- Registrado
- 14 de Nov, 2012
💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.
- Iniciador del tema Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
TrainWreckWatcher
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 9 de Mar, 2023
Google says its someone who never drinks or smokes.
- Registrado
- 22 de Sep, 2021
That’s when you never touch drugs or alcohol!
It’s said tee-total-er.
I used to believe it meant the opposite too, because it was a word you’d always hear in the context of drink and drugs.
- Registrado
- 23 de Jul, 2022
According to the hair follicle test she is a habitual cocaine abuser, so her also having a drinking problem would be the least surprising thing about Nick’s parenting.
Última edición:
TrainWreckWatcher
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 9 de Mar, 2023
Teetotaler does sound like something you'd call a dainty boy who dips his pinky in the coke pile just to have a lil bit of it.
- Registrado
- 22 de Oct, 2020
I’d like to hear exactly what Cuck means by, “The state backed down…” as that particular sentence fragment is doing a lot of the heavy lifting for this particular lying session of morning reee-ing on twitter. Expert testimony is generally for trials, there was no trial. How’d the state backed down, exactly? More like, the case is sealed, so the cuck thinks he’s got carte blanch to lie through his balldo about the circumstances, again.
- Registrado
- 13 de Ago, 2022
Wasn't Nick drunk driving the kids around on no sleep long before the nanny left? Or does it just feel like this has been going on for years?
Honka Honka Burning Love
In Clown World, the only god is the one who Honks.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 29 de Ago, 2019
The State did not back down.
He plead guilty.
He preened up about how he would win, then backed down like the pussy ass bitch he is.
ChiribiscoToo
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Oct, 2022
The sheriff's department can't be balldoguarding, that's ridiculous
- Registrado
- 5 de Jul, 2022
"The state backed down..." meanwhile in reality, junkies tend to have their kids test positive for drugs, Nick probably looked good because only ONE of his kids had ingested cocaine. They probably had no plans to litigate that at all and instead just made Nick bleach his whole house to make sure it was clear of environmental cocaine before letting the kids back in the house.
Your honor, the evidence WILL SHOW through our expert that there's a 0.8% chance that my daughter's positive cocaine test was a mistake, the ebidance WILL S-"Thank you, Mr. Rekieta, but that won't be necessary. You can have supervised visitation starting next week and we'll get them back in your home pronto as long as you keep pissing clean."
EDIT: I just realized he probably means the State backed down from hitting him with the child endangerment misdemeanor. He keeps saying they couldn't prove the elements but that's because in his swiss cheese'd brain he thinks he can just claim that the cocaine was all in a safe behind a locked door and thus there was no child endangerment. Nevermind that there was cocaine through an open bedroom door out in the open in the bedroom so he's retarded, that wouldn't work.
Then where are the charges? Why did they drop it? Nick traded the misdemeanors to cop to the felony. It's not complicated. He even admitted this on Twitter. It's also consistent with his defense of "they have him dead to rights on the revenge porn felony" - nick says that in THAT case, Aaron getting the felony dropped to plead to the misdemeanor does NOT suggest that they couldn't prove the felony on the revenge porn. But Nick getting the misdemeanor dropped to plea to the felony? That proves, BEYOND ALL DOUBT, that they wouldn't have been able to move forward on the misdemeanor child endangerment.
- Registrado
- 20 de Mar, 2025
Isn't there speculation Nick's rich parents have been pulling a lot of weight for him or something to prevent embarrassment to the family?
- Registrado
- 6 de Feb, 2021
The Nick Rekieta Crime family is trying to frame this poor nanny. We go from the daughter hiding her coke and drinking habits by claiming the nanny was the one stealing the booze, to the eldest son who didn’t notice a nanny slamming bottles of whiskey while babysitting, or the polycule, and doesn’t even know what drugs are. Then Lady Rackets who was arrested for cocaine possession and found to have a prescription bottle full of not only her prescription but weed gummies and an ‘unknown’ pill. I kinda lost my train of thought because lol at Kayla being arrested like that.
What a colorful family.
What a colorful family.
i dont understand what rekieta was saying on the female horse podcast. bodycam footage of criminal arrests is FOIAable in the United States of America. unless it's somehow different in Minnesota, which, im not a lawyer, but then again neither is he, I've FOIA'd bodycam stuff before on a felony case, and they withheld it until post sentencing and then simply charged me for their processing and editing fees to blur any victims. am i missing something here or is this crack ghoul just once again a complete fucking retard?
- Registrado
- 6 de Feb, 2021
It is different in Minnesota. It’s been talked about before back when the body cam first came up.
TrainWreckWatcher
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 9 de Mar, 2023
My guess? They're busy and its not front and center on their minds. So it keeps slipping until they have to do it.
Hopefully Null won't have to poke them with a stick to remind them and it gets done sooner than later.
- Registrado
- 23 de Jul, 2024
Teetotaling is the exact opposite. If you are a teetotaler, it means you entirely abstain from drugs and alcohol (though some teetotalers smoke cigarettes, like Angus Young)
TrainWreckWatcher
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 9 de Mar, 2023
This is the correct answer.
He is being a dishonest crackhead.
"well he got it dishonestly so you shouldn't consider it legitimate footage, its a setup from the state."
- Registrado
- 20 de Feb, 2025
Under Minnesota Statutes, such data is generally nonpublic until the investigation is closed or the case has been resolved in court.
Even then, certain footage may be redacted, withheld, or delayed due to privacy concerns.
Any footage of the children should be (and I agree needs to be), censored entirely. They are victims. The adults are not.
Even more then, Nick will fight tooth and nail when notified of the request. Only with heavy legal pressure will Null get it released.
- Registrado
- 1 de Oct, 2021
so im just glancing at it here, and it is in fact under "Minnesota Government Data Practices Act" which is obviously a separate entity for the state, but im skimming over the prerequisites and it reads exactly the same to me as what i had to cover when i FOIA'd the footage i mentioned above. nothing in the rules suggest that the public won't have access to this so long as the proper fees are paid to blur any kids or unrelated persons on said footage. but i really dont get how this guy thinks april or the state would need to bamboozle him to obtain this. seems like a pretty open and shut records request if you ask me
edit - it made perfect sense to me while the case was still ongoing to withhold said footage. any time something that is being used in an ongoing case is requested anywhere they automatically shut it down afaik.