Lolcow LLC v. Liz Fong-Jones (2026)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Three months to respond is pretty long, how many hours a week are they looking at this case? 5 minutes a pop?
Ver archivo adjunto 8725421
"You must accept our demands IMMEDIATELY or be SUED!"
"No no no wait we expected him to capitulate, actually we're really busy and can't make a defence in three months, sorry!"
One can only hope this is a sign the legally minded involved with Elliot have realized they are incredibly screwed from the outset and are attempting to postpone the inevitable legal colonic irrigation as long as possible.
 
Huh, merely requesting a thread lock was enough to get things moving. Neat!
It's amazing how differently things can work when both sides of a legal conflict are represented by at least minimally capable counsel.

The process will still take a long time to get anything done but at least it won't be because of things like "plaintiff didn't check his mail"
 
One can only hope this is a sign the legally minded involved with Elliot have realized they are incredibly screwed from the outset and are attempting to postpone the inevitable legal colonic irrigation as long as possible.
This law firm is the brain trust behind the Threadnaught back during Weeb Wars, famous for predicting every downfall for the Vic lawsuit except the one that actually happened. One of them copyrighted pictures of his kids and tried to threaten Null to take them down. Lane Haygood, the lawyer in all the emails representing LFJ, was a Threadnaughter who couldn't keep things straight during the lawsuit.

They aren't really known for thoughtful self-reflection.
 
It's amazing how differently things can work when both sides of a legal conflict are represented by at least minimally capable counsel.

The process will still take a long time to get anything done but at least it won't be because of things like "plaintiff didn't check his mail"
Or plaintiff had a "seizure", or is having "technical problems", or "doesn't know how to turn on the camera", etc.
 
>Nobody has even heard of you before
>Threaten Kiwi Farms with your employer's email after its users exposed your "friends" for being scammers
>Curious users dig into your past and find out that you sexually assaulted someone and then tried to downplay it as a "consent accident"
>Go on a crusade lasting 4 years and counting going to extreme measures to try to take Kiwi Farms down when a thread gets made about you and the skeletons in your closet
>The site becomes more resilient than ever as a result of your actions
>Now everyone knows about what you've done and "consent accident" is literally what comes up when someone types your name on your now ex-employer's website


What do we call this?
Narcissism
 
Three months to respond is pretty long, how many hours a week are they looking at this case? 5 minutes a pop?
It's a basic rule. It's meant to encourage people not to jack around arguing about service of process.
One can only hope this is a sign the legally minded involved with Elliot have realized they are incredibly screwed from the outset and are attempting to postpone the inevitable legal colonic irrigation as long as possible.
First impressions are a big thing. If you're obviously the party coming right out of the gate being a complete jerk, this is a bad first impression. So by waiving service, you not only get a good first impression, you also get more time to respond. That's why it's written into the rule.

I think this may be the first time involving a cow where someone acted professionally instead of just throwing a bitch fit about every single thing.
 
Última edición:
One can only hope this is a sign the legally minded involved with Elliot have realized they are incredibly screwed from the outset and are attempting to postpone the inevitable legal colonic irrigation as long as possible.
It's also possible they might be going for a "the process is the punishment" thing. I.e., waste as much of Null's time and resources before trying to go "oh no guess we were wrong in good faith darn sucks to be you chud." This is what the left has been doing for the past year against the Trump admin -- every single thing he tries to do, no matter what, they run to a lefty judge who makes up some batshit insane moon logic as to why he can't do it. It's slapped down every single time but it wastes time, resources, and clouds the waters so they can try and recover from the assfucking they got in November 2024.

This law firm is the brain trust behind the Threadnaught back during Weeb Wars, famous for predicting every downfall for the Vic lawsuit except the one that actually happened. One of them copyrighted pictures of his kids and tried to threaten Null to take them down. Lane Haygood, the lawyer in all the emails representing LFJ, was a Threadnaughter who couldn't keep things straight during the lawsuit.

They aren't really known for thoughtful self-reflection.
It would make me no end of amused if the Threadnaught retards had got this totally cool idea of abusing the DMCA by claiming copyright of their tweets (can't, they're licensed to X) or pictures of Slabface Elliot (can't, fair use to mock a confessed sexual deviant) and oh darn, turns out when you're practicing law somewhere not in a hugbox on X or bluesky the rules actually matter.

IIRC the law firm is the one that went after Smash JT too, and if memory doesn't fail me the lawyer involved is your bog standard ultra-lefty tranny, which I'd wager got his law degree the same way my nephews got their participation trophy in Baseball despite not winning a single game all season last year.
 
ECF 10 & 11
2026-03-20-000312.png

Tldr: The motion to extend time was terminated by the Judge, but the time amount seems to have been "endorsed". In other words, motion approved.
 

Archivos adjuntos

It's also possible they might be going for a "the process is the punishment" thing. I.e., waste as much of Null's time and resources before trying to go "oh no guess we were wrong in good faith darn sucks to be you chud."
This is really overanalyzing it. This is an entirely normal and routine thing to do, and the only reason we haven't seen it is the people we either litigate with or observe are lolcows who always do the wrong thing.
 
A little under three months time to have to make a response with the lawsuit seems like a long leeway or is that normal to give people that much ample time for responding to lawsuits?
Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows for 90 days to respond to a lawsuit if the defendant waived serviced and is not within USA. That part is normal. Additionally the defense asked for 12 more days due to "scheduling conflicts". If all parties agree to it (as here), such extensions are common place.

That is to say, currently everything is aboveboard.
 
This case is not nearly as much fun as the usual lolcow cases.
That kind of worries me actually. I prefer more clownshoes.

Oh well, this chink was coming after us anyway eventually, the "race to the courthouse door" is a real thing and at least we have that advantage of having acted first.

If we go down, we go down, but we go down fighting.
 
I expect the filings to be professional and the lawyers to be strong and effective advocates on both sides. You can say lots of things about the man, Liz Fong-jones, credibly accused of and admitteded commiter of a rape and/or rape-like consent accident, but unprofessional is not one of them. He is very professional in his evil doings and that was his success until he managed to start chasing off all his friends and allies by never not trying to wrangle them into his revenge plot.

Its really a villain story when you think about it.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo