Official Kiwi Farms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So, I was researching some gender war bs because Im tipsy and hate myself. According to the DVResearch.org:
These numbers are still likely understated because there are some guys that refused to report on it. But these numbers are unsurprising. Will wymynysts advocate for men to get legal protection because of domestic violence? I don’t think I’m going to hold my breath on that one.
Because we haven’t blamed moids enough!

Millennial women are really not going to handle menopause well. These next ten years are going to get interesting in terms of gender warz bullshit.
 
I was very curious about the kind of person who'd write an article like this. It was penned by a Charlotte Cripps, a single mother of two and writer for The Independent. My initial thought was, "oh, she got pumped 'n dumped by chad and is bitter that he doesn't want to stick around with some slampig." Nope, the truth is a lot stranger.

Charlotte had a husband who has since passed away (rest in peace,) who she had two kids with... Sort of. She decided to get pregnant via in vitro fertilization, with him. She mentions she saved some of his sperm ahead of time in case of "commitment issues." (Archive) Your guess is as good as mine, I'm really hoping I'm misunderstanding and she doesn't actually mean "so I could make him a father even if he changed his mind." She had two children this way, starting IVF after her husband died, and is now explaining that it actually doesn't matter that they're growing up without a father. (Archive.) She also, despite admitting to having had a very good relationship with her own father, now actually hates him and realized he was (therapyspeak incoming) Narcissistic and Gaslighting and made her into a Victim by doing Triangulation and Identity Theft on her, (Archive) and she only just now realized, decades after the fact (and a year after her father died. What a lovely daughter.) But don't worry- the therapist she talked to informed her that she isn't a narcissist and is nothing like her dad. Thank goodness.

So, what do I think happened? She made the decision to become a single mother via IVF, probably assuming she was the pick of the litter and that any man would be happy to throw himself at her feet and raise another man's children. (Wait, no, that's impossible- she's not a narcissist, the therapist said so.) Now she realizes men don't want to date a single mom, so she becomes a whiny misandrist. My children don't need a father! My dad was actually emotionally abusive now that I think about it! Men are entitled babies! Nothing is ever my fault!

And she is not beating the woman behavior allegations anytime soon.
Screenshot 2026-03-23 at 7.01.07 AM.png
(Link | Archive)


(By the way, here's an archive of the original article Sum posted, for posterity. I tried to archive the AOL version, but wasn't jiving with archive.org. This is most likely the exact same,, though.)
 
I find anti troon lesbians, gays, feminists deeply amusing because their entire ideology is

"We only one want this level of degeneracy and this level of degeneracy only. We don't want the degeneracy to spread or get worse, we want our degeneracy to be accepted but their degeneracy to be illegal."

That's not how any of this fucking shit works, if you allow a little bit of it then it always mutates into something worse.

Deeply delusional people.
 
Chappell Roan's security lashes out at an 11-year-old girl and it blows up online:

Chappell then responds here:
 
I find anti troon lesbians, gays, feminists deeply amusing because their entire ideology is

"We only one want this level of degeneracy and this level of degeneracy only. We don't want the degeneracy to spread or get worse, we want our degeneracy to be accepted but their degeneracy to be illegal."

That's not how any of this fucking shit works, if you allow a little bit of it then it always mutates into something worse.

Deeply delusional people.
"I agree with an average troon on literally every issue outside of the troon question itself because the troon question is the only one that directly affects me"

It's also important to notice that even with anti-troonism they never address the core issue of troonism but only the minor end result consequences. They most often talk about stuff like "oh no there is an evil moid in my locker room" which is kinda like saying "oh no, I'm going bald" when you have cancer.

On top of that, I'm sure that years of feminism saying that both genders are basically the same and interchangeable, combined with years of liberalism saying that there is no order to society and you should do whatever you want as long as it's "consenting adults in the privacy of their own home" didn't have anything to do with rise of troonism. I'm sure you can definitely fight the troons while still holding fundamentally pro-troon beliefs like that.
 
These numbers are still likely understated because there are some guys that refused to report on it. But these numbers are unsurprising.
True. I would also love to see data pertaining to rape stats perpetrated by men and women unsullied by the leg-bearded researchers. For those that are not in the know the definition of rape necessitates the possession of the penetrating organ, aka penis, so technically only men is capable of rape ( Unless the woman in question use an object to rape). Academia invented some very colorful terms for the act of women raping men, like 'made to penetrate' and 'unwanted contact' lol.
@synthetic_glazer I'm really hoping I'm misunderstanding and she doesn't actually mean "so I could make him a father even if he changed his mind."
That is definitely what happened lol. A case related to this topic went viral in Poland recently: 'Can a man be forced into fatherhood after a divorce? The case will be dealt with by the Supreme Court'
The case concerns a divorced couple who have an embryo frozen from their marriage. District Court in Radom issued an order allowing the woman to use the embryo with the man's express objection. The dispute will now be resolved by the Supreme Court, which has requested an opinion Commissioner for Human Rights.

– The Infertility Treatment Act states that if the husband does not consent to the transfer of the embryo, permission for this transfer may be issued by the guardianship court. This means directly that the Polish state, through a court ruling, has a tool to break the man's will – added the attorney, emphasizing the asymmetry between the sexes. The legislator did not provide for the possibility of forcing a woman to accept an embryo in court, as this would violate her bodily integrity.

For a man, a court ruling replacing his consent has powerful and irreversible consequences. Under the Family and Guardianship Code, he becomes a full-fledged father. The law does not provide for the status of „anonymous donor” here. This means imposing on him a full, long-term maintenance obligation for a child whom he clearly did not plan for at the post-divorce stage and for whose birth he firmly did not agree – said Iwo Klisz.

The lawyer drew attention to the choice that courts deciding in similar cases must make – they can deprive a woman of her often only chance at biological motherhood and give the embryo for adoption, or force a man into paternity against his will. Moreover, the Polish legal system has no provisions that would protect a man from the financial burden of such a court decision.

This phenomenon (forced parenthood) is much more widely commented on worldwide. The problems faced by people range from forging signatures in in vitro clinics to perform embryo
transfer to obtaining sperm using various methods, such as using a used protective agent after contact.

– The guardianship court may grant the woman consent – instead of the consent of her former partner – to transfer the embryo into the body. This is not, of course, the same as forcing a man to actively participate in the child's life, but he can be charged with the costs of maintaining the child. This is a very difficult situation for the man and also for the child in the future – summarized by attorney Monika Wiśniewska.
 
Chappell Roan's security lashes out at an 11-year-old girl and it blows up online:

Chappell then responds here:
4zmfyz81.mp4
You just know she spent at least an hour perfecting her disheveled, 'makeup-free' look to make the apology seem more genuine. Look at how sad she is! She's literally laying down bed with her hair messy! It's just so much for her! She's just like us, girls!

It's performative vulnerability, looking wewwy sad and distressed after probably spending hours mulling over how she should do her apology to maximize sympathy with her target audience. Women will do this shit and when you call them out they call you cold-hearted.
 
Story time fellas.

I got kicked out of a group for giving relationship advice. They're relatively tolerable normally, but this was apparently their line.

Some bitch decided to post how she had problems with her husband. He has ED, and it's effecting her marriage. He has an ex wife whom also divorced him over his ED. She apparently tried to open the marriage and when he wouldn't, they divorced. So she has decided to ask moids on social media how she can convince her husband to open the marriage because she can't stand his ED anymore.

I rightfully called her an evil, vile bitch and she knew exactly what she was doing. That was apparently a step too far and I got booted over this.

Now, you might say "But Wurmple, this was clearly ragebait", and maybe. What wasn't ragebait though- was the comments.

I shit you not there were 600-1000+ comments on this story, ALL of men and women alike blaming this poor fictional man for ED as if it were his fault. I shit you not, women were legitimately saying the reason he had ED because he wasn't trying hard enough.

You had answers like:

"He needs to go to the doctor!"

"He should just man up and buy some pills!"

"You're a queen and this is unacceptable! He's breaking his marriage vows!"

"He should work out and take care of himself more! It's his fault!"

"You tell him girl! He either fixes this problem or you find dick elsewhere!"

All the fucking bullshit you can imagine. Nobody and I mean NOBODY defended this poor, maybe non-existent old guy with ED. Nobody stood up and said "Hey maybe he has another issue he can't fix" or "hey maybe he just drew the genetic short straw and you're stuck". Nope, just blame, blame, blame him. It's all his fault and he can totally fix it, he's just not trying hard enough.

It's probably one of the most horrible and upsetting things I've ever witnessed on the internet. So, just in case you future Kiwis ever find yourself in this spot someday when you're getting up there in age, remember:

NOBODY will have your back and it is somehow your fault.
 
1000041844.png 1000041845.png

@Party Hat Wurmple
Those same women would be utterly outraged if a man posted something like, "My wife is going through menopause. She has lost all interest in sex. Is it ok if I have a FWB situation with a younger woman in my office?"
 
Última edición:
I would also love to see data pertaining to rape stats perpetrated by men and women unsullied by the leg-bearded researchers.

Felson & Cundiff (2014), Archives of Sexual Behavior. Nearly 300,000 sexual assaults from NIBRS (2000-2007).

The findings: modal victim age was 15 regardless of offender age, offender gender, or victim gender. A 15-year-old boy is more likely to be sexually assaulted than a 40-year-old woman. 15-year-old females are about 9x more likely to be raped than 35-year-old females. By the 50s, rates are negligible.

It overwhelmingly affects children but feminists have abdicated their responsibilities to them, as we all know all too well.

There's also FPCSA research (Cortoni et al. 2017 meta-analysis) that shows something interesting:
"OFFICIAL" data that FUCKIN' LOVES SCIENCE reports 2.2% of sexual offenses are committed by women, while victimization surveys show 11.6%. FIVE FOLD UNDER-REPORTING GAP. Wait. What's that? The Mary Koss methodological issue where "made to penetrate" was excluded from the definition of rape in the CDC's NISVS, which systematically zeroed out male victimization by female perpetrators??

😮

WOMEN RAPING BOYS: A PLAY OF EUPHEMISM AND "HUSH" IN THREE DISGUSTING ACTS!

Act 1: The "Sexual Debut" Paper
Cavazos-Rehg et al. (2009), published in Contraception. Analyzed 1999-2007 YRBS data (CDC's Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System), 72,000+ students, nationally representative sample. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Key findings: 15% of African-American males had experienced "sexual debut" by their 12th birthday, compared to under 10% for every other group. PubMed Central By age 14, 42% of African-American males had experienced sexual debut, versus 20% or less for all other groups. PubMed Central

And here's the sentence. The researchers write: because far fewer female adolescents have had sexual debut at a very early age, they speculate that these young African-American males were either exaggerating reports of sexual debut or having their first sexual intercourse with older females. PubMed Central

Read that again. The researchers' two hypotheses for 11-year-old boys reporting sex are: (a) they're lying, or (b) adult women are having sex with them. And the term for this is "sexual debut." Not rape. Not statutory rape. Not child sexual abuse. "Sexual debut."

The paper then immediately pivots to: it is important to permit freedom of sexual expression to those adolescents who are mature, intelligent and reasonable enough to give consent for sexual activity. PubMed Central

For 11-year-olds!

1774304096455.png

Act 2: The Research Asymmetry

Notice what exists and what doesn't. There are mountains of research on "older male partners" of adolescent females. Guttmacher, Add Health, multiple longitudinal studies. The entire statutory rape research infrastructure is built around the frame of older-male-younger-female.

For younger boys with older female partners? Researchers have called attention to how little is known about associations between age gaps and negative outcomes for male adolescents. ScienceDirect Historically, statutory rape laws deemed that only female adolescents could be victims given the disproportionate burden of pregnancy placed on females. ScienceDirect

The 2019 Middle School YRBS data (66,366 adolescents aged 10-14) found Black/African American adolescents were 4.5 times more likely than White adolescents to report having early sexual intercourse MDPI, and males were over three times more likely than females to report multiple sex partners at ages 11 and 14. MDPI

Nobody asks who these 11-year-old boys are having sex with. That question is not asked.

"...it is important to permit freedom of sexual expression to those adolescents who are mature, intelligent and reasonable enough to give consent for sexual activity..." - Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg, Melissa J Krauss, Edward L Spitznagel, Mario Schootman, Kathleen K Bucholz, Jeffrey F Peipert, Vetta Sanders-Thompson, Linda B Cottler, Laura Jean Bierut.

1774304096455.png
Act 3: The Legal Punchline

When it IS acknowledged that an adult woman had sex with a minor boy, the legal system does this:

Hermesmann v. Seyer (Kansas, 1993): A 16-year-old babysitter began a sexual relationship with a 12-year-old boy in her care. She became pregnant when he was 13. Wikipedia Criminal charges were brought against the woman. The Kansas Supreme Court held that, because being under 16 he had been legally unable to consent to sex, a crime had been committed under statutory rape law, but that Seyer had actually given consent under civil law. Wikipedia

:story: He was ordered to pay child support. :story:

County of San Luis Obispo v. Nathaniel J.: A 15-year-old male victim and a 34-year-old female perpetrator. The perpetrator was prosecuted and convicted of unlawful sex with a minor. The court found the boy was "not an innocent victim" and ordered child support once he reached majority. Wikipedia

1774304541814.png

The deputy attorney general in that case said of the 15-year-old boy: "I guess he thought he was a man then. Now, he prefers to be considered a child." Psychology Today

Nick Olivas (Arizona, 2014): A 14-year-old boy was raped by a 20-year-old woman. He didn't know he had a daughter until six years later, when the state came after him for back child support. ABA Journal Arizona seized money from his bank account and garnished his wages.

As the Barry University law review article puts it: Courts across the country have decided that minor males are consenting to sex and therefore must pay, despite the fact that most states now have gender-neutral statutory rape laws based on the premise that minors are incapable of consent. Barry

Feminist research calls it "sexual debut." The epidemiologists speculate the boys are lying. The courts say the boys consented. The state garnishes their wages. And Mary Koss, who built the "1 in 4" statistic, argued that men and boys cannot be raped by women. Psychology Today

NIGGERFAGGOT

1774304641649.png
 
Atrás
Top Abajo