TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber 2:25-cv-05564 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05564
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    18 de Jun, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    9 de Jun, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 45)

# Date Description Filing
44 9 de Jun, 2026 STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S MARCH 2, 2026 ORDER [DKT. NO. 29] filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/10/2026) PDF
43 5 de Jun, 2026 COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 06/05/2026 to 06/05/2026 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. Court will contact Rom Bar-Nissim at Rom@HeahBarNissim.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Pre-Trial Proceeding: Hearing for Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings on June 5, 2026. FEE PAID. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/06/2026) PDF
42 4 de Jun, 2026 MINUTES OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COMPLAINT 35 Hearing held before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court's Tentative Ruling was issued on June 4, 2026, and reviewed by counsel. The Court heard oral argument. The Court took the matter UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. Court Recorder: CourtSmart. (lom) (Entered: 06/05/2026) PDF
41 2 de Jun, 2026 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CHANGING THE TIME OF THE MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 scheduled for 6/05/2026 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The Court, on its own motion, changes the time to 2:15 PM. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 9B. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cgm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/03/2026)
2 de Jun, 2026  

Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed 2:25-cv-05565 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05565
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    18 de Jun, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    28 de Jun, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Ted Entertainment Inc., Morgan Kamal Majed

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 17)

# Date Description Filing
17 28 de Jun, 2026 APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Application set for hearing on 8/10/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Proposed Order) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/29/2026) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
16 19 de Mayo, 2026 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan. (iv) (Entered: 05/20/2026) PDF
15 18 de Mayo, 2026 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Morgan Kamal Majed filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/19/2026) 1 2 3
14 4 de Ago, 2025 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTEND ING THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 13 by Judge John F. Walter. Frogan's deadline to respond to TEI's complaint extended to October 3, 2025. (iv) (Entered: 08/06/2025) PDF
13 4 de Ago, 2025 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 3, 2025 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 08/05/2025) 1 2

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness 4:25-cv-00459 — District Court, W.D. Missouri

  • Docket No.
    4:25-cv-00459
  • Court
    District Court, W.D. Missouri
  • Filed
    18 de Jun, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:101 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    7 de Dic, 2025

Parties (3)

Parties
Does 1-10, Kacey Caviness, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 36)

# Date Description Filing
27 7 de Dic, 2025 ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025) PDF
26 1 de Dic, 2025 STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025) PDF
25 7 de Oct, 2025 DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL by Kacey Caviness, Does 1-10. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/08/2025) PDF
24 5 de Oct, 2025 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed on 10/6/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 10/06/2025) PDF
23 1 de Oct, 2025 Joint MOTION for protective order for Approval of Proposed Protective Order filed by Benjamin Kassis on behalf of Kacey Caviness. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/02/2025) PDF

In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc. 3:25-mc-80296 — District Court, N.D. California

  • Docket No.
    3:25-mc-80296
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. California
  • Filed
    21 de Sep, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    890 Other Statutory Actions
  • Cause
    Civil Miscellaneous Case
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    3 de Jun, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Doe Defendants, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 60)

# Date Description Filing
48 1 de Jun, 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3553 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 46 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/03/2026) PDF
47 31 de Mayo, 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3513 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 49 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/4/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/02/2026) PDF
49 28 de Mayo, 2026 Petition For Writ Of Mandamus filed Directly with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2026) Modified on 6/4/2026 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/04/2026) PDF
46 28 de Mayo, 2026 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Doe Defendants. Appeal of Order, Terminate Motions 45 (Appeal fee of $605 receipt number ACANDC-22041800 paid.) (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 5/29/2026) (Entered: 05/29/2026) PDF
45 28 de Abr, 2026 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on 4/29/2026. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2026) (Entered: 04/29/2026) 1 2

Doe Defendants v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco 26-3513 — Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-3513
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • Filed
    31 de Mayo, 2026
  • Last Filing
    21 de Jun, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, DOE DEFENDANTS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 9)

# Date Description Filing
9 21 de Jun, 2026 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld [Entered: 06/22/2026 02:10 PM]
8 21 de Jun, 2026 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld for Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 06/22/2026 01:26 PM]
7 14 de Jun, 2026 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:03 PM] PDF
6 3 de Jun, 2026 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Court entered filing to correct DE 5] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:28 PM] PDF
5 3 de Jun, 2026 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 6] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:09 PM] [Edited: 06/04/2026 03:29 PM]
In the contest of who is the dumbest cunt in this case, Frogan was won hands-down. Plus she's fat. I look forward to the uncloaking of the rest of the redditors too.
 
Well, would you look at that. That went quickly.

To make it clear so people do not overreact, this means nothing at this point in time.
It is hilarious, but usually in case of a default if Frogan objects (or file a notice to set aside? however it is called), she will likely get a chance to rewind the clock and get a chance to defend herself anyway.

Judges do not like to make people lose in court without a chance to defend themselves, in particular if a lawyer hired and paid for by them fails to do their job.

But, at this point in time, Frogan has not defended herself and lost by default.

1779297056288.png
 

Archivos adjuntos

Well, would you look at that. That went quickly.

To make it clear so people do not overreact, this means nothing at this point in time.
It is hilarious, but usually in case of a default if Frogan objects (or file a notice to set aside? however it is called), she will likely get a chance to rewind the clock and get a chance to defend herself anyway.

Judges do not like to make people lose in court without a chance to defend themselves, in particular if a lawyer hired and paid for by them fails to do their job.

But, at this point in time, Frogan has not defended herself and lost by default.

Ver archivo adjunto 9033067
Just saw Luz say that welp.
Its tax man time .
Better hope ethan has mercy during bankruptcy.
 
But, at this point in time, Frogan has not defended herself and lost by default.
Time for a tard classic, Motion to Undo the Thing that Just Happened

Judges do not like to make people lose in court without a chance to defend themselves, in particular if a lawyer hired and paid for by them fails to do their job.
If Ethan's lawyer's descriptions are accurate, Frogan is going to have to throw her lawyer directly under the bus, without mercy. It doesn't read like a single mistake, an emergency, or anything generally excusable stopping him. Her lawyer missed 3 deadlines in a row, then Rom even waited an extra week before filing for default.
 
Well, would you look at that. That went quickly.

To make it clear so people do not overreact, this means nothing at this point in time.
It is hilarious, but usually in case of a default if Frogan objects (or file a notice to set aside? however it is called), she will likely get a chance to rewind the clock and get a chance to defend herself anyway.

Judges do not like to make people lose in court without a chance to defend themselves, in particular if a lawyer hired and paid for by them fails to do their job.

But, at this point in time, Frogan has not defended herself and lost by default.

Ver archivo adjunto 9033067
Can't beat them in warfare, can't beat them in lawfare.

You know, at this point I'm thinking that either the Arabs (and other assorted sand niggers) are either extremely incompetent or simply enjoy getting beaten by the kikes.
 
Presumably, like Kaceytron, all of the fundraser is being returned to Israel.
Lets see who donated.
1779307391702.png
1779307304059.png
1779307318839.png
That's rough. Who will save Palestine from the H3H3 podcast now?
 
Did she just ignore everything, hoping that it would all go away? How idiotic lmao
At this point I now am wondering if it was a strategic move. Calling Ethan's bluff.

I honestly don't really think Ethan wanted money out of this -- he wanted an apology and some recognition that he was right (at least in some capacity).

There is a world where now she's testing Ethan. He probably made a million statements in negotiations that he isnt actually in it for the money, etc., he would take an apology and whatever is left of what was crowdfunded and it would go away.

And, really, what does Ethan do next? Can't garnish her wages, she doesn't work. No property to put a lien on. Levy bank account? We'll she isnt going to assist with that, probably hides whatever assets she has, and he will have to subpoena her for information. Which she wont comply with, and then get another default judgment against her. The list goes on and on.

All the while she will cry to the internet about the Jew, who probably doesnt have it in him to go to these lengths (especially after how he softened his stance against iDubbbz in his last podcast discussion).

The lingering default judgment would fuck up her financial life if she was ever going to act like a real adult (e.g. try for a mortgage). But she won't. She will linger on the fringe of productive society all her life and collect welfare and benefits probably at the end of the day. And after all, what's more pathetic than that?
 
What kills me is that this is not even a bolt from the blue shenanigans filing by Kleins lawyers. They wrote in red text that they intended to pursue litigation and that a response was needed by May 11. And they still waited an entire week before filing for default. So Frogan has a hard fucking challenge here to argue why she shouldn't be held in default. Not saying she won't figure out how to get out of it. But getting out of it is almost certainly going to cost way more money then what it would have cost to just do the goy shuffle and hand over the crowd funding bag.
 
Ethan Klein has filed a motion requesting default judgement against Frogan.
The settlement negotiations failed and Frogan did not reply to the complaint in time.

From the Motion
Ver archivo adjunto 9029167


From the Declaration
Ver archivo adjunto 9029160

PS. Turns out the stoner bitch was the one with the highest IQ of the three after all.
And Hasan could easily pay the fine for her, but won't, 'cause he's slime and just uses them and they know it too
Hasanwhores are all cucks
 
At this point I now am wondering if it was a strategic move. Calling Ethan's bluff.

I honestly don't really think Ethan wanted money out of this -- he wanted an apology and some recognition that he was right (at least in some capacity).

There is a world where now she's testing Ethan. He probably made a million statements in negotiations that he isnt actually in it for the money, etc., he would take an apology and whatever is left of what was crowdfunded and it would go away.

And, really, what does Ethan do next? Can't garnish her wages, she doesn't work. No property to put a lien on. Levy bank account? We'll she isnt going to assist with that, probably hides whatever assets she has, and he will have to subpoena her for information. Which she wont comply with, and then get another default judgment against her. The list goes on and on.

All the while she will cry to the internet about the Jew, who probably doesnt have it in him to go to these lengths (especially after how he softened his stance against iDubbbz in his last podcast discussion).

The lingering default judgment would fuck up her financial life if she was ever going to act like a real adult (e.g. try for a mortgage). But she won't. She will linger on the fringe of productive society all her life and collect welfare and benefits probably at the end of the day. And after all, what's more pathetic than that?
Is she monetized on Twitch or YouTube? Those payments can be garnished.
 
This is just a guess, but I wonder if Frogan is doing this on purpose because she would rather take the default judgement than make an apology video or fight it. I'm not saying that's smart, but this is beyond incompetence at this point, it seems intentional.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo