- Registrado
- 18 de Jul, 2017
He's drafting that lawsuit for the Judges clerks, Tina, as we speak. It's sure to be well sourced and cited.
David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC. Case: 2:24-CV-00140, Southern District of West Virginia. - Acerthorn sues the Farms
- Iniciador del tema mindlessobserver
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Stebbins v. Moon 2:24-cv-00140 — District Court, S.D. West Virginia
-
- Docket No.
- 2:24-cv-00140
-
- Court
- District Court, S.D. West Virginia
-
- Filed
- 20 de Mar, 2024
-
- Nature of Suit
- 820 Copyright
-
- Cause
- 17:101 Copyright Infringement
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- None
-
- Last Filing
- 26 de Mayo, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- Joshua Moon, Lolcow LLC, David Stebbins
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 54)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | 26 de Mayo, 2026 | NOTICE OF JUDGMENT as to 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA filed by David Stebbins in 4CCA Case Number 26-1398. (msa) | |
| 50 | 26 de Mayo, 2026 | 4CCA JUDGMENT re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1398. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. (msa) | |
| 49 | 26 de Mayo, 2026 | 4CCA OPINION re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1398. (msa) | |
| 48 | 6 de Mayo, 2026 | ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL TRANSMITTED TO 4CCA re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case Number 26-1556. (ts) | |
| 47 | 6 de Mayo, 2026 | ORDER OF 4CCA as to 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1556. The court grants leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (cmb) |
In re: David Stebbins 26-1398 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
-
- Docket No.
- 26-1398
-
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
-
- Filed
- 6 de Abr, 2026
-
- Terminated
- 26 de Mayo, 2026
-
- Last Filing
- 9 de Jun, 2026
Parties (2)
- Parties
- In re: DAVID A. STEBBINS
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 20)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 9 de Jun, 2026 | BILL OF COSTS by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon. Date and method of service: 06/10/2026 ecf. [1001995048] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:04 PM] | |
| 19 | 26 de Mayo, 2026 | JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Petition denied. Originating case number: 2:24-cv-00140. Entered on Docket Date: 05/27/2026. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1001985492] [26-1398] CH [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:11 AM] | 1 2 |
| 18 | 26 de Mayo, 2026 | UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to dismiss appeal [15]; denying Motion to strike [14]; denying Motion to reconsider [10]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus [2] Originating case number: 2:24-cv-00140. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1001985489] [26-1398] CH [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:09 AM] | |
| 17 | 4 de Mayo, 2026 | RESPONSE/ANSWER by David A. Stebbins to Motion to dismiss appeal [15]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001972939] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:58 AM] | 1 2 |
| 16 | 29 de Abr, 2026 | RESPONSE/ANSWER by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to Motion to strike [14]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001971074] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:12 PM] |
David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon 26-1556 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
-
- Docket No.
- 26-1556
-
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
-
- Filed
- 4 de Mayo, 2026
-
- Nature of Suit
- 3820 Copyright
-
- Last Filing
- 7 de Jun, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- LOLCOW LLC, JOSHUA MOON, DAVID A. STEBBINS
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 24)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 7 de Jun, 2026 | SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon. [1001993253] . [26-1556] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 06/08/2026 11:03 PM] | |
| 23 | 5 de Jun, 2026 | INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by David A. Stebbins. [1001992183] [26-1556] David Stebbins [Entered: 06/06/2026 12:04 AM] | |
| 22 | 28 de Mayo, 2026 | INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon. [1001987336] [26-1556] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 05/29/2026 11:09 AM] | |
| 21 | 28 de Mayo, 2026 | DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joshua Moon. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001987301] [26-1556] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 05/29/2026 10:52 AM] | |
| 20 | 28 de Mayo, 2026 | RULE 46 NOTICE issued to Matthew Hardin for Joshua Moon for filing of disclosure form. Requested document due 06/15/2026. [1001987249] [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/29/2026 10:19 AM] |
- Registrado
- 18 de Jul, 2017
I think we are still waiting for the District judge to rule on the findings of the Magistrate for the In Forma Pauperis application by Stabby. The court is apparently treating this case with the alacrity its merits deserve.
- Registrado
- 14 de Nov, 2012
- Registrado
- 9 de Feb, 2021
Aren't we closing in on the one year anniversary of that initial IFP filing? This has to be a record for slowest IFP consideration.
- Registrado
- 7 de Oct, 2014
I'm sure another writ of mandamus will fix that
- Registrado
- 16 de Mayo, 2019
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2022
I hate when you guys shitpost in this thread
I see a nice notification about a new Mr Stabby post, get all wet and excited about more crazy Stabby lolsuit filings going up but it turns out it's just a bunch of numbnuts trying to be funny.
Son I am disappoint!
I see a nice notification about a new Mr Stabby post, get all wet and excited about more crazy Stabby lolsuit filings going up but it turns out it's just a bunch of numbnuts trying to be funny.
Son I am disappoint!
- Registrado
- 6 de Ene, 2023
stabby will read the posts and get mad about it though. worth.
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TIME, BABY
- Registrado
- 16 de Mayo, 2019
This fucking non-aware idiot.
Greer v Moon racking up those citations, baby!
Kind of leaves out an important fact about the Florida jurisdiction saga, doesn't it?
Greer v Moon racking up those citations, baby!
Kind of leaves out an important fact about the Florida jurisdiction saga, doesn't it?
- Registrado
- 22 de Ago, 2022
>shitting down
Amazing typo from the wereturkey, A+
- Registrado
- 10 de Jul, 2023
It’s going to be really funny when the judge reads those and ultimately concurs with Null.
- Registrado
- 21 de Nov, 2020
I noticed something... there's no proof of service that I can see in the docket, was Moon ever even served? For that matter was Lolcow LLC even served? I mean he may have waived that by having his lawyer reply for "Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC"
The "Stebbins tries to serve Moon" arc would have been extra funny considering Moon's location at the time.
The "Stebbins tries to serve Moon" arc would have been extra funny considering Moon's location at the time.
- Registrado
- 16 de Mayo, 2019
I don't see how a judge can see two courts slapping Ace with vexatious litigant status, and conclude "Ace files frivolous lawsuits" is anywhere near libelous. Even if Josh was wrong and Ace really is an innocent justice seeker, it's a very reasonable conclusion for Josh to draw.
Also, I can't wait for the lolbertarian argument that a person may, in fact, choose to enter into voluntary contract to become a slave. Therefore Jones is a legally bound slave, Stebbins is a slave owner, and libel counts 3-4 get thrown out. Start scribbling, Hardin!
- Registrado
- 28 de Sep, 2022
I like how the envelope is covered in shit like always. Such a messy FAT RETARD WHO STABBED HIS FATHER IN THE FACE BECAUSE THE INTERNET WAS TOO SLOW
- Registrado
- 11 de Oct, 2023
This is some top tier law lolcowdom. This is obviously not going to work. Acerthorn put time and effort into amending his complaint and he is just going to get slapped with a we didn't give you permission to do this denied lol.
I mean you can't just file an amended complaint. The court has to give you permission.
The funniest thing is I'm pretty sure defendant gets their home jurisdiction as preferred jurisdiction. Also funny that he isn't even citing the most egregious part of Greer v Moon but the fucking weird as jurisdiction shenanigans
- Registrado
- 12 de Dic, 2022
TLDR: Acerthorn files paperwork that reads like it was written by a grandmother on Facebook where he bitches about Null complying with a DMCA takedown request and encouraging his userbase to utilize Fair Use when criticizing a gobbling face stabber.