all, you're just another liberal pretending to be stupid, making debates impossible.
 
Let me give you an example, Niggers are inferior and thereby have to sit in the back of the bus.
What does it mean, concretely? They have to sit in the back of the bus.
What is the appeal? You don't have to deal with Niggers on public transport anymore.
How is my ideology going to achieve that? We're simply going to pass a law and enforce it.

It's not nebulous or difficult to understand at all, you're just another liberal pretending to be stupid, making debates impossible.
i'd rather just get rid of niggers but you want don't want solutions you want to type out power fantasies on forums to feel like a bigman
 
Let me give you an example, Niggers are inferior and thereby have to sit in the back of the bus.
What does it mean, concretely? They have to sit in the back of the bus.
What is the appeal? You don't have to deal with Niggers on public transport anymore.
How is my ideology going to achieve that? We're simply going to pass a law and enforce it.

It's not nebulous or difficult to understand at all, you're just another liberal pretending to be stupid, making debates impossible.
Is that all you have? That's a pretty pathetic worldview if all you care about is where niggers sit on the bus.

Imagine riding the bus lmao Makes you nigger by default, imo
 
Atrás
Top Abajo