TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber 2:25-cv-05564 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05564
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    18 de Jun, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    28 de Jun, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 46)

# Date Description Filing
45 28 de Jun, 2026 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 35 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu Granting 35 MOTION: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court ORDERS Defendant to prepare and submit a proposed Judgment in this matter within seven (7) days of this Order. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 07/01/2026) PDF
44 9 de Jun, 2026 STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S MARCH 2, 2026 ORDER [DKT. NO. 29] filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/10/2026) PDF
43 5 de Jun, 2026 COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 06/05/2026 to 06/05/2026 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. Court will contact Rom Bar-Nissim at Rom@HeahBarNissim.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Pre-Trial Proceeding: Hearing for Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings on June 5, 2026. FEE PAID. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/06/2026) PDF
42 4 de Jun, 2026 MINUTES OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COMPLAINT 35 Hearing held before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court's Tentative Ruling was issued on June 4, 2026, and reviewed by counsel. The Court heard oral argument. The Court took the matter UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. Court Recorder: CourtSmart. (lom) (Entered: 06/05/2026) PDF
41 2 de Jun, 2026 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CHANGING THE TIME OF THE MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 scheduled for 6/05/2026 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The Court, on its own motion, changes the time to 2:15 PM. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 9B. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cgm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/03/2026)
View all 46 filings

Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed 2:25-cv-05565 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05565
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    18 de Jun, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    29 de Jun, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Ted Entertainment Inc., Morgan Kamal Majed

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 21)

# Date Description Filing
20 29 de Jun, 2026 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. correcting APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan 19 (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/30/2026) PDF
19 29 de Jun, 2026 APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Application set for hearing on 8/10/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment against Defendant Majed, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Rom Bar-Nissim in support of Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment of Defendant Majed, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: Copyright Office Registration Certificate for Content Nuke: Hasan Piker, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Bar-Nisim Declaration: April 29, 2026 Order by the Honorable Sallie Kim Denying Doe Defendants' Motion to Quash, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: June 29, 2026 Screenshot of Defendant Majed's GoFundMe for Legal Defense Fund, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: April 20, 2026 Email to Majed's Counsel Providing Notice of Default, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 5 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: Invoices Issued to Plaintiff for the Present Action, # 8 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Majed) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/30/2026) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
18 29 de Jun, 2026 Text Entry Order: Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.s Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed filed on June 29, 2026, Docket No. 17 is STRICKEN for failure to comply with paragraph 3(b) of the Court's Standing Order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/30/2026)
— 29 de Jun, 2026  
17 28 de Jun, 2026 *STRICKEN* APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Application set for hearing on 8/10/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Proposed Order) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) Modified on 6/30/2026 (sr). (Entered: 06/29/2026) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
View all 21 filings

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness 4:25-cv-00459 — District Court, W.D. Missouri

  • Docket No.
    4:25-cv-00459
  • Court
    District Court, W.D. Missouri
  • Filed
    18 de Jun, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:101 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    7 de Dic, 2025

Parties (3)

Parties
Does 1-10, Kacey Caviness, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 36)

# Date Description Filing
27 7 de Dic, 2025 ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025) PDF
26 1 de Dic, 2025 STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025) PDF
25 7 de Oct, 2025 DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL by Kacey Caviness, Does 1-10. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/08/2025) PDF
24 5 de Oct, 2025 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed on 10/6/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 10/06/2025) PDF
23 1 de Oct, 2025 Joint MOTION for protective order for Approval of Proposed Protective Order filed by Benjamin Kassis on behalf of Kacey Caviness. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/02/2025) PDF
View all 36 filings

In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc. 3:25-mc-80296 — District Court, N.D. California

  • Docket No.
    3:25-mc-80296
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. California
  • Filed
    21 de Sep, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    890 Other Statutory Actions
  • Cause
    Civil Miscellaneous Case
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    3 de Jun, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Doe Defendants, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 60)

# Date Description Filing
48 1 de Jun, 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3553 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 46 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/03/2026) PDF
47 31 de Mayo, 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3513 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 49 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/4/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/02/2026) PDF
49 28 de Mayo, 2026 Petition For Writ Of Mandamus filed Directly with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2026) Modified on 6/4/2026 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/04/2026) PDF
46 28 de Mayo, 2026 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Doe Defendants. Appeal of Order, Terminate Motions 45 (Appeal fee of $605 receipt number ACANDC-22041800 paid.) (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 5/29/2026) (Entered: 05/29/2026) PDF
45 28 de Abr, 2026 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on 4/29/2026. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2026) (Entered: 04/29/2026) 1 2
View all 60 filings

Doe Defendants v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco 26-3513 — Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-3513
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • Filed
    31 de Mayo, 2026
  • Last Filing
    30 de Jun, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, DOE DEFENDANTS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 10)

# Date Description Filing
10 30 de Jun, 2026 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 07/01/2026 04:03 PM]
9 21 de Jun, 2026 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld [Entered: 06/22/2026 02:10 PM]
8 21 de Jun, 2026 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld for Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 06/22/2026 01:26 PM]
7 14 de Jun, 2026 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:03 PM] PDF
6 3 de Jun, 2026 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Court entered filing to correct DE 5] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:28 PM] PDF
View all 10 filings
Destacado
1783103852682.png
Just as the prophecy foretold.
 
Gobermental Supervisor dijo:
Ruling is out. Denims wins.

Judge says 3 of 4 fair use factors favor Denims, primarily because Ethan sperged about Palestine and himself said she was using it to comment and radicalize her audience.
Ethan literally killed the case himself by plight sperging too much.

You heard it here first, stealing the content produced by two Jews, and adding commentary supporting Islamic Terrorism and inciting violence against Jews is not a market replacement as a matter of law.

EDIT: I really hope this goes to an appeal, because I'd really like this confirmed if possible. Caselaw confirming that you can re-stream movies as long as you hatewatch and shit on them properly sounds like something I could get behind in general.

@MrMM The waiting is over.
Presiona para expandir...
I just want all these retarded nigger faggots to suffer. I don’t think Lex Jewthor fed his kids dog shit, but he is too much of a moralfaggy, litigious kike just like Denims is too much of a smug, retarded degenerate whore.
 
toffle dijo:
Conspiratorial, but I do believe it. Hasan is the type to do this type of thing for sure. And it's just bizarre that Frogan did nothing. It doesn't make sense for many reasons, no matter how retarded she is.
Presiona para expandir...
Same. We already know he is a sex pest probably on the scale of Tiny or the rest of the Twitch aristocracy
 
I may have figured out what frogan is doing.

She said on stream they have to prove damages. That's not true because the video was registered with the Library of Congress.

Her shopping mall lawyer either doesn't know about this or understand that means statutory damages apply.

I don't think she realizes she is going to have to pay 150-180k. I think she genuinely thinks she's just out of the stream income she made as "damages".
 
The Pulverizer dijo:
On one hand, Ethan Klein is blatantly abusing the legal system to get revenge. On the other hand, Denims is a hideous, talentless e-whore that doesn't deserve the kind of money and attention she's gotten. It's a pity both sides can't lose.
Presiona para expandir...
It's not an abuse if the people he sued said they're intentionally trying to cause damages. The only reason Denims won was because Ethan torpedoed his own argument.
 
Gobermental Supervisor dijo:
Ruling is out. Denims wins.

Judge says 3 of 4 fair use factors favor Denims, primarily because Ethan sperged about Palestine and himself said she was using it to comment and radicalize her audience.
Ethan literally killed the case himself by plight sperging too much.

You heard it here first, stealing the content produced by two Jews, and adding commentary supporting Islamic Terrorism and inciting violence against Jews is not a market replacement as a matter of law.

EDIT: I really hope this goes to an appeal, because I'd really like this confirmed if possible. Caselaw confirming that you can re-stream movies as long as you hatewatch and shit on them properly sounds like something I could get behind in general.

@MrMM The waiting is over.
Presiona para expandir...
Get felted Jew lol
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo