- Registrado
- 12 de Nov, 2019
most likely some deal to tell her to shut up & give her info(discord & email & text) for a paused case & not going into discovery.
TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.
- Iniciador del tema Sheryl Nome
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber 2:25-cv-05564 — District Court, C.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 2:25-cv-05564
-
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California
-
- Filed
- 18 de Jun, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Both
-
- Last Filing
- 9 de Jun, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 45)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 9 de Jun, 2026 | STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S MARCH 2, 2026 ORDER [DKT. NO. 29] filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/10/2026) | |
| 43 | 5 de Jun, 2026 | COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 06/05/2026 to 06/05/2026 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. Court will contact Rom Bar-Nissim at Rom@HeahBarNissim.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Pre-Trial Proceeding: Hearing for Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings on June 5, 2026. FEE PAID. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/06/2026) | |
| 42 | 4 de Jun, 2026 | MINUTES OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COMPLAINT 35 Hearing held before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court's Tentative Ruling was issued on June 4, 2026, and reviewed by counsel. The Court heard oral argument. The Court took the matter UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. Court Recorder: CourtSmart. (lom) (Entered: 06/05/2026) | |
| 41 | 2 de Jun, 2026 | SCHEDULING NOTICE AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CHANGING THE TIME OF THE MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 scheduled for 6/05/2026 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The Court, on its own motion, changes the time to 2:15 PM. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 9B. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cgm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/03/2026) | |
| — | 2 de Jun, 2026 |
Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed 2:25-cv-05565 — District Court, C.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 2:25-cv-05565
-
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California
-
- Filed
- 18 de Jun, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Plaintiff
-
- Last Filing
- 29 de Jun, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Does, Ted Entertainment Inc., Morgan Kamal Majed
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 18)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | 29 de Jun, 2026 | ||
| 17 | 28 de Jun, 2026 | APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Application set for hearing on 8/10/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Proposed Order) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/29/2026) | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| 16 | 19 de Mayo, 2026 | DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan. (iv) (Entered: 05/20/2026) | |
| 15 | 18 de Mayo, 2026 | REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Morgan Kamal Majed filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/19/2026) | 1 2 3 |
| 14 | 4 de Ago, 2025 | ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTEND ING THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 13 by Judge John F. Walter. Frogan's deadline to respond to TEI's complaint extended to October 3, 2025. (iv) (Entered: 08/06/2025) |
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness 4:25-cv-00459 — District Court, W.D. Missouri
-
- Docket No.
- 4:25-cv-00459
-
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Missouri
-
- Filed
- 18 de Jun, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:101 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Both
-
- Last Filing
- 7 de Dic, 2025
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Does 1-10, Kacey Caviness, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 36)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 7 de Dic, 2025 | ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025) | |
| 26 | 1 de Dic, 2025 | STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025) | |
| 25 | 7 de Oct, 2025 | DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL by Kacey Caviness, Does 1-10. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/08/2025) | |
| 24 | 5 de Oct, 2025 | PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed on 10/6/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 10/06/2025) | |
| 23 | 1 de Oct, 2025 | Joint MOTION for protective order for Approval of Proposed Protective Order filed by Benjamin Kassis on behalf of Kacey Caviness. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/02/2025) |
In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc. 3:25-mc-80296 — District Court, N.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 3:25-mc-80296
-
- Court
- District Court, N.D. California
-
- Filed
- 21 de Sep, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 890 Other Statutory Actions
-
- Cause
- Civil Miscellaneous Case
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- None
-
- Last Filing
- 3 de Jun, 2026
Parties (2)
- Parties
- Doe Defendants, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 60)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 1 de Jun, 2026 | USCA Case Number 26-3553 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 46 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/03/2026) | |
| 47 | 31 de Mayo, 2026 | USCA Case Number 26-3513 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 49 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/4/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/02/2026) | |
| 49 | 28 de Mayo, 2026 | Petition For Writ Of Mandamus filed Directly with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2026) Modified on 6/4/2026 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/04/2026) | |
| 46 | 28 de Mayo, 2026 | NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Doe Defendants. Appeal of Order, Terminate Motions 45 (Appeal fee of $605 receipt number ACANDC-22041800 paid.) (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 5/29/2026) (Entered: 05/29/2026) | |
| 45 | 28 de Abr, 2026 | ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on 4/29/2026. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2026) (Entered: 04/29/2026) | 1 2 |
Doe Defendants v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco 26-3513 — Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
-
- Docket No.
- 26-3513
-
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
-
- Filed
- 31 de Mayo, 2026
-
- Last Filing
- 21 de Jun, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, DOE DEFENDANTS
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 9)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 21 de Jun, 2026 | ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld [Entered: 06/22/2026 02:10 PM] | |
| 8 | 21 de Jun, 2026 | NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld for Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 06/22/2026 01:26 PM] | |
| 7 | 14 de Jun, 2026 | DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:03 PM] | |
| 6 | 3 de Jun, 2026 | CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Court entered filing to correct DE 5] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:28 PM] | |
| 5 | 3 de Jun, 2026 | DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 6] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:09 PM] [Edited: 06/04/2026 03:29 PM] |
- Registrado
- 28 de Ene, 2024
Imagine Ethan Klein becoming a landlord to Kaceytron, lmao.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Forced mediation is a scam.
- Registrado
- 10 de Nov, 2015
Most states have a homestead exemption. But everything inside the house that isnt taped down is up for grabs.
How so?
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Because if you have to force it at least one party is not being reasonable and is NOT going to go along with it. So both sides end up spending tens of thousands of dollars on some completely worthless mediation that is never going to result in shit, and they also have to pay the mediator for wasting everyone's time.
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2022
it seems to work in australia. i learned that from an abc law show called "Fisk".
is Kaceytron the only one of the 3 with ties to the snark reddit?
- Registrado
- 16 de Abr, 2021
No, I believe Denims refer nced them in her video.
- Registrado
- 12 de Nov, 2019
- Registrado
- 28 de Ene, 2024
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
Kaceytron is using the same lawyer Denims is, and for him to appear pro hac vice they need another lawyer to basically stand in as the responsible party who can practice in Missouri.
Nothing new, this was known for multiple months since the filings were made and we even looked at her lawyers and their case history a bit.
Nothing new, this was known for multiple months since the filings were made and we even looked at her lawyers and their case history a bit.
- Registrado
- 28 de Ene, 2024
It's still crazy she hired two lawfirms instead trying to negotiate a settlement. Lus speculated Kacey might not be as broke as she tries to portray herself based on this fact.
- Registrado
- 30 de Sep, 2023
When will we find out what happened with mediation?
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
It really depends on how much they actually cost.
LUS is a retard and FORMER patent or IP (forgot which, too lazy to look it up) lawyer from Australia, his opinions on legal US topics are about as relevant as a wet fart in my opinion.
He really glomped onto the Karl topic trying to become relevant as some Aussie lawtube persona, but his history is a failed trading card game company speculating on the TCG market, plus is autistic "I now have a girlfriend" talking in the past make him highly suspect as a source.
[EDIT] I would say my opinion on legal US topics is about worth as much as his, which means very little. I have no education in the field, I am not a US citizen, all my "expertise" is Dunning-Kruger Google skills. But I am not making Youtube videos about it.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 16 de Abr, 2021
She's probably rich for Missouri, but poor for California.
I wonder if it's more over her putting so many emotional pleas out over social media.
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
She is poor and her family is poor. They are the definition of white trash.
Semi-retarded unemployed leeches living off the Streamer money the drug addict daughter brings in.
Remember, Kacey started her career as a tits-out LOL streamer.
And her family has been spending the money simps give her for showing half her tits on stream while failing at LOL, getting high and crashing out.
Just look at the house on google maps. If she had money, she would not be living in that ramshackle wooden hut and drive a beater.
- Registrado
- 11 de Jul, 2025
Hiring local counsel plus specialized pro hac counsel is a signal of more money. While Missouri is a third-rate state, it does have St Louis and Kansas City -- which surprisingly do have some reasonably good legal talent (Shook Hardy and Polsinelli come to mind immediately). So it was a choice to go with the California team plus local counsel. I guess the three defendants may have some kind of joint defense arrangement -- ignoring what could be problematic conflicts issues -- and be pooling money.
It's all so dumb. You know damn well these judges don't want to actually expend effort on ruling on motions here -- they expect a settlement, and might put everyone through the ringer trying to force a settlement through mediation. The judge I clerked for had an, in my opinion, naive expectation that "if i just don't rule on the papers, and push them towards more mediation, this will all just go away because it is so obvious" -- and he did that for a case involving a trucker for an out-of-state oil and gas company clearly at-fault killing a bystander, where the amounts at-issue were significantly higher than anything at issue here.
Until the three amigos get a clear adverse ruling I think they'll continue huffing copium about it all.
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
Of course hiring extra lawyers means extra money, but I would assume Kacey is to dumb to hire her own counsel and relied on Denims to get the same lawyers, who then organized for local counsel.
Frogan got her own more boutique LA firm, she is not in the same boat with the other two.
Overall she has been the one who handled the situation the best.
She STFU, deleted all content to avoid causing further harm, and got a lawyer without a conflict.
Denims and Kacey likely have their shared defense arrangement, but I would be surprised if they had pooled their money.
The 40k$ should last Kacey through mediation, but she knows already that she does not like what the Mediator will suggest, and her lawyers already told her what a fair settlement would be. She seems to think she has a chance in court, because she is too stupid to understand what the final sum will be she will be found liable for.
- Registrado
- 12 de Nov, 2019
toooo soon
might need the burger suit with my invese karma
Kaceytron and Ethan Klein have reached a settlement
2 for 3 for jew - reddit & Denims left
.....
might need the burger suit with my invese karma
Kaceytron and Ethan Klein have reached a settlement
2 for 3 for jew - reddit & Denims left
.....
Reacciones:
x 271 x 67 x 91 x 57 x 14 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 2 x 1 x 1 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 1
x 271 x 67 x 91 x 57 x 14 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 2 x 1 x 1 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 1
Reacciones: x 65 x 13 x 2 x 2 x 2
x 65 x 13 x 2 x 2 x 2
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
I am surprised that someone got through to her to explain how much this will cost her if it goes to trial.
And Ethan must have been VERY VERY merciful