Law Bacon may disappear in California as pig rules take effect - Do Californians Dream of Woke Piggies?

DES MOINES, Iowa -- Thanks to a reworked menu and long hours, Jeannie Kim managed to keep her San Francisco restaurant alive during the coronavirus pandemic.

That makes it all the more frustrating that she fears her breakfast-focused diner could be ruined within months by new rules that could make one of her top menu items — bacon — hard to get in California.

“Our number one seller is bacon, eggs and hash browns,” said Kim, who for 15 years has run SAMS American Eatery on the city’s busy Market Street. “It could be devastating for us.”

At the beginning of next year, California will begin enforcing an animal welfare proposition approved overwhelmingly by voters in 2018 that requires more space for breeding pigs, egg-laying chickens and veal calves. National veal and egg producers are optimistic they can meet the new standards, but only 4% of hog operations now comply with the new rules. Unless the courts intervene or the state temporarily allows non-compliant meat to be sold in the state, California will lose almost all of its pork supply, much of which comes from Iowa, and pork producers will face higher costs to regain a key market.

Animal welfare organizations for years have been pushing for more humane treatment of farm animals but the California rules could be a rare case of consumers clearly paying a price for their beliefs.

With little time left to build new facilities, inseminate sows and process the offspring by January, it’s hard to see how the pork industry can adequately supply California, which consumes roughly 15% of all pork produced in the country.

“We are very concerned about the potential supply impacts and therefore cost increases,” said Matt Sutton, the public policy director for the California Restaurant Association.

California's restaurants and groceries use about 255 million pounds of pork a month, but its farms produce only 45 million pounds, according to Rabobank, a global food and agriculture financial services company.

The National Pork Producers Council has asked the U.S. Department of Agriculture for federal aid to help pay for retrofitting hog facilities around the nation to fill the gap. Hog farmers said they haven't complied because of the cost and because California hasn't yet issued formal regulations on how the new standards will be administered and enforced.

Barry Goodwin, an economist at North Carolina State University, estimated the extra costs at 15% more per animal for a farm with 1,000 breeding pigs.

If half the pork supply was suddenly lost in California, bacon prices would jump 60%, meaning a $6 package would rise to about $9.60, according to a study by the Hatamiya Group, a consulting firm hired by opponents of the state proposition.

At one typical hog farm in Iowa, sows are kept in open-air crates measuring 14-square-feet when they join a herd and then for a week as part of the insemination process before moving to larger, roughly 20-square foot group pens with other hogs. Both are less than the 24 square feet required by the California law to give breeding pigs enough room to turn around and to extend their limbs. Other operations keep sows in the crates nearly all of the time so also wouldn't be in compliance.

The California Department of Food and Agriculture said that although the detailed regulations aren't finished, the key rules about space have been known for years.

“It is important to note that the law itself cannot be changed by regulations and the law has been in place since the Farm Animal Confinement Proposition (Prop 12) passed by a wide margin in 2018," the agency said in response to questions from the AP.

The pork industry has filed lawsuits but so far courts have supported the California law. The National Pork Producers Council and a coalition of California restaurants and business groups have asked Gov. Gavin Newsom to delay the new requirements. The council also is holding out hope that meat already in the supply chain could be sold, potentially delaying shortages.

Josh Balk, who leads farm animal protection efforts at the Humane Society of the United States, said the pork industry should accept the overwhelming view of Californians who want animals treated more humanely.

“Why are pork producers constantly trying to overturn laws relating to cruelty to animals?” Balk asked. “It says something about the pork industry when it seems its business operandi is to lose at the ballot when they try to defend the practices and then when animal cruelty laws are passed, to try to overturn them.”


In Iowa, which raises about one-third of the nation's hogs, farmer Dwight Mogler estimates the changes would cost him $3 million and allow room for 250 pigs in a space that now holds 300.

To afford the expense, Mogler said, he’d need to earn an extra $20 per pig and so far, processors are offering far less.

“The question to us is, if we do these changes, what is the next change going to be in the rules two years, three years, five years ahead?” Mogler asked.

The California rules also create a challenge for slaughterhouses, which now may send different cuts of a single hog to locations around the nation and to other countries. Processors will need to design new systems to track California-compliant hogs and separate those premium cuts from standard pork that can serve the rest of the country.

At least initially, analysts predict that even as California pork prices soar, customers elsewhere in the country will see little difference. Eventually, California’s new rules could become a national standard because processors can’t afford to ignore the market in such a large state.

Kim, the San Francisco restaurant owner, said she survived the pandemic by paring back her menu, driving hundreds of miles herself through the Bay Area to deliver food and reducing staff.

Kim, who is Korean-American, said she’s especially worried for small restaurants whose customers can't afford big price increases and that specialize in Asian and Hispanic dishes that typically include pork.

“You know, I work and live with a lot of Asian and Hispanic populations in the city and their diet consists of pork. Pork is huge,” Kim said. “It’s almost like bread and butter.”

 
California is going halal. Just eat lamb, what are you, fucking poor? You live in California, should have a lot of disposable income. That's why you voted for this sort of stuff in the first place, right?
 
This is a clear restriction on interstate trade and blatant bullshit. FFS, courts.
As has been pointed out more articulately by former Chief Justice William Rehnquist in the dissent in Jones v. Rath Packing Co. , the Supreme Court occasionally has the habit of pulling out whichever version of Preemption Doctrine (Florida Lime[dual compliance] or Hines[frustration of purpose]) suits the outcome that the majority wanted to reach, which tends to cause confusion among the people who have to actually practice law for a living, to say nothing of the people trying to obey the law.
 
Última edición:
Please stay the fuck out of Washington, Californians. If you do come, live under the homeless Lord of the Rings Hobbit looking bridge villages in Seattle. They'll welcome you as a fellow drug addict.
 
If the chicken and fricking veal farmers can manage it, I think the pig farmers can. Honestly sounds like they were hoping if they just refused to comply, California would let the law not apply to them.
From the sound of it, it's the fact that they can't actually get a return on the cost, never mind profit, off of the pigs.

I know nothing about the veal farming industry, but I do know that likely-compliant chicken already would have on the market as a premium product anyway. (Something about people finding it tastes better?)

Also, the Humane Society of the United States has problems.
 
Last year I mentioned our recent Cali invader in a thread, proud to say she's left already. It was a combination of keeping life rough for her, refusing to pave our private dirt roads, and not signing up for recycling that supposedly did her in and sent her packing. I think the extra roosters really got to her, or the coyotes making the dogs bark all hours of the night.

Just in case anyone needed ideas for califag deterrents.


I can't wait until bug meat is too expensive, and we start marketing campaigns for bug waste, too!

Come on, you think Montel's side bitch didn't get there on merit? She got good technique.
How did you guys keep life rough for her?
 
NOOOO NOT MY HECKIN BACONERINO!

I guarantee the average person (if you can call a Californian a person) who voted for this is not going to make the connection between this law and meat becoming more scarce and more expensive. If they do even notice it at all, they'll blame the farmers for not wanting to sell at a loss.
Thinking about the consequences of your actions/policies is right wing extremism buddy. Don't want to be caught doing that now do ya?
 
Cram large animals into a tiny box for maximum profit? BASED

Legislate a whole extra 5sqft. so the animal can (hopefully) turn around in it's pen? CRINGE

A lot of you guys are seriously fuckin' retarded. These aren't even sweeping reforms, in fact they're bare minimum to the point of being almost silly, but considering factory animals are practically in torture chambers I'd say anything helps. The actual farmer from the article said $20 per hog wholesale was all he needed to cover costs. The interesting thing about this is watching what happens when you try to impose localized controls on what amounts to a global system. It's a mess. Literal chinashill consulting groups come out of the woodwork to lobby against the local gov'mt (that would technically be your vote btw).

I fall on the pragmatic side of animal welfare (happy to "euthanize" your dog for you if you can't keep it from barking all night) but factory farming is fucked up. If you seriously think it's all good then you're just another walmart plasti-shit consoomer. Go get that 99 cent savings boy!
 
They'll just do what they do now and head to another state to buy their groceries. They're already a nuisance up here in Oregon, so I imagine those on the border in Nevada and Arizona know exactly what I mean.

Just learn spot the Californian and harass them.

If the chicken and fricking veal farmers can manage it, I think the pig farmers can. Honestly sounds like they were hoping if they just refused to comply, California would let the law not apply to them.

So what, Dont sell there and sell to border shops Cali will lose revenue and Calis still get the meat.
 
You know what? I am no longer going to wonder what is going through the California State Government‘s mind. It is a train wreck and I am gonna just watch and enjoy.
 
Cram large animals into a tiny box for maximum profit? BASED

Legislate a whole extra 5sqft. so the animal can (hopefully) turn around in it's pen? CRINGE

A lot of you guys are seriously fuckin' retarded. These aren't even sweeping reforms, in fact they're bare minimum to the point of being almost silly, but considering factory animals are practically in torture chambers I'd say anything helps. The actual farmer from the article said $20 per hog wholesale was all he needed to cover costs. The interesting thing about this is watching what happens when you try to impose localized controls on what amounts to a global system. It's a mess. Literal chinashill consulting groups come out of the woodwork to lobby against the local gov'mt (that would technically be your vote btw).

I fall on the pragmatic side of animal welfare (happy to "euthanize" your dog for you if you can't keep it from barking all night) but factory farming is fucked up. If you seriously think it's all good then you're just another walmart plasti-shit consoomer. Go get that 99 cent savings boy!
I don't think it's 'good,' I think that you're better off legislating this where the fucking farms are, given this kind of proves that California is not a big enough market to ensure that that farmer is going to get that extra $20/hog to cover it.

Though you could also legislate labeling factory-farmed meat. As I noted before? At least with chickens, it was already known that people will pay more so you can cover the costs. I'd honestly bet with veal that it's pretty much the same. (This would also mean that compliance would be a lot easier: you just stop selling the basic-tier product in California.)

So what the fuck do you think is going to happen if the people go "Huh, this pork tastes better, yeah I'll pay more for it"? But you need to ensure it's known it'll sell for more, so start with just "Label yo shit." You might not need to do a thing more, if the market sees it as a 'good value.' It's not rocket science if it turns out it's just $20/hog for something that you can show raises the hog's market value...

Legislation isn't going to do anything but raise the costs and make a bunch of politicians & lobbyists happy, maybe give the HSUS something shiny to wave about to try to distract people from it being pretty much PeTA Lite with #metoo problems.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo