I was going here to actually post about this, hilarious how this added up. The disparity between the streams they're catching up on and the nubmer they'r eon rn with mainline Efap is actually kidna shocking, how do you fall so far behind?
I seriously don't know why they do that. It destroyed their engagement and plummeted the superchats they get. Not to mention, they rarely read normal chat in the first place. So there is no incentive for a few people who watch them live to superchat them because why would they? They don't get a reply and have to watch another stream to get a reply.
Great news. Is it worth getting back into efap now?
It is a step in the right direction, but you've still got turboautist Fringy quoting Simpsons ad nauseam.
Good banter, but I think it'd be funnier if you and ronnal just repeated a scene, word-for-word, either of The Simpsons or Smiling Friends while the rest of us be extremely bored
No Fringy is still there who I honestly think is way worse than Rags, I guess if you're really into someone quoting Simpsons scenes word for word for several minutes and interrupting people who present an opinion slightly different then his by immidietly screaching "UHHHH NOUGH WAIT".
Yeah, you're right. I don't think I'd ever listen to them yap on and on about movies that I have 0 interest in again, but getting rid of Rags is the one thing that could tempt me back.
Attitudes like this completely invalidate the idea of objective film critique.
Pretty sure all of the hosts share this stance for the most part.
It is notable that Mauler disagreed with Platoon on this in the Iron Lung episode, he was much mroe favourable to the movie since Mauler likes cosmic horror. I think it shows how completely blatantly subjective they are tbh. Two hosts being nicer/harsher to a movie based on liking of the genre in the same episode
I thought it was a good example of them realizing the limit to their critique style actually. They were upfront and aware of their bias regarding the genre so even though they agreed on the objective metrics, they were clear as to why this or that didn't work for them. What's annoying is when they aren't aware of their bias and become unfairly uncharitable.
I'll give Platoon this though, he did preface his critique with the fact that this wasn't his type of movie so to take his opinion with that in mind.
Things are dire when Rags was keeping things in check. If anything it's a bigger condemnation of Mauler and his seeming inability to associate with people who aren't retarded faggots.
Yeah it's like how wolves or dogs keep deer population in check.
Fringy was Rags friend originally, so I don't think this makes Mauler look worse.
What do you expect. Movie analysis like are going to lead to you attracting the biggest autists imaginable. Also ones that have 5+ hours to waste on a live stream regularly.