US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Concern over the oversight of the Marshals Service is not new. A 1982 report by the Government Accountability Office called the marshals’ oversight arrangement “an unworkable management condition.” As a possible solution, it proposed legislation to move control of the marshals to the judiciary.

Some members of Congress have begun proposing a similar solution.

“Do you think you could better protect judges if your security was more independent?” Representative Eric Swalwell, Democrat of California, asked a federal judge testifying on behalf of the Judicial Conference at a hearing in February, a few days before Judge Sullivan’s remarks.

Representative Darrell Issa, Republican of California, responded that he considered the question of independent oversight legitimate. The judge answered that the conference would consider the matter.

In an interview, Mr. Swalwell said he was drafting legislation that would put the judiciary in charge of its own security.
This has nothing to do with "security." It's about removing the President's authority over the US Marshals so he can't order them to ignore whatever bullshit the judges try to get them to enforce.
 

There has been lots of confusion over the past week whether Trump has - or has not - spoken to Xi Jinping, to set trade negotiation talks in motion. According to Trump, he has and more than once...

Reporter: Have you spoken to President Xi since the tariffs?@POTUS: “I don’t want to comment on that but I’ve spoken to him many times.” pic.twitter.com/TAkK0EjXhA

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 25, 2025
... while China has repeatedly denied it has had any contact with its US counterparts, which is to be expected: admitting it is negotiating would be seen as a carte blanche for other countries to do the same, ending any attempts at negotiation "cartelization" Beijing may have tried to impose.

Unfortunately, the problem is that both sides tend to.... exaggerate reality, which makes a definitive conclusion either way challenging. And absent 3rd party confirmation either way, the market is forced to flip a coin to decide who is telling the truth. Unless, of course, there was 3rd party confirmation, which now appears to be the case.

According to an overnight report in The JoongAng, one of the three biggest newspapers in South Korea, and the newspaper of record for South Korea, it was "confirmed that the United States and China have begun behind-the-scenes contacts in relation to the 'tariff war' waged by US President Donald Trump."

Again, as noted above, after Trump said he had been in contact with China every day, the Chinese side, through a Foreign Ministry spokesperson briefing, said that Trump was effectively lying: "we have never had any consultations or negotiations with the United States, and (the related remarks) are all fake news.” The Chinese Ministry of Commerce also denied this, saying, “Economic and trade negotiations (with the United States) are not underway.”

However, in its overnight report, JoongAng Ilbo confirmed that at around 7 am ET on the 24th, a high-ranking official from the Chinese Ministry of Finance entered the Treasury building located right next to the White House in Washington D.C. accompanied by about 10 attendants.

1745609551926.webp

According to the report, the exact identities of the senior officials leading the dozen or so entourage have not been confirmed, "but they were all wearing the identification required for entry into the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors meeting currently taking place in Washington." It was the same type of identification worn by Lan Poan, China’s Minister of Finance, when he met with Choi Sang-mok, the Minister of Strategy and Finance, who visited the U.S. the day before.


1745609630094.webp

The Korean newspaper adds that "Chinese officials strongly blocked the press from taking photos of high-ranking officials entering the U.S. Treasury building this morning."

The Chinese officials then reportedly said that “we have no authority to block the freedom of the press,” but added “we have the right to refuse to allow our personnel to be photographed,” and demanded that the press delete all photos taken on their smartphones.

When the press asked him to reveal the identity of the person who had blocked the interview, he refused, saying, “I have no obligation to reveal my identity.” However, the ID card he was wearing had his name, photo, and nationality written as “China.”

The 'Treasury Department Meeting' between the US and China on this day began at around 7:00 AM, about an hour before Deputy Prime Minister Choi and Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy Ahn Duck-keun began the '2+2 Trade Consultation' with US Treasury Secretary Scott Besent and US Trade Representative (USTR) Jamison Greer. As a result, the Korea-US tariff negotiations were conducted following the US-China backroom contacts.

A diplomatic source told JoongAng Ilbo, “The fact that the treasury channels of both the U.S. and China are actually operating means that both countries have reached a critical point under domestic and international pressure due to the current retaliatory tariffs,” and predicted that “the results of the backroom negotiations between the two sides could be a major turning point in the tariff war.”

As for why China has been extremely secretive about the process, the source told the South Korean outlet that “since this tariff war is unfolding as a battle of pride with the leaders of both countries directly appearing, it may not be easy to create some kind of ‘win-win structure." He added that "the fact that China visited the U.S. Treasury Department in person could be an extremely sensitive issue for China."

Remarkably, Trump may have been telling the truth... again.

Source: The JoongAng
tldr - the chinks cucked and are trying to hide the fact they did.
 
I don't understand how he thinks he's going to reform his image for 2028 or whatever by going on his gay little podcast and saying oh shucks wasn't latinx such a silly term but then pulling stunts like this which are very clearly still in the same realm of radical champagne socialism that blatantly hates the native population of the country and puts foreigners on a pedestal.
Th cynical thing is that technically he doesn't have to do anything given his front runner status and how the Democrats primary is rigged as fuck.

It's inevitable that once he gets the nomination, he'll revert back to his lunatic left form purely to keep the lunatic left from revolting on him. It's entirely Kabuki theater because he knows how radioactive he is and lunatic lefty politics are, as do the DNC so they need someone to pull everything back to the center before the rug gets pulled again
 
We don't need to detonate any weapons anymore because the simulation software is just that good.
Just to follow up on this, Live Fire testing of nuclear weapons is still congressionally mandated under 10 USC. This testing would serve to validate model and simulation for such a munition and is legally required for any munition program that is considered a major capability.

The trick with Nuclear weapons, like with warships, is they're able to say the impact and cost would be far too excessive and apply for a waiver. This waiver does not allow them to just use M&S, but it does allow them to perform subcomponent testing and alternative tests to validate models instead of being required to do a full test. It's why the Navy performs shock trials while the Air Force and Army more often than not are forced to actually blow up a perfectly good tank/plane or two loaded to the gills with ammo and fuel.
 
Última edición:
I'm a junior in college right now who was planning on applying to grad school programs next cycle and is basically receiving nothing but nihilism over this. I don't think funding cuts will address the fact we have very little merit within our college system, and if anything this will just discourage the smarter ones (who are also smarter with their money) from going to school and actually making an impact. College shouldn't just be for rich tards that can pay the sticker price, or Chinese/Indians that basically pay 100k+ for a student visa. I'dve hoped he'd discourage foreign students in return for favoring our own but it seems that he's just draining everything simultaneously.
fwiw, I'll graduate with about 10-12k in loans that my mom has offered to pay off for me so I'm not looking forward to debt, but just a gruesome job and career market. I'm better than some Redditors who are leaving undergrad with 160k in loans (why???)
I may try to pivot towards something more industry-based as Bravo said, but that'll depend on getting into a fellowship program or something of that sort. It's not like the professional job market will be a piece of cake come fall

A PhD is mostly a waste of time. There are very few doors a PhD opens that a MS doesn't.

The theory that America's going to lose our best & brightest to other countries due to academia funding being cut is disconnected from reality, because America's science & engineering PhD programs are minority-American. Only 40% of those degrees go to Americans (source). Why? Because Americans don't need green cards to work in our own country, and a graduate degree is an easy way to get one. Smart Americans by and large can get good jobs by getting a BS in mechanical engineering and scoring a couple internships, even with all the anti-white-male bias in HR. Moreover, and I'm going purely from anecdotes here, very few STEM PhDs remain in academia. The main purpose of graduate school is to scam Indian & Chinese kids out of their twenties so the department can harvest grant money from the NSF and the adviser can get tenure or publishing bonuses or whatever. It does very little.

If you are getting a PhD and not going into academia, you are wasting your youth. And you're not going into academia, because there aren't any jobs, and the pay is shit. Granted, the sample of myself and my peers is anecdotal, but a grand total of zero of the graduates from my program that I know are in academia today. I had a fair number of friends in the math department, and only a couple are in academia now. A good number of them went into insurance because the pay is way better. They also didn't need PhDs for those jobs.
 
I agree with your post, but don't seek genuine insight from the other overly emotional Americans on the Farms. They are too nationalistic and nihilistic and spend most of their free time posting about and slandering their compatriots.

It sounds like you are doing the correct thing, and I hope Trump reneges on his attacks on higher education (something America does really well).

There are a lot of us Farmers with graduate degrees, long professional careers, and well-informed cynicism about higher ed & the job market. It would be a good idea for you young guys to listen to your elders, but I remember being a young guy in grad school, and if there's one thing I didn't do, it was listen to my elders. I was smart! I was in a PhD program! Why the fuck would I listen to those gray-haired retards?

Ah, the more things change, the more things stay the same. Aristotle wrote about this exact phenomenon. Fuck it.
 
Chinks caved. Slashed and slammed, crawled on all four in the middle of the night to beg Big Papa Trump to please stop killing them, and no pictures god damnit!

Yes, it's over for chinks

Wumao friends, how does it feel to know you and your familly will be executed for your failure to influence waito piggu to consneed to Chyna?
The only question is, will Reddit be allowed to pivot to calling Trump a Chinese spy? Or would that go too far against their communist ideals?
 
Nah, I'll just start it

CHINA HAV HISTRY. YOU DONT. CHINA ALWAYS WON BIG WAR MAKE CONCEPT OF MONEY AND FREEDOM. STUPID YAOGUAI FAT BELLY AMERICAN. YES I AM AMELICAN Y DO U ASK?
Now to wait a few hours for the thread regular wumao faggots like password faggot, buck broken chink etc to wake up and start their shift. 3-4 hours assuming china workday starts at 8am
 
Smug faggots can't take a small L for a long term W:

Ver archivo adjunto 7277769
Of course they are. Sometimes I wonder if they're the opposite kind of Uniparty mole. We had the "we can't do conservative things, people might not like us" type, now we have the "if it's not literally the wet dreams of libertarians then it's not good enough and we might as well keep the status quo" type.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo