Dr. Rachel McKinnon / Dr. Veronica Ivy / Rhys McKinnon / Rachel Veronica McKinnon / Foxy Moxy / SportIsARight - failed out of a tenured job,man who competes in womens sports, gained like 100 lbs in 2022 (page 813), comically fell off bike before a race (page 830)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Rhys article is now free.
bsky.png
rhy.png L
Here is the article.
 
First paragraph and he's already into "well if you don't think troons are women I can't change your mind" and starts flinging flat earther type as hominims. I know he was never great at this but his skills of argumentation have gotten even fucking worse.

This so called "journal" is just the baby of some hyper specific department in a california university that the most notable thing I can find about is that Gwen Stefani once went there. While love angel music baby is a classic I don't think it makes her an intellectual heavyweight. But really who is this for? He's now actually spending time to write an article when he couldn't be arsed to write a book to save his career, and it's for some "journal" with what must be a single digit readership, and even they have to give it away. It's hilarious how far and fast he's fallen
 
I wonder how much of a blow to his ego that was.
Narcs don't suffer humiliation. It will have angered him because it provided so much terf fodder but
Rhys is a true narcissist.
He'll have justified it to himself as it all being down to the assistant being unprofessional, unfit etc. Nothing to do with him, he was perfect. At the time I was surprised he didn't try to sue for some kind of reputational damage or injury but I assume his self preservation instinct took over.
Rhys forced himself into lycra at that weight and thought he looked great and passed as an athletic woman, which is a massive indicator that he is not.
 
First paragraph and he's already into "well if you don't think troons are women I can't change your mind" and starts flinging flat earther type as hominims. I know he was never great at this but his skills of argumentation have gotten even fucking worse.
His whole argument has always been "if you think transwomen are women then of course they should compete in female sports". So his entire premise ends up falling apart due to the vast majority (even a lot of those "allies") actually don't believe transwomen are women.
 
I've never read an "academic" article that starts with "I'm really tired of repeating myself".
The whole thing is just "I, I, I', it's bonkers.
Did anyone check the interview that went along with it?
https://www.press.uillinois.edu/wordpress/jos-forum-on-transgender-athletes-part-1/ | https://archive.fo/P8feH

Rhys absolutely would have made the Canadian Olympic team if not for PTSD!

I archived the audio version (attached) if anyone wants to listen to his gayfag voice instead of just reading the transcript (I do not)
 

Archivos adjuntos

I too could have made the Olympic team but for my lack of desire to do so and having the athletic ability of an arthritic turtle. Life just isn't fair.
The Olympics is an event designed to foster friendship, sportsmanship, international cooperation and to recognise excellece. Rhys would have fitted in like a mediocre. fat man at a women's cycling meet.
 
Lazy bastard was 37 when he set that fake record and he's going to cry about missing out on the Olympics. The only way Rhys was going to the Olympics was if they made competitive self destruction a sport.

grok_image_1782170324242.jpg
 
Última edición:
Norms of assertion spotted in the wild:

Suppose someone asks you whether the bank is open on Saturday morning. You’re confident that it is, and you have good reasons for your confidence. (You remember its being open on Saturday a few months back.) But do you know the bank is open? If it’s clear in context that nothing much hangs on your answer, then you may be fully entitled to say what you think: “Yes, the bank is open.” But this sort of outright assertion is appropriate only if you know what you’re talking about. So, in this “low stakes” context, your belief amounts to knowledge. But now suppose that it’s clear in context that your friend will miss a rent payment if he shows up on Saturday and the bank is closed. In that context it could be inappropriate for you to say outright, “The bank is open.” And that suggests that whether your belief amounts to knowledge depends on the practical values at stake in the conversation. Philosophers disagree about this conclusion, but that is a subtle problem in epistemology.

Too bad this RETARD doesn't know that DOCTOR Veronica Ivy already laid this question to rest a decade-plus ago, and no philosophers disagree about this anymore.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo