TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.
- Iniciador del tema Sheryl Nome
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber 2:25-cv-05564 — District Court, C.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 2:25-cv-05564
-
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California
-
- Filed
- 18 de Jun, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Both
-
- Last Filing
- 9 de Jun, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 45)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 9 de Jun, 2026 | STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S MARCH 2, 2026 ORDER [DKT. NO. 29] filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/10/2026) | |
| 43 | 5 de Jun, 2026 | COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 06/05/2026 to 06/05/2026 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. Court will contact Rom Bar-Nissim at Rom@HeahBarNissim.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Pre-Trial Proceeding: Hearing for Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings on June 5, 2026. FEE PAID. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/06/2026) | |
| 42 | 4 de Jun, 2026 | MINUTES OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COMPLAINT 35 Hearing held before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court's Tentative Ruling was issued on June 4, 2026, and reviewed by counsel. The Court heard oral argument. The Court took the matter UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. Court Recorder: CourtSmart. (lom) (Entered: 06/05/2026) | |
| 41 | 2 de Jun, 2026 | SCHEDULING NOTICE AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CHANGING THE TIME OF THE MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 scheduled for 6/05/2026 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The Court, on its own motion, changes the time to 2:15 PM. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 9B. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cgm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/03/2026) | |
| — | 2 de Jun, 2026 |
Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed 2:25-cv-05565 — District Court, C.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 2:25-cv-05565
-
- Court
- District Court, C.D. California
-
- Filed
- 18 de Jun, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:501 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Plaintiff
-
- Last Filing
- 29 de Jun, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Does, Ted Entertainment Inc., Morgan Kamal Majed
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 21)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 29 de Jun, 2026 | ||
| 19 | 29 de Jun, 2026 | APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Application set for hearing on 8/10/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment against Defendant Majed, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Rom Bar-Nissim in support of Plaintiff's Application for Default Judgment of Defendant Majed, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: Copyright Office Registration Certificate for Content Nuke: Hasan Piker, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Bar-Nisim Declaration: April 29, 2026 Order by the Honorable Sallie Kim Denying Doe Defendants' Motion to Quash, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 3 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: June 29, 2026 Screenshot of Defendant Majed's GoFundMe for Legal Defense Fund, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 4 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: April 20, 2026 Email to Majed's Counsel Providing Notice of Default, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 5 to Bar-Nissim Declaration: Invoices Issued to Plaintiff for the Present Action, # 8 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Majed) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/30/2026) | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| 18 | 29 de Jun, 2026 | Text Entry Order: Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.s Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed filed on June 29, 2026, Docket No. 17 is STRICKEN for failure to comply with paragraph 3(b) of the Court's Standing Order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/30/2026) | |
| — | 29 de Jun, 2026 | ||
| 17 | 28 de Jun, 2026 | *STRICKEN* APPLICATION for Default Judgment against Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. Application set for hearing on 8/10/2026 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Proposed Order) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) Modified on 6/30/2026 (sr). (Entered: 06/29/2026) | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness 4:25-cv-00459 — District Court, W.D. Missouri
-
- Docket No.
- 4:25-cv-00459
-
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Missouri
-
- Filed
- 18 de Jun, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:101 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- Both
-
- Last Filing
- 7 de Dic, 2025
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Does 1-10, Kacey Caviness, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 36)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 7 de Dic, 2025 | ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025) | |
| 26 | 1 de Dic, 2025 | STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025) | |
| 25 | 7 de Oct, 2025 | DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL by Kacey Caviness, Does 1-10. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/08/2025) | |
| 24 | 5 de Oct, 2025 | PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed on 10/6/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 10/06/2025) | |
| 23 | 1 de Oct, 2025 | Joint MOTION for protective order for Approval of Proposed Protective Order filed by Benjamin Kassis on behalf of Kacey Caviness. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/02/2025) |
In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc. 3:25-mc-80296 — District Court, N.D. California
-
- Docket No.
- 3:25-mc-80296
-
- Court
- District Court, N.D. California
-
- Filed
- 21 de Sep, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 890 Other Statutory Actions
-
- Cause
- Civil Miscellaneous Case
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- None
-
- Last Filing
- 3 de Jun, 2026
Parties (2)
- Parties
- Doe Defendants, Ted Entertainment, Inc.
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 60)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 1 de Jun, 2026 | USCA Case Number 26-3553 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 46 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/03/2026) | |
| 47 | 31 de Mayo, 2026 | USCA Case Number 26-3513 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 49 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/4/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/02/2026) | |
| 49 | 28 de Mayo, 2026 | Petition For Writ Of Mandamus filed Directly with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2026) Modified on 6/4/2026 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/04/2026) | |
| 46 | 28 de Mayo, 2026 | NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Doe Defendants. Appeal of Order, Terminate Motions 45 (Appeal fee of $605 receipt number ACANDC-22041800 paid.) (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 5/29/2026) (Entered: 05/29/2026) | |
| 45 | 28 de Abr, 2026 | ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on 4/29/2026. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2026) (Entered: 04/29/2026) | 1 2 |
Doe Defendants v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco 26-3513 — Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
-
- Docket No.
- 26-3513
-
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
-
- Filed
- 31 de Mayo, 2026
-
- Last Filing
- 21 de Jun, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, DOE DEFENDANTS
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 9)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 21 de Jun, 2026 | ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld [Entered: 06/22/2026 02:10 PM] | |
| 8 | 21 de Jun, 2026 | NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld for Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 06/22/2026 01:26 PM] | |
| 7 | 14 de Jun, 2026 | DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:03 PM] | |
| 6 | 3 de Jun, 2026 | CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Court entered filing to correct DE 5] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:28 PM] | |
| 5 | 3 de Jun, 2026 | DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 6] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:09 PM] [Edited: 06/04/2026 03:29 PM] |
DiabeetusYeetus
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 22 de Ago, 2022
They're Redditors. They believe all the bullshit fantasies. Ex-Redditor here. I got better and haven't visited the site willingly in months.
toffle
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Jun, 2025
hilarious that these LA streamers move to LA and then move into the shittiest neighborhoods imaginable.
Frogan lives a few blocks from skid row. no one in LA willingly lives in downtown, even the people who work there. despite being expensive, it's a shithole. she probably has to step over fent zombies every time she walks outside.
Denims lives in fucking van nuys which is an hour+ from anywhere in LA proper. shes paying north of 2K a month to live in a suburban glorified series of strip malls an hour outside of LA.
I don't know how much money either of those two make, but they could both easily rent places in many other nicer parts of town for what they're paying, that are more central, near artists, with better food, and less shitholey.
Frightened Rabbit
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Ago, 2024
The more this stretches on the more likely it is the Mossad is bankrolling them through a intermidiary.
Reason as to why should be clear!
- Registrado
- 10 de Nov, 2015
I mean it's good for technical questions and answers. Sometimes the question is already asked and answered so I search reddit occasionally.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Those are usually years old, though. Current year answers are usually completely retarded shit that do nothing but shit up search engine results.
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
I have no idea about LA neighborhoods, but even when I looked at the google streetview asked myself "Why would I want to live here?"
As a streamer I can literally stream from a cabin in the woods with a generator and Starlink.
Especially Denims was touted as some "big OF creator", but when I went and actually looked at her portfolio, it is all pinup softcore content and none of the high-paying fetish elf/furry/ahegao/littlesister/cosplay content that sells so well.
It is also very very bad compared to other OF creators.
Makes you really wonder if her primary income stream wasn't actually the leeching off Hasan and hijacking his audience. Why else would she do these long streams where she just blandly stares past the camera at her screen? You can literally see the empy space behind her eyes as she monotonously stares into the void.
Considering that, combined with the abyssmal choice of residence, makes you really think she is just another broke thot trying to make it in LA. Hardcore porn and titty dancing cannot be to far off.
- Registrado
- 10 de Mayo, 2025
Let's fucking goooo.
Kacey is throwing in the towel after having made another settlement offer to Ethan yesterday. Her GoFundMe money is running low and she's crying white woman tears about how going on will financially ruin her poor disabled family.
Archive of her video statement
Kacey is throwing in the towel after having made another settlement offer to Ethan yesterday. Her GoFundMe money is running low and she's crying white woman tears about how going on will financially ruin her poor disabled family.
Archive of her video statement
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
Another win for the Omega Jew.
Also, LMAO. The fat weedhead retard is the breadwinner for the white trash family.
They are so fucking doomed.
Also funny that she is now crying and using her family as a shield and bitching about "harassment".
And claiming people want her to kill herself.
No, we want you to take accountability for the copyright infringement, yet you are still pretending you did not cause damages.
Also, LMAO. The fat weedhead retard is the breadwinner for the white trash family.
They are so fucking doomed.
Also funny that she is now crying and using her family as a shield and bitching about "harassment".
And claiming people want her to kill herself.
No, we want you to take accountability for the copyright infringement, yet you are still pretending you did not cause damages.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 10 de Mayo, 2025
The way she describes her family is like they're from a welfare-based sitcom. Mother and sister are disabled and live off her since they lost food stamps, her grandmother is on social security and Kacey was apparently trying to move her somewhere else when the lawsuit dropped. Whole thing's a mess, but hey at least they're not pumping out future welfare recipients (that I know of).
- Registrado
- 12 de Nov, 2019
That's the point
Your blaming ethan .
When everyone on the internet told you to settle & parley.
Suffer suffer your tears & blood is food & substance for the babby (God of copyright
).Bare minimum you try to ask for a speedy trail (copium) in federal court.
Your pretty much stuck grift harder.
- Registrado
- 28 de Ene, 2024
How the hell did she spent 54k in 6 months on legal fees? As expensive as lawsuits are, there is no way in hell she spent as much...
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
It is amazing how she tries the triple split.
"I offered to settle, but I did not harm him."
"I am taking accountability, but I am not admitting doing anything wrong."
"Ethan has the right to sue me, but I am the real victim here!"
Unknown God
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 19 de Abr, 2025
Even Rekieta probably didn't spend this much as fast using $1000+/hr Randazza against Montagraph. She is lying and pouring on the crocodile tears for sympathy while profiting off of the whole affair.
Personally I don't really care, I don't mind her getting a payday from her retarded simps provided any agreement made with the jew implicates the reddit mods and his pound of flesh becomes 20lbs.
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
I don't think she has already spent the entire 54k, but it is planned for already.
Bad news = tears = more fundraising.
I expect that they asked for a 25k$ retainer, that would be about half the raised money.
Then they ran that money out trying to get a settlement arranged, but since Fatty Booboo is to high to understand basic law, she still believes she "did nuffing wrong".
So the offer to Ethan was more an insult than an actual settlement offer that takes into account the realities around the case and the harm she did with her organized copyright infringement, in collaboration with Reddit Jannies and other streamers. I am pretty sure the stream and video of the stream saw enough viewers to get her over the offered settlement money in youtube adsharing revenue and live ads played on Twitch (if she uses them).
The lawyers will have told her a rough estimate for the lawsuit cost if this goes to trial and asked for additional funds since the attempts to settle this in line with Fatty Booboos expectations failed.
Considering this case I think her own cost will likely exceed 350k$ easy, if she wants to have an actual chance in court by finding expert witnesses who can testify to counter whoever Ethan might put on the stand.
I would expect at least 3 experts to be called.
1. Youtube expert, to explain how the platform works and monetization.
2. Twitch expert (same as above)
3. Video/Content creation expert who explains how much work is put into creating a multi hour video and how re-streaming by others undermined the market, dealing significant harm.
(Semi-Experts 4. Ethan/Hila (and Kacey would have to find someone who can "debunk" what they will testify))
Three of those could be covered by one guy, but why would Ethan limit himself if he can afford calling the most Gucci of Experts, forcing Kaceytron to find a way to counter them, driving up her trial cost into infinity. He might as well call 10 experts.
The fundraising money Kacey got has been long accounted for, even if it has not yet been spent, and we are in the cheap part of the lawsuit.
Kacey's own lawyer fees going into excess of 350k does not take into account the actual judgement and taking over Ethan's costs. Since he registered the copyright, Kacey will not just be stuck with her own lawyer fees and the judgement. Every minute she fights this, she is also spending money on Ethan's lawyer, because she is 100% going to lose, and she will 100% be forced to cover his costs.
The longer she fights, the worse it gets for her.
The house is already gone.
Bad news = tears = more fundraising.
I expect that they asked for a 25k$ retainer, that would be about half the raised money.
Then they ran that money out trying to get a settlement arranged, but since Fatty Booboo is to high to understand basic law, she still believes she "did nuffing wrong".
So the offer to Ethan was more an insult than an actual settlement offer that takes into account the realities around the case and the harm she did with her organized copyright infringement, in collaboration with Reddit Jannies and other streamers. I am pretty sure the stream and video of the stream saw enough viewers to get her over the offered settlement money in youtube adsharing revenue and live ads played on Twitch (if she uses them).
The lawyers will have told her a rough estimate for the lawsuit cost if this goes to trial and asked for additional funds since the attempts to settle this in line with Fatty Booboos expectations failed.
Considering this case I think her own cost will likely exceed 350k$ easy, if she wants to have an actual chance in court by finding expert witnesses who can testify to counter whoever Ethan might put on the stand.
I would expect at least 3 experts to be called.
1. Youtube expert, to explain how the platform works and monetization.
2. Twitch expert (same as above)
3. Video/Content creation expert who explains how much work is put into creating a multi hour video and how re-streaming by others undermined the market, dealing significant harm.
(Semi-Experts 4. Ethan/Hila (and Kacey would have to find someone who can "debunk" what they will testify))
Three of those could be covered by one guy, but why would Ethan limit himself if he can afford calling the most Gucci of Experts, forcing Kaceytron to find a way to counter them, driving up her trial cost into infinity. He might as well call 10 experts.
The fundraising money Kacey got has been long accounted for, even if it has not yet been spent, and we are in the cheap part of the lawsuit.
Kacey's own lawyer fees going into excess of 350k does not take into account the actual judgement and taking over Ethan's costs. Since he registered the copyright, Kacey will not just be stuck with her own lawyer fees and the judgement. Every minute she fights this, she is also spending money on Ethan's lawyer, because she is 100% going to lose, and she will 100% be forced to cover his costs.
The longer she fights, the worse it gets for her.
The house is already gone.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 24 de Ago, 2024
If they filed under seal, they would have to request it and there would be a bunch of docs we can't access but could see that they exist.
*Sorry for this being super late, but I thought it was important to point out.
- Registrado
- 19 de Oct, 2018
She's supporting her family while they're on foodstamps? I sure hope they're declaring those payments, one troll calling the USDA could financially cripple those cripples
- Registrado
- 15 de Ago, 2024
Then what reasons could there be for no filings at all?
The other cases progressed far enough to have potential trial date set, yet Frogan's case is still missing even her own response filing.
She missed the deadline by nearly 2 month now, yet no further filings? They came to an agreement and are keeping it under wraps for now? How would that work in the confines of the lawsuit process with deadlines?
[EDIT] I am not disagreeing, I am asking out of curiosity what you think could be an explanation for no documents being submitted at all. If she missed the filing date, I would have expected a motion for summary judgement, yet there is nothing.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 18 de Mayo, 2025
I would feel bad for her if she actually ever took accountability, but she can’t, or won’t. I was impressed however that she was able to abstain from any marijuana usage for the entire 7 minutes!
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
She doesn't have that money and her lawyers and experts are not going to do it for free. Also not only will she end up owing Ethan's fees if she loses, the context makes it clear it was an entirely intentional infringement with the purpose of doing Ethan harm. Hence, the judgment will not even be dischargeable in bankruptcy.
If this goes to trial, she is under the Balldo of Damocles for the rest of her life. She should govern herself accordingly.