Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 de Sep, 2020
  • Terminated
    22 de Abr, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 de Ago, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
— 6 de Ago, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 de Mayo, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 de Abr, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 de Abr, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 de Abr, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
View all 127 filings

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 de Mar, 2024
  • Terminated
    10 de Jun, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 de Oct, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
— 16 de Oct, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 de Oct, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 de Jul, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 de Jun, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 de Jun, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
View all 155 filings

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 de Jun, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 de Jun, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 de Jun, 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
View all 525 filings

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 de Oct, 2021
  • Terminated
    15 de Oct, 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    4 de Jun, 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 de Oct, 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
View full docket
Destacado
Unknown God dijo:
I think Josh's alogs desperately want to be seen as super serious people who should be taken super seriously, regardless of how many cocks and testicles they have sliced off of themselves. If Liz Fong-Jones starts rubbing shoulders with someone like Greer they would have a really hard time arguing they are not lolcows, and I doubt retards like Greer could keep the secret very long if Consent Accident tried to play behind-the-curtain puppetmaster.
Presiona para expandir...
Not going to happen.

Russ once had legal help, he also had actual friends. Over the years he's managed to alienate and otherwise cut ties with every friend, co-worker, and family member he ever had. He's so convinced of his perceived knowledge and greatness that he would never "rub shoulders" with anyone, ever again. Re-read the first 100 pages of this thread and you'll see how he cut ties with people one by one, until he was alone.

@The Great Citracett is more succinct-

 
Wahgonga dijo:
Not going to happen.

Russ once had legal help, he also had actual friends. Over the years he's managed to alienate and otherwise cut ties with every friend, co-worker, and family member he ever had. He's so convinced of his perceived knowledge and greatness that he would never "rub shoulders" with anyone, ever again. Re-read the first 100 pages of this thread and you'll see how he cut ties with people one by one, until he was alone.

@The Great Citracett is more succinct-

Presiona para expandir...
I'm aware.
 
John Andrews Stan dijo:
I’m genuinely surprised none of Josh’s many alogs have taken RG under xir wing and helped him avoid making so many disastrous errors.
Presiona para expandir...
Josh's gaylawgs wouldn't be of much use because most are even dumber than Russ and generally only good at dogpiling. They've only had success at sabotaging the Farms and Josh's revenue streams because they incessantly spam these places until they get annoyed enough to submit.
 
Unknown God dijo:
I think Josh's alogs desperately want to be seen as super serious people who should be taken super seriously, regardless of how many cocks and testicles they have sliced off of themselves. If Liz Fong-Jones starts rubbing shoulders with someone like Greer they would have a really hard time arguing they are not lolcows, and I doubt retards like Greer could keep the secret very long if Consent Accident tried to play behind-the-curtain puppetmaster.
Presiona para expandir...
I'm pretty sure LFJ is the only 'big time' lolcow enemy Null has left in any case. There are a lot of people who hate him but most of them are about as consequential as a wet fart. Vordrak would like to think he's big time but basically people rarely remember he exists anymore. And Donny Long is about to spend the rest of his life in jail.
 
Malcolm X dijo:
But enough about DSP.

I think it's a mistake that IFP means you don't pay anything at all to file a lawsuit. Four hundred smackers is a lot for a poorfag like Russ me, so IFP can reduce it by 80% or whatever, that seems reasonable to me. After all, it's been proven that people will do shit they don't care about or even want to do if it's free, but if you charge them a nominal fee, like a quarter or even a nickel, substantially fewer people will do it. Think of how many times you were just about to do something you thought was free and then found it wasn't, and didn't, even if the cost was negligible. When it comes to lolsuits, you're coming to the government and asking it to use its power to right some grave injustice done against you, something so grave you simply must spend hours of your time writing up documents and telling people about it at length. If you aren't willing to dip into your hooker Starbucks latte fund to cough up $50 to file your case, perhaps it's not important enough for a bunch of legal bigwigs to spend tax dollars on.
Presiona para expandir...
But muh write to undress greevances and sheeeeit.
 
The first week post-conference call begins.

Anyone think we are going to see plightsfiling from Russ in the next couple of days, or that he was intimidated by the shit kicking he took from Judge Bennett?

I'm thinking an appeal to the 10th circuit is forthcoming, under totally incorrect premises, hoping his bigger court daddy will come to his rescue as they have before. I don't think it will come out the way he hopes this time, but who the fuck knows with the 10th.
 
John Andrews Stan dijo:
I’m genuinely surprised none of Josh’s many alogs have taken RG under xir wing and helped him avoid making so many disastrous errors.
Presiona para expandir...
As uh, funny as it would be to finally have them form Autism Voltron, it’s never going to happen. Part of the reason we document anyone is their fundamental inability to just plain get along with other people. Not only would Russ not want to share or cede his thin veneer of feeling like he’s marginally in control, but anyone else involved would likewise have no ability to meaningfully cooperate with anyone else. Just part of what makes them lolcows.
 
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
Screenshot 2025-05-12 172510.webp
Screenshot 2025-05-12 172521.webp


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
 
Useful_Mistake dijo:
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
Ver archivo adjunto 7352512
Ver archivo adjunto 7352513


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
Presiona para expandir...
Except for the fact that, as we all know [and as both Russtard and The Court should know], "the material" is not and never has been posted to this website, but to a Google Drive.

The only "material" posted here has been a link to said Drive.

Page 6.

[P.S., Russtard has made no effort - to my knowledge; correct me if I'm wrong - to have the Google Drive containing "the material" terminated.]
 
waffle dijo:
If there's no plight-splaining and no response to the motion to dismiss I think it's as good as him throwing the towel in.
Presiona para expandir...
I think it's funny that the one place where he could make a well thought out, well researched, well worded argument would do wonders for his case is the one place he refuses to do it.
Rather, convincing rural Nevada that allowing him to own and operate brothels or butting in on sex trafficking issues is his Iwo Jima.
So much wasted time and energy. Trying to convince a rock to become water would produce better results.
 
Uncle Buck dijo:
[P.S., Russtard has made no effort - to my knowledge; correct me if I'm wrong - to have the Google Drive containing "the material" terminated.]
Presiona para expandir...
Even worse. He has acknowledged that he easily could have done so. and that Google would have complied, but he had not done so because Null called him mean names, and because he couldn't sue if Google had complied.
Useful_Mistake dijo:
Per his own words, that is because they would have complied and made the lawsuit moot. Per his own words, he is suing because Null made fun of him
Ver archivo adjunto 7224888
Presiona para expandir...
 
Useful_Mistake dijo:
Even worse. He has acknowledged that he easily could have done so. and that Google would have complied, but he had not done so because Null called him mean names, and because he couldn't sue if Google had complied.
Presiona para expandir...
Again, correct me if I'm wrong, but does that not constitute.... what's the term the kiddies are using nowadays? "Failure to mitigate"?
 
Useful_Mistake dijo:
Even worse. He has acknowledged that he easily could have done so. and that Google would have complied, but he had not done so because Null called him mean names, and because he couldn't sue if Google had complied.
Presiona para expandir...
"In a lawsuit against KiwiFarms" may have held appeal for some at one point. "Asked Google to remove copyrighted material" just don't hit the same.
 
Useful_Mistake dijo:
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
Ver archivo adjunto 7352512
Ver archivo adjunto 7352513


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
Presiona para expandir...
On one hand this could fuck over Sony and save the Internet. On the other it could get obliterated, as it never should have existed to begin with. Interesting.
 
Useful_Mistake dijo:
The 10th Circuit case is cited by people trying to protect internet users from Sony's self-claimed (and court enforced) ability to terminate your internet access.
Ver archivo adjunto 7352512
Ver archivo adjunto 7352513


Mind you, this is a Petition for a writ of certiorari, not a SCOTUS decision.
Presiona para expandir...
The Kiwi Farms Saves the "Capital-I" Internet, Again!: or "How God Used a Federal Court's Retardation to Fuck Over The Copyrightists via Divine Orchestration" - A book by Gueselle Reer
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo