Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 de Sep, 2020
  • Terminated
    22 de Abr, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 de Ago, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 de Ago, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 de Mayo, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 de Abr, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 de Abr, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 de Abr, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 de Mar, 2024
  • Terminated
    10 de Jun, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 de Oct, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 de Oct, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 de Oct, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 de Jul, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 de Jun, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 de Jun, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 de Jun, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 de Jun, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 de Oct, 2021
  • Terminated
    15 de Oct, 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    4 de Jun, 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 de Oct, 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Greer specifically requested an appointment with the county of Winnemucca at the precise time and day as the motions hearing a month in advance of the hearing and two months after it was scheduled, which then formed the basis of his emergency rescheduling request the Friday before.
Wait, HE scheduled the appointment with Winnemucca? It wasn't just "oh this is when the town hall is, bad coincidence?"

The little retarded fuck intentionally tried to double book to... what? What's the game plan here? Just to waste time? To try and get the judge to go "oh well, guess we can just skip this and go back to the trial" becuase the dipshit missed it?
 
Greer specifically requested an appointment with the county of Winnemucca at the precise time and day as the motions hearing a month in advance of the hearing and two months after it was scheduled, which then formed the basis of his emergency rescheduling request the Friday before.
He truly is a malicious double nigger.
 
Greer specifically requested an appointment with the county of Winnemucca at the precise time and day as the motions hearing a month in advance of the hearing and two months after it was scheduled, which then formed the basis of his emergency rescheduling request the Friday before.
I guess details will come out when Hardin submits them, but I thought the city council meeting was regularly scheduled for May 6th at 1PM. There was then another one on the 20th that Greer could have just waited for. I'm sure Greer will just continue to claim that his mysterious business meeting, that he refuses to elaborate on and was somehow separate from the city council meeting in the same time and place, was the real reason he had to file the emergency motion.

Wait, HE scheduled the appointment with Winnemucca? It wasn't just "oh this is when the town hall is, bad coincidence?"

The little retarded fuck intentionally tried to double book to... what? What's the game plan here? Just to waste time? To try and get the judge to go "oh well, guess we can just skip this and go back to the trial" becuase the dipshit missed it?
Greer did have to ask to get on the docket for the meeting, so I'm guessing he specifically chose the May 6th one instead of just waiting two weeks even though he knew full well that it would conflict with the hearing. Then in his latest filings he's claiming he also had a business meeting the same day that was the real reason for the emergency motion and that the city council meeting is somehow unrelated despite being at the same time on the same day as the hearing.
 
Última edición:
Greer specifically requested an appointment with the county of Winnemucca at the precise time and day as the motions hearing a month in advance of the hearing and two months after it was scheduled, which then formed the basis of his emergency rescheduling request the Friday before.

Do you mean the city of Winnemucca, or the Humboldt County thing?
 
Greer specifically requested an appointment with the county of Winnemucca at the precise time and day as the motions hearing a month in advance of the hearing and two months after it was scheduled, which then formed the basis of his emergency rescheduling request the Friday before.

This explains why his sphincter went into a spastic fit when he found out that Mr Hardin was sniffing around in Winnemucca. Could you possibly get a better example of somebody lying in bad faith to the court than this?

Presumably, he's just attempting to run your costs up at any opportunity he gets, but you have to wonder what he thought he was going to do when Hardin opposed his request for a rescheduling? Was he going to pull out his letter from the Winnemucca town council displaying their appointment to discuss brothel construction in the desert?

He's not the clearest of thinkers, is he?
 
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
Ver archivo adjunto 7352512
Ver archivo adjunto 7352513


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
The Media industry has banded together to file a response wherein they celebrate just how good and epic the Greer v. Moon case was, particularly that it serves as good evidence that your internet should be able to be stolen by Sony:
Screenshot 2025-05-16 191157.webp
Screenshot 2025-05-16 191323.webp
 
The Media industry has banded together to file a response wherein they celebrate just how good and epic the Greer v. Moon case was, particularly that it serves as good evidence that your internet should be able to be stolen by Sony:
Ver archivo adjunto 7370563
Ver archivo adjunto 7370564
Fuck Greer and fuck the 10th and especially fuck sony. Everyone involved in this horseshit of taking effectively a utility away from people should be struck down by lightning. Pick the diety of your choice or nature to do it.
 
I guess details will come out when Hardin submits them, but I thought the city council meeting was regularly scheduled for May 6th at 1PM. There was then another one on the 20th that Greer could have just waited for. I'm sure Greer will just continue to claim that his mysterious business meeting, that he refuses to elaborate on and was somehow separate from the city council meeting in the same time and place, was the real reason he had to file the emergency motion.
They meet every 2 weeks and he picked a full month ahead of time to schedule something at the same time as the hearing. He could have picked one two weeks before or after without any issue.
 
B-b-but that is wrong.
That citation is factually wrong.
There was NO INFRINGING CONTENT POSTED ON THE "BLOG"....IT WAS A LINK. A LINK
A FUCKING GOOGLE LINK
 
Última edición:
Wait, HE scheduled the appointment with Winnemucca? It wasn't just "oh this is when the town hall is, bad coincidence?"

The little retarded fuck intentionally tried to double book to... what? What's the game plan here? Just to waste time? To try and get the judge to go "oh well, guess we can just skip this and go back to the trial" becuase the dipshit missed it?
He was trying to play hooky. He didn't want to deal with it, so just delay as long as possible and let future you figure it out. Get a do-over and maybe the judge let's you do written arguments instead. It's not a strategy, it's just a panicked way to try and deflect consequences.
 
The Media industry has banded together to file a response wherein they celebrate just how good and epic the Greer v. Moon case was, particularly that it serves as good evidence that your internet should be able to be stolen by Sony:
Does not compute. If this dude was allegedly infringing "38 times a day" why the fuck didn't they just sue him and get an injunction and have him thrown in jail if he defied it?
 
but I thought the city council meeting was regularly scheduled for May 6th at 1PM
you need to submit your motions to a city council in order to get them to hear it. otherwise the meeting is the usual minutes of last meeting, any council/county agenda points, public floor and then close of meeting. you dont get to show up day of and talk about rezoning because the council won't have the documents to understand what youre talking about.

Because ISPs have more money
Depends on the size of the isp.


this new lawsuit with the sony backed consortium sued an isp i've never heard of. i'm pretty sure another anti piracy consortium lost a case against an alleged pirate because there was no proof the guy was the one who downloaded anything.
 
Última edición:
They meet every 2 weeks and he picked a full month ahead of time to schedule something at the same time as the hearing. He could have picked one two weeks before or after without any issue.
And if he tries to weasel out with "excusable neglect" of honestly forgetting the hearing date, remind him that he "had this calendared for two months".

1747412814567.webp
 
Atrás
Top Abajo