Respuestas al mensaje #1

Surely fewer words than these could spark greater revulsion and scorn in the hearts of free men and women.

You can say that but anyone that says this: clearly has an agenda. At some point people started talking about the second amendment as if it was...

not very likely and this dipshit isn't changing it

just because you wrote down a law doesn't mean you need to follow it, claims Associate Professor of Law & History at Stanford Law School all...

"You mean words have meaning, and people had a meaning in mind when they used them? But, but that's not fair! It's a hard counter to our agenda of...

You'd have to reach deep, deep within your ass to possibly believe that Americans of the 18th century wanted a strong national government. If...

Yeah, literally every freshman polisci student knows that. The Constitution itself refers to the Law of Nations and common law. But that doesn't...

Article V, Article V, Article V. You want to change the 'meaning' of the Constitution? Amend it. How is that working out for the angloids right...

I did something with this article that I almost never do: I gave it the benefit of the doubt. I am disappoint, son. It went exactly where I...

Look at his stupid faggot face. This photo alone is a pretty big clue we should ignore anything he says.

Originalism is not in any way in conflict with what he's saying. Originalism is what he's saying, at least at first. The "living document" fags...