💼 Careercow Andrew Dobson (aka Tom Preston)

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
I love how Dobson and his ilk keep complaining certain media is "problematic" and then can't explain how it's problematic when asked.

:story:
 
"Problematic"
image.jpg
 
A retweet and some answers of Dobson in it:
[MEDIA=twitter]640216331959304192[/MEDIA]
Sure, "LGBT children", because children nowdays are thinking "I think I'm sexually attracted to my same gender" and "My gender is wrong". Do this idiots really think a children cares about this things instead of, I don't know, PLAYING AND BEING JUST A KID?.
I'm having a really hard time believing this type of people (hardcore SJWs) can actually raise a kid and don't push their shitty SJWs agenda all over them, and when those kids talk or try to put it in practice in school, get bullied the shit out of them because of it. Oh, won't somebody PLEASE think of the children!? (I always wanted to use that line, sorry).
When I was very young (< 7 years), I felt a kind of physical (proto-sexual) attraction to both boys and girls, so maybe there's some truth in Freud's assumption that we're born bisexual and later become more discriminating. I began to feel attraction exclusively to females when I was around 10 years old.

Anyway, shoehorning LGBTQ issues into children's media is patent nonsense. If you want to read something extremely silly, here's a children's picture book created by some SJWs in Germany (English version): Our House.

It's a collection of trite everyday stories that are neither for children nor for adults very interesting, the only "quality" they have is that the protagonists are NOT white cisheterosexual people.

E.g. there's a black girl raised by two homosexual daddies, a genderqueer boy who loves pink dresses and wants to become a ballet dancer, a girl who lives in a commune, a Turkish girl etc.

It's a great illustration of the tried and true SJW principle: Everything is Better with Minorities!

The illustrations were probably made in MS Paint and are borderline nightmare fuel.
 
We could never be angry at you, Dobot, and we appreciate the work you do.

 
Última edición:
So Dobbot has a new best friend while the real deal continues to bitch about a game he'll never play. Its only been around a couple of weeks and Dobbot already has a better life than Dobson.
 
[MEDIA=twitter]640323023745126400[/MEDIA]
That's irrational.
Ugh, what about endangered animals that are in danger, dogs and cats getting abused throughout countries, the dog cat eating festival in China? Elephants, sharks, and other exotic animals getting hunted?

Meh, fake animal deaths are more important than actual animals going through abuse, unless the republicans are involved in it!
 
The truth is, Dobson never deactivated the Dobbot. The reason the Dobbot was inactive was because he was trying to escape from Dobson's endless drama, it even made the Dobbot question it's own self-love! It took a lot of begging to get it to come back.

Dobbot's good-bye.jpg
 
Once again, Dobby is responding to someone who probably won't even bother reading his reply. They only pointed out about how strange it is for Disney to be doing choppy animation on a huge budget, and Dobson instantly goes in giving this weird sarcastic response about how it's more mature to "some people" because it "mimics the animus".

In all seriousness though, those cheap ass DiC video game cartoons are smoother than that animation, and also much smoother than the proposal one Dobby did a while back. Wait... Could this mean Disney may just be hiring people as lazy as Dobson?
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo