Official Kiwi Farms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Destacado
The Mannon NIBRS study found something the Snyder report obscures: female perpetrators offend against adolescent victims about 45% of the time, and for forcible offenses choose adolescent victims of both genders equally. PubMed tl;dr for female perpetrators who do get caught, adolescent boys are a major target. That one guy (I forget the thread) bragging that he got groomed comes to mind. They don't see it as a problem. Then he glosses over his own lifelong hyper-sexuality. The aristocrats.

So then there's the Stemple, Flores & Meyer (2017) paper in Aggression and Violent Behavior that blew the doors off this. They cross-referenced CDC and BJS data and found that in a study examining the percentage of women and men who admitted to forcing sex on someone, 43.6% of the subset were women, compared with 56.4% of men. Redfame And a female perpetrator forced the sexual act in 79.2% of the cases Redfame involving male victims.

w/r/t "pedogays", for "made to penetrate", only 80% are women. So that means 20% were men. Lovely.

The data doesn't cleanly answer "by age, male vs female perp for male victims" because nobody has built that table because legbeards have captured academia lol.

The other thing hiding in the data is "pedos don't care that much about the sex of the kid."

The aristocrats.
 
Dante Alighieri dijo:
How about teachers versus religious leaders?
Presiona para expandir...

Your name just had to be fucking Dante. Nigger FUCKING Faggot. Here we go:

The Shakeshaft Report (2004), commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education under No Child Left Behind, is the foundational study. The best data available suggest that nearly 10 percent of American students are targets of unwanted sexual attention by public school employees, ranging from sexual comments to rape, at some point during their school years. EdWeek More recent studies refined this: Denney et al. (2022) found that 5-7% of K-12 educators are implicated in sexual abuse cases involving students. Whole Reason

For Catholic clergy: The John Jay College of Criminal Justice found that between 1950 and 2002, 4,392 priests and deacons were plausibly accused of abusing 10,667 minors, about 4 percent of clergy active during that period. Wikipedia

So: 5-7% of teachers vs. 4% of priests. Teachers are slightly worse by rate, and vastly worse by raw numbers because there are millions of teachers and relatively few priests. Shakeshaft herself said the quiet part loud: "The physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests." CBS News

It should be stated for those who aren't old enough to remember this: Clergy have been under MUCH higher scrutiny than teachers and did it less. So, teachers are probably under-reported! YAY!!!!!!

Also, of course, female teacher male student is "sexual debut" not, yanno. A raped child. Yay.

God dammit dude.
 
God of Nothing dijo:
Jesus fucking Christ, I despise everyone holding up these insane fucking delusions enabling some of the worst people to ever live just because pussy. Everyone supporting, directly or indirectly, needs to have a very intimate relationship with a rope.
Presiona para expandir...

BUT MEN ARE EVIL AND IF YOU HOLD A WOMAN TO ACCOUNT YOU'RE BEING MEAN 😡
(She chose Bear)
 
Aristophanes COMPLETELY predicted this shit centuries before Christ, and his plays have survived to now because they were funny through the millennia before they became a "told you so."

The Clouds (423 BCE) - The Thinkery
Strepsiades sends his son Pheidippides to Socrates' "Thinkery" to learn how to make the weaker argument defeat the stronger, so he can talk his way out of debts. The son learns the technique. Then he comes home and beats his father, and uses the same rhetorical method to prove that beating your father is just.

lol

The Wasps (422 BCE) - Jury Addiction

Philocleon is addicted to serving on juries. Not because he cares about justice but because the per diem pay and the feeling of power over others is intoxicating. His son Bdelycleon proves to him that the jurors are being manipulated by demagogues who use the courts to destroy their enemies while skimming the real money.

:story:

The Birds (414 BCE) - Cloud Cuckoo Land

Two Athenians, sick of Athens and its litigiousness and corruption, leave to build a new city in the sky with the birds. They succeed. Cloudcuckooland is founded. It's going to be pure and uncorrupted.

Immediately, a priest shows up to perform the inaugural sacrifices. Then a poet arrives wanting patronage. Then a decree-seller. Then a geometer to survey the land. Then an inspector. Then a legal statute-seller. Every institutional parasite they fled Athens to escape shows up to fuck the new institution before it's even finished.

✡️

Ecclesiazusae / The Assemblywomen (392 BCE)

(This is the one that should slap the hardest)

The women of Athens, led by Praxagora, disguise themselves as men. They pack the Assembly. They vote to hand all power to women because "women are better managers, more caring, more responsible." They institute communal property and communal sex.

The result is immediate institutional dysfunction. People game the system. The communal sex rule means young men must sleep with old ugly women before they can be with young women, producing a scene where three old women literally fight over and drag away a young man. The "caring" rationale for the power grab produces outcomes that are grotesque, coercive, and harm the people with the least power.

Aristophanes wrote this in 392 BCE. A group claims moral superiority based on identity ("women are more caring"), uses that claim to capture institutional power, institutes policies based on the identity-claim rather than on outcomes, and the policies produce coercion against the most vulnerable. The young man being dragged off by the old women is the 12-year-old boy whose "sexual debut" nobody investigates.

Hahahahahohmygodourfathersfuckedup.
 
Sneed's Feed n Seed dijo:
Hahahahahohmygodourfathersfuckedup.
Presiona para expandir...
Yes our fathers and grandfathers fucked up, but it’s not entirely their fault. At the beginning of the 20th century, it was expected that an education included learning Latin and Ancient Greek, and you’d read Aristophanes’ plays.

By the end of the 20th century, basically no one learns Latin and Ancient Greek. This was not accidental. It was enemy action.
 
Pluciferous dijo:
Yes our fathers and grandfathers fucked up, but it’s not entirely their fault. At the beginning of the 20th century, it was expected that an education included learning Latin and Ancient Greek, and you’d read Aristophanes’ plays.

By the end of the 20th century, basically no one learns Latin and Ancient Greek. This was not accidental. It was enemy action.
Presiona para expandir...
Stop advocating for systemic racism.
 
Jace on ice dijo:
I find anti troon lesbians, gays, feminists deeply amusing because their entire ideology is

"We only one want this level of degeneracy and this level of degeneracy only. We don't want the degeneracy to spread or get worse, we want our degeneracy to be accepted but their degeneracy to be illegal."

That's not how any of this fucking shit works, if you allow a little bit of it then it always mutates into something worse.

Deeply delusional people.
Presiona para expandir...
I've said this before but it's like HIV getting mad at other strains for developing into full-blown AIDS. They're all cut from the same cloth of a movement that can trace it's origins back to thought leaders who were either pedos or pedo apologists.
 
Anyone, male, female, religious, atheist, teacher, priest or whatever; anyone who abuses children or enables or excuses the abuse of children, gets the rope.
It baffles me that we play these ‘group A is worse than group B’ games. Predators go where the prey is, and that means that they will try to get into these professions or places where kids are. It’s not ‘being priest’ or ‘being teacher’ that calls them its proximity and trust to children and the vulnerable. But all child abusers need to be removed from society.
Ser Prize dijo:
Were they better than bras, in that case?
Presiona para expandir...
In some circumstances yes.
If you’re wearing multiple layers of underclothing, definitely. The layers of dresses or skirts it helps to distribute the weight. It holds your back and abdominals in a better position - a lot of women have issues with their abs not going back together after birth and I’ve often wondered if a decent set of stays would help.
Bras probably better for very active sports, very hot climates (although tropical corsets existed!) and certain clothing. Overbust corsets would be needed to replace a modern bra. If you’ve got a bit of a bad back, or hips, or poor posture then corsets can help, it’s effectively doing what a lumbar brace or the straps you get if you’ve had bad SPD will do.
Alas no one really sells this sort of stuff and most corsetry is costume/fetish stuff, but if you’re ever in a museum that has displays of old clothing in, it’s well worth a look - a lot of it was actually extremely practical. If you look at the designs of most modern bras they have very thin bands and that doesn’t give good support - one thing I hear women say repeatedly is that thicker bands (3-5 hooks) are way better. That structure is what bras mainly lack and what corsets provide
 
Otterly dijo:
Anyone, male, female, religious, atheist, teacher, priest or whatever; anyone who abuses children or enables or excuses the abuse of children, gets the rope.
It baffles me that we play these ‘group A is worse than group B’ games. Predators go where the prey is, and that means that they will try to get into these professions or places where kids are. It’s not ‘being priest’ or ‘being teacher’ that calls them its proximity and trust to children and the vulnerable. But all child abusers need to be removed from society.
Presiona para expandir...
In a perfect world it would be true but right now we have to have this conversation mostly because we have our media of all kinds that only talk about pedophile priests and ignore literally every other type of pedophile (especially LGBT related pedophiles).
 
NarkDigger dijo:
In a perfect world it would be true but right now we have to have this conversation mostly because we have our media of all kinds that only talk about pedophile priests and ignore literally every other type of pedophile (especially LGBT related pedophiles).
Presiona para expandir...
You’re right, and the reason it’s encouraged is because it allows certain groups to get off Scot free and for the focus to be on their identity, not their actions. So you get troons dismantling the safeguarding rules that keep kids safer in schools, while being immune from criticism. At the same time they use the identity stuff to say ‘priests are bad because they’re priests.’ It’s… infuriating.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo